Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Reading Comprehension Test (reading + comprehension_test)
Selected AbstractsThe Influence of Several Factors on Reliability for Complex Reading Comprehension TestsJOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, Issue 2 2002Guemin Lee The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of items, passages, contents, themes, and types of passages on the reliability and standard errors of measurement for complex reading comprehension tests. Seven different generalizability theory models were used in the analyses. Results indicated that generalizability coefficients estimated using multivariate models incorporating content strata and types of passages were similar in size to reliability estimates based upon a model that did not include these factors. In contrast, incorporating passages and themes within univariate generalizability theory models produced non-negligible differences in the reliability estimates. This suggested that passages and themes be taken into account when evaluating the reliability of test scores for complex reading comprehension tests. [source] Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language readingJOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, Issue 1 2005Asim Sakar Abstract This study first explores intermediate-level English learners' preferences for hypermedia annotations while they are engaged in reading a hypermedia text. Second, it examines whether multimedia annotations facilitate reading comprehension in the second language. The participants were 44 adult learners of English as a foreign language studying English for Academic Purposes. Data were collected through a tracking tool, a reading comprehension test, a questionnaire, and interviews. Results indicate that learners preferred visual annotations significantly more than textual and audio annotations. On the other hand, a negative relationship was found between annotation use and reading comprehension. Especially, pronunciations, audiorecordings, and videos were found to affect reading comprehension negatively. However, the qualitative data revealed that the participants had positive attitudes towards annotations and hypermedia reading in general. [source] Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: examining where these differences lieJOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, Issue 2 2009Sarah Logan The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in the relationship between reading ability, frequency of reading and attitudes and beliefs relating to reading and school. Two hundred and thirty-two 10-year-old children (117 male) completed a reading comprehension test and a questionnaire exploring the following areas: frequency of reading, attitude to reading, attitude to school, competency beliefs and perceived academic support (from peers and teacher). Overall, girls had better reading comprehension, read more frequently and had a more positive attitude to reading and school. However, smaller gender differences were found in reading ability than in attitudes and frequency of reading. Indeed, effect sizes for gender differences in reading were found to be small in this and other studies. Reading ability correlated with both boys' and girls' reading frequency and competency beliefs; however, only boys' reading ability was associated with their attitude to reading and school. Notably, gender differences were found predominantly in the relationship between factors, rather than solely in the factors themselves. Previous research has neglected to study these relationships, and has focused instead on the gender differences found in individual factors. Conclusions are made regarding the applicability of these findings to the school situation. [source] The Influence of Several Factors on Reliability for Complex Reading Comprehension TestsJOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, Issue 2 2002Guemin Lee The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of items, passages, contents, themes, and types of passages on the reliability and standard errors of measurement for complex reading comprehension tests. Seven different generalizability theory models were used in the analyses. Results indicated that generalizability coefficients estimated using multivariate models incorporating content strata and types of passages were similar in size to reliability estimates based upon a model that did not include these factors. In contrast, incorporating passages and themes within univariate generalizability theory models produced non-negligible differences in the reliability estimates. This suggested that passages and themes be taken into account when evaluating the reliability of test scores for complex reading comprehension tests. [source] | ||||||||||