Home About us Contact | |||
Population Assessment (population + assessment)
Selected AbstractsWildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future DirectionsBIOMETRICS, Issue 1 2000S. T. Buckland Summary. We review the major developments in wildlife population assessment in the past century. Three major areas are considered: mark-recapture, distance sampling, and harvest models. We speculate on how these fields will develop in the next century. Topics for which we expect to see methodological advances include integration of modeling with Geographic Information Systems, automated survey design algorithms, advances in model-based inference from sample survey data, a common inferential framework for wildlife population assessment methods, improved methods for estimating population trends, the embedding of biological process models into inference, substantially improved models for conservation management, advanced spatiotemporal models of ecosystems, and greater emphasis on incorporating model selection uncertainty into inference. We discuss the kind of developments that might be anticipated in these topics. [source] Factors Affecting Population Assessments of Desert TortoisesCONSERVATION BIOLOGY, Issue 5 2000Jerome E. Freilich With a wide geographic range and more living individuals than any other listed land animal, biologists have needed to detect population trends against a "noisy" background of strong annual changes. We obtained annual population estimates of desert tortoises over 6 consecutive years at a 2.59-km2 plot in Joshua Tree National Park, California. Our estimates, based on weekly spring surveys, varied substantially, particularly between wet and dry years. Concurrently, we followed 10 radiotagged animals for 3 years to corroborate the surveys. Population density was determined separately for each year and for all years combined. Our best population estimate was an average of 67 adult tortoises, three times more than the density reported in a 1978 survey of the same site. Annual mortality was low ( <10%), and the animals showed extreme site fidelity. Apparent changes in population size were most strongly related to the animals' varying susceptibility to capture. In dry years, home ranges decreased, captures decreased, and effort required to find each tortoise nearly doubled. Our data confirm that tortoises are likely to be undercounted during dry years and call into question earlier studies conducted during droughts. Resumen: Las tortugas del desierto han sido tema de controversia desde que fueron enlistadas como amenazadas en 1990. Con un amplio rango de distribución geográfica y más individuos vivos que cualquier otro animal terrestre enlistado, los biólogos han necesitado detectar tendencias poblacionales contra un trasfondo "ruidoso" de cambios anuales fuertes. Obtuvimos estimaciones de la población anual de tortugas del desierto por seis años consecutivos en un cuadrante de 2.59 Km2 en el Parque Nacional Joshua Tree de California. Nuestras estimaciones, basadas en sondeos semanales de primavera, variaron sustancialmente, particularmente al comparar años lluviosos con años secos. Al mismo tiempo, monitoreamos por tres años a 10 animales marcados con radiotransmisores para corroborar los sondeos. La densidad poblacional estuvo determinada por separado para cada año y para todos los años combinados. Nuestras mejores estimaciones de densidad poblacional fueron en promedio de 67 adultos, tres veces más que la densidad reportada en un sondeo de 1978 en el mismo sitio. La mortalidad anual fue baja ( <10%) y los animales mostraron una fidelidad extrema por el sitio. Los cambios aparentes en el tamaño poblacional estuvieron más fuertemente relacionados con la variación en la susceptibilidad de captura de los animales. En años secos, el rango de hogar disminuyó, las capturas disminuyeron, y el esfuerzo requerido para encontrar cada tortuga fue de casi el doble. Nuestros datos confirman que las tortugas son probablemente mal contadas ( menos) durante los años de seca y ponen en duda estudios previos realizados durante secas. [source] CRANIAL SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN ERASER'S DOLPHIN, LAGENODELPHIS HOSEIMARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, Issue 3 2003William F. Perrin Abstract Knowledge of geographic variation is important to questions of population assessment and management. Fraser's dolphins have been exploited in two regions in the western Pacific. Analysis of 137 skulls from the Philippines, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Africa, France, the U.S., St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and the eastern tropical Pacific revealed sexual dimorphism in 5 of 26 measurements (difference of 1.9%-5.8% between males and females), similar to levels of cranial dimorphism in other small pelagic delphinids. Males had a larger braincase and temporal fossae and smaller external nares than females. Sexually dimorphic characters were excluded, and male and females samples were pooled to examine geographic differences in the remaining characters. Multivariate analyses yielded significant differences between the Philippine and Japanese series within the North Pacific and between a pooled North Pacific series and a North Atlantic series. The Japanese skulls were on average broader and had a wider rostrum, larger orbit, larger internal nares, and longer braincase than the Philippine skulls. These differences suggest that Fraser's dolphins exploited in Japanese and Philippine waters in directed fisheries or as by catch belong to different populations and should be assessed and managed separately. [source] Wildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future DirectionsBIOMETRICS, Issue 1 2000S. T. Buckland Summary. We review the major developments in wildlife population assessment in the past century. Three major areas are considered: mark-recapture, distance sampling, and harvest models. We speculate on how these fields will develop in the next century. Topics for which we expect to see methodological advances include integration of modeling with Geographic Information Systems, automated survey design algorithms, advances in model-based inference from sample survey data, a common inferential framework for wildlife population assessment methods, improved methods for estimating population trends, the embedding of biological process models into inference, substantially improved models for conservation management, advanced spatiotemporal models of ecosystems, and greater emphasis on incorporating model selection uncertainty into inference. We discuss the kind of developments that might be anticipated in these topics. [source] |