Home  About us  Contact
 

Perceived Predation Risk (perceived + predation_risk)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Life Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Response of small rodents to manipulations of vegetation height in agro-ecosystems

INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY (ELECTRONIC), Issue 1 2008
Jens JACOB
Abstract Some small mammal populations require human interference to conserve rare or threatened species or to minimize adverse effects in plant production. Without a thorough understanding about how small rodents behave in their environment and consideration of how they react to management efforts, management will not be optimal. Social behavior, spatial and temporal activity patterns, predator avoidance and other behavioral responses can affect pest rodent management. Some of these behavioral patterns and their causes have been well studied. However, their impact on pest rodent management, especially for novel management approaches, is not always clear. Habitat manipulation occurs necessarily through land use and intentionally to reduce shelter and food availability and to increase predation pressure on rodents. Rodents often respond to decreased vegetation height with reduced movements and increased risk sensitivity in their feeding behavior. This seems to result mainly from an elevated perceived predation risk. Behavioral responses may lessen the efficacy of the management because the desired effects of predators might be mediated. It remains largely unknown to what extent such responses can compensate at the population level for the expected consequences of habitat manipulation and how population size and crop damage are affected. It is advantageous to understand how target and non-target species react to habitat manipulation to maximize the management effects by appropriate techniques, timing and spatial scale without causing unwanted effects at the system level. [source]

The role of water abundance, thermoregulation, perceived predation risk and interference competition in water access by African herbivores

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2008
Marion Valeix
Abstract In African savannas, surface water can become limiting and an understanding of how animals address the trade-offs between different constraints to access this resource is needed. Here, we describe water access by ten African herbivore species in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, and we explore four possible determinants of the observed behaviours: water abundance, thermoregulation, perceived predation risk and interference competition. On average, herbivores were observed to drink in 80% of visits to a waterhole. The probability of drinking was higher in 2003 (474 mm) than in 2004 (770 mm), and at the end of the dry season than at its beginning. For larger species, this probability may also be related to risks of interference competition with elephants or other herbivores. For smaller species, this probability may also be related to the perceived risk of predation. We also investigate the time spent accessing water to drink. The influence of herd size and the presence of young on the time spent accessing water for most species suggests that perceived predation risk plays a role. Thermoregulation also affects this time: during the hottest periods, herbivores spend less time in open areas, unless when wind is strong, probably owing to evapotranspired heat loss. Résumé Dans les savanes africaines, l'eau de surface disponible peut devenir un facteur limitant et il est nécessaire de comprendre comment les animaux agissent face aux différentes contraintes que pose l'accès à cette ressource. Nous décrivons ici l'accès à l'eau de dix herbivores africains du Parc National de Hwange, au Zimbabwe, et nous explorons quatre facteurs qui sont peut-être déterminants dans les comportements observés: l'abondance de l'eau, la thermorégulation, le risque de prédation ressenti et la compétition/ interférence. En moyenne, on a observé que les herbivores buvaient lors de 80% de leurs visites au point d'eau. La probabilité qu'ils boivent étai plus forte en 2003 (474 mm) qu'en 2004 (770 mm), et à la fin de la saison sèche qu'au début. Pour les plus grandes espèces, cette probabilité pourrait aussi être liée aux risques de compétition par interférence avec les éléphants ou d'autres herbivores. Pour les plus petites espèces, cette probabilité pourrait aussi être liée au risque de prédation ressenti. Nous avons aussi étudié le temps passéà se rendre au point d'eau pour y boire. L'influence de la taille du groupe et de la présence de jeunes sur le temps pris par la plupart des espèces pour se rendre au point d'eau laisse penser que la perception du risque de prédation joue un rôle. La thermorégulation affecte aussi cette durée: pendant les périodes les plus chaudes, les herbivores passent moins de temps dans les espaces ouverts, sauf si le vent est fort, probablement à cause de la perte de chaleur par évapotranspiration. [source]

The effects of perceived predation risk on pre- and post-metamorphic phenotypes in the common frog

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
C. E. Stamper
Abstract Where organisms undergo radical changes in habitat during ontogeny, dramatic phenotypic reshaping may be required. However, physiological and functional interrelationships may constrain the extent to which an individual's phenotype can be equally well adapted to their habitat throughout the life cycle. The phenotypic response of tadpoles to the presence of a predator has been reported for several species of anuran but the potential post-metamorphic consequences have rarely been considered. We reared common frog Rana temporaria tadpoles in the presence or absence of a larval odonate predator, Aeshna juncea, and examined the consequences of the resulting phenotypic adjustment in the aquatic larval stage of the life cycle for the terrestrial juvenile phenotype. In early development tadpoles developed deeper tail fins and muscles in response to the predator and, in experimental trials, swam further than those reared in the absence of a predator. While the difference in swimming ability remained significant throughout the larval period, by the onset of metamorphosis we could no longer detect any differences in the morphological parameters measured. The corresponding post-metamorphic phenotypes also did not initially differ in terms of morphology. At 12 weeks post-metamorphosis, however, froglets that developed from predator-exposed tadpoles swam more slowly and less far than those that developed from tadpoles reared in the absence of predators, the opposite trend to that observed in the larval stage of the life cycle, and had narrower femurs. These results suggest that there may be long-term costs for subsequent life-history stages of tailoring the larval phenotype to prevailing environmental conditions. [source]