Home About us Contact | |||
Radical Procedure (radical + procedure)
Selected AbstractsChemInform Abstract: An Efficient Radical Procedure for the Halogenation and Chalcogenation of B-Alkylcatecholboranes.CHEMINFORM, Issue 39 2008Arnaud-Pierre Schaffner Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a "Full Text" option. The original article is trackable via the "References" option. [source] A Mild Radical Procedure for the Reduction of B-Alkylcatecholboranes to Alkanes.CHEMINFORM, Issue 9 2006Davide Pozzi Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract, please click on HTML or PDF. [source] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gallbladder cancerJOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 8 2006Ralf Steinert MD Abstract Heightened awareness of the possible presence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) and the knowledge of appropriate management are important for surgeons practising laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Long-term effects of initial LC versus open cholecystectomy (OC) on the prognosis of patients with GBC remain undefined. Patients who are suspected to have GBC should not undergo LC, since it is advantageous to perform the en-bloc radical surgery at the initial operation. Since preoperative diagnosis of early GBC is difficult, preventive measures, such as preventing bile spillage and bagging the gallbladder should be applied for every LC. Many port-site recurrences (PSR) have been reported after LC, but the incidence of wound recurrence is not higher than after OC. No radical procedure is required after postoperative diagnosis of incidental pT1a GBC. It is unclear if patients with pT1b GBC require extended cholecystectomy. In pT2 GBC, patients should have radical surgery (atypical or segmental liver resection and lymphadenectomy). In advanced GBC (pT3 and pT4), radical surgery can cure only a small subset of patients, if any. Additional port-site excision is recommended, but the effectiveness of such measure is debated. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:682,689. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Role of surgery in children with rhabdomyosarcoma,PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, Issue 1 2003Erica L. Schalow MD Abstract Background Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood. Historically, surgery has played a central role in the management of children with this tumor, though with surgery alone survival rates were poor. With current multimodal (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) treatment of these patients, survival has dramatically improved and, with this improvement, there has been an evolution of the role of surgery in the management of this condition. Material and Method The contemporary published literature (English) regarding surgical aspects of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma was reviewed and evaluated. Results Multimodal therapy has improved the survival of children with RMS from 25% in 1970 to greater than 70% today. Surgical procedures for childhood RMS today are less apt to be exenterative or multilating than those employed thirty years ago. Conclusions Surgery plays a vital role in the diagnosis and treatment of children with RMS. This role has evolved in the context of multimodal therapy and improved survival to an emphasis on less radical procedures with decreased morbidity. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003;41:1,6. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |