Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Patient Safety (patient + safety)
Terms modified by Patient Safety Selected AbstractsPatient Safety in DermatologyDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Issue 12p1 2004C. William Hanke MD First page of article [source] Profiles in Patient Safety: Antibiotic Timing in Pneumonia and Pay-for-performanceACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 7 2006Jesse M. Pines MD The delivery of antibiotics within four hours of hospital arrival for patients who are admitted with pneumonia, as mandated by the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has gained considerable attention recently because of the plan to implement pay-for-performance for adherence to this standard. Although early antibiotic administration has been associated with improved survival for patients with pneumonia in two large retrospective studies, the effect on actual patient care and outcomes for patients with pneumonia and other emergency department patients of providing financial incentives and disincentives to hospitals for performance on this measure currently is unknown. This article provides an in-depth case-based description of the evidence behind antibiotic timing in pneumonia, discusses potential program effects, and analyzes how the practical implementation of pay-for-performance for pneumonia conforms to American Medical Association guidelines on pay-for-performance. [source] Profiles in Patient Safety: Medication Errors in the Emergency DepartmentACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 3 2004Pat Croskerry MD Abstract Medication errors are frequent in the emergency department (ED). The unique operating characteristics of the ED may exacerbate their rate and severity. They are associated with variable clinical outcomes that range from inconsequential to death. Fifteen adult and pediatric cases are described here to illustrate a variety of errors. They may occur at any of the previously described five stages, from ordering a medication to its delivery. A sixth stage has been added to emphasize the final part of the medication administration process in the ED, drawing attention to considerations that should be made for patients being discharged home. The capability for dispensing medication, without surveillance by a pharmacist, provides an error-producing condition to which physicians and nurses should be especially vigilant. Except in very limited and defined situations, physicians should not administer medications. Adherence to defined roles would reduce the team communication errors that are a common theme in the cases described here. [source] Patient Safety: A Curriculum for Teaching Patient Safety in Emergency MedicineACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 1 2003Karen S. Cosby MD Abstract The last decade has witnessed a growing awareness of medical error and the inadequacies of our health care delivery systems. The Harvard Practice Study and subsequent Institute of Medicine Reports brought national attention to long-overlooked problems with health care quality and patient safety. The Committee on Quality of Health Care in America challenged professional societies to develop curriculums on patient safety and adopt patient safety teaching into their training and certification requirements. The Patient Safety Task Force of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) was charged with that mission. The curriculum presented here offers an approach to teaching patient safety in emergency medicine. [source] Profiles in Patient Safety: Organizational Barriers to Patient SafetyACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 8 2002Shawna J. Perry MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Setting the Stage for the Second Decade of the Era of Patient Safety: Contributions by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and GranteesHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, Issue 2p2 2009Lee H. Hilborne First page of article [source] Revealing and Resolving Patient Safety Defects: The Impact of Leadership WalkRounds on Frontline Caregiver Assessments of Patient SafetyHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, Issue 6 2008Allan Frankel Objective. To evaluate the impact of rigorous WalkRounds on frontline caregiver assessments of safety climate, and to clarify the steps and implementation of rigorous WalkRounds. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary outcome variables were baseline and post WalkRounds safety climate scores from the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). Secondary outcomes were safety issues elicited through WalkRounds. Study period was August 2002 to April 2005; seven hospitals in Massachusetts agreed to participate; and the project was implemented in all patient care areas. Study Design. Prospective study of the impact of rigorously applied WalkRounds on frontline caregivers assessments of safety climate in their patient care area. WalkRounds were conducted weekly and according to the seven-step WalkRounds Guide. The SAQ was administered at baseline and approximately 18 months post-WalkRounds implementation to all caregivers in patient care areas. Results. Two of seven hospitals complied with the rigorous WalkRounds approach; hospital A was an academic teaching center and hospital B a community teaching hospital. Of 21 patient care areas, SAQ surveys were received from 62 percent of respondents at baseline and 60 percent post WalkRounds. At baseline, 10 of 21 care areas (48 percent) had safety climate scores below 60 percent, whereas post-WalkRounds