Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Retinal Photography (retinal + photography)
Selected AbstractsEffectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy , a systematic reviewDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 7 2000A. Hutchinson SUMMARY Aims To determine which screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy are most effective and under what circumstances. Methods A systematic review of the English language literature, published from 1983 to April 1999. Results Available studies are generally limited in their ability to answer the important questions on the effectiveness of tests for early detection of diabetic retinopathy. No randomized controlled trials were identified although primary studies exist for two screening tests: ophthalmoscopy, either direct or indirect, and retinal photography, using either mydriasis or non-mydriasis. Retinal photography under mydriasis appears to be the most effective test, with the majority reporting levels of sensitivity in excess of 80%. However effectiveness is compromised when photographs are ungradable. Ophthalmoscopy can also reach acceptable standards of sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion Based on an assessment of available cohort studies, the most effective strategy for testing is the use of mydriatic retinal photography with the additional use of ophthalmoscopy for cases where photographs are ungradable. This does not exclude the use of ophthalmoscopy alone for opportunistic case finding but there is evidence of considerable variation in effectiveness of this test. [source] Retinal photography for diabetic retinopathy screening in Indigenous primary health care: the Inala experienceAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Issue 2010Geoffrey K. P. Spurling Abstract Objective: We aimed to determine the impact of clinic based retinal photography on access to appropriate screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Design, setting and participants: We opportunistically recruited patients undergoing their annual diabetic cycle of care over a two year period in the urban Indigenous primary health care clinic. Data were collected on retinal outcomes, health variables and referral patterns. Main outcome measures: Access to appropriate screening and ophthalmic follow up, prevalence of DR, acceptability and feasibility of clinic-based retinal photography were the main outcome measures of this study. Results: One hundred and thirty-two of a possible 147 patients consented to participate. 30% of participants had DR. Appropriate screening and ophthalmic follow up increased six fold, from 20 to 124 participants, following the introduction of the retinal camera. Most participants felt very positive about DR screening. Conclusions: Primary care DR screening using retinal photography can improve access to DR screening for indigenous patients, reduce the burden on busy outpatient departments and should reduce visual loss. Policy-makers could contribute to screening sustainability by funding a medicare item-number for primary care based DR screening associated with the annual diabetic cycle of care. An upfront Practice Incentive Program (PIP) payment could offset set up costs. [source] A national retinal screening programme for diabetes in ScotlandDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 12 2003G. P. Leese Abstract The Health Technology Board Scotland (HTBS) have issued recommendations for eye screening in patients with diabetes. These are based on evidence-based clinical studies. Evidence-based studies do not answer all the practical issues, and some conclusions have thus been extrapolated from the known evidence base. Other factors such as patient issues, organizational issues and cost effectiveness have also been incorporated into the recommendations. HTBS recommend single-field digital retinal photography. Retinal photography best addresses the issues of adequate sensitivity and accountable quality assurance. Non-mydriatic photography is recommended, followed by immediate use of dilating eye drops if it is unsuccessful, followed by slit-lamp examination if both of these approaches fail. An independent grading scheme has been established, which is similar to the ,Global', and compatible with the National Screening Committee (NSC) grading scheme. The rationale for these recommendations, and debate behind some of the decisions, is laid out in this article. [source] A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathyDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 7 2003J. A. Olson Abstract Aims To compare the respective performances of digital retinal imaging, fundus photography and slit-lamp biomicroscopy performed by trained optometrists, in screening for diabetic retinopathy. To assess the potential contribution of automated digital image analysis to a screening programme. Methods A group of 586 patients recruited from a diabetic clinic underwent three or four mydriatic screening methods for retinal examination. The respective performances of digital imaging (n = 586; graded manually), colour slides (n = 586; graded manually), and slit-lamp examination by specially trained optometrists (n = 485), were evaluated against a reference standard of slit-lamp biomicroscopy by ophthalmologists with a special interest in medical retina. The performance of automated grading of the digital images by computer was also assessed. Results Slit-lamp examination by optometrists for referable diabetic retinopathy achieved a sensitivity of 73% (52,88) and a specificity of 90% (87,93). Using two-field imaging, manual grading of red-free digital images achieved a sensitivity of 93% (82,98) and a specificity of 87% (84,90), and for colour slides, a sensitivity of 96% (87,100) and a specificity of 89% (86,91). Almost identical results were achieved for both methods with single macular field imaging. Digital imaging had a lower technical failure rate (4.4% of patients) than colour slide photography (11.9%). Applying an automated grading protocol to the digital images detected any retinopathy, with a sensitivity of 83% (77,89) and a specificity of 71% (66,75) and diabetic macular oedema with a sensitivity of 76% (53,92) and a specificity of 85% (82,88). Conclusions Both manual grading methods produced similar results whether using a one- or two-field protocol. Technical failures rates, and hence need for recall, were lower with digital imaging. One-field grading of fundus photographs appeared to be as effective as two-field. The optometrists achieved the lowest sensitivities but reported no technical failures. Automated grading of retinal images can improve efficiency of resource utilization in diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabet. Med. 20, 528,534 (2003) [source] Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy , a systematic reviewDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 7 2000A. Hutchinson