Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Pantoprazole
Kinds of Pantoprazole Selected AbstractsLow-dose intravenous pantoprazole for optimal inhibition of gastric acid in Korean patientsJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 9 2007Jung-Hwan Oh Abstract Background and Aim:, Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for bleeding ulcers is more efficacious in Asian patients than in non-Asian patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various doses of pantoprazole on intragastric acidity in Korean patients. Methods:, A prospective randomized study was conducted in 52 patients either with bleeding peptic ulcers after successful endotherapy or who received endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric neoplasms. Patients were randomized into two doses of intravenous pantoprazole: 40 mg q.d. and 40 mg b.i.d. We compared these results with our preliminary study utilizing high-dose pantoprazole (80 mg + 8 mg/h). The potential contribution of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms and the presence of Helicobacter pylori were also assessed. Results:, Pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. and high-dose pantoprazole demonstrated better inhibition of intragastric acid than pantoprazole q.d. (P < 0.05). The pantoprazole 40 mg q.d. group exhibited significant variations in acid inhibition correlating with CYP2C19 genotype. Median 24 h pH values did not differ significantly between the pantoprazole b.i.d. and high-dose pantoprazole groups, regardless of H. pylori infection status. A median intragastric pH < 6.0 was observed in only three of 28 patients in the 40 mg b.i.d. group; these three patients were extensive metabolizers. Conclusion:, A 40 mg b.i.d. dose of pantoprazole is sufficient to maintain pH > 6.0 in Korean patients, except for patients with extensive metabolizing CYP2C19 genotypes. [source] Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Pantoprazole in AlpacasJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2010G.W. Smith Background: Despite frequent clinical use, information about the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of pantoprazole in camelids is not available. Objectives: To examine the pharmacokinetics of both IV and SC pantoprazole and to determine whether pantoprazole administration would increase 3rd compartment pH in alpacas. Animals: Six healthy adult alpacas. Methods: Alpacas were fitted with a 3rd compartment cannula for measuring gastric pH. After recovery, alpacas received 1 mg/kg pantoprazole IV, q24h for 3 days or 2 mg/kg SC q24h for 3 days. Alpacas received both IV and SC pantoprazole, with a minimum of 3 weeks between treatments. Third compartment pH was recorded and plasma samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results: Pantoprazole induced a slow but sustained increase in 3rd compartment pH when given by both the IV and SC routes. Third compartment pH was significantly increased as compared with baseline values (1.81 ± 0.7; mean ± SD) at 24 (2.47 ± 0.8), 48 (3.53 ± 1.0) and 72 hours (4.03 ± 1.3) after daily IV administration of pantoprazole. Third compartment pH increased from 1.73 ± 0.6 at baseline to 3.05 ± 1.1, 4.02 ± 1.4, and 3.61 ± 1.6 at 24, 48, and 72 hours after SC administration, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that pantoprazole had a short elimination half-life (0.47 + 0.06 h) and a high clearance rate (12.2 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min) after both IV and SC administration. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Based on the results of this study, pantoprazole represents a safe and effective drug for increasing 3rd compartment pH in camelids. Either IV or SC administration is likely to be an effective treatment for gastric ulcers. [source] Clinical trial: intravenous pantoprazole vs. ranitidine for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding: a multicentre, multinational, randomized trialALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 5 2009C. VAN RENSBURG Summary Background, Controlled pantoprazole data in peptic ulcer bleeding are few. Aim, To compare intravenous (IV) pantoprazole with IV ranitidine for bleeding ulcers. Methods, After endoscopic haemostasis, 1256 patients were randomized to pantoprazole 80 mg+8 mg/h or ranitidine 50 mg+13mg/h, both for 72 h. Patients underwent second-look endoscopy on day 3 or earlier, if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was an overall outcome ordinal score: no rebleeding, rebleeding without/with subsequent haemostasis, surgery and mortality. The latter three events were also assessed separately and together. Results, There were no between-group differences in overall outcome scores (pantoprazole vs. ranitidine: S0: 91.2 vs. 89.3%, S1: 1.5 vs. 2.5%, S2: 5.4 vs. 5.7%, S3: 1.7 vs. 2.1%, S4: 0.19 vs. 0.38%, P = 0.083), 72-h clinically detected rebleeding (2.9% [95% CI 1.7, 4.6] vs. 3.2% [95% CI 2.0, 4.9]), surgery (1.9% [95% CI 1.0, 3.4] vs. 2.1% [95% CI 1.1, 3.5]) or day-3 mortality (0.2% [95% CI 0, 0.09] vs. 0.3% [95% CI 0, 1.1]). Pantoprazole significantly decreased cumulative