Home  About us  Contact
 

PILONIDAL DISEASE (pilonidal + disease)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL DISEASE: SINOTOMY VERSUS EXCISIONAL SURGERY, A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2007
M. Ezzedien Rabie
Pilonidal disease is a disease of relatively young people, the exact aetiology of which is unknown. Treatment options vary from simple incision to complex flap procedures. Each method has its advocates and they all have a variable recurrence rate. The multiplicity of procedures testifies to the lack of an optimal treatment method. The objective of this study is to compare sinotomy, that is, simply laying the sinus open with the more popular radical surgery, where the sinus-bearing tissues are excised. Patients who were admitted to Aseer Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia with a pilonidal sinus or abscess, in the period from April 1999 to January 2005, were identified. The medical records were reviewed and data related to the patient characteristics, disease process and the procedures carried out were noted. Identified patients were contacted by phone to check recurrence of the disease and their abidance to instructions regarding regular hair removal from the area. Eighty-one patients were included in the study. The median age was 24.2 years (range 16,60 years). There were 9 women and 72 men. All procedures were carried out under general anaesthesia except sinotomy, which was carried out under general or local anaesthesia. The surgical procedure was incision and drainage of abscess in 16 cases (19.8%), excision with primary closure in 29 cases (35.8%), excision by the open method in 15 cases (18.5%), sinotomy in 14 cases (17.3%) and rhomboid flap construction in 8 cases (9.9%). The overall recurrence rate was 26.9%, and the mean hospital stay was 4.1 days. Sinotomy had a low recurrence rate (12.5%) and a short hospital stay (2.8 days). Sinotomy has the advantages of simplicity, the possibility of operating under local anaesthesia, with an acceptable recurrence rate. We recommend sinotomy for pilonidal sinus and abscess alike, both in primary and recurrent cases. [source]

PILONIDAL DISEASE IN SINGAPORE: CLINICAL FEATURES AND MANAGEMENT

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2000
H. C. Lee
Background: Pilonidal disease has not been well documented in Asian people. The aims of the present study were to investigate any variations in the clinical features and effectiveness of various surgical treatments in such a population. Methods: A prospectively collected computerized database of 61 consecutive patients admitted to a specialist colorectal unit over a 9-year period was studied. The five methods of surgical treatment used during this period (incision and drainage; laying open; marsupialization; primary closure; and the flap procedure) were compared. Results: There were 38 men and 23 women with a mean age of 27 ± 1.02 years. Pilonidal disease was significantly more common among the Indian people (52.5% of patients) than the other ethnic races in the Singaporean community (P < 0.001). Chronic discharging sinuses were the most common presentation (93.4%). There were no differences between the various surgical techniques employed with regard to the time required for wound healing (mean: 48 ± 21 days) and recurrence rates (4/61, 6.6%). Wound dehiscence after primary wound closure (10%) and flap procedures (42%) meant that the overall healing rate was not faster than when the wound was just laid open. Furthermore, flap procedures required a longer hospitalization than other procedures (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Pilonidal disease was more common among Indian people, the more hirsute among the Singaporean population. Primary closure and flap procedure did not improve overall wound healing because of dehiscence. [source]

Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising Adjacent to a Recurrent Pilonidal Disease

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 9 2006
HAKAN AGIR MD
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL DISEASE: SINOTOMY VERSUS EXCISIONAL SURGERY, A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2007
M. Ezzedien Rabie
Pilonidal disease is a disease of relatively young people, the exact aetiology of which is unknown. Treatment options vary from simple incision to complex flap procedures. Each method has its advocates and they all have a variable recurrence rate. The multiplicity of procedures testifies to the lack of an optimal treatment method. The objective of this study is to compare sinotomy, that is, simply laying the sinus open with the more popular radical surgery, where the sinus-bearing tissues are excised. Patients who were admitted to Aseer Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia with a pilonidal sinus or abscess, in the period from April 1999 to January 2005, were identified. The medical records were reviewed and data related to the patient characteristics, disease process and the procedures carried out were noted. Identified patients were contacted by phone to check recurrence of the disease and their abidance to instructions regarding regular hair removal from the area. Eighty-one patients were included in the study. The median age was 24.2 years (range 16,60 years). There were 9 women and 72 men. All procedures were carried out under general anaesthesia except sinotomy, which was carried out under general or local anaesthesia. The surgical procedure was incision and drainage of abscess in 16 cases (19.8%), excision with primary closure in 29 cases (35.8%), excision by the open method in 15 cases (18.5%), sinotomy in 14 cases (17.3%) and rhomboid flap construction in 8 cases (9.9%). The overall recurrence rate was 26.9%, and the mean hospital stay was 4.1 days. Sinotomy had a low recurrence rate (12.5%) and a short hospital stay (2.8 days). Sinotomy has the advantages of simplicity, the possibility of operating under local anaesthesia, with an acceptable recurrence rate. We recommend sinotomy for pilonidal sinus and abscess alike, both in primary and recurrent cases. [source]

PILONIDAL DISEASE IN SINGAPORE: CLINICAL FEATURES AND MANAGEMENT

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2000
H. C. Lee
Background: Pilonidal disease has not been well documented in Asian people. The aims of the present study were to investigate any variations in the clinical features and effectiveness of various surgical treatments in such a population. Methods: A prospectively collected computerized database of 61 consecutive patients admitted to a specialist colorectal unit over a 9-year period was studied. The five methods of surgical treatment used during this period (incision and drainage; laying open; marsupialization; primary closure; and the flap procedure) were compared. Results: There were 38 men and 23 women with a mean age of 27 ± 1.02 years. Pilonidal disease was significantly more common among the Indian people (52.5% of patients) than the other ethnic races in the Singaporean community (P < 0.001). Chronic discharging sinuses were the most common presentation (93.4%). There were no differences between the various surgical techniques employed with regard to the time required for wound healing (mean: 48 ± 21 days) and recurrence rates (4/61, 6.6%). Wound dehiscence after primary wound closure (10%) and flap procedures (42%) meant that the overall healing rate was not faster than when the wound was just laid open. Furthermore, flap procedures required a longer hospitalization than other procedures (P = 0.005). Conclusion: Pilonidal disease was more common among Indian people, the more hirsute among the Singaporean population. Primary closure and flap procedure did not improve overall wound healing because of dehiscence. [source]

Comparison of three methods in surgical treatment of pilonidal disease

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2001
Hasan Aydede
Background: The present study was designed to compare three methods that are still used for the surgical treatment of pilonidal disease: marsupialization, primary midline closure and skin flaps. Methods: One hundred and one out of a total of 203 pilonidal disease patients underwent excision and marsupialization, while 82 patients had excision and primary closure and the remaining 20 were treated with excision and skin flaps. The minimum and maximum follow-up periods for the aforementioned surgical methods were 4 and 5 years, respectively. All patients were reviewed for in-hospital stay, return to work, wound infection and recurrence rates. Student's t -test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Average hospital stays for marsupialization, primary closure and skin flaps were 2.84 ± 0.13, 2.62 ± 0.12 and 5.95 ± 0.52 days, respectively. Hospital stay for the skin flaps method was longer than that for the other two methods. The average time to return to work after marsupialization was 5.42 ± 0.08 weeks; but the time needed to return to work after undergoing the primary closure or the skin flaps methods was much shorter: 2.15 ± 0.05 and 2.90 ± 0.20 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in wound infection rate (P = 1.000) or recurrence rates. Conclusion: The fact that there were no differences in terms of wound infection or recurrence rates between the three groups, and the relatively shorter period for returning to work, emphasize the usefulness of the excision and repair techniques in the surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. [source]