Home  About us  Contact
 

POLICE INTERROGATIONS (police + interrogation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Law and Criminology60%
Psychology40%

Selected Abstracts

MANDATE THE ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF POLICE INTERROGATIONS

CRIMINOLOGY AND PUBLIC POLICY, Issue 4 2007
RICHARD A. LEO
First page of article [source]

Juror Beliefs About Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Expert Testimony

JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, Issue 2 2010
Mark Costanzo
Although there has been a rapid expansion in research on police interrogations and false confessions, little is known about the beliefs of potential jurors as to these issues. In collaboration with a trial research firm, we recruited 461 jury-eligible men and women who matched the demographic characteristics of jury pools in several states. Surrogate jurors responded to questions and statements in five areas: likely rates of false confessions for different crimes, the ability to discern true from false confessions, beliefs about false confessions, beliefs about permissible interrogation tactics, and beliefs about expert testimony on police interrogations. Results indicated that jurors believed that police interrogators are better than ordinary people at identifying lies and that this ability improves with experience. Jurors believed that they would be able to differentiate a true confession from a false confession by watching a videotape, but were less confident about making such a differentiation from an audio recording. A large majority of the sample reported that it would be helpful to hear expert testimony about interrogation techniques and reasons why a defendant might falsely confess to a crime. There were no significant gender differences. Compared to whites, nonwhite jurors had significantly less confidence in the abilities of the police and gave significantly higher estimates of false confession rates. Results are discussed in light of prior research and implications for jury decision making and expert testimony. [source]

Doing justice to the complexities of interrogations: Police interrogation and american justice.

APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, Issue 2 2009

No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Anticipatory injustice among adolescents: age and racial/ethnic differences in perceived unfairness of the justice system,

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, Issue 2 2008
Jennifer L. Woolard Ph.D.
The present study examines age differences in anticipatory injustice, or the expectation of unfair or discriminatory treatment in the legal system. 1,393 adolescents and young adults from the community or from detention centers and jails were interviewed regarding demographic and justice system experience, intelligence, expectations about fair treatment, and legal decisions. African Americans and Latinos and those with more system experience expected greater injustice across multiple legal contexts. Anticipatory injustice increased with age among African Americans and those with the most system experience. It also predicted choices about police interrogation, attorney consultation, and plea agreements. Anticipations of injustice during adolescence may affect future interactions with court officials as well as more general constructs of legal socialization. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Juror Beliefs About Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Expert Testimony

JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, Issue 2 2010
Mark Costanzo
Although there has been a rapid expansion in research on police interrogations and false confessions, little is known about the beliefs of potential jurors as to these issues. In collaboration with a trial research firm, we recruited 461 jury-eligible men and women who matched the demographic characteristics of jury pools in several states. Surrogate jurors responded to questions and statements in five areas: likely rates of false confessions for different crimes, the ability to discern true from false confessions, beliefs about false confessions, beliefs about permissible interrogation tactics, and beliefs about expert testimony on police interrogations. Results indicated that jurors believed that police interrogators are better than ordinary people at identifying lies and that this ability improves with experience. Jurors believed that they would be able to differentiate a true confession from a false confession by watching a videotape, but were less confident about making such a differentiation from an audio recording. A large majority of the sample reported that it would be helpful to hear expert testimony about interrogation techniques and reasons why a defendant might falsely confess to a crime. There were no significant gender differences. Compared to whites, nonwhite jurors had significantly less confidence in the abilities of the police and gave significantly higher estimates of false confession rates. Results are discussed in light of prior research and implications for jury decision making and expert testimony. [source]