Home About us Contact | |||
Predator Control (predator + control)
Selected AbstractsCarnivore-Livestock Conflicts: Effects of Subsidized Predator Control and Economic Correlates on the Sheep IndustryCONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2006KIM MURRAY BERGER Canis latrans; coyotes; depredación; evaluación de política Abstract:,Despite the importance of carnivores in terrestrial ecosystems, many nations have implemented well-coordinated, state-funded initiatives to remove predators, largely because of conflicts with humans over livestock. Although these control efforts have been successful in terms of the number of carnivores removed, their effects on the viability of the industries they seek to protect are less understood. I assessed the efficacy of long-term efforts by the U.S. government to improve the viability of the sheep industry by reducing predation losses. I used regression analysis and hierarchical partitioning of a 60-year data set to explore associations among changes in sheep numbers and factors such as predator control effort, market prices, and production costs. In addition, I compared trends in the sheep industry in the western United States, where predator control is subsidized and coyotes (Canis latrans) are abundant, with trends in eastern states that lack federally subsidized predator control and that were (1) colonized by coyotes before 1950 or (2) colonized by coyotes between 1950 and 1990. Although control efforts were positively correlated with fluctuations in sheep numbers, production costs and market prices explained most of the model variation, with a combined independent contribution of 77%. Trends in sheep numbers in eastern and western states were highly correlated (r ,0.942) independent of the period during which they were colonized by coyotes, indicating either that control has been ineffective at reducing predation losses or that factors other than predation account for the declines in both regions. These results suggest that government-subsidized predator control has failed to prevent the decline in the sheep industry and alternative support mechanisms need to be developed if the goal is to increase sheep production and not simply to kill carnivores. Resumen:,A pesar de la importancia de carnívoros en los ecosistemas terrestres, muchos países han implementado iniciativas bien coordinadas, financiadas por el gobierno, para remover depredadores, principalmente debido a conflictos entre humanos y ganado. Aunque estos esfuerzos de control han sido exitosos en términos del número de carnívoros removidos, sus efectos sobre la viabilidad de las industrias que se busca proteger son poco comprendidos. Evalué la eficacia de los esfuerzos a largo plazo del gobierno de E.U.A. para mejorar la viabilidad de la industria ovina mediante la reducción de pérdidas por depredación. Utilicé análisis de regresión y partición jerárquica de un conjunto de datos de 60 años para explorar asociaciones entre cambios en el número de ovejas y factores como el esfuerzo de control de depredadores, precios de mercado y costos de producción. Adicionalmente comparé las tendencias en la industria ovina en el oeste de Estados Unidos, donde el control de depredadores está subsidiado y los coyotes (Canis latrans) son abundantes, con las tendencias en los estados orientales que carecen de control subsidiado federalmente y que fueron (1) colonizados por coyotes antes de 1950 o (2) colonizados por coyotes entre 1950 y 1990. Aunque los esfuerzos de control se correlacionaron positivamente con las fluctuaciones en el número de ovejas, los costos de producción y los precios de mercado explicaron la mayor parte de la variación del modelo, con una contribución independiente combinada de 77%. Las tendencias en el número de ovejas en los estados orientales y occidentales estaban muy correlacionadas (r , 0.942) independientemente del período en que fueron colonizados por coyotes, lo que indica que el control ha sido ineficiente en la reducción de depredación o que factores, distintos a la depredación, son responsables de las declinaciones en ambas regiones. Estos resultados sugieren que el control subsidiado por el gobierno ha fallado en prevenir la declinación de la industria ovina y que se necesitan desarrollar mecanismos de soporte alternativos si la meta es incrementar la producción de ovejas y no simplemente matar carnívoros. [source] Predator control of ecosystem nutrient dynamicsECOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 10 2010Oswald J. Schmitz Abstract Predators are predominantly valued for their ability to control prey, as indicators of high levels of biodiversity and as tourism attractions. This view, however, is incomplete because it does not acknowledge that predators may play a significant role in the delivery of critical life-support services such as ecosystem nutrient cycling. New research is beginning to show that predator effects on nutrient cycling are ubiquitous. These effects emerge from direct nutrient excretion, egestion or translocation within and across ecosystem boundaries after prey consumption, and from indirect effects mediated by predator interactions with prey. Depending on their behavioural ecology, predators can create heterogeneous or homogeneous nutrient distributions across natural landscapes. Because predator species are disproportionately vulnerable to elimination from ecosystems, we stand to lose much more from their disappearance than their simple charismatic attractiveness. [source] Survival rates, causes of failure and productivity of Skylark Alauda arvensis nests on lowland farmlandIBIS, Issue 4 2002P. F. Donald This paper analyses data from 995 Skylark Alauda arvensis nests found on lowland farms in southern England from 1996 to 1998. The majority of recorded nest failures were caused by predation