three care areas (14 percent) had safety climate scores below 60 percent without improving by 10 points or more. Safety climate scale scores in hospital A were 62 percent at baseline and 77 percent post-WalkRounds (t=2.67, p=.03), and in hospital B were 46 percent at baseline and 56 percent post WalkRounds (t=2.06, p=.06). Main safety issues by category were equipment/facility (A [26 percent] and B [33 percent]) and communication (A [24 percent] and B [18 percent]). Conclusions. WalkRounds implementation requires significant organizational will; sustainability requires outstanding project management and leadership engagement. In the patient care areas that rigorously implemented WalkRounds, frontline caregiver assessments of patient safety increased. SAQ results such as safety climate scores facilitate the triage of quality improvement efforts, and provide consensus assessments of frontline caregivers that identify themes for improvement. [source] Advancing Patient Safety through Process ImprovementsJOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, Issue 5 2009Linda Elgart Abstract: The department of Women's and Children's Services at the Hospital of Saint Raphael (HSR) in New Haven, CT, has initiated several different and successful approaches to reducing patient risk within the department. The department purchased a computerized fetal monitoring and documentation program that has improved the ability to provide high-level antepartal care for mothers and fetuses with automatic patient data management and continuous fetal heart rate surveillance. A Risk Reduction Grant offered through the hospital malpractice insurance program provided the financial assistance for all medical providers to become certified in electronic fetal monitoring. The certification is now a required educational standard for nurses, certified nurse midwives, and for physicians who work in the labor and delivery unit. Infant and pediatric security is incorporated into policy and practice measures that include hospital-wide drills for the prevention of infant abduction. The Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) Quality Improvement Committee supports systematic reviews of identified clinical risks and works to find viable solutions to these problems. The hospital has supported specialized obstetrical care through the Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU), Newborn Intensive Care Unit (NICU), the Inpatient Pediatric Unit, and the labor and delivery unit. In addition, HSR has initiated an enhanced medical informed consent that is available online for providers and a patient education tool that includes a computer room at the hospital for patient use. [source] Keeping an Eye on Patient Safety Using Human Factors Engineering (HFE): A Family Affair for the Hospitalized ChildJOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN PEDIATRIC NURSING, Issue 1 2010Barbara L. Wilson PhD Barbara L. Wilson Column Editor: Bonnie Gance-Cleveland Family-Centered Care provides a forum for sharing information about basic components of caring for children and families, including respect, information sharing, collaboration, family-to-family support, and confidence building. [source] Evaluation of Nationally Mandated Drug Use Reviews to Improve Patient Safety in Nursing Homes: A Natural ExperimentJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 6 2005Becky Briesacher PhD Objectives: To test whether nationally required drug use reviews reduce exposure to inappropriate medications in nursing homes. Design: Quasi-experimental, longitudinal study. Setting: Data source is the 1997,2000 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries. Participants: Nationally representative population sample of 8 million nursing home (NH) residents (unweighted n=2,242) and a comparative group of 2 million assisted living facility (ALF) residents (unweighted n=664). Measurements: Prevalence and incident use of 38 potentially inappropriate medications compared before and after the policy: 32 restricted for all NH residents and six for residents with certain conditions. Inappropriate medications were stratified by potential for legitimate exceptions: always avoid, rarely appropriate, or some acceptable indications. Results: In July 1999, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandated expansions to the drug use review policy for nursing home certification. Using explicit criteria, surveyors and consultant pharmacists must evaluate resident records for potentially inappropriate medication exposures and related adverse drug reactions. Nursing homes in noncompliance may receive citations for deficient care. Before the CMS policy, 28.8% (95% confidence interval (CI)=27.3,30.3) of Medicare beneficiaries in NHs and 22.4% (95% CI=19.8,25.0) in ALFs received potentially inappropriate medications. Nearly all prepolicy use came from medications with some acceptable indications: 23.4% in NHs (95% CI=20.4,26.4) and 18.0% in ALFs (95% CI=15.6,20.4). After the policy, exposures in NHs declined to 25.6% (95% CI=24.1,27.1, P<.05), but similar declines occurred in ALFs (19.0%, 95% CI=16.7,21.3, nonsignificant). Postpolicy use of inappropriate medications with exempted indications remained high, and more than half was incident use: 20.6% of NH residents (95% CI=19.0,22.0) and 15.6% of ALF residents (95% CI=15.2,15.7). Use of drugs that are restricted with certain diseases increased 33% in NHs between 1997 and 2000 (from 9.3% to 13.2%; P<.05). Multivariate results detected no postpolicy differences in inappropriate drug use between long-term care facilities