Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Assertive Community Treatment (assertive + community_treatment)
Selected AbstractsSchizophrenia treatment: content versus deliveryACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2009J. Van Os Objective:, To review the evidence supporting the importance of ensuring that patients with psychiatric disorders receive an optimal and appropriate level of non-pharmacological treatment, and how Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) may be able to contribute to this aim. Method:, Analysis of data from selected individual published studies on ACT, in addition to reviews from the Cochrane Library, and other study groups. Results:, Treatment management using ACT appears to offer benefits in terms of reduction in hospitalisation, although there is some debate as to whether this is the most representative outcome measure. Preliminary indications using remission as an outcome measure have also shown promising results in favour of ACT. Conclusion:, While further investigation and validation are necessary, current data indicate that ACT may be an appropriate strategy to facilitate the delivery of treatment to patients with psychotic disorders. [source] Assertive community treatment in the NetherlandsACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2008J. A. Jenner No abstract is available for this article. [source] Assertive community treatment: development of the team, selection of clients, and impact on length of hospital stayJOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC & MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, Issue 3 2002A. Jones bn(hons) rmn rn(adult) Mental health services have been criticized for the lack of focus and response to people suffering from a serious mental illness (SMI). Assertive community treatment (ACT) offers the potential for greater partnership working between the user and provider of mental health services. The author describes one approach in developing ACT in the UK. Four criteria were developed to identify the most appropriate service users for ACT: those with SMI, illness instability, illness disability and risk to self or others. Fifty-five clients were identified using these criteria and tracked for their length of hospital stay and frequency of admission 2 years before acceptance to an ACT team and for 12 months after. Duration of hospital stay was unchanged although both the frequency and total numbers of bed days were reduced. [source] Impact of assertive community treatment and client characteristics on criminal justice outcomes in dual disorder homeless individualsCRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR AND MENTAL HEALTH, Issue 4 2005Dr Robert J. Calsyn PhD Background People with severe mental illness and substance use disorders (dual disorder) often have considerable contact with the criminal justice system. Aims To test the effects of client characteristics on six criminal justice outcomes among homeless (at intake) people with mental illness and substance misuse disorders. Methods The sample was of participants in a randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment, assertive community treatment (ACT) and integrated treatment (IT). Data were analysed using hierarchical logistic regression. Results Half the sample was arrested and a quarter incarcerated during the two-year follow-up period. The regression models explained between 22% and 35% of the variance of the following criminal justice measures: (1) major offences, (2) minor offences, (3) substance-use-related offences, (4) incarcerations, (5) arrests, and (6) summons. Prior criminal behaviour was the strongest predictor of all of the dependent variables; in general, demographic and diagnostic variables were not. Similarly, neither the type nor the amount of mental health treatment received predicted subsequent criminal behaviour. Conclusion Elsewhere the authors have shown that ACT and IT had advantages for health and stability of accommodation but these analyses suggest that more specialized interventions are needed to reduce criminal behaviour in dual disorder individuals. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Community forensic psychiatry: restoring some sanity to forensic psychiatric rehabilitationACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 2002J. Skipworth Objective:, To review clinical and legal paradigms of community forensic mental health care, with specific focus on New Zealand, and to develop a clinically based set of guiding principles for service development in this area. Method:, The general principles of rehabilitating mentally disordered offenders, and assertive community care programmes were reviewed and applied to the law and policy in a New Zealand forensic mental health setting. Results: There is a need to develop comprehensive community treatment programmes for mentally disordered offenders. The limited available research supports assertive community treatment models, with specialist forensic input. Ten clinically based principles of care provision important to forensic mental health assertive community treatment were developed. Conclusion:, Deinstitutionalization in forensic psychiatry lags behind the rest of psychiatry, but can only occur with well-supported systems in place to assess and manage risk in the community setting. The development of community-based forensic rehabilitation services in conjunction with general mental health is indicated. [source] Early intervention with difficult to engage, ,high-risk' youth: evaluating an intensive outreach approach in youth mental healthEARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, Issue 3 2008Carsten Schley Abstract Background: Although intensive outreach (IO) models such as assertive community treatment and intensive case management have a strong evidence base in adult psychiatry, their effectiveness in the early intervention sector is unknown. Aim: To explore client characteristics and treatment effects in a group of difficult to engage, ,high-risk' young people, seen by the Intensive Mobile Youth Outreach Service (IMYOS, ORYGEN Youth Heath) in Western Metropolitan Melbourne. Methods: The clinical files of 47 clients were audited, targeting demographic and treatment outcome data prior to and during IMYOS involvement. Results: Clients typically presented with traumatic childhoods, disrupted education, repeated treatment dropout, poor mental health and ,high-risk' behaviours. Results showed a significant reduction in risk to self and others between referral and discharge, and significantly lower admissions rates and inpatient days compared with the 9 months prior to referral. Conclusions: IO might be an effective early intervention strategy to minimize risk of harm and decrease hospitalization in young people. However, conclusions are provisional as there was no control group included in this study. Further study is required, perhaps with a waiting list control. [source] Evaluation of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment,BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, Issue 4 2003Merith Cosden Ph.D. Without active engagement, many adults with serious mental illnesses remain untreated in the community and commit criminal offenses, resulting in their placement in the jails rather than mental health facilities. A mental health treatment court (MHTC) with an assertive community treatment (ACT) model of case management was developed through the cooperative efforts of the criminal justice and mental health systems. Participants were 235 adults with a serious mental illness who were booked into the county jail, and who volunteered for the study. An experimental design was used, with participants randomly assigned to MHTC or treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of adversarial criminal processing and less intensive mental health treatment. Results were reported for 6 and 12 month follow-up periods. Clients in both conditions improved in life satisfaction, distress, and independent living, while participants in the MHTC also showed reductions in substance abuse and new criminal activity. Outcomes are interpreted within the context of changes brought about in the community subsequent to implementation of the MHTC. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | |||||||||||||