Prostatic Volume (prostatic + volume)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Comparison of prostate and transition zone volume measured by the ellipsoid and planimetric methods with transrectal ultrasonography before seed implantation of prostate cancer

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 2 2008
Tetsuhiro Ikeda
Abstract: A total of 122 men who were diagnosed with localized prostatic cancer underwent transrectal ultrasound and the volumes of their prostates and transitional zones were obtained using the planimetric method and the ellipsoid method. Mean age was 64.2 ±13.4 (48.2,85.8), and mean preimplant prostate specific antigen was 6.01 ± 2.35 mg/mL (0.92,15.5). The clinical stage was T1c in 70 patients, T2a in 46 and T2b in 6. Prostatic volumes and transitional zone volumes obtained by the planimetric method were 18 % and 39% greater than those obtained by the ellipsoid method, respectively. There were significant differences between the volumes obtained by the two different methods. However, there was a good correlation between the prostatic volume and the transitional zone volume obtained by both the ellipsoid method (r = 0.851) and the planimetric method (r = 0.908). The regression line of the prostate volume between these two methods was calculated as . [source]


Combined transurethral resection of prostate and inguinal mesh hernioplasty

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 2 2006
E. Çimentepe
Summary We aimed to evaluate the difference among early post-operative morbidities of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), inguinal herniorrhaphy and their combination in this study. Between 1998 and 2004, 44 patients undergoing combined inguinal herniorrhaphy and TURP (Group I) were compared with 50 consecutive cases of TURP alone (Group II) and 50 consecutive cases of inguinal herniorrhaphy alone (Group III). There were no differences in the mean age and mean prostatic volume between Group I and II. The mean operation time and length of hospital stay were 126.1 ± 20.9 min, 3.0 ± 0.7 days for Group I, 61.4 ± 15.6 min and 2.9 ± 0.69 days for Group II and 55.0 ± 15.6 min and 1.2 ± 0.4 days for Group III, respectively. The mean operation time of Group I was found as longer than Group II and III. There were no significant differences among all groups regarding post-operative complications. No mesh infection was detected. Combined TURP and inguinal herniorrhaphy is a practical, safe and effective procedure. [source]


Comparison of prostate and transition zone volume measured by the ellipsoid and planimetric methods with transrectal ultrasonography before seed implantation of prostate cancer

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 2 2008
Tetsuhiro Ikeda
Abstract: A total of 122 men who were diagnosed with localized prostatic cancer underwent transrectal ultrasound and the volumes of their prostates and transitional zones were obtained using the planimetric method and the ellipsoid method. Mean age was 64.2 ±13.4 (48.2,85.8), and mean preimplant prostate specific antigen was 6.01 ± 2.35 mg/mL (0.92,15.5). The clinical stage was T1c in 70 patients, T2a in 46 and T2b in 6. Prostatic volumes and transitional zone volumes obtained by the planimetric method were 18 % and 39% greater than those obtained by the ellipsoid method, respectively. There were significant differences between the volumes obtained by the two different methods. However, there was a good correlation between the prostatic volume and the transitional zone volume obtained by both the ellipsoid method (r = 0.851) and the planimetric method (r = 0.908). The regression line of the prostate volume between these two methods was calculated as . [source]


Comparison of the Effect of the Aromatase Inhibitor, Anastrazole, to the Antioestrogen, Tamoxifen Citrate, on Canine Prostate and Semen

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, Issue 2009
G Gonzalez
Contents This study compared the efficiency of the aromatase inhibitor, anastrazole, with the antioestrogenic receptor blocker, tamoxifen, on normal (NRL) and hyperplastic prostate glands. Forty healthy dogs were classified as NRL (n = 18) or abnormal (ABN) with benign prostate hyperplasia (n = 22). The dogs were randomly assigned to one of the following six groups, treated for 60 days; oral placebo for normal (NRL-PLC; n = 6) and abnormal (ABN-PLC; n = 6), oral anastrazole 0.25,1 mg/day, for normal (NRL-ANZ, n = 6) and abnormal (ABN-ANZ, n = 8) and oral tamoxifen citrate 2.5,10 mg/day for normal (NRL-TMX; n = 6) and abnormal (ABN-TMX; n = 8) dogs. The dogs were evaluated before treatment and then monthly for 4 months. At the end of the treatment, the prostatic volume decreased by 28.5 ± 4.3%, 21.6 ± 6.3% and 0.7 ± 1.0% in the ABN-TMX, ABN-ANZ and ABN-PLC (p < 0.01), respectively. From then on, prostatic volume began to increase without reaching pre-treatment values at the end of the study. In the ABN animals, there were no differences for this parameter between ANZ and TMX treatment (p > 0.1), whereas in the NRL animals ANZ produced a less pronounced decrease (p < 0.05), libido, testicular consistency and scrotal diameter decreased during treatment in the TMX group (p > 0.05). These parameters and sperm volume, count, motility and morphological abnormalities remained unaltered throughout the study in the ANZ and PLC groups (p > 0.05). There were no haematological nor biochemical side effects. Anastrazole might offer a safe and effective alternative for the medical management of dogs with benign prostatic hyperplasia. [source]