			Home About us Contact

Rape Cases (rape + case)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Psychology	60%

Selected Abstracts

Counterfactuals and roles: mock victims' and perpetrators' accounts of judicial cases

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, Issue 3 2001
Patrizia Catellani
Three studies assessed the influence of differential perspective taking on counterfactual thinking. In Study 1 male and female subjects were asked to play the role of, respectively, perpetrator and victim in a rape case, and to give their own account of the event. Analysis of spontaneous counterfactuals showed a main tendency to focus on actions more than inactions and on controllable more than uncontrollable elements. However, this tendency was moderated by the subject's role and the counterfactual target. While victims focused on perpetrators' controllable actions more than on their own, perpetrators did not focus on victims' controllable actions more than on their own; they focused on victims' controllable inactions instead. In Study 2, where males and females were asked to reverse their roles, and where prompted as well as spontaneous counterfactuals were analysed, the same results were found. Further evidence for generality of these results was found in Study 3, where an assault case instead of a rape case was taken into account. These findings support the view that counterfactual mutability may be influenced by role-based motivations, as well as by role-based expectations regarding how active a party is supposed to have been in an event. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Belief in a Just World and Jury Decisions in a Civil Rape Trial

JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, Issue 5 2000
Linda A. Foley
When people's belief in a just world (BJW) is challenged, it can be restored by attributing blame to the victim or alleviating the victim's suffering. In criminal cases, jurors can attribute responsibility to victims, but cannot alleviate suffering. Participants (n= 106) heard a taped civil rape case. The effect of age of plaintiff, gender of participant, and type of participant on mock jurors' reactions to a plaintiff were examined. Participants evaluated responsibility of plaintiff and awarded monetary damages. It was hypothesized that, given this opportunity to compensate the victim, jurors would be less likely to derogate the victim. As hypothesized, women with high and low BJW attributed the same level of responsibility to the plaintiff but those with a high BJW awarded more monetaly damages. Men with high BJW awarded much less in damages than did men with low BJW. The just-world theory appears to explain many of the decisions made by mock jurors. [source]

How nurses' experiences of domestic violence influence service provision: Study conducted in North-west province, South Africa

NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, Issue 1 2005
Nicola J. Christofides
Abstract This study was undertaken to determine whether nurses' experiences of domestic violence (DV) influence their management of DV and rape cases. In total, 212 nurses were interviewed in two South African health districts using a standardized questionnaire. We measured sociodemographic characteristics, quality of care in the areas of rape and DV management, and experiences of DV in their own lives and amongst family and friends. A total of 39% nurses reported having experienced either physical or emotional abuse themselves and 40.6% amongst family and friends. Having personally experienced DV had no influence on DV identification and management. Those with experience from friends and family were more likely to have provided better care for patients who presented after DV (mean quality of care score = 23.1), while nurses who reported no personal experience of DV, either in their own lives or among family and friends, had a lower quality of care score of 19.8 (P = 0.02). Having ever intervened in a domestic dispute was associated with higher quality of care (P < 0.001). This suggests that the greater degree to which nurses identify with DV and intervene, the more likely they are to provide higher quality of care. Training of nurses in DV must try to build such empathy. [source]

The Social Life of Rights: ,Gender Antagonism', Modernity and Raet in Vanuatu

THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGY, Issue 2 2008
John P. Taylor
In the northern Vanuatu town of Luganville a small group of men have responded to social and legal changes engendered by women's rights activists by forming a male support group called ,Violence Against Men'. Members of this ,backlash' movement argue that the insidious promotion of Western-style ,women's rights' is leading to discrimination against men in divorce proceedings, child custody battles, and in domestic violence and rape cases. They directly oppose recent and ongoing legal changes aimed at protecting women from domestic violence, such as Domestic Violence Protection Court Orders, and the repeatedly tabled (but long-delayed) ,Family Protection Bill'. Such interventions, they argue, undermine Vanuatu's ,natural'kastom and Christian patriarchal gender order and, in doing so, pose a serious threat to the socio-economic productivity of the nation-state. For other men, however, rather than opposing women's rights activism, such challenges have raised questions about how men might successfully negotiate their identities in ways that are sensitive to contemporary issues of gender equality without undermining existing paradigms. Thus, this paper addresses the value accorded to universalism and relativism in gender activism in Vanuatu, and especially in terms of the linked discourses of kastom, church and modernity. It therefore explores gender relations in terms of the contemporary entanglement of indigenous and exogenous epistemologies, and in doing so argues that the contextual analysis of ,rights' should consider the specific historical, political and socio-cultural circumstances in which they are put to use. [source]

Schema-driven information processing in judgements about rape

APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, Issue 5 2007
Barbara Krahé
Two studies addressed the impact of rape schemata on judgements about rape cases. In Study 1, 286 undergraduate students rated perpetrator and victim blame for five rape scenarios and completed the Perceived Causes of Rape Scale. Most blame was assigned to victims of an ex-partner rape, followed by acquaintance and stranger rape. Least blame was assigned to perpetrators of ex-partner rapes, followed by acquaintance and stranger rapes. Female precipitation beliefs increased victim blame and reduced perpetrator blame. In Study 2, 158 students rated rape scenarios that varied in victim perpetrator relationship and coercive strategy and completed a measure of Female Precipitation Beliefs. Half expected to be held accountable for their judgements. The perpetrator was held less liable and the victim blamed more when the perpetrator exploited the victim's incapacitated state versus using physical force. Accountability instruction reduced the impact of female precipitation beliefs on perceived perpetrator liability and victim blame. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]