except in agricultural grass, where trampling and agricultural operations were equally important. Nest survival rates varied between crop types, nests in cereals being around twice as likely to succeed as nests in grass or set-aside. In cereals, nest survival rates increased with increasing distance from the nearest tramline and declined over the course of the breeding season. Predator control also had a significant independent effect on nest survival rates. On one farm where many other factors were held constant, a highly significant increase in nest survival rates from 12.3% to 40.7% coincided with the introduction of intensive predator control, which also appeared to bring forward mean laying dates. Most environmental factors explaining significant variation in nest survival rates did so only at the chick stage. The mean number of chicks produced per nesting attempt was 1.26 in cereals, 0.78 in set-aside and 0.63 in grass, the differences being due primarily to variation in nest survival rates. Low densities of Skylark territories in cereal crops are not therefore the consequence of low breeding success at the scale of the individual nest and probably reflect limitations on the number of attempts made in a season. Measures taken to improve the attractiveness of cereal crops as a nesting habitat for Skylarks, and beneficial changes in grassland management, are likely to increase overall productivity. [source] Carnivore-Livestock Conflicts: Effects of Subsidized Predator Control and Economic Correlates on the Sheep IndustryCONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2006KIM MURRAY BERGER Canis latrans; coyotes; depredación; evaluación de política Abstract:,Despite the importance of carnivores in terrestrial ecosystems, many nations have implemented well-coordinated, state-funded initiatives to remove predators, largely because of conflicts with humans over livestock. Although these control efforts have been successful in terms of the number of carnivores removed, their effects on the viability of the industries they seek to protect are less understood. I assessed the efficacy of long-term efforts by the U.S. government to improve the viability of the sheep industry by reducing predation losses. I used regression analysis and hierarchical partitioning of a 60-year data set to explore associations among changes in sheep numbers and factors such as predator control effort, market prices, and production costs. In addition, I compared trends in the sheep industry in the western United States, where predator control is subsidized and coyotes (Canis latrans) are abundant, with trends in eastern states that lack federally subsidized predator control and that were (1) colonized by coyotes before 1950 or (2) colonized by coyotes between 1950 and 1990. Although control efforts were positively correlated with fluctuations in sheep numbers, production costs and market prices explained most of the model variation, with a combined independent contribution of 77%. Trends in sheep numbers in eastern and western states were highly correlated (r ,0.942) independent of the period during which they were colonized by coyotes, indicating either that control has been ineffective at reducing predation losses or that factors other than predation account for the declines in both regions. These results suggest that government-subsidized predator control has failed to prevent the decline in the sheep industry and alternative support mechanisms need to be developed if the goal is to increase sheep production and not simply to kill carnivores. Resumen:,A pesar de la importancia de carnívoros en los ecosistemas terrestres, muchos países han implementado iniciativas bien coordinadas, financiadas por el gobierno, para remover depredadores, principalmente debido a conflictos entre humanos y ganado. Aunque estos esfuerzos de control han sido exitosos en términos del número de carnívoros removidos, sus efectos sobre la viabilidad de las industrias que se busca proteger son poco comprendidos. Evalué la eficacia de los esfuerzos a largo plazo del gobierno de E.U.A. para mejorar la viabilidad de la industria ovina mediante la reducción de pérdidas por depredación. Utilicé análisis de regresión y partición jerárquica de un conjunto de datos de 60 años para explorar asociaciones entre cambios en el número de ovejas y factores como el esfuerzo de control de depredadores, precios de mercado y costos de producción. Adicionalmente comparé las tendencias en la industria ovina en el oeste de Estados Unidos, donde el control de depredadores está subsidiado y los coyotes (Canis latrans) son abundantes, con las tendencias en los estados orientales que carecen de control subsidiado federalmente y que fueron (1) colonizados por coyotes antes de 1950 o (2) colonizados por coyotes entre 1950 y 1990. Aunque los esfuerzos de control se correlacionaron positivamente con las fluctuaciones en el número de ovejas, los costos de producción y los precios de mercado explicaron la mayor parte de la variación del modelo, con una contribución independiente combinada de 77%. Las tendencias en el número de ovejas en los estados orientales y occidentales estaban muy correlacionadas (r , 0.942) independientemente del período en que fueron colonizados por coyotes, lo que indica que el control ha sido ineficiente en la reducción de depredación o que factores, distintos a la depredación, son responsables de las declinaciones en ambas regiones. Estos resultados sugieren que el control subsidiado por el gobierno ha fallado en prevenir la declinación de la industria ovina y que se necesitan desarrollar mecanismos de soporte alternativos si la meta es incrementar la producción de ovejas y no simplemente matar carnívoros. [source] Keeping the herds healthy and alert: implications of predator control for infectious diseaseECOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 9 2003Craig Packer Abstract Predator control programmes are generally implemented in an attempt to increase prey population sizes. However, predator removal could prove harmful to prey populations that are regulated primarily by parasitic infections rather than by predation. We develop models for microparasitic and macroparasitic infection that specify the conditions where predator removal will (a) increase the incidence of parasitic infection, (b) reduce the number of healthy individuals in the prey population and (c) decrease the overall size of the prey population. In general, predator removal is more likely to be harmful when the parasite is highly virulent, macroparasites are highly aggregated in their prey, hosts are long-lived and the predators select infected prey. [source] Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old-field ecosystemECOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 2 2003Oswald J. Schmitz Abstract Predators can have strong indirect effects on plants by altering the way herbivores impact plants. Yet, many current evaluations of plant species diversity and ecosystem function ignore the effects of predators and focus directly on the plant trophic level. This report presents results of a 3-year field experiment in a temperate old-field ecosystem that excluded either predators, or predators and herbivores and evaluated the consequence of those manipulations on plant species diversity (richness and evenness) and plant productivity. Sustained predator and predator and herbivore exclusion resulted in lower plant species evenness and higher plant biomass production than control field plots representing the intact natural ecosystem. Predators had this diversity-enhancing effect on plants by causing herbivores to suppress the abundance of a competitively dominant plant species that offered herbivores a refuge from predation risk. [source] Survival rates, causes of failure and productivity of Skylark Alauda arvensis nests on lowland farmlandIBIS, Issue 4 2002P. F. Donald This paper analyses data from 995 Skylark Alauda arvensis nests found on lowland farms in southern England from 1996 to 1998. The majority of recorded nest failures were caused by predation except in agricultural grass, where trampling and agricultural operations were equally important. Nest survival rates varied between crop types, nests in cereals being around twice as likely to succeed as nests in grass or set-aside. In cereals, nest survival rates increased with increasing distance from the nearest tramline and declined over the course of the breeding season. Predator control also had a significant independent effect on nest survival rates. On one farm where many other factors were held constant, a highly significant increase in nest survival rates from 12.3% to 40.7% coincided with the introduction of intensive predator control, which also appeared to bring forward mean laying dates. Most environmental factors explaining significant variation in nest survival rates did so only at the chick stage. The mean number of chicks produced per nesting attempt was 1.26 in cereals, 0.78 in set-aside and 0.63 in grass, the differences being due primarily to variation in nest survival rates. Low densities of Skylark territories in cereal crops are not therefore the consequence of low breeding success at the scale of the individual nest and probably reflect limitations on the number of attempts made in a season. Measures taken to improve the attractiveness of cereal crops as a nesting habitat for Skylarks, and beneficial changes in grassland management, are likely to increase overall productivity. [source] Predicting the effects of perturbations on ecological communities: what can qualitative models offer?JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 5 2005DAVE RAMSEY Summary 1Quantitative predictions of the effects of perturbations on communities of interacting species have often proved to be difficult. However, if precise predictions are not a requirement then qualitative models of community dynamics offer an alternative method for predicting species responses to perturbations. 2We used two qualitative modelling approaches to predict the effects of predator control on the fledging rate of an endangered New Zealand bird, the North Island kokako. The first approach was based on loop analysis and provided predictions on the probable direction of change in species abundances to single species perturbations. The second approach, ,fuzzy interaction webs', used fuzzy logic in the framework of a fuzzy cognitive map to provide predictions on the probable magnitude of change in species abundances to perturbations. 3Using both methods, we predicted the qualitative change in the equilibrium fledging rates of kokako under various regimes of single- and multispecies predator control (ship rats, brushtail possums and stoats). Single species control was insufficient to lift the fledging rate from ,low' to ,moderate'. However, simultaneous control of both ship rats and possums had the greatest influence on the fledging rates compared with any other combination as a result of the additional indirect effect of ship rat control on stoat abundance. 4We propose qualitative modelling of community dynamics as a method suitable for predicting the effects of perturbations in complex ecological communities that can encapsulate diverse sources of knowledge about food web interactions. We believe that these methods are a useful set of heuristic tools that can be used to propose testable hypotheses about ecosystem functioning that can complement existing statistical and quantitative modelling approaches. [source] Non-target impacts of poison baiting for predator control in AustraliaMAMMAL REVIEW, Issue 3 2007A. S. GLEN ABSTRACT 1Mammalian predators are controlled by poison baiting in many parts of the world, often to alleviate their impacts on agriculture or the environment. Although predator control can have substantial benefits, the poisons used may also be potentially harmful to other wildlife. 