frequencies of events comprising the ordinal score in spurting lesions (13.9% [95% CI 6.6, 24.7] vs. 33.9% [95% CI 22.1, 47.4]; P = 0.01) and gastric ulcers (6.7% [95% CI 4, 10.4] vs. 14.3% [95% CI 10.3, 19.2], P = 0.006). Conclusions, Outcomes amongst pantoprazole and ranitidine-treated patients were similar; pantoprazole provided benefits in patients with arterial spurting and gastric ulcers. [source] Pantoprazole, azithromycin and tinidazole: short duration triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infectionALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 12 2000C. Calabrese Background: Azithromycin is an acid-stable macrolide that achieves remarkably high concentrations in gastric tissue, persisting above the MIC90 for Helicobacter pylori over a period of 5-days, after a single 500 mg oral dose. Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two eradicating regimens of pantoprazole, azithromycin and tinidazole. Methods: A total of 100 consecutive symptomatic H. pylori- positive patients received pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. for 1 week, and were randomly assigned to either azithromycin 500 mg o.m. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. during the first 3 days (early group, n=50) or during the last 3 days of therapy with pantoprazole (late group, n=50). H. pylori status was assessed by histology and rapid urease test at entry and by histology and 13C-urea breath test 1 month after the end of the therapy. Results: Ninety-nine patients completed the study. H. pylori was eradicated in 86% of patients in the early group (intention-to-treat 86%) and in 88% of patients in the late group (intention-to-treat 88%). Conclusions: This short triple therapy is effective for H. pylori eradication. The compliance was excellent and side-effects negligible. Moreover, the pantoprazole pre-treatment did not modify the efficacy of the therapy. [source] Nefopam hydrochloride compatibility and stability with selected proton pump inhibitors in bionolyte G5 injection for intravenous infusionJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2009N. K. Kambia PharmD PhD Summary Background:, The use of extemporaneously prepared admixtures of drugs must be supported by documentation of their chemical stability. Objective:, To assess the physical compatibility and the chemical stability of nefopam hydrochloride, a centrally acting non-opioid analgesic, when admixed with selected proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, esomeprazole or pantoprazole), in bionolyte G5 injection for intravenous infusion. Method:, Admixtures were assessed for periods of up to 72 h after storage at ambient temperature without protection from light and at +4 °C protected from light. A preparation was considered stable if the compounds of the mixture retained at least 90% of their original potency during the storage. Triplicate samples of nefopam and the selected proton pump inhibitors as well as the following mixtures (nefopam/omeprazole, nefopam/esomeprazole and nefopam/pantoprazole) were prepared in the concentrations required, in polypropylene bottles of bionolyte G5 injection. The physical compatibility was assessed by visual observation at each sampling interval. The chemical stability of the drugs was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography and by measurement of pH values. Results:, During refrigerated storage, nefopam as well as the selected proton pump inhibitors, when prepared separately in bionolyte G5 injection maintained chemical stability for up to 7 days. At ambient storage conditions, the protons pump inhibitors maintained chemical stability for 24 h, but thereafter their concentrations decreased significantly at day 1. Nefopam maintained chemical stability for up to 72 h at +25 °C. Nefopam/omeprazole and nefopam/esomeprazole mixtures in bionolyte were physically incompatible with the mixtures exhibiting a black colour. They underwent rapid and extensive loss, making the combination unacceptable within minutes of mixing. However, the nefopam/pantoprazole mixture was compatible over the study period, but with a reduced duration of the stability. Conclusion:, Within the limits defined above, nefopam and the selected proton pump inhibitors may be prepared separately in advance in bionolyte G5 injection. The nefopam/pantoprazole mixture was stable for a short period, while the nefopam/omeprazole and the nefopam/esomeprazole mixtures were incompatible and unusable, immediately upon admixture. [source] Effect of pantoprazole in patients with chronic laryngitis and pharyngitis related to gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, proximal, and distal pH monitoring resultsDISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 4 2010S. Karoui SUMMARY Few studies had evaluated the results of proton pump inhibitors on distal and proximal pH recording using a dual-channel probe. