Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
R Wave Amplitude (r + wave_amplitude)
Selected AbstractsValidation of 2 Techniques for Electrocardiographic Recording in Dogs and CatsJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2006Luca Ferasin Background: Standard electrocardiographic (ECG) recording in the dog and cat is commonly performed in right lateral recumbency, by connecting the ECG leads to the skin of the patient via metallic alligator clips. The jaws of the alligator clips are usually filed or flattened to reduce their uncomfortable pressure on the patient's skin. However, filed and flattened alligator clips can occasionally lose their grip to the skin, causing lead detachment during standard ECG recording. Hypothesis: The aim of the study was to validate two novel ECG recording techniques ("gel" and "pads"). Animals: Six-lead standard ECG recording was obtained from 42 dogs and 40 cats using the standard technique, as well as the two novel methods. Methods: Measurements were taken of the amplitude and duration of P waves and QRS complexes, duration of PQ and QT intervals, and mean electrical axis (MEA). In each recording, five representative complexes were measured, and the results were averaged for each parameter. Results: A good quality ECG recording was obtained with all the three different techniques, although a degree of wandering trace was observed in one third of cats with the "pads" technique. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the ECG values recorded with the two novel techniques and those recorded with the standard traditional technique. Furthermore, the observed differences were not clinically relevant, except for the R wave amplitude recorded with the "pads" method in cats (-0.35 to 0.37 mV). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: In conclusion, this study supports the reliability and clinical validity of the "gel" and "pads" techniques for ECG recording both in the dog and the cat, with some limitations for the "pads" technique in cats. [source] Compatibility of Automatic Threshold Tracking Pacemakers with Previously Implanted Pacing Leads in ChildrenPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 11 2002OSMAN KUCUKOSMANOGLU KUCUKOSMANOGLU, O., et al.: Compatibility of Automatic Threshold Tracking Pacemakers with Previously Implanted Pacing Leads in Children. The Autocapture function controls and optimizes the amplitude of the pacing pulse and saves energy. The manufacturer recommends using a special low polarization, low threshold bipolar Pacesetter lead for the Autocapture function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of Autocapture with previously implanted pacing leads. The study included 15 patients (mean age 13.6 ± 3.4 years) who needed pulse generator replacement and received the VVIR pacemaker Regency SR+ or the DDDR pacemakers Affinity DR or Integrity DR with the Autocapture function. The new pulse generators connected to previously implanted ventricular leads. At the time of implantation the pacing threshold was 1.0 ± 0.35 V at 0.5 ms, the lead impedance was 580 ± 80 ,, and the spontaneous R wave amplitude was 7.89 ± 4.89 mV. The polarization signal (PS) was 3.8 ± 3.04 mV, and evoked response (ER) was 8.15 ± 4.57 mV at the predischarge testing. Follow-up telemetry was done at months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18. The follow-up duration was 9.4 ± 5 months (range 1,18 months). If the results of PS and ER measurements were acceptable for Autocapture, it turned on at the 1-month visit. In six (40%) patients the results were found acceptable for Autocapture function. Age, lead impedance, pacing threshold, intrinsic R wave measurement, lead age, fixation mechanism, and ER measurements were not statistically different in Autocapture suitable and not suitable groups. The main reason not to activate Autocapture had been increased PS. Any significant fluctuations were not observed in pacing threshold, lead impedance, ER, and PS during follow-up. In conclusion, previously implanted pacing leads may be compatible with the Autocapture function. [source] Mapping the Coronary Sinus and Great Cardiac VeinPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2002MICHAEL GIUDICI GIUDICI, M., et al.: Mapping the Coronary Sinus and Great Cardiac Vein. The purpose of this study was to develop a better understanding of the pacing and sensing characteristics of electrodes placed in the proximal cardiac veins. A detailed mapping of the coronary sinus (CS) and great cardiac vein (GCV) was done on 25 patients with normal sinus rhythm using a deflectable electrophysiological catheter. Intrinsic bipolar electrograms and atrial and ventricular pacing voltage thresholds were measured. For measurement purposes, the GCV and the CS were each subdivided into distal (D), middle (M), and proximal (P) regions, for a total of six test locations. Within the CS and GCV, the average atrial pacing threshold was always lower (P < 0.05) than the ventricle with an average ventricular to atrial ratio > 5, except for the GCV-D. The average atrial threshold in the CS and GCV ranged from 0.2, to 1.0-V higher than in the atrial appendage. Diaphragmatic pacing was observed in three patients. Atrial signal amplitude was greatest in the CS-M, CS-D, and GCV-P and smaller in the CS-P, GCV-M, and GCV-D. Electrode spacing did not significantly affect P wave amplitude, while narrower electrode spacing attenuated R wave amplitude. The average P:R ratio was highest with 5-mm-spaced electrodes compared to wider spaced pairs. The P:R ratio in the CS was higher (P < 0.05) than in all positions of the GVC. It is possible to pace the atrium independent of the ventricle at reasonably low thresholds and to detect atrial depolarization without undue cross-talk or noise using closely spaced bipolar electrode pairs. The areas of the proximal, middle, and distal CS produced the best combination of pacing and sensing parameters. [source] R-Wave Detection by Subcutaneous ECG.ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, Issue 1 2001Possible Use for Analyzing R-R Variability Background: Atrial arrhythmia (AA) discrimination remains a technological challenge for implanted cardiac devices. We examined the feasibility of R-wave detection by a subcutaneous far field ECG (SFFECG) and analysis of these signals for R to R variability as an indicator of atrial arrhythmia (AA). Methods: Surface ECG and SFFECG (from the pacemaker pocket) were recorded in sixteen patients (61.5 ± 11.4 years) with AA. The SFFECG was recorded with a pacemaker sized four electrode array acutely placed in the pacemaker pocket during implantation. The signals were analyzed to obtain peak-to-peak R wave amplitude and R to R interval variability (indicative of AAs). Results: In sixteen patients R waves were visually discernible in all recordings. The percentage over and under detection for automatic R wave recognition SFFECG was 3 and 9%, respectively. R to R variability analysis using the SFFECG produced results concordant to those using the surface ECG. Conclusion: SFFECG might be a helpful adjunct in implantable device systems for detection of R waves and may be used for measurement of R to R variability. A.N.E. 2001;6(1):18,23 [source] | ||||||||||