Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Pressure-sensitive Adhesives (pressure-sensitive + adhesive)
Selected AbstractsWaterborne, Nanocomposite Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives with High Tack Energy, Optical Transparency, and Electrical Conductivity,ADVANCED MATERIALS, Issue 20 2006T. Wang Transparent and conductive pressure-sensitive adhesives are cast from aqueous colloidal dispersions of poly(butyl acrylate) (P(BuA)) and functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs). At the percolation threshold for network formation (at only 0.3,wt,% functionalized CNT), the nanotubes remarkably double the amount of strain at adhesive failure and increase the adhesion energy by 85,% (see figure). The tack properties are explained by current models of adhesive debonding. [source] Empirical Modeling of Butyl Acrylate/Vinyl Acetate/Acrylic Acid Emulsion-Based Pressure-Sensitive AdhesivesMACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS & ENGINEERING, Issue 5 2004Renata Jovanovic Abstract Summary: Butyl acrylate/vinyl acetate/acrylic acid (BA/VAc/AA) emulsion latexes were produced in a semi-batch mode. The objective was to generate polymers with properties favoring their application as pressure-sensitive adhesives. The influence of the individual monomer concentrations on final properties such as glass transition temperature (Tg), peel strength, shear strength and tack was investigated. To obtain the maximum amount of information in a reasonable number of runs, a constrained three-component mixture design was used to define the experimental conditions. Latexes were coated onto a polyethylene terephthalate carrier and dried. Different empirical models (e.g. linear, quadratic and cubic mixture models) governing the individual properties (i.e. Tg, peel adhesion, shear resistance and tack) were developed and evaluated. In the given experimental region, no single model was found to fit all of the responses (i.e. the final properties). However, in all models the most significant factor affecting the final properties was the AA concentration, followed by the VAc concentration. Shear strength contour lines over the investigated region. [source] Waterborne, Nanocomposite Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives with High Tack Energy, Optical Transparency, and Electrical Conductivity,ADVANCED MATERIALS, Issue 20 2006T. Wang Transparent and conductive pressure-sensitive adhesives are cast from aqueous colloidal dispersions of poly(butyl acrylate) (P(BuA)) and functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs). At the percolation threshold for network formation (at only 0.3,wt,% functionalized CNT), the nanotubes remarkably double the amount of strain at adhesive failure and increase the adhesion energy by 85,% (see figure). The tack properties are explained by current models of adhesive debonding. [source] Effect of silica on viscosity, tack, and shear strength of epoxidized natural rubber-based pressure-sensitive adhesives in the presence of coumarone-indene resinJOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, Issue 6 2010Imran Khan Abstract The viscosity, loop tack, and shear strength of silica-filled epoxidized natural rubber (ENR 25 and ENR 50 grade) adhesive were investigated using coumarone-indene as the tackifying resin. Silica loading was varied from 10,50 parts per hundred parts of rubber (phr), whereas the coumarone-indene concentration was fixed at 40 phr. Toluene was used as the solvent throughout the study. Polyethylene terephthalate substrate was coated at various adhesive coating thicknesses, i.e., 30, 60, 90, and 120 ,m using a SHEEN Hand Coater. Viscosity of the adhesive was determined by a HAAKE Rotary Viscometer whereas loop tack and shear strength were measured by a Llyod Adhesion Tester operating at 30 cm/min. Result shows that viscosity of the adhesive increases gradually with increase of silica loading due to the concentration effect of the filler. Both loop tack and shear strength show maximum value at 40 phr silica for ENR 25. However, the respective values for ENR 50 are 20 and 40 phr of filler. This observation is attributed to the maximum wettability and compatibility of adhesive on the substrate at the respective silica loadings. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010 [source] Preparation and flame retardancy of 2-EHA/n -BA acrylic PSA containing single and combined flame retardantsJOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, Issue 5 2010Eun-Young Park Abstract UV curable acrylic PSAs (pressure-sensitive adhesives) were modified with organic and inorganic flame retardants to improve flame retardancy of PSAs minimize the sacrifice of adhesion properties. The flame retardancy (UL-94 test) of acrylic PSAs were enhanced by the addition of 5,30 wt % of an organic flame retardant such as TCEP (Tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate), PBPE (pentabromophenyl ether), and TBBPA(3,3,5,5,-tetrabromobisphenol A). Especially, TBBPA is the best flame retardant for acrylic PSAs when it works alone. However, PSAs compounded with aluminum trihydroxide (Al(OH)3) showed a little reduction in burning time up to 30 wt %. An apparent synergic effect was observed only for an acrylic PSAs with a combination of TCEP and PBPE flame retardants. The addition of flame retardants brought a no significant effect on curing even in high amount. It was surmised that the miscibility between PSAs and flame retardant was closely related with flame retardancy and adhesion properties of acrylic PSAs. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010 [source] Adhesion properties of pressure-sensitive adhesives prepared from SMR 10/ENR 25, SMR 10/ENR 50, and ENR 25/ENR 50 blendsJOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, Issue 1 2008B. T. Poh Abstract The adhesion properties, i.e. viscosity, tack, and peel strength of pressure-sensitive adhesives prepared from natural rubber/epoxidized natural rubber blends were investigated using coumarone-indene resin and toluene as the tackifier and solvent respectively. One grade of natural rubber (SMR 10) and two grades of epoxidized natural rubbers (ENR 25 and ENR 50) were used to prepare the rubber blends with blend ratio ranging from 0 to 100%. Coumarone-indene resin content was fixed at 40 parts per hundred parts of rubber (phr) in the adhesive formulation. The viscosity of adhesive was measured by a HAAKE Rotary Viscometer whereas loop tack and peel strength was determined using a Lloyd Adhesion Tester operating at 30 cm/min. Results show that the viscosity of the adhesive passes through a minimum value at 20% blend ratio. For loop tack and peel strength, it indicates a maximum at 60% blend ratio for SMR 10/ENR 25 and SMR 10/ENR 50 systems. However, for ENR 25/ENR 50 blend, maximum value is observed at 80% blend ratio. SMR 10/ENR 25 blend consistently exhibits the best adhesion property in this study, an observation which is attributed to the optimum compatibility between rubbers and wettability of adhesive on the substrate. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008 [source] Morphological and Physical Properties of Triblock Copolymers of Methyl Methacrylate and 2-Ethylhexyl MethacrylateMACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS & ENGINEERING, Issue 9 2006Hormoz Eslami Abstract Summary: Triblock copolymers of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) [that is, poly(MMA,EHMA,MMA)] were prepared by an emulsion atom-transfer radical polymerization. The relationships of their structural, morphological, and physical properties were investigated. The latex particles had core-shell morphologies and the block copolymers experienced phase separation. Small latex particles with a low number of cores could deform and wet silicon-wafer surfaces, but the deformation of large latex particles was restricted by the internal two-phase morphology of the particles. Latex casting produced continuous pinhole-free films, in which hard poly(MMA) (PMMA) cores of different latex particles merged and provided interparticle connections. The morphology of solution-cast films depended on block composition, solvent type, and film thickness. For all the prepared polymer samples, thick films cast in toluene had poly(EHMA) (PEHMA) materials at air surface, whereas those cast in tetrahydrofuran had a sponge-like PMMA surface structure. Thin toluene-cast films from P(MMA,EHMA,MMA) with the block degrees of polymerization () 200,930,200 showed spherical PMMA domains and those from 380,930,380 yielded a protruded worm-like PMMA structure. The copolymer materials were coated on a glass surface for peeling tests. The films gave good hot-melt adhesion properties when the of the PEHMA block was over 600. The peeling strength depended on the lengths of both PEHMA and PMMA blocks. The P(MMA,EHMA,MMA) sample with of 310,930,310 yielded the highest peeling strength of 7.4 kgf,·,inch,1. The developed material is demonstrated to be a good candidate for a solvent-free, hot-melt, pressure-sensitive adhesives for special-purpose applications such as medical tapes and labels. [source] Empirical Modeling of Butyl Acrylate/Vinyl Acetate/Acrylic Acid Emulsion-Based Pressure-Sensitive AdhesivesMACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS & ENGINEERING, Issue 5 2004Renata Jovanovic Abstract Summary: Butyl acrylate/vinyl acetate/acrylic acid (BA/VAc/AA) emulsion latexes were produced in a semi-batch mode. The objective was to generate polymers with properties favoring their application as pressure-sensitive adhesives. The influence of the individual monomer concentrations on final properties such as glass transition temperature (Tg), peel strength, shear strength and tack was investigated. To obtain the maximum amount of information in a reasonable number of runs, a constrained three-component mixture design was used to define the experimental conditions. Latexes were coated onto a polyethylene terephthalate carrier and dried. Different empirical models (e.g. linear, quadratic and cubic mixture models) governing the individual properties (i.e. Tg, peel adhesion, shear resistance and tack) were developed and evaluated. In the given experimental region, no single model was found to fit all of the responses (i.e. the final properties). However, in all models the most significant factor affecting the final properties was the AA concentration, followed by the VAc concentration. Shear strength contour lines over the investigated region. [source] | ||||||||||