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and pH-metric effect of treatment with pantoprazole 80 mg for 8 weeks in patients with ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with pathological proximal acid exposure. We conducted a prospective open study. Patients included had to have chronic pharyngitis or laryngitis, and a pathological gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux. All patients received treatment with pantoprazole 80 mg daily for 8 weeks. One week after the end treatment, patients had a second ENT examination and a 24-hour pH monitoring using dual-channel probe. We included 33 patients (11 men, 22 women). A pathological distal acid reflux was found in 30 patients (91%). After treatment, the improvement of ENT symptoms was found in 51.5% of patients. Normalization of 24-hour proximal esophageal pH monitoring was observed in 22 patients (66%). After treatment, the overall distal acid exposure, the number of distal reflux events, and the number of reflux during more than 5 minutes were significantly decreased (respectively: 19.4% vs 7.2% [P < 0.0001], 62.7 vs 28.4 [P < 0.0001], and 10.4 vs 3.9 [P < 0.0001] ). Similarly, in proximal level, the same parameters were significantly decreased after treatment (respectively: 6.8% vs 1.6% [P < 0.0001], 32.6 vs 8.1 [P < 0.0001], and 3.4 vs 0.6 [P= 0.005] ). Treatment with pantoprazole reduced the frequency and severity of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux in patients with chronic pharyngitis and laryngitis. [source] Comparison of efficacy of pantoprazole alone versus pantoprazole plus mosapride in therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized trialDISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 4 2004K. Madan SUMMARY, The present study aimed to compare the efficacy for the therapy of GERD of pantoprazole alone with a combination of pantoprazole and mosapride. The study was a prospective, randomized trial involving 68 patients suffering heartburn and/or regurgitation at least twice a week for 6 weeks. Sixty-one patients consented to be randomized to receive either pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. (n = 33, group A) or pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. plus mosapride 5 mg t.d.s. (n = 28, group B) for 8 weeks. Twenty-four-hour esophageal pH-metry and endoscopy were conducted at recruitment and endoscopy was repeated at 8 weeks in all the patients studied. There were no differences in symptomatic responses to therapy between the groups (69.7% vs 89.2%; P = 0.11). The mean symptom score after 8 weeks was significantly lower in group B (3.78 ± 3.62 vs 1.67 ± 2.09; P = 0.009). Nonerosive esophagitis was present in 29 patients. In patients with nonerosive GERD there was no significant difference in symptomatic response to either regimen (17/20 in group A and 7/9 in group B responded; P = 0.63). In erosive esophagitis, symptomatic responses occurred more frequently in group B, 18/19 (94.7%), than in group A, 6/13 (46.2%; P = 0.003). However endoscopic healing of esophagitis occurred equally with either regimen (6/11, 54.5% in group A; 12/17, 70.5% in group B; P = 0.44). In nonerosive GERD, the addition of mosapride offers no benefit over pantoprazole alone. A combination of pantoprazole and mosapride is more effective than pantoprazole alone in providing symptomatic relief to patients with erosive GERD. [source] Double-Dose, New-Generation Proton Pump Inhibitors Do Not Improve Helicobacter pylori Eradication RateHELICOBACTER, Issue 6 2007Hyo Sun Choi Abstract Background: Up to present, omeprazole plus two antibiotics are used for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy . Few studies have compared double-dose new-generation, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with omeprazole. Therefore, we conducted a randomized, prospective study to evaluate differences in H. pylori eradication rates by PPI type. Material and Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2006, 576 consecutive patients with proven H. pylori infection were enrolled prospectively. Four different PPIs [omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (old generation), or pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. (new generation)] were added to clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week. Results: By intention-to-treat analysis, no difference was found between the eradication rates of these four PPIs: 64.9% (omeprazole, n = 148), 69.3% (pantoprazole, n = 140), 69.3% (rabeprazole, n = 140), and 72.9% (esomoprazole, n = 148). When eradication rates were analyzed according to whether patients had an ulcer or not on a per-protocol basis, no difference was found between the eradication rates of the four PPIs. However, side-effects were more common in the esomeprazole-based triple therapy group than in the other groups (p < .05). Conclusions: No convincing evidence was obtained that double-dose new-generation PPIs have better H. pylori eradication rates and tolerability than omeprazole. [source] Recent Use of Proton Pump Inhibitor-Based Triple Therapies for the Eradication of H. pylori: A Broad Data ReviewHELICOBACTER, Issue 2 2003Hans-Joachim Ulmer abstract Introduction. For the eradication of Helicobacter pylori a 1-week triple therapy combining proton pump inhibitors with two antibiotics has been recommended as a gold