Home  About us  Contact
 

Rare Plants (rare + plant)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Life Sciences100%

Terms modified by Rare Plants

  • rare plant species
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Should We Use Pesticides to Conserve Rare Plants?

    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 5 2000
    Peter Lesica
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]

    Matrix Models as a Tool for Understanding Invasive Plant and Native Plant Interactions

    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2005
    DIANE M. THOMSON
    competencia; invasión biológica; plantas invasoras; modelo matricial; perturbación Abstract:,Demographic matrix models are an increasingly standard way to evaluate the effects of different impacts and management approaches on species of concern. Although invasive species are now considered among the greatest threats to biodiversity, matrix methods have been little used to explore and integrate the potentially complicated effects of invasions on native species. I developed stage-structured models to assess the impacts of invasive grasses on population growth and persistence of a federally listed (U.S.A.) endemic plant, the Antioch Dunes evening primrose (Oenothera deltoides subsp. howellii [Munz] W. Klein). I used these models to evaluate two frequently made assumptions: (1) when rare plant populations decline in invaded habitats, invasive species are the cause and (2) invasive plants suppress rare plants primarily through direct resource competition. I compared two control and two removal matrices based on previous experimental work that showed variable effects of invasive grasses on different life-history stages of O. deltoides. Matrix analysis showed that these effects translated into substantial changes in population growth rates and persistence, with control matrices predicting a mean stochastic population growth rate (,) of 0.86 and removal matrices predicting growth rates from 0.92 to 0.93. Yet even the most optimistic invasive removal scenarios predicted rapid decline and a probability of extinction near one in the next 100 years. Competitive suppression of seedlings had much smaller effects on growth rates than did lowered germination, which probably resulted from thatch accumulation and reduced soil disturbance. These results indicate that although invasive grasses have important effects on the population growth of this rare plant, invasion impacts are not solely responsible for observed declines and are likely to be interacting with other factors such as habitat degradation. Further, changes in the disturbance regime may be as important a mechanism creating these impacts as direct resource competition. My results highlight the value of demographic modeling approaches in creating an integrated assessment of the threats posed by invasive species and the need for more mechanistic studies of invasive plant interactions with native plants. Resumen:,Los modelos demográficos matriciales son una forma cada vez más utilizada para evaluar los efectos de diferentes impactos y métodos de gestión sobre las especies en cuestión. Aunque actualmente se considera a las plantas invasoras entre las mayores amenazas a la biodiversidad, los modelos matriciales han sido poco utilizados para explorar e integrar los efectos potencialmente complicados de las invasiones sobre las especies nativas. Desarrollé modelos estructurados por etapas para evaluar los impactos de pastos invasores sobre el crecimiento poblacional y la persistencia de una especie de planta endémica, enlistada federalmente (E.U.A.), Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii [Munz] W. Klein. Utilicé estos modelos para evaluar dos suposiciones frecuentes: (1) cuando las poblaciones de plantas raras declinan en hábitats invadidos, las especies invasoras son la causa y (2) las plantas invasoras suprimen a las plantas raras principalmente mediante la competencia directa por recursos. Comparé dos matrices de control y dos de remoción con base en trabajo experimental previo que mostró efectos variables de los pastos invasores sobre las diferentes etapas de la historia de vida de O. deltoides. El análisis de la matriz mostró que estos efectos se tradujeron en cambios sustanciales en las tasas de crecimiento y persistencia de la población, las matrices de control predijeron una tasa media de crecimiento poblacional estocástica (,) de 0.86 y las matrices de remoción predijeron tasas de crecimiento de 0.92-0.93. Aun los escenarios más optimistas de remoción de invasores predijeron una rápida declinación y una probabilidad de extinción en 100 años cerca de uno. La supresión competitiva de plántulas tuvo mucho menor efecto sobre las tasas de crecimiento que la disminución en la germinación, que probablemente resultó de la acumulación de paja y reducción en la perturbación del suelo. Estos resultados indican que, aunque los pastos invasores tienen efectos importantes sobre el crecimiento poblacional de esta planta rara, los impactos de la invasión no son los únicos responsables de las declinaciones observadas y probablemente están interactuando con otros factores como la degradación del hábitat. Más aun, los cambios en el régimen de perturbación pueden ser un mecanismo tan importante en la creación de estos impactos como la competencia directa por recursos. Mis resultados resaltan el valor del enfoque de los modelos demográficos para la evaluación integral de las amenazas de especies invasoras y la necesidad de estudios más mecanicistas de las interacciones de plantas invasoras con plantas nativas. [source]

