Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
pH Recording (ph + recording)
Selected AbstractsEffect of pantoprazole in patients with chronic laryngitis and pharyngitis related to gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, proximal, and distal pH monitoring resultsDISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 4 2010S. Karoui SUMMARY Few studies had evaluated the results of proton pump inhibitors on distal and proximal pH recording using a dual-channel probe. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and pH-metric effect of treatment with pantoprazole 80 mg for 8 weeks in patients with ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with pathological proximal acid exposure. We conducted a prospective open study. Patients included had to have chronic pharyngitis or laryngitis, and a pathological gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux. All patients received treatment with pantoprazole 80 mg daily for 8 weeks. One week after the end treatment, patients had a second ENT examination and a 24-hour pH monitoring using dual-channel probe. We included 33 patients (11 men, 22 women). A pathological distal acid reflux was found in 30 patients (91%). After treatment, the improvement of ENT symptoms was found in 51.5% of patients. Normalization of 24-hour proximal esophageal pH monitoring was observed in 22 patients (66%). After treatment, the overall distal acid exposure, the number of distal reflux events, and the number of reflux during more than 5 minutes were significantly decreased (respectively: 19.4% vs 7.2% [P < 0.0001], 62.7 vs 28.4 [P < 0.0001], and 10.4 vs 3.9 [P < 0.0001] ). Similarly, in proximal level, the same parameters were significantly decreased after treatment (respectively: 6.8% vs 1.6% [P < 0.0001], 32.6 vs 8.1 [P < 0.0001], and 3.4 vs 0.6 [P= 0.005] ). Treatment with pantoprazole reduced the frequency and severity of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux in patients with chronic pharyngitis and laryngitis. [source] Lansoprazole in children: pharmacokinetics and efficacy in reflux oesophagitisALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2001C. Faure Background: Data on the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole in paediatric patients are limited. Aim: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, optimal dosage and efficacy of lansoprazole in paediatric patients. Methods: A 24-h gastric pH recording and a pharmacokinetic study were performed after 7 days of lansoprazole, 17 mg/m2, in 23 patients with reflux oesophagitis (median age, 3.5 years). Response was defined as pH > 3 for > 65% of the recording. The dosage was doubled in non-responders. Patients with no response on day 14 were excluded. Responders underwent endoscopy after 4 weeks on the response-inducing dosage; abnormal findings led to a repeat endoscopy after four additional weeks. Results: Nine patients responded to 17 mg/m2 and six to 30.3 mg/m2. On day 7, time with pH > 3 was significantly correlated with the area under the plasma concentration,time curve (P=0.003). The area under the plasma concentration,time curve was significantly greater in the nine responders to 17 mg/m2 than in the 14 other patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in responders and non-responders to the higher dose. After 4 weeks, oesophagitis was healed in 80% of responders. Adverse events occurred in three patients and required treatment discontinuation in one. Conclusions: Lansoprazole is effective and safe in children. The optimal starting dosage is 30 mg/m2 or 1.4 mg/kg. [source] Characterization of reflux events after fundoplication using combined impedance,pH recording,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 1 2007S. Roman Background: Laparoscopic fundoplication effectively controls symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and decreases acid reflux, but its impact on non-acid reflux is not known. The aim of the study was to characterize reflux events after fundoplication using oesophageal combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII),pH monitoring, to demonstrate its efficacy on acid as well as non-acid reflux events. Methods: Thirty-six patients in whom ambulatory MII,pH recording was performed after laparoscopic fundoplication were reviewed retrospectively. There were 23 symptomatic and 13 asymptomatic patients, whose results were compared with those of 72 healthy volunteers. Results: Oesophageal acid exposure was low in all but one operated patient, and there was no difference between those with and without symptoms. The median number of reflux events over 24 h was lower after fundoplication (11 in operated patients compared with 44 in healthy volunteers; P < 0·001). Almost all reflux events were non-acid after surgery whereas acid reflux episodes were predominant in healthy volunteers. Proximal reflux events were less common in operated patients. Non-acid reflux events were significantly associated with symptoms after surgery in some patients. Conclusion: Fundoplication restores a competent barrier for all types of reflux. Reflux events are mostly non-acid after surgery, and such events may be positively correlated with symptoms. Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The lower esophageal sphincter strength in patients with gastroesophageal reflux before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplicationDISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 1 2007J. H. Schneider SUMMARY., Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and sphincter strength (LESS) were measured before and after short and floppy laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in 38 patients with severe gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). These patients were compared with a control group of 23 healthy volunteers. GERD was assessed by stationary manometry, 24-h pH recordings and endoscopy. LESS was verified by motorized pull-back of an air-filled balloon catheter from the stomach into the esophagus. The catheter assembly was well tolerated by all study participants. LESP increased significantly after operation from 8 mmHg to 14 mmHg (75% of normal values; P < 0.0001), but compared to the control group, LESP (22 mmHg) decreased significantly (P < 0.002). In the control group and in patients with GERD, LESP and LESS showed excellent correlation (r = 0.97, r = 0.94, respectively). After LNF, LESS increased significantly from 0.6 to 1.6 N (P < 0.0001), about 166%. We conclude that the measurement of LESS is able to explain the discrepancy between satisfactory NF operation and the distinct increase of postoperative LESP. The evaluation of LESS is a helpful tool in assessing functional understanding of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a short and floppy wrap. [source] The effects of changing temperature correction factors on measures of acidity calculated from gastric and oesophageal pH recordingsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 5 2006J. D. GARDNER Summary Background, Recently, Medtronic notified customers that new correction factors should be used for their Slimline and Zinetics24 single-use, internal-standard pH catheters. Aim and Methods, We selected 24-h recordings of oesophageal and gastric pH with the Zinetics24 from our archives for five healthy subjects and for five gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects who were studied at baseline and again after 8 days of treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor. All pH values obtained with the old correction factors were rescaled using the new correction factors. Values for median pH, integrated acidity and time pH , 4 were then calculated from pH values with old and new correction factors. Results, The new correction factors changed values for median pH, integrated acidity and time pH , 4. Values for median pH and integrated acidity changed in a predictable, proportionate way, whereas values for time pH , 4 did not. Conclusions, The new correction factors will not change the interpretation of previously published results with median pH or integrated acidity. In contrast, values for time ,4 cannot be converted in an obvious way with the new correction factors. Instead, the raw pH data will need to be rescaled and values for time pH , 4 recalculated using the rescaled pH data. [source] | ||||||||||