Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Patient Clinical Outcome (patient + clinical_outcome)
Selected AbstractsPrognostic value of combined analysis of cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patientsPATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2003Tae Sook Hwang The amplification of cyclin D1, located on chromosome 11q13, in breast cancer patients has been found to be associated with reduced relapse-free and overall survival; however, there still exists strong controversy about these findings. In order to evaluate the prognostic value of cyclin D1 and other prognostic variables in human breast cancers, we have assessed estrogen receptor (ER) status, cyclin D1, c-erbB2 and p53 overexpression in 175 primary breast carcinomas, and investigated the relationships of prognostic variables to the patient clinical outcome and the association between cyclin D1 overexpression and other prognostic variables. There was some degree of variability in staining intensities and proportions within the same tumor. The overexpression of both cyclin D1 and ER revealed a significantly prolonged survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.020). Among the various prognostic variables, distant metastasis showed a statistically significant association with overall survival. A significant correlation was observed between cyclin D1 overexpression and small size of the primary tumor (P = 0.031), low Bloom and Richardson's histological grade (P = 0.001), and positive ER status (P = 0.000). In contrast to what was previously expected, the present study suggests that the overexpression of cyclin D1 has a tendency to have a positive clinical outcome and a potential role in identifying a subset of patients predicting a good prognosis, particularly when ER is coexpressed. [source] High Incidence of Donor-Reactive Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reactivity in Transplant PatientsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2002Ronald P. Pelletier Evidence of transplant recipient cellular sensitization towards donor antigens has rarely been directly measured. Rather, sensitization has been generally inferred by the presence of detectable allo-reactive or donor-reactive antibodies. In this study a newly developed delayed-type hypersensitivity assay was used to directly determine the incidence of post-transplant donor-reactive T-cell sensitization in a large cohort of kidney and simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients. These results were compared with the presence of detectable circulating alloantibodies and with patient clinical outcome. We found an unexpectedly high incidence (52%) of donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity reactivity in our study patients. Donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity reactivity occurred at a much higher frequency than detectable alloantibodies (20%). Further, we found no correlation between the presence of alloantibodies and donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity reactivity. We also found no correlation between the development of donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity reactivity and the degree of donor and recipient HLA matching. Finally, the presence of detectable donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity reactivity did not correlate with a worse clinical outcome at the time of these analyses. We conclude that in transplant recipients, the presence of circulating alloantibodies is a poor indicator of previous T-cell sensitization to donor antigens. We also conclude that our current immunosuppression strategies are relatively ineffective at blocking T-cell allosensitization, but are very effective at blocking the biological consequences of that allosensitization. [source] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor produces a decrease in IFN, and increase in IL-4 when administrated to healthy donorsJOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, Issue 4 2010Octavio Rodríguez-Cortés Abstract Hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT) is the leading curative therapy for a variety of hematological and hereditary diseases; however, graft versus host disease (GVHD), an immunologic phenomenon that is favored by Th1 cytokines and cytotoxic cells from donors, is present frequently and is one of the most important causes of transplant related mortality. Peripheral blood HSCT is the preferred source of stem cells in almost 100% of the cases of autologous HSCT and in 70% of allogeneic transplants. The best mobilizing agent to get the stem cells out from the bone marrow is the Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF). In this work, our main objective was to study a possible correlation between the graft cell dose and the patient's clinical outcome. We evaluated the immunologic changes produced by G-CSF in the lymphocyte and cytokine profiles in allogeneic HSC donors. HSC from twelve donors were mobilized with G-CSF at 16 ,g/kg/day, for 5 days. Basal Peripheral Blood (BPB), Mobilized Peripheral Blood (MPB), and aphaeresis mononuclear cells (G-MNC) samples were taken from all donors. Using flow cytometry, we quantified CD19+, CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, NK, NKT, DC1, and DC2 cells. Cytokines were determined by ELISA in culture supernatants. CD19+ (p = 0.001), DC1 (p < 0.002) and DC2 (p < 0.001) cells were increased in MPB with respect to BPB. An increase in Th2 cytokines such as (IL-4) and a decrease in Th1 cytokines (IFN,, IL-2) were also found in MPB samples. In conclusion, Th1 and Th2 cytokines are relevant in predicting the clinical outcome after allogeneic peripheral blood HSCT. J. Clin. Apheresis 25:181,187, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Identifying Subjects Who Benefit from Additional Information for Better Prediction of the Outcome VariablesBIOMETRICS, Issue 3 2009L. Tian Summary Suppose that we are interested in using new bio- or clinical markers, in addition to the conventional markers, to improve prediction or diagnosis of the patient's clinical outcome. The incremental value from the new markers is typically assessed by averaging across patients in the entire study population. However, when measuring the new markers is costly or invasive, an overall improvement does not justify measuring the new markers in all patients. A more practical strategy is to utilize the patient's conventional markers to decide whether the new markers are needed for improving prediction of his/her health outcomes. In this article, we propose inference procedures for the incremental values of new markers across various subgroups of patients classified by the conventional markers. The resulting point and interval estimates can be quite useful for medical decision makers seeking to balance the predictive or diagnostic value of new markers against their associated cost and risk. Our proposals are theoretically justified and illustrated empirically with two real examples. [source] Teaching Culturally Appropriate Care: A Review of Educational Models and MethodsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 12 2006Cherri Hobgood MD Abstract The disparities in health care and health outcomes between the majority population and cultural and racial minorities in the United States are a problem that likely is influenced by the lack of culturally competent care. Emergency medicine and other primary-care specialties remain on the front lines of this struggle because of the nature of their open-door practice. To provide culturally appropriate care, health care providers must recognize the factors impeding cultural awareness, seek to understand the biases and traditions in medical education potentially fueling this phenomenon, and create a health care community that is open to individuals' otherness, thus leading to better communication of ideas and information between patients and their health care providers. This article highlights the rationale for and current problems in teaching cultural competency and examines several different models implemented to teach and promote cultural competency along the continuum of emergency medicine learners. However, the literature addressing the true efficacy of such programs in leading to long-lasting change and improvement in minority patients' clinical outcomes remains insufficient. [source] | ||||||||||