    Ecology and conservation status of temporary and fluctuating ponds in two areas of southern England

    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, Issue 2 2009
    D.T. Bilton
    Abstract 1.A high proportion of ponds are temporary in nature, although the biodiversity value of such sites is still poorly recognized. This work explores the plant and macroinvertebrate communities of 76 temporary and fluctuating water bodies in two regions of southern England (Lizard Peninsula, Cornwall and New Forest, Hampshire) that have retained high pond densities. The ecology and conservation status of sites is examined, and comparisons made with ponds elsewhere in England and Wales. 2.Lizard and New Forest ponds supported 119 plant and 165 macroinvertebrate species respectively. Patterns of community similarity for plants and macroinvertebrates were highly concordant, taxa being related in a similar manner to measured environmental variables including pond area, depth, pH and water chemistry. 3.Patterns of pond occupancy revealed that most species were locally rare, over half occurring in less than 10% of ponds, and less than 10% being recorded from more than 50% of sites. More than 50% of ponds supported at least one nationally rare plant and almost 75% at least one nationally rare macroinvertebrate. These taxa occupied a wide range of pond types in each region, and did not have predictably different ecologies from common species. 4.Comparisons with ponds elsewhere in England and Wales revealed that Lizard and New Forest communities are nationally distinct, being most similar to ponds in areas of low intensity agriculture elsewhere in western Britain. Individual ponds in both regions supported more nationally rare taxa, on average, than ponds sampled in the national survey. 5.Ponds in the two areas have high conservation value, both regionally and nationally, supporting almost 75% of the global species richness of temporary ponds sampled across England and Wales. Within each region, many taxa are found in relatively few sites, and effective conservation of pond biodiversity will require a regional management approach. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

    Quantifying Plant Population Persistence in Human-Dominated Landscapes

    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 4 2008
    DAWN M. LAWSON
    Base de Datos de la Diversidad Natural de California; conservación de plantas; crecimiento de la población; especies en peligro; paisajes urbanos Abstract:,We assessed population performance of rare plants across a gradient from rural to urban landscapes and evaluated 2 hypotheses central to strategic conservation planning: (1) population performance declines with increasing human dominance and (2) small populations perform poorly relative to larger ones. Assessing these hypotheses is critical to strategic conservation planning. The current conservation paradigm adheres to the well-established ecology theory that small isolated populations, particularly those in human-dominated landscapes, are the least likely to succeed over the long term. Consequently, conservation planning has strongly favored large, remote targets for protection. This shift in conservation toward ecosystem-based programs and protection of populations within large, remote systems has been at the expense of protection of the rarest of the rare species, the dominant paradigm for conservation driven by the endangered species act. Yet, avoiding conservation of small populations appears to be based more on theoretical understanding and expert opinion than empiricism. We used Natural Heritage data from California in an assessment of population performance of rare plants across a landscape with an urban-rural gradient. Population performance did not decrease in urban settings or for populations that were initially small. Our results are consistent with a pattern of few species extinctions within these landscapes over the past several decades. We conclude that these populations within compromised landscapes can contribute to overall biodiversity conservation. We further argue that conservation planning for biodiversity preservation should allocate relatively more resources to protecting urban-associated plant taxa because they may provide conservation benefit beyond simply protecting isolated populations; they may be useful in building social interest in conservation. Resumen:,Evaluamos el funcionamiento de la población de plantas raras a lo largo de un gradiente de paisajes rurales a urbanos y evaluamos 2 hipótesis centrales para la planificación estratégica de la conservación: (1) declinaciones en el funcionamiento poblacional con el incremento de la dominancia humana y (2) las poblaciones pequeñas funcionan pobremente en relación con las grandes. La evaluación de estas hipótesis es crítica para la planificación estratégica de la conservación. El paradigma actual de la conservación se adhiere a la teoría ecológica bien establecida que propone que las poblaciones pequeñas aisladas, particularmente en paisajes dominados por humanos, tienen menor probabilidad de sobrevivir a largo plazo. Consecuentemente, la planificación de la conservación ha favorecido objetivos grandes y remotos. Este cambio hacia programas de conservación basados en ecosistemas y la protección de poblaciones en sistemas extensos y remotos ha sido a costa de la protección de las especies más raras entre las raras, el paradigma dominante en la conservación conducida por el acta de especies en peligro. No obstante, la evasión de la conservación de poblaciones pequeñas parece estar basada más en entendimiento teórico y en la opinión de expertos que en el empirismo. Utilizamos datos del Patrimonio Natural de California en una evaluación del funcionamiento de plantas raras en un paisaje con un gradiente urbano a rural. El funcionamiento de la población no decreció en sitios urbanos o en poblaciones que eran pequeñas inicialmente. Nuestros resultados son consistentes con un patrón de extinción de especies en estos paisajes en las últimas décadas. Concluimos que estas poblaciones en paisajes comprometidos pueden contribuir a la conservación de la biodiversidad en general. También argumentamos que la planificación de la conservación para la preservación de la biodiversidad debería asignar más recursos para la protección de taxa de plantas asociadas a ambientes urbanos porque pueden proporcionar beneficios de conservación más allá de simplemente proteger poblaciones aisladas; pueden ser útiles para construir el interés social por la conservación. [source]

