Home About us Contact | |||
Post-liver Transplant (post-liver + transplant)
Selected AbstractsEvolution of Causes and Risk Factors for Mortality Post-Liver Transplant: Results of the NIDDK Long-Term Follow-Up StudyAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2010K. D. S. Watt Although mortality rates following liver transplantation (LT) are well described, there is a lack of detailed, prospective studies determining patterns of and risk factors for long-term mortality. We analyzed the multicenter, prospectively obtained The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases LT Database of 798 transplant recipients from 1990 to 1994 (follow-up 2003). Overall, 327 recipients died. Causes of death >1 year: 28% hepatic, 22% malignancy, 11% cardiovascular, 9% infection, 6% renal failure. Renal-related death increased dramatically over time. Risk factors for death >1 year (univariate): male gender, age/decade, pre-LT diabetes, post-LT diabetes, post-LT hypertension, post-LT renal insufficiency, retransplantation >1 year, pre-LT malignancy, alcoholic disease (ALD) and metabolic liver disease, with similar risks noted for death >5 years. Hepatitis C, retransplantation, post-LT diabetes, hypertension and renal insufficiency were significant risk factors for liver-related death. Cardiac deaths associated with age, male gender, ALD, cryptogenic disease, pre-LT hypertension and post-LT renal insufficiency. In summary, the leading causes of late deaths after transplant were graft failure, malignancy, cardiovascular disease and renal failure. Older age, diabetes and renal insufficiency identified patients at highest risk of poor survival overall. Diligent management of modifiable post-LT factors including diabetes, hypertension and renal insufficiency may impact long-term mortality. [source] Outcomes of acute rejection after interferon therapy in liver transplant recipientsLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2004Sammy Saab Interferon alfa has been increasingly used against recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in post-liver transplant (LT) recipients. A serious potential adverse effect is acute rejection. We reviewed our experience using interferon-based therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin) for treating recurrent HCV in LT recipients. Forty-four LT recipients were treated with interferon for recurrent HCV. Five of the 44 patients developed acute rejection during interferon-based therapy. These 5 patients started treatment of 42.4 ± 33.89 months (mean ± SD) after LT. Mean (± SD) histological activity index and fibrosis scores before initiating antiviral therapy were 8.8 (± 1.92) and 2.6 (± 0.55), respectively. Patients were treated for 3.3 ± 2.28 months (mean ± SD) prior to rejection. At the time of rejection, HCV load was not detectable in 4 of the 5 recipients. All 5 patients had tolerated interferon therapy, and none had stopped therapy because of adverse effects. The rejection was successfully treated in 3 patients. In 2 of those 3 patients, cirrhosis eventually developed. In the 2 patients who did not respond to rejection treatment, immediate graft failure occurred, leading to re-LT in 1 patient and death from sepsis in the other. In conclusion, the results indicate that further studies are needed to assess the safety of interferon in LT recipients. Interferon-based therapy may lead to acute rejection and subsequent graft loss and should therefore be used with caution. Treated recipients may also develop progressive cirrhosis despite achieving a sustained virological response. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:859,867.) [source] Long-term outcome and management of hepatopulmonary syndrome in childrenPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2010Abdulrahman Al-Hussaini Al-Hussaini A, Taylor RM, Samyn M, Bansal S, Heaton N, Rela M, Mieli-Vergani G, Dhawan A. Long-term outcome and management of hepatopulmonary syndrome in children. Pediatr Transplantation 2010:14:276,282. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract:, We aim to report a single center experience of the management and long term outcome of HPS in pediatric liver transplant recipients. A retrospective review of children with HPS from 1990 to 2004. Inclusion criteria: liver disease or portal hypertension, hypoxemia (PaO2 < 70 mmHg or SaO2 < 95%) and intrapulmonary shunting documented by macroaggregated albumin scan ratio of >4% (classified mild group [<20%], moderate group [20,40%] and severe group [>40%]). Resolution of HPS post-liver transplant was defined as PaO2 > 70 mmHg or SaO2 > 95%. Eighteen children (six male [34%], median age at diagnosis of HPS 8.6 [1,15.5] yr) had HPS: biliary atresia (n = 8), idiopathic biliary cirrhosis (n = 4), progressive intrahepatic cholestasis (n = 2), miscellaneous (n = 4). The majority had mild shunting (n = 8). Fourteen underwent transplantation with resolution of HPS in 13. Six developed complications: hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 4), biliary (n = 2). Four children died (28%), two pretransplant. There was a tendency towards shunt fraction worsening to a slower degree over time. One-yr survival rate post-transplant was 93%. Median PaO2 was significantly lower in non-survivors compared to survivors (43 vs. 55.2 mmHg, p = 0.03). There was correlation between