			Home About us Contact

Phase III Study (phase + iii_study)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	94%

Distribution within Medical Sciences

Hematology	17%
Oncology & Radiotherapy	11%

Selected Abstracts

A Phase III Study of Belatacept-based Immunosuppression Regimens versus Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients (BENEFIT Study)

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010
F. Vincenti
Belatacept, a costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation. This Phase III study (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial) assessed a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adults receiving a kidney transplant from living or standard criteria deceased donors. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were patient/graft survival, a composite renal impairment endpoint (percent with a measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Month 12 or a decrease in mGFR ,10 mL/min/1.73 m2 Month 3,Month 12) and the incidence of acute rejection. At Month 12, both belatacept regimens had similar patient/graft survival versus cyclosporine (MI: 95%, LI: 97% and cyclosporine: 93%), and were associated with superior renal function as measured by the composite renal impairment endpoint (MI: 55%; LI: 54% and cyclosporine: 78%; p , 0.001 MI or LI versus cyclosporine) and by the mGFR (65, 63 and 50 mL/min for MI, LI and cyclosporine; p , 0.001 MI or LI versus cyclosporine). Belatacept patients experienced a higher incidence (MI: 22%, LI: 17% and cyclosporine: 7%) and grade of acute rejection episodes. Safety was generally similar between groups, but posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was more common in the belatacept groups. Belatacept was associated with superior renal function and similar patient/graft survival versus cyclosporine at 1 year posttransplant, despite a higher rate of early acute rejection. [source]

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT Study)

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2010
A. Durrbach
Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT-EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial,EXTended criteria donors) is a 3-year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. The coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). The mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4,7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. The incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine-treated patients. [source]

A Phase III Study of Belatacept-based Immunosuppression Regimens versus Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients (BENEFIT Study)

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT Study)

What does the report of the USMHRP Phase III study in Thailand mean for HIV and for vaccine developers?

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
Barney S. Graham MD, PhD Senior Investigator
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Treatment of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CEOP versus CNOP

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2002
A Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group Study
Abstract:Introduction: During the last few years epirubicin (E) and mitoxantrone (M) (Novantrone) have been used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), because of their favorable principal profile. In particular, M has less severe non-hematological toxicity. Patients and methods: A randomized multicenter phase III study was conducted in order to compare the efficacy and toxicity of CEOP and CNOP in intermediate- and high-grade NHL. CEOP (arm A) consisted of cyclophosphamide 1000 mg m,2, vincristine 2 mg, E 70 mg m,2 on day 1 and prednisone 60 mg on days 1,7. The CNOP regimen (arm B) was identical to CEOP except for replacement of E by M at a dose of 12 mg m,2. Randomization was stratified according to stages I,IV. From September 1993 to March 1999, 249 patients registered for the trial. Patient characteristics were equally distributed in the two arms, except for age and International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of complete (CR) and partial response (PR). The overall response rate was 78% in arm A (57% CR, 21% PR) and 82% in arm B (60% CR, 22% PR). With a median follow-up time of 47.3 months, the median survival was not reached in arm A, while it was 39.5 months in arm B (P = 0.09). Three-year survival rates were 62.5% for CEOP and 51.5% for CNOP. There was no significant difference regarding the time to progression between the two groups (29.7 vs. 18.5 months); furthermore the median duration of CRs was 71.6 and 49 months for CEOP and CNOP, respectively (P = 0.07). The therapeutic efficacies of both regimens were equivalent among the four IPI groups. More alopecia was observed in arm A. WHO grade >2 neutropenia was more frequent in arm B. Supportive treatment with G-CSF was given to 22 and 24 patients, respectively. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in terms of overall response rates, overall survival and time to progression between CEOP and CNOP in the treatment of intermediate- and high-grade NHL. Patients with low or low intermediate IPI risk treated with either CEOP or CNOP showed significantly better survival, response rates and time to progression than those with high intermediate or high IPI risk. Therefore, new improved therapeutic approaches should be developed for the treatment of high IPI risk patients. [source]