    Matrix Models as a Tool for Understanding Invasive Plant and Native Plant Interactions

    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2005
    DIANE M. THOMSON
    competencia; invasión biológica; plantas invasoras; modelo matricial; perturbación Abstract:,Demographic matrix models are an increasingly standard way to evaluate the effects of different impacts and management approaches on species of concern. Although invasive species are now considered among the greatest threats to biodiversity, matrix methods have been little used to explore and integrate the potentially complicated effects of invasions on native species. I developed stage-structured models to assess the impacts of invasive grasses on population growth and persistence of a federally listed (U.S.A.) endemic plant, the Antioch Dunes evening primrose (Oenothera deltoides subsp. howellii [Munz] W. Klein). I used these models to evaluate two frequently made assumptions: (1) when rare plant populations decline in invaded habitats, invasive species are the cause and (2) invasive plants suppress rare plants primarily through direct resource competition. I compared two control and two removal matrices based on previous experimental work that showed variable effects of invasive grasses on different life-history stages of O. deltoides. Matrix analysis showed that these effects translated into substantial changes in population growth rates and persistence, with control matrices predicting a mean stochastic population growth rate (,) of 0.86 and removal matrices predicting growth rates from 0.92 to 0.93. Yet even the most optimistic invasive removal scenarios predicted rapid decline and a probability of extinction near one in the next 100 years. Competitive suppression of seedlings had much smaller effects on growth rates than did lowered germination, which probably resulted from thatch accumulation and reduced soil disturbance. These results indicate that although invasive grasses have important effects on the population growth of this rare plant, invasion impacts are not solely responsible for observed declines and are likely to be interacting with other factors such as habitat degradation. Further, changes in the disturbance regime may be as important a mechanism creating these impacts as direct resource competition. My results highlight the value of demographic modeling approaches in creating an integrated assessment of the threats posed by invasive species and the need for more mechanistic studies of invasive plant interactions with native plants. Resumen:,Los modelos demográficos matriciales son una forma cada vez más utilizada para evaluar los efectos de diferentes impactos y métodos de gestión sobre las especies en cuestión. Aunque actualmente se considera a las plantas invasoras entre las mayores amenazas a la biodiversidad, los modelos matriciales han sido poco utilizados para explorar e integrar los efectos potencialmente complicados de las invasiones sobre las especies nativas. Desarrollé modelos estructurados por etapas para evaluar los impactos de pastos invasores sobre el crecimiento poblacional y la persistencia de una especie de planta endémica, enlistada federalmente (E.U.A.), Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii [Munz] W. Klein. Utilicé estos modelos para evaluar dos suposiciones frecuentes: (1) cuando las poblaciones de plantas raras declinan en hábitats invadidos, las especies invasoras son la causa y (2) las plantas invasoras suprimen a las plantas raras principalmente mediante la competencia directa por recursos. Comparé dos matrices de control y dos de remoción con base en trabajo experimental previo que mostró efectos variables de los pastos invasores sobre las diferentes etapas de la historia de vida de O. deltoides. El análisis de la matriz mostró que estos efectos se tradujeron en cambios sustanciales en las tasas de crecimiento y persistencia de la población, las matrices de control predijeron una tasa media de crecimiento poblacional estocástica (,) de 0.86 y las matrices de remoción predijeron tasas de crecimiento de 0.92-0.93. Aun los escenarios más optimistas de remoción de invasores predijeron una rápida declinación y una probabilidad de extinción en 100 años cerca de uno. La supresión competitiva de plántulas tuvo mucho menor efecto sobre las tasas de crecimiento que la disminución en la germinación, que probablemente resultó de la acumulación de paja y reducción en la perturbación del suelo. Estos resultados indican que, aunque los pastos invasores tienen efectos importantes sobre el crecimiento poblacional de esta planta rara, los impactos de la invasión no son los únicos responsables de las declinaciones observadas y probablemente están interactuando con otros factores como la degradación del hábitat. Más aun, los cambios en el régimen de perturbación pueden ser un mecanismo tan importante en la creación de estos impactos como la competencia directa por recursos. Mis resultados resaltan el valor del enfoque de los modelos demográficos para la evaluación integral de las amenazas de especies invasoras y la necesidad de estudios más mecanicistas de las interacciones de plantas invasoras con plantas nativas. [source]