with mandatory drug use reviews and those without. Conclusion: Some postpolicy declines were noted in NH use of potentially inappropriate medications, but the decrease was uneven and could not be attributed to the national drug use reviews. This study is the first evaluation of the CMS policy, and it highlights the unclear effectiveness of drug use reviews to improve patient safety in NHs even though state and federal agencies have widely adopted this strategy. [source] Duty Hours in Emergency Medicine: Balancing Patient Safety, Resident Wellness, and the Resident Training Experience: A Consensus Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Resident Duty Hours RecommendationsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 9 2010Mary Jo Wagner MD Abstract Representatives of emergency medicine (EM) were asked to develop a consensus report that provided a review of the past and potential future effects of duty hour requirements for EM residency training. In addition to the restrictions made in 2003 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the potential effects of the 2008 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on resident duty hours were postulated. The elements highlighted include patient safety, resident wellness, and the resident training experience. Many of the changes and recommendations did not affect EM as significantly as other specialties. Current training standards in EM have already emphasized patient safety by requiring continuous on-site supervision of residents. Resident fatigue has been addressed with restrictions of shift lengths and limitation of consecutive days worked. One recommendation from the IOM was a required 5-hour rest period for residents on call. Emergency department (ED) patient safety becomes an important concern with the decrease in the availability and in the patient load of a resident consultant that may result from this recommendation. Of greater concern is the already observed slower throughput time for admitted patients waiting for resident care, which will increase ED crowding and decrease patient safety in academic institutions. A balance between being overly prescriptive with duty hour restrictions and trying to improve resident wellness was recommended. Discussion is included regarding the appropriate length of EM training programs if clinical experiences were limited by new duty hour regulations. Finally, this report presents a review of the financing issues associated with any changes. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1004,1011 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [source] Does the Trainee's Level of Experience Impact on Patient Safety and Clinical Outcomes in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, Issue 1 2008L. Ray Guo M.D. We designed this study to determine if there were any significant differences in patient demographics and clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass procedures (CABG) performed by residents of PGY 4/lower, residents of PGY 5/6, fellows, or consultants. Methods: Standardized preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively collected and analyzed on 2906 isolated CABG procedures, performed between July 1999 and March 2006 with the primary surgeon prospectively classified as PGY4/lower, PGY5/6, fellow, and consultant. Results: The number of cases performed by residents of PGY4/lower, PGY5/6, fellows and consultants were 179, 263, 301, and 2163, respectively. Preoperative demographics and comorbidities were similar except PGY4/lower group had more diabetics and consultant group had more patients requiring IABP. More non-LIMA arterial conduits were used in the consultant and fellow groups. However, there were neither significant differences in the mean number of grafts nor in the composite postoperative morbidity, median ICU, and hospital lengths of stay. Observed in-hospital mortality was 2.2%, 1.5%, 1.7%, and 2.7% (p = 0.49), respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative patient demographics and operative data were similar in all groups except that patients requiring IABP preoperatively were more likely operated on by consultants and arterial revascularization was performed more commonly by consultants and fellows. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were similar among all groups, thus demonstrating that with appropriate supervision, trainees of all levels can safely be taught CABG. [source] A New Information Exchange System for Nursing Professionals to Enhance Patient Safety Across EuropeJOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, Issue 4 2009Dr. Alessandro Stievano RN Abstract Purpose: Ensuring safe healthcare services is one of today's most challenging issues, especially in light of the increasing mobility of health professionals and patients. In the last few years, nursing research has contributed to the creation of a culture of safety that is an integral part of clinical care and a cornerstone of healthcare systems. Organizing Constructs: European institutions continue to discuss methods and tools that would best contribute to ensuring safe and high-quality care, as well as ensuring access to healthcare services. According to the European Commission between 8% and 12% of patients admitted to hospitals in the European Union member states suffer from adverse events while receiving care, although some of these events are part of the intrinsic risk linked to receiving care. However, most of these adverse events are caused by such avoidable healthcare errors as, for instance, diagnosis mistakes, inability to act on