Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Pustular Eruption (pustular + eruption)
Selected AbstractsPainful pustular eruption in the groin and the scrotum induced by erlotinibJOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY & VENEREOLOGY, Issue 4 2008E Cholongitas [source] Cutaneous Pustular Leukemoid Reactions in Trisomy 21PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2003Joanna M. Burch, M.D. The white blood cell (WBC) counts on the first day of life were markedly elevated, with blasts seen on examination of the peripheral blood smear. The skin eruptions progressed and became pustular. Viral and bacterial cultures were negative. Skin examination revealed pustules on an erythematous base on the cheeks, shoulders, trunk, and proximal extremities. Skin biopsy specimens showed an intraepidermal pustule with an inflammatory infiltrate including neutrophils, eosinophils, and mononuclear cells. The mononuclear cells had atypical, immature-appearing nuclei. In patient 1, these cells were strongly myeloperoxidase positive on immunohistochemistry, indicating myeloid lineage. In patient 2, these cells were CD3-positive T cells. Patient 1 received a 5-day infusion of continuous cytarabine (ara-C) secondary to high WBC counts and symptomatic hyperviscosity. During therapy, the high WBC count and the pustules resolved. The lesions of patient 2 improved with topical mometasone furoate and resolved as her WBC count decreased. Recently, similar cases have been reported. Transient myeloproliferative disorders, or leukemoid reactions, should always be considered when newborns with Down syndrome or trisomy 21 mosaicism develop a pustular eruption. [source] Successful treatment of a 9-year-old boy affected by acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau with targeted ultraviolet B narrow-band phototherapyPHOTODERMATOLOGY, PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, Issue 1 2010Matteo Bordignon Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) consists of a relapsing pustular eruption of the distal portions of hands and feet. We described a case of a 9-year-old boy affected by ACH, successfully treated with targeted ultraviolet B 311 nm phototherapy, which seems to be an effective and safe therapy for this condition. [source] Subcorneal pustular dermatosis: 50 years onCLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2008S. Cheng Summary We review the key developments in our understanding of subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SCPD, also known as Sneddon,Wilkinson disease) over the past 50 years. SCPD is a rare, chronic, sterile pustular eruption that was first described by Sneddon and Wilkinson in 1956. The primary lesions are pea-sized pustules classically described as half-pustular, half-clear flaccid fluid blisters. Histologically the salient feature is a subcorneal accumulation of neutrophils, suggesting the presence of chemoattractants such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF), in the uppermost epidermis. However, to date its exact pathophysiology is unknown. Cases in association with pyoderma gangrenosum, benign monoclonal IgA gammopathy and multiple myeloma are well documented. There are anecdotal reports of SCPD associated with other internal malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, thymoma, apudoma and epidermoid carcinoma of the lung. The treatment of choice is dapsone. Therapeutic alternatives include retinoids, phototreatment with psoralen ultraviolet (UV) A, broadband or narrow band UVB and corticosteroids. Anecdotal uses of tacalcitol, ketoconazole, azithromycin, tetracycline, minocycline, vitamin E, ciclosporin, colchicine, mizoribine, mebhydrolin, infliximab and adalimumab with mycophenolate mofetil have all been reported. [source] Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) , A clinical reaction patternJOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY, Issue 3 2001Alexis Sidoroff Background: A wide range of diseases or reactions can cause pustular eruptions of the skin. In this spectrum there seems to be a subgroup with characteristic clinical features and a typical course which is mostly caused by drugs for which the term acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) has been established. Objective: To describe the clinical features of AGEP. Methods: The authors' experience from a multinational epidemiological study on severe cutaneous adverse reactions and a comprehensive review of the literature were used to provide an overview of the disease and it's possible causes. An algorithm for validating cases which was established for this study is also presented. Results: AGEP typically presents with at least dozens of non follicular sterile pustules occurring on a diffuse, edematous erythema predominalty in the folds and/or on the face. Fever and elevated blood neutrophils are common. Histopathology typically shows spongiform subcorneal and/or intraepidermal pustules, a marked edema of the papillary dermis, and eventually vasculitis, eosinophils and/or focal necrosis of keratinocytes. Onset is acute, most often following drug intake, but viral infections can also trigger the disease. Pustules resolve spontaneously in less than 15 days. Conclusion: The diagnosis AGEP should be considered in cases of acute pustular rashes and detection of the causative drug should be strived for. Knowledge of the clinical features and usual course of this disease can often prevent unnecessary therapeutical measures. [source] Evidence-based review of lasers, light sources and photodynamic therapy in the treatment of acne vulgarisJOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY & VENEREOLOGY, Issue 3 2008M Hædersdal Abstract Background, There is a considerable need for effective and safe treatment for acne vulgaris. Objective, In a systematic review with an evidence-based approach to assess the effects of optical treatments for acne vulgaris. Methods, Original publications of controlled clinical trials were identified through searches in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Results, A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 3 controlled trials (CT) were identified, involving a total of 587 patients. Interventions included photodynamic therapy (PDT; 5 RCTs), infrared lasers (4 RCTs), broad-spectrum light sources (3 RCTs, 1 CT), pulsed dye lasers (PDL; 2 RCTs, 1 CT), intense pulsed light (IPL; 1 RCTs, 2 CTs), and potassium titanyl phosphate laser (1 RCT). The randomization method was mentioned in 6 of 16 RCTs, and one trial described adequate allocation concealment. Most trials were intraindividual trials (12 of 19), which applied blinded response evaluations (12 of 19) and assessed a short-term efficacy up to 12 weeks after treatment (17 of 19). Based on the present best available evidence, we conclude that optical treatments possess the potential to improve inflammatory acne on a short-term basis with the most consistent outcomes for PDT [up to 68% improvement, aminolevulinic acid (ALA), methyl-aminolevulinic acid (MAL) and red light]. IPL-assisted PDT seems to be superior to IPL alone. Only two trials compare optical vs. conventional treatments, and further studies are needed. Side-effects from optical treatments included pain, erythema, oedema, crusting, hyperpigmentation, pustular eruptions and were more intense for treatments combined with ALA or MAL. Conclusion, Evidence from controlled clinical trials indicates a short-term efficacy from optical treatments for acne vulgaris with the most consistent outcomes for PDT. We recommend that patients are preoperatively informed of the existing evidence, which indicates that optical treatments today are not included among first line treatments. [source] | ||||||||||