			Home About us Contact

Quantitative Cartilage Imaging (quantitative + cartilage_imaging)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	50%

Selected Abstracts

Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: Precision and inter-subject variability

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 2 2002
Dina Al-Ali
Alterations of ankle cartilage are observed in degenerative and inflammatory joint disease, but cartilage cannot be directly visualized by radiography. The purpose of this study was therefore to analyze the feasibility and precision of quantitative cartilage imaging in the human hind foot (talocrural, talotarsal, and intertarsal joints), and to report the inter-subject variability for cartilage volume, thickness and surface areas. The feet of 16 healthy volunteers were imaged using a 3D gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging sequence with water-excitation. After interpolation to a resolution of 1 ± 0.125 ± 0.125 mm3 the cartilage plates were segmented, and the cartilage volume, thickness, and surface areas determined. The precision (four repeated measurements) was examined in eight volunteers, the RMS average CV% being 2.1% to 10.9% in single joint surfaces, and , 3% for the cumulative values of all joints. The mean cartilage thickness ranged from 0.57 ± 0.08 (navicular surface) to 0.89 ± 0.19 mm (trochlear surface for tibia). In conclusion this study shows that it is feasible to quantify thin cartilage layers in the hind foot under in vivo imaging conditions, and that the precision errors are substantially smaller than the inter-subject variability in healthy subjects. © 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [source]

Parallel imaging of knee cartilage at 3 Tesla

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Issue 4 2007
Jin Zuo PhD
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of quantitative cartilage imaging with parallel imaging at 3T and to determine the impact of the acceleration factor (AF) on morphological and relaxation measurements. Materials and Methods An eight-channel phased-array knee coil was employed for conventional and parallel imaging on a 3T scanner. The imaging protocol consisted of a T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE), a 3D-spoiled gradient echo (SPGR), a custom 3D-SPGR T1rho, and a 3D-SPGR T2 sequence. Parallel imaging was performed with an array spatial sensitivity technique (ASSET). The left knees of six healthy volunteers were scanned with both conventional and parallel imaging (AF = 2). Results Morphological parameters and relaxation maps from parallel imaging methods (AF = 2) showed comparable results with conventional method. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the two methods for cartilage volume, mean cartilage thickness, T1rho, and T2 were 0.999, 0.977, 0.964, and 0.969, respectively, while demonstrating excellent reproducibility. No significant measurement differences were found when AF reached 3 despite the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Conclusion The study demonstrated that parallel imaging can be applied to current knee cartilage quantification at AF = 2 without degrading measurement accuracy with good reproducibility while effectively reducing scan time. Shorter imaging times can be achieved with higher AF at the cost of SNR. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26:1001,1009. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: Precision and inter-subject variability

Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 10 2003
R. Burgkart
Objective T scores (an indicator of the difference between patients and young healthy subjects) and Z scores (an indicator of the difference between patients and age-matched healthy subjects) are used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and form the current basis for the definition of osteoporosis by the World Health Organization. We tested the feasibility of using T and Z scores derived from quantitative cartilage imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). Methods High-resolution MR images of tibial cartilage were acquired from 126 young healthy adults (ages 20,35 years), 24 age-matched elderly healthy adults (ages 50,75 years), 7 OA patients prior to tibial osteotomy, and 7 OA patients prior to knee arthroplasty. Cartilage volume, thickness, surface area, and original joint surface area (before onset of disease) were determined in the medial and lateral tibia. Results The cartilage volume of the medial tibia of osteotomy patients with varus malalignment displayed moderate T scores (,1.0), and more negative T scores (,3.8) were observed in knee arthroplasty patients with varus malalignment. Normalization of the cartilage volume to the original joint surface area substantially enhanced the scores in patients undergoing osteotomy (,2.3) and in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty (,5.5), and this was superior to the normalization ratios of cartilage volume to body height and cartilage volume to body weight, in terms of distinguishing the loss of articular cartilage. Conclusion Quantitative analysis of OA by MRI is feasible using T and Z scores. However, cartilage volume should be normalized to the individual joint surface area in order to maximize the discriminatory power of this technique for the diagnosis of OA. [source]