SUMMARY Aims To determine which screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy are most effective and under what circumstances. Methods A systematic review of the English language literature, published from 1983 to April 1999. Results Available studies are generally limited in their ability to answer the important questions on the effectiveness of tests for early detection of diabetic retinopathy. No randomized controlled trials were identified although primary studies exist for two screening tests: ophthalmoscopy, either direct or indirect, and retinal photography, using either mydriasis or non-mydriasis. Retinal photography under mydriasis appears to be the most effective test, with the majority reporting levels of sensitivity in excess of 80%. However effectiveness is compromised when photographs are ungradable. Ophthalmoscopy can also reach acceptable standards of sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion Based on an assessment of available cohort studies, the most effective strategy for testing is the use of mydriatic retinal photography with the additional use of ophthalmoscopy for cases where photographs are ungradable. This does not exclude the use of ophthalmoscopy alone for opportunistic case finding but there is evidence of considerable variation in effectiveness of this test. [source] Echocardiographic Findings of Patients With Retinal Ischemia or EmbolismJOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, Issue 3 2002Mikael Mouradian MD ABSTRACT Background and Purpose. A potential source of emboli is not detected in more than 50% of patients with retinal arterial occlusive events. Echocardiographic studies are not always included in the diagnostic workup of these patients. The authors studied the diagnostic yield of transthoracic (TTE) and/or transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography in identifying potential sources of emboli in patients with retinal ischemia or embolism. Methods. In a prospective study, 73 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed retinal ischemia or embolism received a standardized diagnostic workup including retinal photography, echocardiography, and imaging studies of the internal carotid arteries. TTE was performed in 83.6% of patients, TEE was performed in 5.5% of patients, and both TTE and TEE were per-formed in 11.0% of patients. Ophthalmological diagnoses consisted of amaurosis fugax (n= 28), asymptomatic cholesterol embolism to the retina (n= 34), and branch or central retinal artery occlusion (n= 11). Results. Echocardiography identified a potential cardiac or proximal aortic source for embolism in 16 of 73 (21.9%) patients, including 8 who also had either atrial fibrillation or internal carotid artery stenosis of more than 50% on the side of interest. Thus, 8 of 73 (11.0%) patients had lesions detected only by echocardiography. The most commonly identified lesions were proximal aortic plaque of more than 4 mm thickness (n= 7, 9.6%) and left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30% (n= 6, 8.2%). TEE was particularly helpful in identifying prominent aortic plaques. Conclusion. Echocardiography frequently identifies lesions of the heart or aortic arch that can act as potential sources for retinal ischemia or embolism. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic and therapeutic relevance of these findings. [source] Retinal photography for diabetic retinopathy screening in Indigenous primary health care: the Inala experienceAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Issue 2010Geoffrey K. P. Spurling Abstract Objective: We aimed to determine the impact of clinic based retinal photography on access to appropriate screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Design, setting and participants: We opportunistically recruited patients undergoing their annual diabetic cycle of care over a two year period in the urban Indigenous primary health care clinic. Data were collected on retinal outcomes, health variables and referral patterns. Main outcome measures: Access to appropriate screening and ophthalmic follow up, prevalence of DR, acceptability and feasibility of clinic-based retinal photography were the main outcome measures of this study. Results: One hundred and thirty-two of a possible 147 patients consented to participate. 30% of participants had DR. Appropriate screening and ophthalmic follow up increased six fold, from 20 to 124 participants, following the introduction of the retinal camera. Most participants felt very positive about DR screening. Conclusions: Primary care DR screening using retinal photography can improve access to DR screening for indigenous patients, reduce the burden on busy outpatient departments and should reduce visual loss. Policy-makers could contribute to screening sustainability by funding a medicare item-number for primary care based DR screening associated with the annual diabetic cycle of care. An upfront Practice Incentive Program (PIP) payment could offset set up costs. [source] Screening for retinal detachment using a wide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopeACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 2009G BONNAY Purpose The development of non-mydriatic retinal photography has changed the clinical practice, allowing detection of abnormalities in the posterior pole without clinical examination in mydriasis. However the field of view does not exceed 60° and peripheral retinal detachments are likely to be missed on these images. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a wide field (200°) imaging system (Optos, UK ) using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) for screening purposes in retinal detachment. Methods All patients referred for retinal detachment from November 2007 to April 2008 were examined by one retinal surgeon who also performed the fundus drawing. An SLO image was taken by an orthoptist in training. A masked image lecture of the entire data base was performed by a resident. Both were unaware of the details of the retinal examination. The number of breaks and the extent of the detachment on the drawing were compared with the findings detected on the SLO image. Results 56 eyes with retinal detachment were documented. In 40 out of 56 eyes the retinal breaks could be detected on the SLO images obtained. The retinal breaks situated superiorly between 11 and 1o'clock or inferiorly between 5 and 7 o'clock and two retinal detachments, one superior and one inferior, were not detected on the SLO images. SLO image analysis enabled correct diagnosis of retinal breaks in more than 7/10 cases. Retinal detachments were detected in more than 9/10 cases. Conclusion Although the wide field SLO imaging system is not suitable as a diagnostic tool of retinal breaks and retinal detachment replacing the fundus examination by a retinal specialist, it represents a reliable screening method. Commercial interest [source] | ||||||||||