    Can distribution models help refine inventory-based estimates of conservation priority?

    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, Issue 4 2010
    A case study in the Eastern Arc forests of Tanzania, Kenya
    Abstract Aim, Data shortages mean that conservation priorities can be highly sensitive to historical patterns of exploration. Here, we investigate the potential of regionally focussed species distribution models to elucidate fine-scale patterns of richness, rarity and endemism. Location, Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania and Kenya. Methods, Generalized additive models and land cover data are used to estimate the distributions of 452 forest plant taxa (trees, lianas, shrubs and herbs). Presence records from a newly compiled database are regressed against environmental variables in a stepwise multimodel. Estimates of occurrence in forest patches are collated across target groups and analysed alongside inventory-based estimates of conservation priority. Results, Predicted richness is higher than observed richness, with the biggest disparities in regions that have had the least research. North Pare and Nguu in particular are predicted to be more important than the inventory data suggest. Environmental conditions in parts of Nguru could support as many range-restricted and endemic taxa as Uluguru, although realized niches are subject to unknown colonization histories. Concentrations of rare plants are especially high in the Usambaras, a pattern mediated in models by moisture indices, whilst overall richness is better explained by temperature gradients. Tree data dominate the botanical inventory; we find that priorities based on other growth forms might favour the mountains in a different order. Main conclusions, Distribution models can provide conservation planning with high-resolution estimates of richness in well-researched areas, and predictive estimates of conservation importance elsewhere. Spatial and taxonomic biases in the data are essential considerations, as is the spatial scale used for models. We caution that predictive estimates are most uncertain for the species of highest conservation concern, and advocate using models and targeted field assessments iteratively to refine our understanding of which areas should be prioritised for conservation. [source]

    Do pollen carryover and pollinator constancy mitigate effects of competition for pollination?

    OIKOS, Issue 7 2009
    Benjamin R. Montgomery
    Pollinator constancy and pollen carryover are both thought to mitigate competitive effects that result when shared pollinators cause loss of pollen to heterospecific flowers. I present analytical and simulation models to investigate how pollinator constancy and pollen carryover interact with each other and with the relationship between pollen receipt and seed set to determine pollination success in competitive environments. With inconstant pollinators, increased pollen carryover reduces variance in pollen receipt without affecting average pollen receipt. Consequently, for flowers requiring at least a threshold quantity of pollen for success, rare flowers with inconstant pollinators benefit from reduced carryover, especially for high pollen receipt thresholds, whereas common flowers benefit from increased carryover, especially for low receipt thresholds. Pollinator constancy is predicted to increase pollen receipt, especially if pollen carryover rates are low. As a result, increased pollinator constancy reduces the range of pollen receipt thresholds for which carryover is beneficial. Similarly, for flowers whose pollination success is a convex function of pollen receipt, carryover is expected to increase fecundity if pollinators are inconstant, but with even a low degree of pollinator constancy, carryover reduces fecundity. These results predict that rare plants with many ovules per flower benefit from dispersing aggregations of pollen, especially if their pollinators exhibit constancy, whereas plants with inconstant pollinators and low thresholds of pollen receipt benefit from pollen grains dispersing individually to increase the number of flowers reached by the pollen. [source]