oxygen parameters pretransplant and time to HPS resolution post-transplant. HPS is reversible after transplant, but is associated with increasing mortality and morbidity. [source] Development of multiple food allergies in children taking tacrolimus after heart and liver transplantationPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2006Öner Özdemir Abstract: Angioedema and chronic diarrhea in patients taking immunosuppressants are not always because of side effects and could be a new onset of food allergy. Our aim is to discuss the pathogenesis and treatment of the post-transplant development of food allergies. The first patient was receiving tacrolimus subsequent to heart transplantation and developed angioedema after consumption of dairy products at 12 months after transplantation. He was found to be allergic to multiple foods by both RAST and ImmunoCAP tests. The second patient with argininosuccinic aciduria, post-liver transplant, also received tacrolimus and developed chronic non-mucoid/bloody diarrhea at seven months following transplantation. ImmunoCAP test was positive only for egg white and peanuts. Biopsy showed eosinophilic infiltration of the mucosa from the stomach to the rectum. Elimination diets in both patients resolved the symptoms. These cases suggest a direct relationship between tacrolimus and development of food allergy. [source] Utility of azathioprine metabolite measurements in post-transplant recurrent autoimmune and immune-mediated hepatitisPEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2004Carolina Rumbo Abstract:, Patients with post-transplant immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH) and recurrent autoimmune hepatitis (RAIH) have a poor outcome and a higher need for retransplantation. Azathioprine (AZA) is used as adjunctive immunosuppression after transplantation; optimizing its dose may be a key point in preserving graft function. Complications of high AZA dosing make dose escalation potentially problematic. Our aim was to correlate AZA metabolite levels with therapeutic effects, toxicity, and adherence to medication in children with IMH and RAIH. Charts of 14 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The post-transplant diagnosis was based on liver biopsy and autoimmune markers. AZA was prescribed after establishing the post-transplant diagnosis. AZA was started at 1.1 (1.0,1.8) mg/kg/day. Routine biochemical studies, tacrolimus levels, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) and 6-methylmercaptopurine levels were assessed every 8 wk. AZA dose was routinely adjusted to achieve 6-TG levels between 235 and 450 pmol per 8 × 108 RBC. A total of 92 samples from 14 patients were reviewed. Four patients were excluded because of non-adherence. AZA dose was increased by 245% resulting in eight of 10 patients in the target range; no hepatic or bone marrow toxicity was observed. ALT levels and steroid requirements were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The AZA dose required to achieve target 6-TG levels was significantly greater in children <10 yr. AZA metabolite testing in children post-liver transplant is useful in assessing adherence to medication and it is potentially helpful in optimizing medication dosing. In younger children the AZA dose requirements were two to four times higher than previously reported standard doses. [source] Hepatitis B prophylaxis post-liver transplant without maintenance hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapyCLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2006Dilip S. Nath Abstract: Background: We examined outcomes in recipients who underwent a liver transplant for HBV-induced liver disease and received a protocol for prophylaxis that did not use HBIG maintenance. Results: Between October 2002 and July 2005, a total of 14 liver transplant recipients were identified that met the study criteria. Mean recipient age was 47.6 yr; mean donor age was 37.2 yr. Category of transplant was as follows: cadaveric liver (n=10, 71%), cadaveric split-liver (n=2, 14%), and cadaveric liver,kidney (n=2, 14%). Liver disease was diagnosed at a mean of 7.3 yr before transplant; three (21%) had a coexisting hepatocellular cancer at the time of transplant. Pre-transplant, all 14 (100%) recipients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, and 11 (79%) were HBV DNA positive (mean viral load of 251.2 pg/mL). Three (21%) were E antigen positive, and one (7%) was D antigen positive. Pre-transplant, seven patients (50%) were on anti-viral therapy and there was documented diminution in viral loads after initiating anti-viral therapy in 3 cases. Three (21%) were hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen positive and all had low-RNA titers. With mean follow-up of 14.1 months, all 14 patients are alive with a functioning graft. Mean ALT, AST and total bilirubin values are currently at 43.2, 32.2, and 0.84, respectively. One recipient remains HBsAg surface antigen positive post-transplant but has normal lab values. The remaining recipients have no evidence of HBV recurrence by serology and protocol biopsies. The regimen has been well tolerated without the need for drug reduction or discontinuation because of side-effects. Conclusion: Longer follow-up is needed, but this regimen may represent an alternative to chronic HBIG maintenance therapy. [source] |