Intratumoral cisplatin/epinephrine gel in advanced head and neck cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III study in North America,

HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 9 2003
Dan J. Castro MD
Abstract Background. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel intratumoral cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel (CDDP/epi gel) for local control and palliation of tumor-related symptoms in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients and Methods. Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to either CDDP/epi or placebo gel in this phase III, double-blind study. Tumors were ,20 cm3; most recurrences (88%) were in a previously irradiated field. The most symptomatic or threatening tumor was designated as the target tumor. Dose: 0.25 mL CDDP/epi gel/cm3 tumor volume. Treatments: ,6 weekly intratumoral injections in an 8-week period. Primary outcomes: target tumor response and symptom relief. Results. During the blinded phase, 34% (21 of 62) of patients achieved an objective response (CR or PR) in the target tumor treated with CDDP/epi gel vs 0% (0 of 24) treated with placebo gel (p < .001). Responses occurred within a median of four treatments (range, 2,6) and were durable (median, 95 days; range, 34,168+ days). More patients treated with CDDP/epi gel achieved palliative benefit than did those treated with placebo gel (37% vs 12%, p = .036). Most frequent side effects were local pain and local cutaneous reactions, which resolved over 3,12 weeks. Renal and hematologic toxicities were rare. Conclusions. This phase III trial showed that CDDP/epi gel significantly reduces tumor burden, palliates tumor-related symptoms, and is an effective local treatment for recurrent tumors. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 25: 717,731, 2003 [source]

A pilot study evaluating the safety and microbiologic efficacy of an economically viable antimicrobial lozenge in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy

HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 1 2002
FRCPC, Samy El-Sayed MD
Abstract Background Mucositis occurs in almost all radiotherapy-treated head and neck cancer patients, in approximately 75% of patients receiving hematopoietic marrow transplantation, and in approximately 40% of all patients who receive chemotherapy. Mucositis is painful, may affect all oral functions, and is a dose- and rate-limiting toxicity of therapy for cancer. Radiation-associated mucositis (onset, intensity, and duration) has been shown in recent clinical trials to be modified by the use of antibacterial/antifungal lozenges. Purpose The aim of this collaborative two-center phase II study was to assess the toxicity and microbiologic efficacy of an economically viable antimicrobial lozenge in the management of patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods Seventeen patients scheduled to receive radical or postoperative radiotherapy were provided with bacitracin, clotrimazole, and gentamicin (BCoG) lozenges (one lozenge dissolved in the mouth qid from day 1 of radiotherapy until completion). Ease of use and palatability of the lozenges, patients' symptoms (swallowing and pain), and quantitative and qualitative microbiologic evaluation of an oral rinse collection was conducted at least once weekly during radiation therapy. Results No significant side effects were reported from the use of the lozenges. The lozenges were well tolerated at the beginning of treatment by all patients, with some minor difficulty associated with oral discomfort toward the end of the treatment. Microbiologic evaluation showed consistent elimination of yeast organisms in all patients. In four patients there was no growth of gram-negative bacilli on culture, whereas in two patients, fluctuating counts were seen, and one patient had increased counts. The remaining patients had significant reduction in the gram-negative bacilli counts. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the BCoG lozenge is tolerable and microbiologically efficacious, achieving elimination of Candida in all patients and reduction in gram-negative flora in most patients. A phase III study is underway to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this lozenge. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 24: 6,15, 2002. [source]

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with an integrated boost to the macroscopic tumor volume in the treatment of high-grade gliomas

