			Home About us Contact

Plant Defence Reactions (plant + defence_reaction)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Life Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Plant defence reactions against fusarium wilt in chickpea induced by incompatible race 0 of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris and nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum

PLANT PATHOLOGY, Issue 6 2002
J. M. Cachinero
Germinated seeds of ,kabuli' chickpea cv. ICCV 4 were inoculated with a conidial suspension of the incompatible race 0 of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris (Foc) or of nonhost F. oxysporum resistance ,inducers', and 3 days later were challenged by root dip with a conidial suspension of highly virulent Foc race 5. Prior inoculation with inducers delayed the onset of symptoms and/or significantly reduced the final amount of fusarium wilt caused by race 5. However, the extent of disease suppression varied with the nature of the inducing agent; the nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum were more effective at disease suppression than the incompatible Foc race 0. Inoculation with the inducers gave rise to synthesis of maackiain and medicarpin phytoalexins in inoculated seedlings; these did not accumulate in plant tissues but were released into the inoculum suspension. Inoculation with inducers also resulted in accumulation of chitinase, ,-1,3-glucanase and peroxidase activities in plant roots. These defence-related responses were induced more consistently and intensely by nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum than by incompatible Foc race 0. The phytoalexins and, to a lesser extent, the antifungal hydrolases, were also induced after challenge inoculation with Foc race 5. However, in this case the defence responses were induced in both preinduced and noninduced plants infected by the pathogen. It is concluded that the suppression of fusarium wilt in this study possibly involved an inhibitory effect on the pathogen of preinduced plant defences, rather than an increase in the expression of defence mechanisms of preinduced plants following a subsequent challenge inoculation. [source]

The role of plant defence proteins in fungal pathogenesis

MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, Issue 5 2007
RICARDO B. FERREIRA
SUMMARY It is becoming increasingly evident that a plant,pathogen interaction may be compared to an open warfare, whose major weapons are proteins synthesized by both organisms. These weapons were gradually developed in what must have been a multimillion-year evolutionary game of ping-pong. The outcome of each battle results in the establishment of resistance or pathogenesis. The plethora of resistance mechanisms exhibited by plants may be grouped into constitutive and inducible, and range from morphological to structural and chemical defences. Most of these mechanisms are defensive, exhibiting a passive role, but some are highly active against pathogens, using as major targets the fungal cell wall, the plasma membrane or intracellular targets. A considerable overlap exists between pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and antifungal proteins. However, many of the now considered 17 families of PR proteins do not present any known role as antipathogen activity, whereas among the 13 classes of antifungal proteins, most are not PR proteins. Discovery of novel antifungal proteins and peptides continues at a rapid pace. In their long coevolution with plants, phytopathogens have evolved ways to avoid or circumvent the plant defence weaponry. These include protection of fungal structures from plant defence reactions, inhibition of elicitor-induced plant defence responses and suppression of plant defences. A detailed understanding of the molecular events that take place during a plant,pathogen interaction is an essential goal for disease control in the future. [source]

Molecular and histochemical characterisation of two distinct poplar Melampsora leaf rust pathosystems

PLANT BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010
B. Boyle
Abstract In this study, we compared interactions of two Melampsora foliar rust species with poplar, which resulted in either limited or abundant pathogen proliferation. In the pathosystem exhibiting limited pathogen growth, a defence response was observed after invasion of poplar leaf tissues by the biotroph, with late and clear production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other products. Characterisation of the histological, biochemical and transcriptional events occurring in both pathosystems showed striking similarity with components of plant defence reactions observed during qualitative resistance. Key components associated with development of an active defence response, such as up-regulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, were observed during infection. Moreover, the time course and strength of gene induction appear to be critical determinants for the outcome of the tree,pathogen interaction. This work provides basic biochemical characterisation and expression data for the study of so-called partial resistance in the poplar,rust pathosystem, which is also applicable to other plant,pathogen interactions resulting in quantitative disease resistance. [source]

Activation of defence reactions in Solanaceae: where is the specificity?

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 1 2007
Sabine Desender
Summary When a potential pathogen attempts to infect a plant, biochemical and molecular communication takes place and leads to the induction of plant defence mechanisms. In the case of efficient defence, visible symptoms are restricted and the pathogen does not multiply (incompatible interaction); when defence is inefficient, the plant becomes rapidly infected (compatible interaction). During the last 30 years, a growing body of knowledge on plant,pathogen interactions has been gathered, and a large number of studies investigate the induction of various plant defence reactions by pathogens or by pathogen-derived compounds. However, as most papers focus on incompatible interactions, there is still a lack of understanding about the similarities and differences between compatible and incompatible situations. This review targets the question of specificity in Solanaceae,pathogen interactions, by comparing defence patterns in plants challenged with virulent or avirulent pathogens (or with pathogen-associated molecular patterns from these). A special emphasis is made on analysing whether defence reactions in Solanaceae depend primarily on the type of elicitor, on the plant genotype/species, or on the type of interaction (compatible or incompatible). [source]