Home About us Contact | |||
Partial Breast Irradiation (partial + breast_irradiation)
Selected AbstractsCentre credentialing for Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 06.02: multicentre feasibility study of accelerated partial breast irradiationJOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, Issue 4 2009T Kron Summary Introduction:, Inconsistencies in contouring target volumes for partial breast irradiation (PBI) may result in geographical misses and compromise treatment outcomes. The present study aimed to (1) determine the variability of the target volumes contoured and treatment plans generated by participating centres in credentialing for participation in a multicentre PBI trial; and (2) assess dosimetric changes when standardized target volumes were used. Methods:, The CT image sets of two de-identified patients post-breast conserving surgery were used. Contouring of the target volumes for the two cases was performed and a treatment plan as per protocol specifications was generated for each case by the seven participating centres. Planning of both cases was repeated by five centres using a set of standardized target volumes to evaluate resulting dosimetric changes in the treatment plans. Results:, The surgical cavity, the part of the planning target volume used for dose evaluation and ipsilateral whole breast volumes contoured by the centres varied by 25%, 16% and 21% (1 standard deviation), respectively. The dosimetric variations found when the standardized target volumes were used were smaller than those noted when centre-specific volumes were used. The volumes of the ipsilateral lungs receiving 30% of the prescribed dose and the volumes of the ipsilateral whole breasts receiving 95% and 50% of the prescribed dose were reduced in the treatment plans developed using the standardized target volumes. Conclusions:, Given the impact of contouring on dose distributions, quality assurance procedures in clinical trials of PBI need to take into account both the technical approaches and the contouring. [source] Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer,CANCER, Issue 8 2009Implications for partial breast irradiation Abstract BACKGROUND: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) of patients with early breast cancer is being investigated on a multi-institutional protocol National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-39/RTOG 0413. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than mammography (MG) and may aid in selection of patients appropriate for PBI. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) routinely undergo contrast-enhanced, bilateral breast MRI at the Cleveland Clinic. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all early-stage breast cancer patients who had a breast MRI, MG, and surgical pathology data at our institution between June of 2005 and December of 2006. Any suspicious lesions identified on MRI were further evaluated by targeted ultrasound ± biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients met eligibility criteria for NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 by MG, physical exam, and surgical pathology. The median age was 57 years. DCIS was present in 63 patients, and invasive breast cancer was found in 197 patients. MRI identified suspicious lesions in 35 ipsilateral breasts (13%) and in 16 contralateral breasts (6%). Mammographically occult, synchronous ipsilateral foci were found by MRI in 11 patients (4.2%), and in the contralateral breast in 4 patients (1.5%). By univariate analysis, lobular histology (infiltrating lobular carcinoma [ILC]), pathologic T2, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II were significantly associated with additional ipsilateral disease. Of patients with ILC histology, 18% had ipsilateral secondary cancers or DCIS, compared with 3% in the remainder of histologic subtypes (P = .004). No patient older than 70 years had synchronous cancers or DCIS detected by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI identified synchronous mammographically occult foci in 5.8% of early breast cancer patients who would otherwise be candidates for APBI. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. [source] Breast radiation therapy guideline implementation in low- and middle-income countries,CANCER, Issue S8 2008Nuran Senel Bese MD Abstract Radiation therapy plays a critical role in the management of breast cancer and often is unavailable to patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMCs). There is a need to provide appropriate equipment and to improve the techniques of administration, quality assurance, and use of resources for radiation therapy in LMCs. Although the linear accelerator is the preferred equipment, telecobalt machines may be considered as an acceptable alternative in LMCs. Applying safe and effective treatment also requires well trained staff, support systems, geographic accessibility, and the initiation and completion of treatment without undue delay. In early-stage breast cancer, standard treatment includes the irradiation of the entire breast with an additional boost to the tumor site and should be delivered after treatment planning with at least 2-dimensional imaging. Although postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has demonstrated local control and overall survival advantages in all patients with axillary lymph node metastases, preference in limited resource settings could be reserved for patients who have ,4 positive lymph nodes. The long-term risks of cardiac morbidity and mortality require special attention to the volume of heart and lungs exposed. Alternative treatment schedules like hypofractionated radiation and partial breast irradiation currently are investigational. Radiation therapy is an integral component for patients with locally advanced breast cancer after initial systemic treatment and surgery. For patients with distant metastases, radiation is an effective tool for palliation, especially for bone, brain, and soft tissue metastases. The implementation of quality-assurance programs applied to equipment, the planning process, and radiation treatment delivery must be instituted in all radiation therapy centers. Cancer 2008;113(8 suppl):2305,14. © 2008 American Cancer Society. [source] |