standard therapy. However, a recent broad data review on the efficacy of the different regimens is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the recent literature. Methods. We undertook a broad data review of the efficacy of nine different 7-day triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, omeprazole) in its standard dosage and two antibiotics. Relevant original papers on H. pylori eradication in adults, published in English or German between 1995 and 2000, were identified from MEDLINE searches. Studies were reviewed and selected according to predefined criteria. Results. Our predefined criteria were fulfilled by 79 full paper articles including 112 study arms with 8383 patients on intention-to-treat, or 6787 patients on per-protocol basis, respectively. The mean eradication rates unweighted or weighted by the number of patients in the study arm vary from 71.9% to 83.8% for intention-to-treat analysis and from 78.5% to 91.2% for per-protocol analysis. Conclusions. All nine PPI based triple therapy regimens are very effective in H. pylori eradication. The current literature review underlines that the use of either lansoprazole, omeprazole, or pantoprazole combined with two antibiotics yield similar high eradication rates. [source] In GERD patients, mucosal repair associated genes are upregulated in non-inflamed oesophageal epitheliumJOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, Issue 5 2009D. R. De Vries Abstract Previous studies addressing the effects of acid reflux and PPI therapy on gene expression in oesophageal epithelium concentrated on inflamed tissue. We aimed to determine changes in gene expression in non-inflamed oesophageal epithelium of GERD patients. Therefore, we included 20 GERD patients with pathological total 24-hr acid exposure of 6,12% and SAP , 95%. Ten patients discontinued PPI treatment (PPI-), 10 took pantoprazole 40 mg bid (PPI+). Ten age/sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. Biopsies were taken from non-inflamed mucosa 6 cm and 16 cm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ). Gene expression profiling of biopsies from 6 cm was performed on Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix). Genes exhibiting a fold change >1.4 (t-test P -value < 1E, 4) were considered differentially expressed. Results were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR. In PPI- patients, 92 microarray probesets were deregulated. The majority of the corresponding genes were associated with cell,cell contacts, cytoskeletal reorganization and cellular motility, suggesting facilitation of a migratory phenotype. Genes encoding proteins with anti-apoptotic or anti-proliferative functions or stress-protective functions were also deregulated. No probesets were deregulated in PPI+ patients. QPCR analysis of 20 selected genes confirmed most of the deregulations in PPI- patients, and showed several deregulated genes in PPI+ patients as well. In the biopsies taken at 16 cm QPCR revealed no deregulations of the selected genes. We conclude that upon acid exposure, oesophageal epithelial cells activate a process globally known as epithelial restitution: up-regulation of anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidant and migration associated genes. Possibly this process helps maintaining barrier function. [source] Nefopam hydrochloride compatibility and stability with selected proton pump inhibitors in bionolyte G5 injection for intravenous infusionJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2009N. K. Kambia PharmD PhD Summary Background:, The use of extemporaneously prepared admixtures of drugs must be supported by documentation of their chemical stability. Objective:, To assess the physical compatibility and the chemical stability of nefopam hydrochloride, a centrally acting non-opioid analgesic, when admixed with selected proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, esomeprazole or pantoprazole), in bionolyte G5 injection for intravenous infusion. Method:, Admixtures were assessed for periods of up to 72 h after storage at ambient temperature without protection from light and at +4 °C protected from light. A preparation was considered stable if the compounds of the mixture retained at least 90% of their original potency during the storage. Triplicate samples of nefopam and the selected proton pump inhibitors as well as the following mixtures (nefopam/omeprazole, nefopam/esomeprazole and nefopam/pantoprazole) were prepared in the concentrations required, in polypropylene bottles of bionolyte G5 injection. The physical compatibility was assessed by visual observation at each sampling interval. The chemical stability of the drugs was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography and by measurement of pH values. Results:, During refrigerated storage, nefopam as well as the selected proton pump inhibitors, when prepared separately in bionolyte G5 injection maintained chemical stability for up to 7 days. At ambient storage conditions, the protons pump inhibitors maintained chemical stability for 24 h, but thereafter their concentrations decreased significantly at day 1. Nefopam