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 6 2001
Christoph Thilmann M.D.
Abstract Integrated boost radiotherapy (IBRT) delivers a higher fraction size to the gross tumor volume and a conventional fraction size to the surrounding tissue of microscopic spread. We compared stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with regard to their suitability for IBRT in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. In 20 patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, an additional treatment plan for IBRT [planning target volume (PTV1) defined as contrast-enhancing lesion plus margin due to setup errors 75 Gy, PTV2 defined as edema plus margin due to microscopic spread and setup error 60 Gy] with 7 non-coplanar beams for IMRT and for SCRT was carried out and compared. The part of the PTV2 irradiated with more than 107% of the prescribed dose was 13.9% for IMRT and 30.9% for SCRT (P < 0.001). Dose coverage of PTV2 (volume above 95% of the prescribed dose) was improved with IMRT (88.4% vs. 75.3% with SCRT, P < 0.001). Dose coverage of PTV1 was slightly higher with SCRT (93.7% vs. 87.5% with IMRT), but the conformity to the boost shape was improved by IMRT [conformity index (COIN95) = 0.85 vs. 0.69 with SCRT]. Simultaneously the brain volume irradiated with > 50 Gy was reduced from 60 to 33 cc (P < 0.001). We conclude that IMRT is suitable for local dose escalation in the enhancing lesion and for delivering a homogeneous dose to the PTV2 outside the PTV1 at the same time. Our encouraging results justify application of IMRT for IBRT in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. For clinical evaluation a phase III study has been initiated. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Tolterodine: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Older Patients with Overactive Bladder

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 6 2001
James G. Malone-Lee MD
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of two dosages of tolterodine in older patients with symptoms attributable to overactive bladder. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, phase III study. SETTING: Incontinence, older care, urological, and urogynecological clinics in the United Kingdom, France, and the Republic of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seventy-seven older patients (age ,65 years) with symptoms of urinary urgency, increased frequency of micturition (,8 micturitions/24 hours), and/or urge incontinence (,1 episode/24 hours). INTERVENTION: Tolterodine 1 mg or 2 mg twice daily (bid), or placebo, for 4 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Safety and tolerability were evaluated through spontaneously reported adverse events, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure measurements. Efficacy was assessed using micturition diary variables: mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition and number of incontinence episodes/24 hours. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient population was 75 years. Overall, ,87% of patients completed the study. Neither dosage of tolterodine was associated with serious drug-related adverse events during the study. No cardiac arrythmogenic events were noted. Dry mouth (mild to moderate intensity) was the most common adverse event in both the placebo and tolterodine treatment groups. Three percent of patients in the tolterodine 2 mg bid group discontinued treatment because of dry mouth, compared with 2% of placebo-treated patients. Compared with placebo, statistically significant decreases in micturition frequency were apparent in both tolterodine treatment groups. Furthermore, patients treated with tolterodine 2 mg bid had statistically significant decreases in urge incontinence episodes/24 hours and increases in volume voided per micturition compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Tolterodine (taken for 4 weeks) is safe and shows efficacy, particularly at a dosage of 2 mg bid, in the treatment of older patients with urinary symptoms attributable to overactive bladder. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:700,705, 2001. [source]

Acotiamide (Z-338) as a possible candidate for the treatment of functional dyspepsia

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY & MOTILITY, Issue 6 2010
H. Suzuki
Abstract Acotiamide hydrochloride is a novel upper gastrointestinal (GI) motility modulator and stress regulator currently being developed for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD). The mechanism underlying the enhancement of GI motility by this agent has been proposed to be based on its muscarinic antagonism and inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase activity. Pathophysiological studies showed that acotiamide significantly improved both delayed gastric emptying and feeding inhibition in restraint stress-induced model, but did not affect both normal gastric emptying and feeding in intact animals, indicating that acotiamide exerted effects only on the impaired gastric emptying and feeding behavior. According to the clinical pilot study in Europe, acotiamide, at the dose of 100 mg t.i.d., showed to improve the symptoms and quality of life of patients with FD, indicating the need for larger scale symptomatic studies on the efficacy of acotiamide in patients with FD. The recent phase II studies conducted in Japan presented in this issue of the journal also confirmed that acotiamide, at the optimal dose of 100 mg, has potential therapeutic efficacy, especially for meal-related FD symptoms. Although a phase III study is on going, acotiamide is now expected as a novel treatment option for FD. [source]

Quality assurance within the scope of Good Clinical Practice (GCP),what is the cost of GCP-related activities?

