Home About us Contact | |||
Phase Holdup (phase + holdup)
Selected AbstractsHydrodynamics of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactorsAICHE JOURNAL, Issue 2 2009Ting-Ting Ren Abstract The hydrodynamic characteristics of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors were investigated in this study. A UASB reactor was visualized as being set-up of a number of continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) in series. An increasing-sized CSTRs (ISC) model was developed to describe the hydrodynamics of such a bioreactor. The gradually increasing tank size in the ISC model implies that the dispersion coefficient decreased along the axial of the UASB reactor and that its hydrodynamic behavior was basically dispersion-controlled. Experimental results from both laboratory-scale H2 -producing and full-scale CH4 -producing UASB reactors were used to validate this model. Simulation results demonstrate that the ISC model was better than the other models in describing the hydrodynamics of the UASB reactors. Moreover, a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was performed with an Eulerian-Eulerian three-phase-fluid approach to visualize the phase holdup and to explore the flow patterns in UASB reactors. The results from the CFD simulation were comparable with those of the ISC model predictions in terms of the flow patterns and dead zone fractions. The simulation results about the flow field further confirm the discontinuity in the mixing behaviors throughout a UASB reactor. © 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2009 [source] Phase distributions in a gas,liquid,solid circulating fluidized bed riserTHE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, Issue 4 2010S. A. Razzak Abstract The distributions of the three phases in gas,liquid,solid circulating fluidized beds (GLSCFB) were studied using a novel measurement technique that combines electrical resistance tomography (ERT) and optical fibre probe. The introduction of gas into a liquid,solid circulating fluidized bed (LSCFB), thus forming a GLSCFB, caused the increase of solids holdup due to the significantly decreased available buoyancy with the lower density of the gas, even with a somewhat increased liquid velocity due to the decreased liquid holdup giving space for the gas holdup. The gas passed through the riser in the form of bubbles, which tended to flow more through the central region of the riser, leading to more radial non-uniformity in radial holdup of the phases. The gas velocity has the most significant effect on the gas phase holdup. While the gas velocity also has an obvious effect to the solids holdups, the liquid flow rate had a much more considerable effect on the phase holdups. The solids circulation rate also had a significant effect on the phase holdups, with increasing solids circulation rate causing much more increased solids holdup in the central region than close to the wall. A correlation was developed for the relative radial distributions of solids holdup in GLSCFB, as such radial profiles were found similar over a wide range of operating conditions, like those in a typical gas,solid circulating fluidized beds (GSCFB). Finally, the axial solids profiles in a GLSCFB was found to be much closer to those in an LSCFB which are very uniform, than those found in a GSCFB which are less uniform and sometime having a S shape. Water was used as the continuous and conductive phase, air was the gas phase and glass bead and lava rock particles were used as the solid and non-conductive phase. Les distributions des trois phases des lits fluidisés circulants gaz-liquide-solide (LFCGLS) ont été étudiées à l'aide d'une technique de mesure originale qui combine la tomographie à résistance électrique (ERT) et la sonde à fibre optique. L'introduction de gaz dans un lit fluidisé circulant liquide-solide, formant par conséquent un lit fluidisé circulant gaz-liquide-solide, a provoqué une retenue de solides en raison de la diminution importante de la flottabilité disponible avec la densité moindre du gaz, même avec une vitesse de liquide quelque peu accrue causée par la retenue de liquide diminuée qui donne de l'espace pour la retenue de gaz. Le gaz passé dans la colonne de montée sous forme de bulles, qui avaient tendance à circuler davantage dans la région centrale de la colonne, donne une non-uniformité plus radiale dans la retenue radiale des phases. La vitesse du gaz a aussi un effet évident sur les retenues des solides; le débit du liquide a un effet beaucoup plus considérable sur les retenues des phases. Le taux de circulation des solides avait également un effet important sur les retenues des phases, le taux de circulation des solides croissant causant beaucoup plus de retenues de solides accrues dans la région centrale que près du mur. Une corrélation a été créée pour les distributions radiales relatives de la retenue des solides dans le LFCGLS, puisque de tels profils radiaux ont été trouvés semblables sur une vaste gamme de conditions d'utilisation, comme celles dans un LFCGS typique. Enfin, on a découvert que les profils des solides axiaux dans un LFCGLS sont beaucoup plus près que ceux d'un LFCLS qui sont très uniformes, que ceux découverts dans un LFCGS, qui sont moins uniformes et qui ont à peu