Home About us Contact | |||
Perineal Sling (perineal + sling)
Selected AbstractsComparison between reduction in 24-hour pad weight, International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Post-Operative Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score in patient evaluation after male perineal slingNEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Issue 1 2007Christian O. Twiss Abstract Aims We assessed the utility of three self-assessment instruments: the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), the post-operative Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score, and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by correlating them with an objective outcome, the change in 24-hr pad weight, after a male perineal sling. Methods Twenty-six men with urodynamically confirmed stress incontinence underwent a male perineal sling. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively with a 24-hr pad test, IPSS and ICIQ-SF. Patients also completed the PGI-I post-operatively. Changes in study parameters were compared via the paired t -test, and correlations were performed using Spearman's rho. Results There were significant reductions in 24-hr pad weight (,274 g, P,<,0.001), percentage 24-hr pad weight (54.2%), ICIQ-SF score (,6.3, P,<,0.001), and the three ICIQ-SF subscores (,1.2, ,1.7, ,3.4 for Questions 3, 4, and 5, respectively, P,<,0.001 for all). The change in total ICIQ-SF score and the post-operative PGI-I score correlated strongly with percentage reduction in 24-hr pad weight (r,=,,0.68, P,<,0.001; r,=,,0.81, P,<,0.001, respectively) and with each other (r,=,0.79, P,<,0.001). The change in all three ICIQ-SF subscores correlated significantly with percentage reduction in 24-hr pad weight and with post-operative PGI-I score. There was no significant change in the IPSS or the voiding or storage subscores, and none correlated with any other study parameter. Conclusions This study validates the construct validity of the ICIQ-SF and PGI-I in the assessment of treatment for male stress incontinence and should make clinicians confident in comparing studies of incontinence treatment utilizing the change ICIQ-SF score, the post-operative PGI-I score, and percentage reduction in 24-hr pad weight as outcome measures. Neurourol. Urodynam. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgeryBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2009Miguel Guimarães OBJECTIVE To examine the intermediate-term outcome (up to 4 years) of a bone-anchored perineal sling (InVanceTM, American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) in men with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 62 men with SUI were implanted with the InVance sling. SUI was diagnosed after radical prostatectomy in 58 patients and after benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) prostatectomy in four patients. Implantation of the InVance bone-anchored bulbourethral sling was conducted primarily under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were considered cured, if they stopped wearing continence pads and improved if the daily number of pads used decreased by at least half. The Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire and a simple verbal question about patient satisfaction with the surgery were also used and complications were measured. RESULTS In all, 40 patients (65%) were cured and 14 (23%) were improved after a mean follow-up of 28 months. The UI cure rates at 3 and 4 years follow-up were 70% and 66%, respectively. The most common side-effect was transient scrotal or perineal pain or numbness, which affected 12 patients (19%). There was a prolonged postvoid residual urine volume of >100 mL in six patients (10%), which resolved within 2 weeks of indwelling catheterization. Explantation of the sling was required in two cases (3%) because of infection. In one patient (2%), revision was required for bone-anchor dislodgement. CONCLUSION The InVance sling offers good intermediate-term cure and improvement rates for SUI after prostatectomy. The procedure has an acceptably low rate of minor complications, and should be considered for treating men with less severe forms (,5 pads per day) of SUI. [source] |