Home About us Contact | |||
Recirculating System (Recirculat + system)
Kinds of Recirculating System Selected AbstractsRole of circulating neurotoxins in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy: potential for improvement following their removal by liver assist devicesLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2003Roger F. Butterworth Abstract Both acute and chronic liver failure result in impaired cerebral function known as hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Evidence suggests that HE is the consequence of the accumulation in brain of neurotoxic and/or neuroactive substance including ammonia, manganese, aromatic amino acids, mercaptans, phenols, short-chain fatty acids, bilirubin and a variety of neuroactive medications prescribed as sedatives to patients with liver failure. Brain ammonia concentrations may attain levels in excess of 2 mm, concentrations which are known to adversely affect both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission as well as brain energy metabolism. Manganese exerts toxic effects on dopaminergic neurones. Prevention and treatment of HE continues to rely heavily on the reduction of circulating ammonia either by reduction of gut production using lactulose or antibiotics or by increasing its metabolism using l -ornithine- l -aspartate. No specific therapies have so far been designed to reduce circulating concentrations of other toxins. Liver assist devices offer a potential new approach to the reduction of circulating neurotoxins generated in liver failure. In this regard, the Molecular Absorbents Recirculating System (MARS) appears to offer distinct advantages over hepatocyte-based systems. [source] Albumin dialysis in cirrhosis with superimposed acute liver injury: possible impact of albumin dialysis on hospitalization costsLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2003T. Hassanein Abstract Albumin dialysis using the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) has been found to be beneficial in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation to improve survival as well as reduce associated complications. The present study attempts to analyze the costs involved, and compare it to the benefit as a result of the MARS therapy, thus evaluating its cost-effectiveness. Using the results of a study by Kim et al. (Hepatology 2001) describing the effects of complications on the cost of hospitalization in alcoholic liver disease patients, the expenditure incurred in a group of 11 patients treated with standard medical therapy (five survivors) and a group of 12 patients treated with MARS in addition (11 survivors) (Heemann et al., Hepatology 2002) were analyzed. MARS resulted in a reduction of in-hospital deaths, as well as liver disease-related complications. Both these factors led to a substantial reduction of costs in the MARS group, which was enough to counterbalance the extra costs associated with extra-corporeal therapy. In the control group, the total hospitalization cost per survivor were calculated to be at $35 904. In the MARS group, the overall expenditure per survivor including standard medical therapy plus additional MARS liver support therapy were $32 036 , a saving of nearly $4000 compared to the control group. Therefore, it appears that the benefits of MARS therapy are enough to justify the cost of treatment and safe hospital costs, at least in the described population. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results. [source] Economic evaluation and 1-year survival analysis of MARS in patients with alcoholic liver diseaseLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2003Franz P. Hessel Abstract Objective of this study was to determine 1-year survival, costs and cost-effectiveness of the artificial liver support system Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and an underlying alcoholic liver disease. In a case,control study, 13 patients treated with MARS were compared to 23 controls of similar age, sex and severity of disease. Inpatient hospital costs data were extracted from patients' files and hospital's internal costing. Patients and treating GPs were contacted, thus determining resource use and survival 1-year after treatment. Mean 1-year survival time in MARS group was 261 days and 148 days in controls. Kaplan,Meier analysis shows advantages of MARS patients (Logrank: P = 0.057). Direct medical costs per patient for initial hospital stay and 1-year follow-up from a payer's perspective were ,18 792 for MARS patients and ,9638 for controls. The costs per life-year gained are ,29 719 (time horizon 1 year). From a societal perspective, the numbers are higher (costs per life-year gained: ,79 075), mainly because of the fact that there is no regular reimbursement of MARS and therefore intervention costs were not calculated from payer's perspective. A trade-off between medical benefit and higher costs has to be made, but 1-year results suggest an acceptable cost-effectiveness of MARS. Prolonging the time horizon and including indirect costs, which will be done in future research, would probably improve cost-effectiveness. [source] Application of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System® in patients with severe liver failure after hepatic resection or transplantation: initial single-centre experiencesLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2002R Kellersmann Abstract: Acute liver failure after hepatic surgery is still plaqued with high mortality rate. Recently, a liver dialysis system (MARS®) that allows detoxification of albumin-bound substances and may hereby support liver regeneration and patient's recovery has been developed. In the present study, we report our experiences with MARS® dialysis in patients with liver failure after hepatic resection or transplantation. Between September 1999 and January 2001, five patients were treated with MARS® (2,5 courses). Though beneficial effects such as improvement of encephalopathy and renal function as well as reduced bilirubin levels were recorded during MARS® therapy, only one patient survived. Neither significant technical problems nor adverse effects occurred by using MARS® dialysis. We conclude that in surgical patients, acute liver failure is usually part of a complicated clinical course affecting multipleorgan systems. Thus, it is difficult to determine the specific influence of MARS® on patient's outcome. However, beneficial effects observed in our patients justify its continuous use and may stimulate further evaluation in controlled studies with surgical patients. [source] Clinical Experience with Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in Patients with Drug-induced Liver FailureARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 5 2004Xin-min Zhou Abstract:, The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is a novel extracorporeal technique for liver support. We report the clinical results in a group of fourteen patients with drug-induced liver failure. Fourteen patients, aged 22,83 years, with acute or subacute liver failure [mean Child,Turcotte,Pugh (CTP) score 11 (range 8,15)] due to the intake of various drugs (diet pill overdose,2; Chinese traditional medicine (CTM),4; antibiotic, paracetamol, tuberculostatic, or vasodilator abuse,8) were treated with one to seven sessions of MARS. Beneficial effects such as the improvement of encephalopathy and prothrombin activity, as well as a reduction of bilirubin and ammonia were recorded during MARS treatments. Thirteen out of fourteen patients survived the hospitalization (93%), and two of the discharged patients died during the follow-up of 6,12 months. The overall survival rate was about 79%. MARS therapy can contribute to the improved treatment of drug-induced liver failure patients. [source] |