près la forme d'un « S ». [source] Studies on Liquid,Gas and Three-Phase Fluidized Beds with Pulsating Air FlowsTHE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, Issue 1 2003Christopher G. J. Baker Abstract The effects of air-flow pulsation and water and air flowrates on the hydrodynamics of liquid,gas and three-phase fluidized beds containing 3-mm glass beads have been studied in a 90-mm i.d. column. Under steady-flow conditions, both types of bed contained a relatively large number of small bubbles. With a pulsing air flow, however, a smaller number of much larger bubbles or slugs were formed. This was attributed to different mechanisms of bubble formation at the distributor. Variations in phase holdup were explained in terms of the effects of the operating parameters on the bubble characteristics. On a étudié dans une colonne de 90 mm de diamètre intérieur les effets de la pulsation air-écoulement et des débits d'eau et d'air sur l' hydrodynamique de lits fluidisés gaz,liquide et triphasiques contenant des billes de verre de 3 mm. Dans des conditions d'écoulement en régime permanent, les deux types de lit contenaient un nombre relativement important de petites bulles. Toutefois, avec un écoulement à air pulsé, il s 'est formé un moins grand nombre de bulles de très grande dimension ou de bouchons. Ceci est imputable aux différents mécanismes de formation des bulles au niveau du distributeur. Les variations dans la rétention des phases sont expliquées par les effets des paramètres opératoires sur les caractéristiques des bulles. [source] Phase distributions in a gas,liquid,solid circulating fluidized bed riserTHE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, Issue 4 2010S. A. Razzak Abstract The distributions of the three phases in gas,liquid,solid circulating fluidized beds (GLSCFB) were studied using a novel measurement technique that combines electrical resistance tomography (ERT) and optical fibre probe. The introduction of gas into a liquid,solid circulating fluidized bed (LSCFB), thus forming a GLSCFB, caused the increase of solids holdup due to the significantly decreased available buoyancy with the lower density of the gas, even with a somewhat increased liquid velocity due to the decreased liquid holdup giving space for the gas holdup. The gas passed through the riser in the form of bubbles, which tended to flow more through the central region of the riser, leading to more radial non-uniformity in radial holdup of the phases. The gas velocity has the most significant effect on the gas phase holdup. While the gas velocity also has an obvious effect to the solids holdups, the liquid flow rate had a much more considerable effect on the phase holdups. The solids circulation rate also had a significant effect on the phase holdups, with increasing solids circulation rate causing much more increased solids holdup in the central region than close to the wall. A correlation was developed for the relative radial distributions of solids holdup in GLSCFB, as such radial profiles were found similar over a wide range of operating conditions, like those in a typical gas,solid circulating fluidized beds (GSCFB). Finally, the axial solids profiles in a GLSCFB was found to be much closer to those in an LSCFB which are very uniform, than those found in a GSCFB which are less uniform and sometime having a S shape. Water was used as the continuous and conductive phase, air was the gas phase and glass bead and lava rock particles were used as the solid and non-conductive phase. Les distributions des trois phases des lits fluidisés circulants gaz-liquide-solide (LFCGLS) ont été étudiées à l'aide d'une technique de mesure originale qui combine la tomographie à résistance électrique (ERT) et la sonde à fibre optique. L'introduction de gaz dans un lit fluidisé circulant liquide-solide, formant par conséquent un lit fluidisé circulant gaz-liquide-solide, a provoqué une retenue de solides en raison de la diminution importante de la flottabilité disponible avec la densité moindre du gaz, même avec une vitesse de liquide quelque peu accrue causée par la retenue de liquide diminuée qui donne de l'espace pour la retenue de gaz. Le gaz passé dans la colonne de montée sous forme de bulles, qui avaient tendance à circuler davantage dans la région centrale de la colonne, donne une non-uniformité plus radiale dans la retenue radiale des phases. La vitesse du gaz a aussi un effet évident sur les retenues des solides; le débit du liquide a un effet beaucoup plus considérable sur les retenues des phases. Le taux de circulation des solides avait également un effet important sur les retenues des phases, le taux de circulation des solides croissant causant beaucoup plus de retenues de solides accrues dans la région centrale que près du mur. Une corrélation a été créée pour les distributions radiales relatives de la retenue des solides dans le LFCGLS, puisque de tels profils radiaux ont été trouvés semblables sur une vaste gamme de conditions d'utilisation, comme celles dans un LFCGS typique. Enfin, on a découvert que les profils des solides axiaux dans un LFCGLS sont beaucoup plus près que ceux d'un LFCLS qui sont très uniformes, que ceux découverts dans un LFCGS, qui sont moins uniformes et qui ont à peu près la forme d'un « S ». [source] |