maintained chemical stability for up to 72 h at +25 °C. Nefopam/omeprazole and nefopam/esomeprazole mixtures in bionolyte were physically incompatible with the mixtures exhibiting a black colour. They underwent rapid and extensive loss, making the combination unacceptable within minutes of mixing. However, the nefopam/pantoprazole mixture was compatible over the study period, but with a reduced duration of the stability. Conclusion:, Within the limits defined above, nefopam and the selected proton pump inhibitors may be prepared separately in advance in bionolyte G5 injection. The nefopam/pantoprazole mixture was stable for a short period, while the nefopam/omeprazole and the nefopam/esomeprazole mixtures were incompatible and unusable, immediately upon admixture. [source] Conformational analysis: A new approach by means of chemometricsJOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, Issue 2 2002Aline Thaís Bruni Abstract In conformational analysis, the systematic search method completely maps the space but suffers from the combinatorial explosion problem because the number of conformations increases exponentially with the number of free rotation angles. This study introduces a new methodology of conformational analysis that controls the combinatorial explosion. It is based on a dimensional reduction of the system through the use of principal component analysis. The results are exactly the same as those obtained for the complete search but, in this case, the number of conformations increases only quadratically with the number of free rotation angles. The method is applied to a series of three drugs: omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole,benzimidazoles that suppress gastric-acid secretion by means of H+, K+ -ATPase enzyme inhibition. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 222,236, 2002 [source] Effect of the CYP2C19 polymorphism on the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection by 7-day triple therapy with regular proton pump inhibitor dosageJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 8pt1 2008Jung Mook Kang Abstract Background and Aim:, Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) in the liver. We investigated whether the CYP2C19 genotype plays a role in the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients receiving pantoprazole- or esomeprazole-based triple therapy. Methods:, A total of 327 patients infected with H. pylori were treated with either pantoprazole or esomeprazole, plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 7 days. The presence of the CYP2C19 genotype was determined by pyrosequencing. Results:, The overall H. pylori eradication rate was 85%; 82.6% for the PAC regimen, and 88.3% for the EAC regimen; the differences were not statistically significant. The overall eradication rate in the poor metabolizer groups (PM) was significantly higher than in the extensive metabolizer groups (EM) (97.4% vs 83.3%; P = 0.016). The eradication rates in the EM and PM groups were 80.8% and 95.7% for the PAC regimen and 86.8% and 100% for the EAC regimen, respectively. Conclusion:, The results of this study suggest that the CYP2C19 genotype status may play a role in the H. pylori eradication rate in patients receiving pantoprazole or esomeprazole-based triple therapy. [source] Low-dose intravenous pantoprazole for optimal inhibition of gastric acid in Korean patientsJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 9 2007Jung-Hwan Oh Abstract Background and Aim:, Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for bleeding ulcers is more efficacious in Asian patients than in non-Asian patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various doses of pantoprazole on intragastric acidity in Korean patients. Methods:, A prospective randomized study was conducted in 52 patients either with bleeding peptic ulcers after successful endotherapy or who received endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric neoplasms. Patients were randomized into two doses of intravenous pantoprazole: 40 mg q.d. and 40 mg b.i.d. We compared these results with our preliminary study utilizing high-dose pantoprazole (80 mg + 8 mg/h). The potential contribution of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms and the presence of Helicobacter pylori were also assessed. Results:, Pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. and high-dose pantoprazole demonstrated better inhibition of intragastric acid than pantoprazole q.d. (P < 0.05). The pantoprazole 40 mg q.d. group exhibited significant variations in acid inhibition correlating with CYP2C19 genotype. Median 24 h pH values did not differ significantly between the pantoprazole b.i.d. and high-dose pantoprazole groups, regardless of H. pylori infection status. A median intragastric pH < 6.0 was observed in only three of 28 patients in the 40 mg b.i.d. group; these three patients were extensive metabolizers. Conclusion:, A 40 mg b.i.d. dose of pantoprazole is sufficient to maintain pH > 6.0 in Korean patients, except for patients with extensive metabolizing CYP2C19 genotypes. [source] Semipreparative chiral supercritical