QUALITY ASSURANCE JOURNAL, Issue 1 2009
A survey within the Swedish Association of the Pharmaceutical Industry (LIF)'s members
Abstract The bureaucracy that the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) system generates, due to industry over-interpretation of documentation requirements, clinical monitoring, data verifications etc. is substantial. The aim of this study was to estimate the percentage cost of all such GCP-related activities within phase III clinical trials performed in Sweden in 2005. Method: An electronic questionnaire on ICH GCP-activities and their related costs was sent to 47 of the 60 member companies of the Swedish Association of the Pharmaceutical Industry (LIF). Results: The number of respondents was 29, giving a response rate of 62% and covering 97% (n=250) of phase III trials performed in Sweden in 2005. Approximately 50% of the total budget for a phase III study was reported to be GCP-related. 50% of the GCP-related cost was related to Source Data Verification (SDV). A vast majority (71%) of respondents did not support the notion that these GCP-related activities increase the scientific reliability of clinical trials. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti,tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2006
Stanley B. Cohen
Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to anti,tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies and to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in this population. Methods We evaluated primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA (REFLEX) Trial, a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of rituximab therapy. Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF agents were randomized to receive intravenous rituximab (1 course, consisting of 2 infusions of 1,000 mg each) or placebo, both with background MTX. The primary efficacy end point was a response on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points were responses on the ACR50 and ACR70 improvement criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 24 weeks. Additional end points included scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy,Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, as well as Genant-modified Sharp radiographic scores at 24 weeks. Results Patients assigned to placebo (n = 209) and rituximab (n = 311) had active, longstanding RA. At week 24, significantly more (P < 0.0001) rituximab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrated ACR20 (51% versus 18%), ACR50 (27% versus 5%), and ACR70 (12% versus 1%) responses and moderate-to-good EULAR responses (65% versus 22%). All ACR response parameters were significantly improved in rituximab-treated patients, who also had clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, disability, and health-related quality of life (demonstrated by FACIT-F, HAQ DI, and SF-36 scores, respectively) and showed a trend toward less progression in radiographic end points. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD20+ B cells, but the mean immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) remained within normal ranges. Most adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The rate of serious infections was 5.2 per 100 patient-years in the rituximab group and 3.7 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group. Conclusion At 24 weeks, a single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF therapies. [source]

Sustained long-term remissions with weekly interferon maintenance therapy in hairy cell leukemia

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Issue 3 2010
Raj RAMAKRISHNA
Abstract Aim: This study evaluates the efficacy of weekly ,-interferon (IFN) maintenance therapy in hairy cell leukaemia (HCL), a disease that remains incurable. Method: Nine patients (six male, three female, aged 41,69 yrs) with hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) received IFN 3mU s.c. once weekly as long-term maintenance therapy after achieving optimal clinical and hematological response to initial therapy with thrice weekly IFN. Results: Eight of the nine patients are in a state of sustained response at 3,17 years (median 12 years). Conclusion: Our results are similar to those from three previous studies using long-term IFN maintenance therapy, bringing the total number of patients in sustained remission to 118. We hope these reports will lead to a multi-centre, phase III study of IFN maintenance therapy (including pegylated IFN, given less frequently) in HCL patients achieving optimal response to initial therapy, be it IFN or a purine analogue. [source]

Due to low infection rates no routine anti-infective prophylaxis is required in younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia during fludarabine-based first line therapy

