Home  About us  Contact
 

Protamine Suspension (protamine + suspension)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Protamine Suspension

  • insulin lispro protamine suspension
    		•
  • lispro protamine suspension
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Addition of insulin lispro protamine suspension or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens: a randomized trial

    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 10 2010
    K. Strojek
    Aims: The addition of basal insulin to existing oral therapy can help patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) achieve glycaemic targets. This study compares the efficacy and safety of insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) and insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with T2D and inadequate control on oral antihyperglycaemic medication (OAM). Materials and Methods: An open-label, randomized, multicentre, multinational 24-week study of 471 patients receiving ,2 OAMs for ,3 months with a body mass index between 25 and 45 kg/m2 and HbA1c 7.5,10.0% was conducted. ILPS was injected once or twice daily vs. glargine injected once daily plus prestudy OAMs. Primary objective compared the HbA1c change from baseline. Results: HbA1c change from baseline to endpoint was similar in both groups [,1.46% (ILPS) and ,1.41% (glargine)]. Least-squares mean difference (95% CI) for HbA1c (,0.05 [,0.21, 0.11]%), glycaemic variability (0.06 [,0.06, 0.19] mmol/l) and weight change (,0.01 [,0.61, 0.59] kg) showed non-inferiority (margins of 0.4%, 0.8 mmol/l and 1.5 kg, respectively). Percentages of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% were 43.8% ILPS and 41.2% glargine. Mean daily insulin dose was 0.39 vs. 0.35 U/kg (p = 0.02) and weight gain was 1.04 vs. 1.07 kg for ILPS vs. glargine (p = 0.98). Overall hypoglycaemia (episodes/patient/year) was similar for ILPS and glargine (24.2 ± 28.8 vs. 23.0 ± 30.9); nocturnal (6.1 ± 10.6 vs. 4.1 ± 9.4, p < 0.001) rates were higher for ILPS. Severe hypoglycaemia was higher for ILPS vs. glargine (n = 9 vs. n = 2; p = 0.04). Conclusions: At endpoint, ILPS was non-inferior to glargine in HbA1c change from baseline, but associated with increased risk of hypoglycaemia. [source]

    Comparison of insulin lispro protamine suspension and insulin detemir in basal-bolus therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes

    DIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 5 2010
    A. R. Chacra
    Diabet. Med. 27, 563,569 (2010) Abstract Aims, The efficacy of two basal insulins, insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) and insulin detemir, was compared in basal-bolus regimens in Type 1 diabetes. Methods, In this 32-week, multinational, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial, adult patients with Type 1 diabetes received ILPS or insulin detemir, injected twice daily (before breakfast and bedtime) and prandial insulin lispro three times daily. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint. Results, Least squares mean (±se) changes in HbA1c were similar between groups, meeting non-inferiority (margin, 0.4%): ,0.69 ± 0.07% for ILPS and ,0.59 ± 0.07% for insulin detemir [between-treatment difference ,0.10%; 95% confidence interval (CI) ,0.29, 0.10]. Standard deviation of fasting blood glucose was similar (non-inferiority margin 0.8 mmol/l): 2.74 ± 0.14 mmol/l for ILPS and 2.38 ± 0.14 mmol/l for insulin detemir (CI ,0.03, 0.75). Patients on ILPS gained more weight (1.59 ± 0.23 kg vs. 0.62 ± 0.24 kg; CI 0.34, 1.60; margin 1.5 kg). Weight-adjusted daily total and prandial insulin doses were lower for ILPS (prandial insulin, 0.38 ± 0.01 U/kg/day for ILPS, 0.44 ± 0.01 U/kg/day for insulin detemir; P = 0.004); daily basal insulin dose was similar. All hypoglycaemia incidence and rate and nocturnal hypoglycaemia incidence were similar between groups; nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate was lower for insulin detemir (mean ± sd 0.79 ± 1.23 for ILPS, 0.49 ± 0.85 for insulin detemir; P = 0.001). Severe hypoglycaemia rate was 0.03 ± 0.11 for ILPS and 0.02 ± 0.10 for insulin detemir (P = 0.37). Conclusions, ILPS-treated patients with Type 1 diabetes achieved similar glycaemic control as insulin detemir-treated patients after 32 weeks. Glucose variability was similar. While weight gain and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate were statistically higher with ILPS, the clinical relevance is unclear. [source]