Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Patients' Difficulties (patient + difficulty)
Selected AbstractsEvaluation of Melbourne Edge Test contrast sensitivity measures in the visually impairedOPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 4 2005James S. Wolffsohn Abstract Aim:, Contrast sensitivity (CS) provides important information on visual function. This study aimed to assess differences in clinical expediency of the CS increment-matched new back-lit and original paper versions of the Melbourne Edge Test (MET) to determine the CS of the visually impaired. Methods:, The back-lit and paper MET were administered to 75 visually impaired subjects (28,97 years). Two versions of the back-lit MET acetates were used to match the CS increments with the paper-based MET. Measures of CS were repeated after 30 min and again in the presence of a focal light source directed onto the MET. Visual acuity was measured with a Bailey,Lovie chart and subjects rated how much difficulty they had with face and vehicle recognition. Results:, The back-lit MET gave a significantly higher CS than the paper-based version (14.2 ± 4.1 dB vs 11.3 ± 4.3 dB, p < 0.001). A significantly higher reading resulted with repetition of the paper-based MET (by 1.0 ± 1.7 dB, p < 0.001), but this was not evident with the back-lit MET (by 0.1 ± 1.4 dB, p = 0.53). The MET readings were increased by a focal light source, in both the back-lit (by 0.3 ± 0.81, p < 0.01) and paper-based (1.2 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) versions. CS as measured by the back-lit and paper-based versions of the MET was significantly correlated to patients' perceived ability to recognise faces (r = 0.71, r = 0.85 respectively; p < 0.001) and vehicles (r = 0.67, r = 0.82 respectively; p < 0.001), and with distance visual acuity (both r = ,0.64; p < 0.001). Conclusions:, The CS increment-matched back-lit MET gives higher CS values than the old paper-based test by approximately 3 dB and is more repeatable and less affected by external light sources. Clinically, the MET score provides information on patient difficulties with visual tasks, such as recognising faces. [source] Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: The use of clinical materialTHE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS, Issue 2 2008Judy L. Kantrowitz In this paper, I wish to illustrate how working with a patient who had a certain kind of narcissistic difficulty led me to develop particular clinical strategies to facilitate the development of a sturdier sense of self, greater affect tolerance and modulation, the diminution of harshness of her superego, and the ownership of projected parts of herself, and to decrease paranoid ideation. I call upon concepts from various theoretical schools of psychoanalysis to make sense of the dynamic intricacies of the patient's psychological organization as they revealed themselves in the analytic process. These conceptualizations of the patient's difficulties and of clinical interventions to address them result in a hybrid theory of both theory and technique. What transpired in the clinical work also led me to propose an additional way to understand this kind of patient's difficulties with accepting interpretations or any view that differed from the patient's subjectivity. I am proposing that ,otherness' itself, rather than only specific conflictual aspects of the self, is disowned. It is the analyst's empathic stance toward all that is repudiated , the specific disowned aspects of the self and ,otherness' itself , along with empathy for the patient's conscious state that will enable reinternalization and ultimately healing. [source] Basic knowledge in psychodermatologyJOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY & VENEREOLOGY, Issue 2 2007F Poot Abstract Background, The authors try to define the framework of this approach, what should be acquired by "well-informed" dermatologists and what is required to be a pyschodermatologist. Objective, To better define the necessary knowledge to practice psychodermatology. Results, 1) The first level is dermatology psychology: there is a psychotherapeutical implicit effect of the dermatological consultation with a goal that is not psychological change. This effect can be improved by acquiring better communication skills and information. The second level needs a possibility to change the emotional individual process and the relational context in a continuum between counselling and psychotherapy. To practice this level a complete psychotherapeutic education with some specificity is needed. This can be reached by a dermatologist also being a psychotherapist or by a team consisting of both dermatologist-psychotherapist. 2) The psychodermatological patient is characterized by alexithymia. He/she needs to be understood through the body language he/she presents. This kind of patient is coming from families where the theme of loss seems to dominate the histories and be associated with deep emotional experiences of separation anxiety. These characteristics must be known together with the different psychodermatological disorders and the mind-body interaction to handle these patients. 3) Taking all of this complexity into account, the psychodermatologist or the psychodermatological team should be able to integrate the different points and adapt attitudes to the patient's difficulty during the whole therapeutic process. 4) The evaluation of the problem should be done using psychological tools here described. Conclusion, The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) together with the European Society for Dermatology and Psychiatry (ESDaP) are able to provide the specific education for dermatologist and psychotherapist. In the future, they could be responsible for the recognition of these special abilities and treatments on a governmental and European political level. [source] Psychological distress and concerns of elderly patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for lung cancerPSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, Issue 8 2007N. J. Turner Abstract We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 83 elderly patients (aged 75 and above) being treated with palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer, with a comparison group of 49 younger patients (aged 65 and under). Psychological distress and concerns were measured before and after treatment using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a Concerns Checklist. Psychosocial morbidity was common, however, prevalence was similar in both age groups. There was a trend towards worsening of both anxiety and depression scores after treatment, but this did not reach statistical significance. Younger patients reported more concerns than the older group (median 12 vs 10) but this too was not statistically significant. Concerns about the illness and symptoms were more likely to have been addressed by the care team than were concerns about psychosocial issues such as the family and the future. People of all ages have similar concerns and levels of anxiety and depression whilst receiving palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Further research is needed to explore the use of screening tools, like those used in this study, to identify patients' difficulties and target interventions to improve their quality of life. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] ,A little bitty spot and I'm a big man': patients' perspectives on refusing diagnosis or treatment for lung cancerPSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, Issue 8 2005Barbara F. Sharf Abstract Patient refusal of physicians' recommendations may partially account for variations in lung cancer treatment affecting survival. Reasons for refusal have not been well researched, and patients who refuse are often labeled derogatorily as irrational or enigmatically non-compliant. This study explored why patients refused recommendations for further diagnosis or treatment of lung cancer. We conducted in-depth interviews with nine patients, identified and recruited over a 2-year period, with documented refusal of doctors' recommendations. Recruiting was hampered by deaths, logistics, and refusal to participate. Questions focused on participants' understanding of disease, medical recommendations, and perceptions of decision-making. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Participants emphasized self-efficacy, minimizing threat, fatalism or faith, and distrust of medical authority; explanations were often multi-dimensional. Comments included complaints about communication with physicians, health system discontinuities, and impact of social support. Explanations of participants' decisions reflected several ways of coping with an undesirable situation, including strategies for reducing, sustaining, and increasing uncertainty. Problematic Integration Theory helps to explain patients' difficulties in managing uncertainty when assessments of disease outcomes and treatment recommendations diverge. Implications for clinical communication include increasing trust while delivering bad news, understanding the source of resistance to recommendations, and discussing palliative care. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | ||||||||||