Home About us Contact | |||
Primary Patency (primary + patency)
Terms modified by Primary Patency Selected AbstractsFluoropolymer coated Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypass grafting: a multicentre trialANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2003Brett I. Robinson Background: This trial was designed to compare graft patency between expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and fluoropolymer coated Dacron for femoropopliteal bypass in patients in whom saphenous vein was unavailable. Methods: A multicentre prospective trial randomized 129 patients (74 men, 55 women) who underwent femoropopliteal bypass using either a PTFE or fluoropolymer coated Dacron graft. The indication for operation was disabling claudication in 68 (52.7%) and critical limb ischaemia in 61 (47.3%) patients. Distal anastomosis was above the knee in 76 (58.9%) and below the knee in 53 (41.1%) patients. Results: Primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months was 71%, 56% and 47% for PTFE and 50%, 36% and 36% for fluoropolymer coated Dacron (P = 0.002), respectively. Secondary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months was 77%, 60% and 48% for PTFE and 66%, 49% and 46% for fluoropolymer coated Dacron (P = 0.13), respectively. The superior primary patency of PTFE over fluoropolymer coated Dacron was most evident in patients with poor prognostic indicators for graft survival: critical limb ischaemia (P = 0.001); below-knee anastomosis (P = 0.01); and smaller (6 mm) diameter grafts (P = 0.002). Graft thrombosis developed in the first month in 22 of 61 (36%) patients receiving fluoropolymer coated grafts compared to six of 68 (8.8%) patients receiving PTFE, which accounts for the difference in primary patency. Successful thrombectomy in 10 of the 22 fluoropolymer coated grafts resulted in similar secondary patency. Conclusion: Polytetrafluoroethylene has superior primary patency and similar secondary patency to fluoropolymer coated Dacron. These results support the preferential use of PTFE in patients with critical limb ischaemia, especially when a below-knee distal anastomosis and smaller diameter graft is required. [source] Prosthetic femoropopliteal bypass: randomized comparison of polytetrafluoroethylene and heparin-bonded DacronBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2000C. Devine Background: Dacron was largely abandoned for femoropopliteal bypass 30 years ago as saphenous vein achieved better patencies. As patency in prosthetic above-knee (AK) femoropopliteal bypass in patients on aspirin is equivalent to that with saphenous vein, heparin-bonded Dacron (HBD) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) have been compared in a randomized trial involving ten hospitals which also included below-knee (BK) popliteal or tibioperoneal trunk bypass where the long saphenous vein was absent or inadequate. Methods: Over a 28-month recruitment period, 209 patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass (180 AK, 29 BK) were randomized by the method of minimization to HBD (n = 106) or PTFE (n = 103). Aspirin 300 mg day,1 was started before surgery and continued unless the patient was intolerant. Results: Mean follow-up was 34 (range 19,48) months. Fifteen patients (7 per cent) died with patent grafts and three (1 per cent) infected grafts were removed. Patency (measured by Kaplan,Meier survival analysis) was 70, 63 and 55 per cent at 1, 2 and 3 years for HBD, compared with 56, 46 and 42 per cent respectively for PTFE (P = 0·0444). Patency at 3 years for AK bypass was significantly better than that for BK bypass. A total of 70 interventions were performed on 47 patients, achieving long-term patency in only three. Amputations were performed in 23 patients, six with HBD and 17 with PTFE grafts (P = 0·015, Fisher's exact test). Conclusion: In femoropopliteal bypass, primary patency was better with HBD than PTFE, and HBD was associated with a lower amputation rate. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] |