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2007
Barbara F. Eichhorst
Summary The impact of the combination therapy fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC) in comparison with fludarabine alone regarding the incidence and severity of infections among previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) was evaluated within a multicentre phase III study. A total of 375 patients, up to 65 years old, were randomised between fludarabine or FC for first line therapy. No routine anti-infective prophylaxis was provided. A total of 196 infectious episodes, including 33 severe infections, were documented. In the fludarabine arm, 32·9% of the patients developed an infectious complication compared with 39·9% in the FC arm (P = 0·2). No difference was observed in the rate of severe infections (Common Toxicity Crtieria grades III and IV) between both treatment arms. Dose reductions were performed more frequently in FC-treated patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered due to leucopenia in 5% of all patients. A multivariate regression model identified only elevated thymidine kinase, but not the treatment arm, as a statistically independent risk factor for infections. In summary, FC was not associated with a higher rate of infections compared with fludarabine alone. No routine antibiotic or virostatic prophylaxis, or pre-emptive treatment with G-CSF, is necessary in first line therapy with fludarabine-based regimens in younger patients with CLL, if adequate dose reduction is performed. The combination therapy FC is not associated with a higher rate of infections compared with fludarabine alone. No routine antibiotic or virostatic prophylaxis as well as pre-emptive treatment with G-CSF is necessary in first line therapy with fludarabine-based regimen in younger patients with CLL, if adequate dose reductions due to cytopenia or previous infections are performed. [source]

Deep vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide and chemotherapy: effects of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 5 2004
Maurizio Zangari
Summary A group of 256 newly diagnosed myeloma patients were enrolled in a phase III study that included 4 monthly cycles of induction chemotherapy and tandem transplant. All patients were randomized to either receive or not receive thalidomide. A total of 221 patients (86%) received no prophylactic anticoagulation (cohort I); 35 patients received low dose coumadin (cohort II). The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was significantly higher in the thalidomide arm hazard ratio: 4·5; P < 0·0001). As low dose coumadin (1 mg/d) failed to decrease thrombotic complications in 35 patients (cohort II), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, enoxaparin 40 mg s.c. q.d.) was instituted as DVT prophylaxis in the thalidomide-treated patients (n = 68) of the subsequent cohort (n = 130, cohort III). This intervention eliminated the difference in DVT incidence between the two arms (thalidomide and no thalidomide). Within cohorts I and II, 36 patients, in whom thalidomide was discontinued after experiencing a thrombotic episode during chemotherapy, subsequently resumed the drug on full anticoagulation; with a median follow-up of 22 months, DVT recurred in four patients (11%). After completing induction and tandem transplantation, 55 patients were re-exposed to thalidomide and chemotherapy during consolidation treatment. Thrombotic complications were observed in 4%. Our experience, although not based on a randomized study, suggests that the excess frequency of thrombosis in patients treated with chemotherapy and thalidomide can be safely reduced by the prophylactic use of LMWH. The rate of DVT recurrence observed in our study upon thalidomide resumption was sufficiently low to allow its continuation in patients who may benefit from this therapeutic intervention. [source]

Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% versus latanoprost 0.005% eye drops in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: 24-month results of a randomized, double-masked phase III study

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue 1 2010
Hannu Uusitalo
Abstract. Purpose:, The objective of the study was to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% with latanoprost 0.005% eye drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods:, This double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre, phase III study was conducted at 49 centres in 8 countries. Eligible patients were assigned to treatment administered once daily at 20:00 hrs for up to 24 months. Change from baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was the primary efficacy variable. Adverse events were recorded and ocular safety was evaluated. Both tafluprost and latanoprost were preserved with benzalkonium chloride. Results:, From 533 patients randomized, 402 patients completed 24 months of therapy. Both treatments had a substantial IOP-lowering effect which persisted throughout the study (,7.1 mmHg for tafluprost and ,7.7 mmHg for latanoprost at 24 months). Although the IOP-lowering effect during the study was slightly larger with latanoprost, this difference was clinically small and the noninferiority of tafluprost to latanoprost over all diurnal IOP measurements was shown with anova and almost reached with ancova (upper limits of the 95% confidence intervals 1.38 and 1.52 for the overall period, respectively). The noninferiority limit was 1.5 mmHg. Conclusions:, Tafluprost is a new effective and well-tolerated treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension. [source]