Home  About us  Contact
 

Practitioner Clinic (practitioner + clinic)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics in adult patients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED HEALTHCARE, Issue 1 2005
Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep) MNSc
Executive summary Background, Coronary heart disease is the major cause of illness and death in Western countries and this is likely to increase as the average age of the population rises. Consumers with established coronary heart disease are at the highest risk of experiencing further coronary events. Lifestyle measures can contribute significantly to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality in established coronary heart disease. Improved management of cardiac risk factors by providing education and referrals as required has been suggested as one way of maintaining quality care in patients with established coronary heart disease. There is a need to ascertain whether or not nurse-led clinics would be an effective adjunct for patients with coronary heart disease to supplement general practitioner advice and care. Objectives, The objective of this review was to present the best available evidence related to nurse-led cardiac clinics. Inclusion criteria, This review considered any randomised controlled trials that evaluated cardiac nurse-led clinics. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, other research designs such as non-randomised controlled trials and before and after studies were considered for inclusion. Participants were adults (18 years and older) with new or existing coronary heart disease. The interventions of interest to the review included education, assessment, consultation, referral and administrative structures. Outcomes measured included adverse event rates, readmissions, admissions, clinical and cost effectiveness, consumer satisfaction and compliance with therapy. Results, Based on the search terms used, 80 papers were initially identified and reviewed for inclusion; full reports of 24 of these papers were retrieved. There were no papers included that addressed cost effectiveness or adverse events; and none addressed the outcome of referrals. A critical appraisal of the 24 remaining papers identified a total of six randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Two studies addressed nurse-led clinics for patients diagnosed with angina, one looked at medication administration and the other looked at educational plans. A further four studies compared secondary preventative care with a nurse-led clinic and general practitioner clinic. One specifically compared usual care versus shared care introduced by nurses for patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. Of the remaining three studies, two have been combined in the results section, as they are an interim report and a final report of the same study. Because of inconsistencies in reporting styles and outcome measurements, meta-analysis could not be performed on all outcomes. However, a narrative summary of each study and comparisons of specific outcomes assessed from within each study has been developed. Although not all outcomes obtained statistical significance, nurse-led clinics were at least as effective as general practitioner clinics for most outcomes. Recommendations, The following recommendations are made: ,The use of nurse-led clinics is recommended for patients with coronary heart disease (Level II). ,Utilise nurse-led clinics to increase clinic attendance and follow-up rates (Level II). ,Nurse-led clinics are recommended for patients who require lifestyle changes to decrease their risk of adverse outcomes associated with coronary heart disease (Level II). [source]

Patient priorities of care in rheumatology outpatient clinics: a qualitative study

MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, Issue 4 2007
Vicky Ward PhD
Abstract Objective:,To provide more understanding of what rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients want and need from an outpatient visit. Methods:,25 patients who experienced care in a nurse practitioner clinic (n = 10), junior doctor clinic (n = 9) or consultant clinic (n = 6) in a large teaching hospital in West Yorkshire were interviewed about their perceptions and experiences of care. Interviews were approximately 11/2 hours in duration and were carried out in a neutral environment by a research nurse. Interview data were subjected to atheoretical content analysis, which resulted in the identification of emergent themes. Results:,Five main themes emerged from the analysis of interview data: 1) patients want to be communicated to clearly and effectively and value positive relationships with practitioners. These help to give patients confidence in the care they are receiving; 2) patients want to feel in control of their condition and tend to refuse interventions as a way of gaining control; 3) patients want to be given clear explanations during consultations, and want information in oral and written forms; 4) patients want to be able to access practitioners between scheduled appointments as a way of gaining reassurance; and 5) patients want to feel valued by society through having their difficulties appreciated and understood by others. Conclusion:,This research adds to the body of evidence on what patients want from their rheumatology care, and each theme has clear implications for future practice. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Outcomes for patients with RA: a rheumatology nurse practitioner clinic compared to standard outpatient care

MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, Issue 1 2003
Dr Jackie Hill PhD, FRCN, MPhil
Abstract Objectives: The study aimed to extend our previous work by comparing the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) attending a rheumatology nurse practitioner (RNP) clinic with those of patients attending the more traditional junior hospital doctor's clinic (JHD). Method: A randomised controlled trial of 80 people with RA were allocated to either an RNP or JHD clinic and seen six times in 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the DAS28. Secondary measures included stiffness, fatigue, physical function, psychological status, knowledge and satisfaction. Results: Number of patients: RNP 39 (8 males); JHD 41 (9 males). Age of patients: RNP 36,76 years (median 57); JHD 35,74 years (median 57). Median disease duration: RNP 12 years (range 2,40); JHD 17 years (range 1.5,41). Years of full time education: RNP 8,17 years (median 10); JHD 9,20 years (median 10). Week 48 DAS scores compared to baseline: RNP 19 unchanged, 6 worse and 11 better; JHD 22 unchanged, 7 worse, 6 better. Length of morning stiffness increased significantly at week 24 (p = 0.05) in the JHD cohort but improved to become non-significant at week 48 (p = 0.09). By week 48 fatigue had improved in the RNP cohort (p = 0.038) and deteriorated in JHD patients (p = 0.008). The AIMS showed decreases in pain in the RNP cohort (p = 0.044) and worsening physical function in JHD patients (p = 0.038). Patient satisfaction in the RNP cohort increased significantly (overall satisfaction p = 0.000). The JHD cohort showed a decrease in satisfaction with access and continuity (p = 0.027). Conclusions: The findings from this research confirm that care from the RNP is both effective and safe. Furthermore, a specialist RNP can bring additional benefits in the form of greater symptom control and enhanced patient self-care. Copyright © 2003 Whurr Publishers Ltd. [source]

Effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics in adult patients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED HEALTHCARE, Issue 1 2005
Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep) MNSc
Executive summary Background, Coronary heart disease is the major cause of illness and death in Western countries and this is likely to increase as the average age of the population rises. Consumers with established coronary heart disease are at the highest risk of experiencing further coronary events. Lifestyle measures can contribute significantly to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality in established coronary heart disease. Improved management of cardiac risk factors by providing education and referrals as required has been suggested as one way of maintaining quality care in patients with established coronary heart disease. There is a need to ascertain whether or not nurse-led clinics would be an effective adjunct for patients with coronary heart disease to supplement general practitioner advice and care. Objectives, The objective of this review was to present the best available evidence related to nurse-led cardiac clinics. Inclusion criteria, This review considered any randomised controlled trials that evaluated cardiac nurse-led clinics. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, other research designs such as non-randomised controlled trials and before and after studies were considered for inclusion. Participants were adults (18 years and older) with new or existing coronary heart disease. The interventions of interest to the review included education, assessment, consultation, referral and administrative structures. Outcomes measured included adverse event rates, readmissions, admissions, clinical and cost effectiveness, consumer satisfaction and compliance with therapy. Results, Based on the search terms used, 80 papers were initially identified and reviewed for inclusion; full reports of 24 of these papers were retrieved. There were no papers included that addressed cost effectiveness or adverse events; and none addressed the outcome of referrals. A critical appraisal of the 24 remaining papers identified a total of six randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Two studies addressed nurse-led clinics for patients diagnosed with angina, one looked at medication administration and the other looked at educational plans. A further four studies compared secondary preventative care with a nurse-led clinic and general practitioner clinic. One specifically compared usual care versus shared care introduced by nurses for patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. Of the remaining three studies, two have been combined in the results section, as they are an interim report and a final report of the same study. Because of inconsistencies in reporting styles and outcome measurements, meta-analysis could not be performed on all outcomes. However, a narrative summary of each study and comparisons of specific outcomes assessed from within each study has been developed. Although not all outcomes obtained statistical significance, nurse-led clinics were at least as effective as general practitioner clinics for most outcomes. Recommendations, The following recommendations are made: ,The use of nurse-led clinics is recommended for patients with coronary heart disease (Level II). ,Utilise nurse-led clinics to increase clinic attendance and follow-up rates (Level II). ,Nurse-led clinics are recommended for patients who require lifestyle changes to decrease their risk of adverse outcomes associated with coronary heart disease (Level II). [source]