the results of tests, medication errors, failures of healthcare equipment and hospital infections. Nosocomial infections alone are estimated to affect 4.1 million inpatients, that is, about 1 of every 20 inpatients, causing avoidable suffering and mortality, as well as an enormous loss of financial resources (at least ,5.48 billion a year). Conclusions: The Internal Market Information (IMI) System, developed by the European Commission, aims at contributing to patient safety by means of a timely and updated exchange of information among nursing regulatory bodies on the good standing and scope of practice of their registrants. Through the IMI System, the European Federation of Nursing Regulators will improve its electronic database on nurses to allow national nursing regulatory bodies to exchange the information needed to recognize the nurses' educational and professional qualifications and competencies. This process both facilitates the mobility of professionals and ensures high-quality nursing practice in an even and consistent way across the European Union. Clinical Relevance: On a national basis, nursing regulatory bodies play an important role in ensuring patient safety through high standards of nursing education and competence, whereas on an international basis, patient safety can assured by a better exchange of information between national regulatory bodies on the good professional standing of nurses. [source] Perinatal Patient Safety From the Perspective of Nurse Executives: A Round Table DiscussionJOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC, GYNECOLOGIC & NEONATAL NURSING, Issue 3 2006Kathleen E. Thorman Six nurse executives across the United States discussed issues related to perinatal patient safety. Gaps in communication were identified as one of the biggest challenges facing nurse executives. Other issues included expectations of regulators and accreditors, the pressure for productivity with limited resources and staffing, and undercapitalized technology versus safety and staff competence. Each nurse executive discussed a perinatal patient safety initiative implemented recently in her organization. If costs were not an issue, construction of facilities, adoption of electronic documentation, and adding positions to help assure patient safety were at the top of their wish lists. Patient safety continues as the number one priority for nurse executives. JOGNN, 35, 409-416; 2006. DOI: 10.1111/J.1552-6909.2006.00058.x [source] Medical Error and Patient Safety: Understanding Cultures in ConflictLAW & POLICY, Issue 2 2002Joanna Weinberg Evidence documenting the high rate of medical errors to patients has taken a prominent place on the health care radar screen. The injuries and deaths associated with medical errors represent a major public health problem with significant economic costs and erosion of trust in the health care system. Between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths due to preventable medical errors are estimated to occur each year, making medical errors the eighth leading cause of death in the United States. However, the recent prominence of the issue of safety or error does not reflect a new phenomenon or sudden rift in the quality of health care (although it is a system fraying at the edges). Rather, the prominence of the issue reflects a radical change in the culture of health care, and in how relationships within the health care system are structured and perceived. In this paper, I discuss the multiple factors responsible for the change in the culture of health care. First, the culture has shifted from a clinician cantered system, in which decision making is one,sided, to a shared system of negotiated care between clinician and patient, and, often, between administrator or payer. Second, the nature of quality in health care has changed due to the geometric increase in the availability of technological and pharmaceutical enhancements to patient care. Third, the health care culture continues to rely on outdated models of conflict resolution. Finally, the regulatory structure of health system oversight was set in place when fee,for,service care governed physician,patient relationships and where few external technologies were available. In the current health care culture, that structure seems inadequate and diffuse, with multiple and overlapping federal and state regulatory structures that make implementation of patient safety systems difficult. [source] Perinatal Clinical Decision Support System: A Documentation Tool for Patient SafetyNURSING FOR WOMENS HEALTH, Issue 4 2007Carla Provost RN First page of article [source] A Feminist Approach on Patient SafetyNURSING FORUM, Issue 4 2009Zenobia C. Y. Chan RN No abstract is available for this article. [source] "Health Courts" and Accountability for Patient SafetyTHE MILBANK QUARTERLY, Issue 3 2006MICHELLE M. MELLO Proposals that medical malpractice claims be removed from the tort system and processed in an alternative system, known as administrative compensation or ,health courts,' attract considerable policy interest during malpractice ,crises,' including the current one. This article describes current proposals for the design of a health court system and the system's advantages for improving patient safety. Among these advantages are the cultivation of a culture of transparency regarding medical errors and the creation of mechanisms to gather and analyze data on medical injuries. The article discusses the experiences of foreign countries with administrative compensation systems for medical injury, including their use of claims data for research on patient safety; choices regarding the compensation system's relationship to physician disciplinary processes; and the proposed system's possible limitations. [source] Ensuring Patient Safety: What Lessons Can Be Learned from Device-Related Adverse Events in Hemodialysis?ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 4 2002Richard A. WardArticle first published online: 22 MAY 200 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Defining Systems Expertise: Effective Simulation at the Organizational Level,Implications for Patient Safety, Disaster Surge Capacity, and Facilitating the Systems InterfaceACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 11 2008Amy H. Kaji MD Abstract The Institute of Medicine's report "To Err is Human" identified simulation as a means to enhance safety in the medical field, just as flight simulation is used to improve the aviation industry. Yet, while there is evidence that simulation may improve task performance, there is little evidence that simulation actually improves patient outcome. Similarly, simulation is currently used to model teamwork-communication skills for disaster management and critical events, but little research or evidence exists to show that simulation improves disaster response or facilitates intersystem or interagency communication. Simulation ranges from the use of standardized patient encounters to robot-mannequins to computerized virtual environments. As such, the field of simulation covers a broad range of interactions, from patient,physician encounters to that of the interfaces between larger systems and agencies. As part of the 2008 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on the Science of Simulation, our group sought to identify key research questions that would inform our understanding of simulation's impact at the organizational level. We combined an online discussion group of emergency physicians, an extensive review of the literature, and a "public hearing" of the questions at the Consensus Conference to establish recommendations. The authors identified the following six research questions: 1) what objective methods and measures may be used to demonstrate that simulator training actually improves patient safety? 2) How can we effectively feedback information from error reporting systems into simulation training and thereby improve patient safety? 3) How can simulator training be used to identify disaster risk and improve disaster response? 4) How can simulation be used to assess and enhance hospital surge capacity? 5) What methods and outcome measures should be used to demonstrate that teamwork simulation training improves disaster response? and 6) How can the interface of systems be simulated? We believe that exploring these key research questions will improve our understanding of how simulation affects patient safety, disaster surge capacity, and intersystem and interagency communication. [source] Profiles in Patient Safety: A "Perfect Storm" in the Emergency DepartmentACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 8 2007CCFP(EM), Samuel G. Campbell MB Correct and rapid diagnosis is pivotal to the practice of emergency medicine, yet the chaotic and ill-structured emergency department environment is fertile ground for the commission of diagnostic error. Errors may result from specific error-producing conditions (EPCs) or, more frequently, from an interaction between such conditions. These EPCs are often expedient and serve to shorten the decision making process in a high-pressure environment. Recognizing that they will inevitably exist, it is important for clinicians to understand and manage their dangers. The authors present a case of delayed diagnosis resulting from the interaction of a number of EPCs that produced a "perfect" situation to produce a missed or delayed diagnosis. They offer practical suggestions whereby clinicians may decrease their chances of becoming victims of these influences. [source] Session 4B , Patient safetyINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, Issue S1 2009Article first published online: 8 JAN 2010 No abstract is available for this article. [source] Patient safety: Are we maximizing the potential of the pharmacist's role?INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, Issue 1 2009Soraya Dhillon MBE No abstract is available for this article. [source] Patient safety and quality of care: the role of the health care assistantJOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, Issue 6 2004AdvDipEd, DipN (Lond), FEANS, FRCN, FRCSI, Hugh P. McKenna BSc (Hons) The role of the Health Care Assistant emerged primarily to support the professional nurse and to undertake perceived ,non-nursing' duties under the direction and supervision of qualified nurses. Health Care Assistants are employed in a variety of clinical settings and carry out a range of tasks and procedures. While they represent a substantial proportion of the health care workforce, the growth of their role has taken place without regulation, clear boundaries, or systematic education and training. This has raised serious concerns, especially with regard to the issues of patient safety and quality of care. For health professionals, regulations, role clarity and validated education and training are key elements of ensuring the safety of the public. This paper explores these issues with regard to the Health Care Assistant role and finds them wanting. [source] Perinatal Patient Safety From the Perspective of Nurse Executives: A Round Table DiscussionJOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC, GYNECOLOGIC & NEONATAL NURSING, Issue 3 2006Kathleen E. Thorman Six nurse executives across the United States discussed issues related to perinatal patient safety. Gaps in communication were identified as one of the biggest challenges facing nurse executives. Other issues included expectations of regulators and accreditors, the pressure for productivity with limited resources and staffing, and undercapitalized technology versus safety and staff competence. Each nurse executive discussed a perinatal patient safety initiative implemented recently in her organization. If costs were not an issue, construction of facilities, adoption of electronic documentation, and adding positions to help assure patient safety were at the top of their wish lists. Patient safety continues as the number one priority for nurse executives. JOGNN, 35, 409-416; 2006. DOI: 10.1111/J.1552-6909.2006.00058.x [source] Patient safety and quality: can anaesthetists play a greater role?ANAESTHESIA, Issue 9 2003C. Jorm No abstract is available for this article. [source] Patient safety in medicine: are surgeons ready for checklists?ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 1-2 2010FRACS, John A. Windsor MBChB No abstract is available for this article. [source] Prevention of medication errors: detection and auditBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 6 2009Germana Montesi 1. Medication errors have important implications for patient safety, and their identification is a main target in improving clinical practice errors, in order to prevent adverse events. 2. Error detection is the first crucial step. Approaches to this are likely to be different in research and routine care, and the most suitable must be chosen according to the setting. 3. The major methods for detecting medication errors and associated adverse drug-related events are chart review, computerized monitoring, administrative databases, and claims data, using direct observation, incident reporting, and patient monitoring. All of these methods have both advantages and limitations. 4. Reporting discloses medication errors, can trigger warnings, and encourages the diffusion of a culture of safe practice. Combining and comparing data from various and encourages the diffusion of a culture of safe practice sources increases the reliability of the system. 5. Error prevention can be planned by means of retroactive and proactive tools, such as audit and Failure Mode, Effect, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). Audit is also an educational activity, which promotes high-quality care; it should be carried out regularly. In an audit cycle we can compare what is actually done against reference standards and put in place corrective actions to improve the performances of individuals and systems. 6. Patient safety must be the first aim in every setting, in order to build safer systems, learning from errors and reducing the human and fiscal costs. [source] A response to ,Patient safety', Levison A, Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 1236 and ,Sleep deprivation and performance', Price S R, Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 1238ANAESTHESIA, Issue 5 2004Francis Arnstein No abstract is available for this article. [source] Establishing a standardized quality management system for the European Health Network GA2LEN,ALLERGY, Issue 6 2010L. Heinzerling To cite this article: Heinzerling L, Burbach G, van Cauwenberge P, Papageorgiou P, Carlsen K-H, Lødrup Carlsen KC, Zuberbier T. Establishing a standardized quality management system for the European Health Network GA2LEN. Allergy 2010; 65: 743,752. Abstract Background:, Quality management is increasingly important in clinical practice. The Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN) is a network of clinical and scientific excellence with originally 25 allergy centres in 16 European countries, a scientific society (European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology), and a patient organization (European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations). Although some allergy centres adhere to internal quality criteria, the implementation of a standardized quality management system for allergy centres across Europe was lacking. Objectives:, To implement standardized quality criteria among allergy centres organized within GA2LEN and thus ensure equal standards of diagnosis and care as well as to establish a culture of continuous quality improvement. Methods:, Quality criteria covering, e.g., diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and emergency preparedness to assure patient safety were developed and agreed upon by all 25 participating centres. To assure implementation of quality criteria, centres were audited to check quality indicators and document deviations. A follow-up survey was used to assess the usefulness of the project. Results:, Deviations were documented mainly in the areas of emergency care/patient safety (27.3% lacked regular emergency training of doctors and nurses; 22.7% inadequate emergency intervention equipment; 22.7% lacked critical incidence reporting/root cause analyses) and handling of extracts/pharmaceuticals (31.8% lacked temperature logs of fridges; 4.5% inadequate check of expiration dates). Quality improvement was initiated as shown by findings of re-audits. Usefulness of the project was rated high. Conclusion:, The establishment of a quality management system with joint standards of care and harmonized procedures can be achieved in an international health network and ensures quality of care. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||