Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Reproductive Choices (reproductive + choice)
Selected Abstracts,EVEN IF YOU'RE POSITIVE, YOU STILL HAVE RIGHTS BECAUSE YOU ARE A PERSON': HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE OF HIV-POSITIVE PERSONSDEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, Issue 1 2008LESLIE LONDON ABSTRACT Global debates in approaches to HIV/AIDS control have recently moved away from a uniformly strong human rights-based focus. Public health utilitarianism has become increasingly important in shaping national and international policies. However, potentially contradictory imperatives may require reconciliation of individual reproductive and other human rights with public health objectives. Current reproductive health guidelines remain largely nonprescriptive on the advisability of pregnancy amongst HIV-positive couples, mainly relying on effective counselling to enable autonomous decision-making by clients. Yet, health care provider values and attitudes may substantially impact on the effectiveness of nonprescriptive guidelines, particularly where social norms and stereotypes regarding childbearing are powerful, and where providers are subjected to dual loyalty pressures, with potentially adverse impacts on rights of service users. Data from a study of user experiences and perceptions of reproductive and HIV/AIDS services are used to illustrate a rights analysis of how reproductive health policy should integrate a rights perspective into the way services engage with HIV-positive persons and their reproductive choices. The analysis draws on recognised tools developed to evaluate health policies for their human rights impacts and on a model developed for health equity research in South Africa to argue for greater recognition of agency on the part of persons affected by HIV/AIDS in the development and content of policies on reproductive choices. We conclude by proposing strategies that are based upon a synergy between human rights and public health approaches to policy on reproductive health choices for persons with HIV/AIDS. [source] Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in UteroHYPATIA, Issue 1 2006Shelley Tremain This article critically examines the constitution of impairment in prenatal testing and screening practices and various discourses that surround these technologies. While technologies to test and screen (for impairment) prenatally are claimed to enhance women's capacity to be self-determining, make informed reproductive choices, and, in effect, wrest control of their bodies from a patriarchal medical establishment, I contend that this emerging relation between pregnant women and reproductive technologies is a new strategy of a form of power that began to emerge in the late eighteenth century. Indeed, my argument is that the constitution of prenatal impairment, by and through these practices and procedures, is a widening form of modem government that increasingly limits the field of possible conduct in response to pregnancy. Hence, the government of impairment in utero is inextricably intertwined with the government of the maternal body. [source] Healthy babies for mothers with serious mental illness: A case management framework for mental health cliniciansINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, Issue 6 2008Yvonne Hauck ABSTRACT Women with a serious mental illness (SMI), notably schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and personality disorders are considered high risk for adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, which in turn, are associated with poor neurodevelopment in the child. Failure to access antenatal care, poor adherence with folate supplementation, an unhealthy lifestyle, and inappropriate health decisions can contribute to poor outcomes. Many women with SMI continue contact with mental health services while pregnant. This primary prevention project aimed to develop a framework for community mental health clinicians to improve the reproductive health outcomes for women with SMI. The consultation process involved discussions with key stakeholders, an environmental scan to determine current service delivery issues, a literature review, and individual and group interviews with community mental health clinicians, consumers, general practitioners, and midwives. Three key elements underpin the framework: early detection and monitoring of pregnancy, providing reproductive choices, and implementing a ,small known team approach' in the management of the pregnant client. Specific modules within the framework focus upon establishing a professional support network, assessing the risk of pregnancy, the early detection of pregnancy, monitoring during pregnancy, preparing for birth, and planning for the postnatal period. Implementation of the framework has the potential to significantly improve obstetric and neonatal outcomes for this high-risk group. [source] DEAF BY DESIGN: DISABILITY AND IMPARTIALITYBIOETHICS, Issue 8 2008DAVID SHAW ABSTRACT In ,Benefit, Disability and the Non-Identity Problem', Hallvard Lillehammer uses the case of a couple who chose to have deaf children to argue against the view that impartial perspectives can provide an exhaustive account of the rightness and wrongness of particular reproductive choices. His conclusion is that the traditional approach to the non-identity problem leads to erroneous conclusions about the morality of creating disabled children. This paper will show that Lillehammer underestimates the power of impartial perspectives and exaggerates the ethical force of partial perspectives, which in turn commits him to providing weak justifications for the choice made by the couple in his example case. [source] An audit of genetic testing in diagnosis of inherited retinal disorders: a prerequisite for gene-specific interventionCLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, Issue 7 2009Monika Pradhan MS MRCOphth Abstract Background:, There has been an exponential increase in the number of genes implicated in inherited retinal disease over the last decade, but the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity limited mutation detection. The high cost of sequencing and long turn around times meant that gene testing was not a viable option, particularly in New Zealand. Recently, advancements including development of micro-array-based mutation analysis and non-for-profit laboratories have resulted in affordable and time-efficient testing. This has enabled genetic diagnostics to become an integral component of the work-up for inherited retinal disease. Methods:, Genetic testing for inherited retinal disorders was initiated via the Ocular Genetic Clinic in Auckland 2 years ago. A retrospective audit of genetic testing over this period was carried out. The results of these tests and outcomes are discussed. Results:, Thirty-five probands have undergone genetic testing for retinal disorders. This has included X-Linked Retinoschisis, Leber Congenital Amaurosis, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Albinism, Achromatopsia, Usher syndrome, Stargardt disease and Mitochondrial disease. Of these, 54% of tests (19/35) showed a rare variant or pathogenic mutation. Three couples have proceeded to investigate the options of prenatal diagnosis and/or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Conclusion:, The introduction of genetic testing, largely via disease arrays, has been highly successful at clarifying disease genotype in our cohort. It is now a timely and cost-effective investigation that should be elemental to the assessment of inherited retinal disease. Genetic testing in an opportune fashion permits genetic counselling, enables families to make reproductive choices and might allow the possibility of gene therapy interventions. [source] | |||||||||||||