2Impacts on non-target species must be minimized, but can be difficult to predict or quantify. Species and individuals vary in their sensitivity to toxins and their propensity to consume poison baits, while populations vary in their resilience. Wildlife populations can accrue benefits from predator control, which outweigh the occasional deaths of non-target animals. We review recent advances in Australia, providing a framework for assessing non-target effects of poisoning operations and for developing techniques to minimize such effects. We also emphasize that weak or circumstantial evidence of non-target effects can be misleading. 3Weak evidence that poison baiting presents a potential risk to non-target species comes from measuring the sensitivity of species to the toxin in the laboratory. More convincing evidence may be obtained by quantifying susceptibility in the field. This requires detailed information on the propensity of animals to locate and consume poison baits, as well as the likelihood of mortality if baits are consumed. Still stronger evidence may be obtained if predator baiting causes non-target mortality in the field (with toxin detected by post-mortem examination). Conclusive proof of a negative impact on populations of non-target species can be obtained only if any observed non-target mortality is followed by sustained reductions in population density. 4Such proof is difficult to obtain and the possibility of a population-level impact cannot be reliably confirmed or dismissed without rigorous trials. In the absence of conclusive evidence, wildlife managers should adopt a precautionary approach which seeks to minimize potential risk to non-target individuals, while clarifying population-level effects through continued research. [source] Evidence for top predator control of a grazing ecosystemOIKOS, Issue 11 2008Douglas A. Frank The importance of top predators in controlling ecological processes in large, intact ecosystems is unclear. In grasslands that support abundant ungulates, top,down control by predators may be particularly important, because of the tight biogeochemical linkages of ungulate prey with plants and soil microbes. Here, I examined the effects of the recent reintroduction of the gray wolf Canis lupus on ecosystem processes in Yellowstone National Park, where herds of grazing ungulates previously have been shown to stimulate several processes, including soil net nitrogen (N) mineralization. Rates of ungulate grazing intensity and soil net N mineralization were compared before and after wolf reintroduction in grasslands ranging five-fold in aboveground production. Grazing intensity and grassland net N mineralization declined after wolf reintroduction, a likely partial function of fewer ungulates; wolf predation has been one of several factors implicated in causing the decline in Yellowstone ungulates. In addition, the spatial pattern of grazing and net N mineralization changed after reintroduction. A shift in the spatial patterns of grazer-associated processes is consistent with a growing body of work indicating that wolves have changed habitat use patterns of ungulates in Yellowstone National Park. These findings suggest widespread wolf effects on ungulate prey, plants, and microbial activity that have spatially reorganized grassland energy and nutrient dynamics in Yellowstone Park. [source] Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife managementBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 3 2005Alistair S. Glen ABSTRACT Mammalian carnivore populations are often intensively managed, either because the carnivore in question is endangered, or because it is viewed as a pest and is subjected to control measures, or both. Most management programmes treat carnivore species in isolation. However, there is a large and emerging body of evidence to demonstrate that populations of different carnivores interact with each other in a variety of complex ways. Thus, the removal or introduction of predators to or from a system can often affect other species in ways that are difficult to predict. Wildlife managers must consider such interactions when planning predator control programmes. Integrated predator control will require a greater understanding of the complex relationships between species. In many parts of the world, sympatric species of carnivores have coexisted over an evolutionary time scale so that niche differentiation has occurred, and competition is difficult to observe. Australia has experienced numerous introductions during the past 200 years, including those of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the feral cat (Felis catus). These species now exist in sympatry with native mammalian predators, providing ecologists with the opportunity to study their interactions without the confounding effects of coevolution. Despite an increasing body of observational evidence for complex interactions among native and introduced predators in Australia, few studies have attempted to clarify these relationships experimentally, and the interactions remain largely unacknowledged. A greater understanding of these interactions would provide ecologists and wildlife managers world-wide with the ability to construct robust predictive models of carnivore communities, and to identify their broader effects on ecosystem functioning. We suggest that future research should focus on controlled and replicated predator removal or addition experiments. The dingo (Canis lupus dingo), as a likely keystone species, should be a particular focus of attention. [source] |