Home About us Contact | |||
Processing Firms (processing + firm)
Selected AbstractsIntegrating Poverty and Environmental Concerns into Value-Chain Analysis: A Strategic Framework and Practical GuideDEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, Issue 2 2010Lone Riisgaard This article aims to guide the design and implementation of action-research projects in value-chain analysis by presenting a strategic framework focused on small producers and trading and processing firms in developing countries. Its stepwise approach , building on the conceptual framework set out in a companion article , covers in detail what to do, questions to be asked and issues to be considered, and integrates poverty, gender, labour and environmental concerns.,Upgrading' strategies potentially available for improving value-chain participation for small producers are identified, with the ultimate purpose of increasing the rewards and/or reducing the risks. [source] Barriers to HACCP implementation: evidence from the food processing sector in Ontario, CanadaAGRIBUSINESS : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, Issue 2 2010Deepananda Herath This study explores the barriers that impede the adoption of hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) by food processing firms in Ontario, Canada. The study identifies four broad groupings of barriers to HACCP implementation, namely perceptions that HACCP is of "questionable appropriateness" to the firm, the scale of change required to achieve implementation, low priority given to enhancement of food safety controls, and financial constraints. The severity of these identified barriers differs significantly between firms that have implemented HACCP and those that have not. In particular, HACCP implementation is impeded significantly by barriers related to financial constraints. The most important driver promoting implementation is customer requirements for HACCP to be implemented in supplier facilities. [EconLit citations: D210, L600, L660]. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [source] Growth dynamics of dairy processing firms in the European UnionAGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, Issue 3-4 2010Cornelis Gardebroek EU dairy processing industry; Dynamic panel data; Firm growth Abstract The structure of the dairy processing industry in the European Union has changed enormously in recent decades. In many countries, the industry is characterized by a few large companies with a big market share accompanied by many small processors that often produce for niche markets. This article investigates which factors relate to growth of dairy processing firms. Using a unique 10-year panel data set and recently developed dynamic panel data estimators, the growth process of dairy processors is investigated for six rather diverse European countries. The data structure and the estimation method allow for dealing with endogeneity issues in an appropriate way. Firm size growth measured in total assets is found to be affected by firm size, firm age, and financial variables. Growth in number of employees is only affected by firm age and lagged labor productivity. Implications for these results are given in the final section of the article. [source] Manufacturing Site Location Preferences of Small Agribusiness FirmsJOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, Issue 3 2002Kim Jensen This study examined the perceived importance of site location characteristics identified in a 1999 survey of 198 small Tennessee agribusinesses. Responding firms ranked proximity to buyers/customers, labor, and raw materials above other factors. However, the relative importance of all factors varied by industry subsector. For example, compared to food processing firms, textile milling and lumber/wood products firms perceived community incentives as less important. Projected firm growth and current location also affected the perceived importance of site location factors. The diversity of perceived factor importance across agribusiness subsectors supports the idea that incentives and promotion of site location factors to attract small agribusiness may need to be tailored to meet specific firms' needs. [source] Does Canada Need Mandatory HACCP?CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, Issue 4 2006Evidence from the Ontario Food Processing Sector The likelihood of the voluntary adoption of hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) among food processing firms is evaluated by exploring the perceptions of food safety managers with respect to a range of possible motivating factors including the exogenous pressure to adopt HACCP, efficacy of existing food safety controls, perception that HACCP will improve the firm's food safety controls, relative costs and benefits of HACCP implementation, impact of HACCP on business performance, and the nature of barriers to implementing HACCP. While market-based factors exert substantial pressure on firms to adopt HACCP, many food safety managers perceive that their existing food safety controls are adequate to meet existing food safety demands. While good manufacturing practice (GMP) and traceability are considered the most efficacious food safety controls, HACCP is most often perceived to provide intangible and "incidental" benefits that are often not recognized by food safety managers a priori. An important barrier to the voluntary adoption of HACCP is the perceived questionable appropriateness of HACCP for enhancing food safety controls, while financial constraints can be an absolute barrier to implementation. The results suggest a number of potential strategies through which the implementation of HACCP might be facilitated and enhanced through cooperation and coordination between regulators and industry organizations. La probabilité que les entreprises de transformation des aliments adoptent volontairement le système HACCP (analyse des risques et maîtrise des points critiques) a étéévaluée en examinant les perceptions des gestionnaires de sécurité alimentaire envers certains facteurs de motivation possibles tels que la pression exogène, l'efficacité des moyens de contrôle existants, la perception voulant que le système HACCP améliore le contrôle de la sécurité alimentaire de l'entreprise, les coûts et les avantages relatifs de la mise en place du système, les répercussions du système sur la performance de l'entreprise et la nature des obstacles à la mise en place du système. Bien que des facteurs de marché exercent d'importantes pressions pour que les entreprises adoptent ce système, de nombreux gestionnaires de sécurité alimentaire estiment que leurs moyens de contrôle existants répondent adéquatement aux demandes actuelles de sécurité alimentaire. Bien que les bonnes pratiques de fabrication (BPF) et la traçabilité soient considérées comme les moyens de contrôle de la sécurité alimentaire les plus efficaces, le système HACCP est le plus souvent perçu comme procurant des avantages intangibles et ,accessoires, qui, souvent, ne sont pas reconnus a priori par les gestionnaires de sécurité alimentaire. La pertinence discutable perçue du système HACCP comme moyen d'améliorer le contrôle de la sécurité alimentaire constitue un important obstacle à l'adoption volontaire du système, bien que les contraintes financières peuvent être un obstacle absolu à sa mise en place. Les résultats suggèrent un certain nombre de stratégies potentielles grâce auxquelles la mise en place du système pourrait être facilitée et améliorée par la collaboration et la coordination entre les organismes de réglementation et les entreprises de l'industrie de la transformation des aliments. [source] Quality Measurement and Contract Design: Lessons from the North American Sugarbeet IndustryCANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, Issue 2 2004Brent Hueth This paper examines contracts used in the North American sugarbeet industry. Though quite similar in many respects, the contracts we study vary across processing firms in the set of quality measures used to condition contract payments to growers. This is somewhat surprising, given the homogeneous nature of the processors' finished product (refined sugar). It seems unlikely that processors differ significantly in how they value the various attributes of a sugarbeet, and such a difference is perhaps the most natural reason to expect variation in the structure of quality incentives across processors. Previous attempts to explain the observed variation in sugarbeet contracts have focused on differences in organizational form across firms. In this paper, we provide an alternative explanation that relies on variation across production regions in growers' ability to control the relevant measures of sugarbeet quality. Les auteurs se penchent sur les contrats utilisés dans l'industrie nord-américaine de la betterave sucrière. Bien qu'ils se ressemblent à maints égards, les contrats examinés varient d'un transformateur à l'autre quant au jeu de paramètres servant àévaluer la qualité du produit et à déterminer les sommes qu'on versera au producteur. La chose est surprenante étant donné le caractère homogène du produit fini (sucre raffiné). Il est peu probable que les transformateurs recourent à des méthodes fort différentes pour évaluer les paramètres de la betterave. Or, ce facteur constituerait normalement la raison la plus plausible pour expliquer la variation des incitatifs auxquels recourent les transformateurs Antérieurement, on a tenté d'expliquer les écarts relevés dans les contrats par les différences dans l'organisation des entreprises. L'article que voici propose une autre explication s'appuyant sur la compétence variable des producteurs à respecter les critères de qualité de la betterave sucrière selon la région. [source] |