fluid chromatography in the fractionation of lansoprazole and two related antiulcer drugs enantiomersJOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, JSS, Issue 8 2008Laura Toribio Abstract The semipreparative chiral separation of lansoprazole and two related compounds (pantoprazole and rabeprazole) using supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is presented in this work. Different loads were evaluated in order to obtain high enantiomeric purities and production rates. The volumes injected were 1, 2 and 4 mL. The concentrations of the racemic mixtures were 3 and 6 g/L for lansoprazole and 1.5 g/L for pantoprazole and rabeprazole. In all the cases, the recoveries, for a purity higher than 99.9%, were better for the second eluted enantiomer than for the first one. This fact conditioned the production rate of the first eluted enantiomer that, considering a fixed purity, was always lower than that obtained for the other one. In the case of lansoprazole it was possible to obtain 0.025 and 0.090 mg/min of the first and second eluted enantiomer, respectively, with an enantiomeric purity of 99.9%. For rabeprazole enantiomers 0.037 and 0.062 mg/min, and in the case of pantoprazole the results were better (0.062 and 0.122 mg/min) due to the higher resolution. [source] Clinical trial: gastric acid suppression in Hispanic adults with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease , comparator study of esomeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazoleALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2010D. Morgan Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 200,208 Summary Background, Hispanic-Americans are a rapidly growing population in the United States, yet gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is not well studied in this population. Aim, To compare the efficacy of esomeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in suppressing gastric acid, including the area of the ,acid pocket,' in Hispanics with GERD. Methods, In this open-label, 3-way crossover study, 83 Hispanics with symptomatic GERD were randomized to 1 of 6 possible treatment sequences of three 5,7-day dosing periods with esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg daily separated by 10,17-day washout periods. Intragastric pH was measured for 24 h using dual probes with a distal and proximal (area of the ,acid pocket') electrode. Results, Esomeprazole suppressed intragastric acid (pH >4.0) significantly longer over 24 h (primary end point) compared with lansoprazole and pantoprazole (P < 0.0001), and proximal gastric acid (pH >4.0) significantly longer over 24 h compared with lansoprazole (P < 0.05) and pantoprazole (P < 0.0001). Conclusions, Esomeprazole was more effective than lansoprazole and pantoprazole in suppressing gastric acidity at both intragastric distal and proximal (area of the acid pocket) sites in Hispanics with GERD. Future studies are warranted to understand better the role of the acid pocket in GERD (Clinical trial numbers: D9612L00106; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00410592). [source] Effects of a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and oesophageal acid exposure: a randomized study in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with a history of nocturnal heartburnALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2010P. MINER Aliment Pharmacol Ther,31, 991,1000 Summary Background, Nocturnal heartburn is common in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Aim, To compare the effects of single doses of rabeprazole 20 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-h intragastric acidity and oesophageal acid exposure (OAE). Methods, A total of 52 subjects with GERD and a ,6-month history of heartburn were randomized into a blinded, 2 × 2 crossover trial. Subjects' intragastric pH was monitored in two 48-h study periods with 6- to 13-day washout between periods. Patients received placebo on day 1, a single dose of rabeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg on day 2, and standardized meals throughout. Results, The mean percentage time with intragastric pH >4 was significantly greater with rabeprazole vs. pantoprazole for the 24-h postdose interval (44.0% vs. 32.8%; P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in the daytime (51.0% vs. 42.2%; P < 0.001) and nighttime (32.0% vs. 16.9%; P < 0.001). Rabeprazole was also significantly superior in other intragastric pH parameters. There was no statistical difference for OAE between treatments. Conclusions, In GERD patients with nocturnal heartburn, rabeprazole 20 mg was significantly more effective than pantoprazole 40 mg in percentage time with intragastric pH >4 during the nighttime, daytime, and 24-h periods. Differences between treatments in OAE were not demonstrated. This trial is registered with http://clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00237367. [source] A comparison of the acid-inhibitory effects of esomeprazole and pantoprazole in relation to pharmacokinetics and CYP2C19 polymorphismALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 1 2010N. G. HUNFELD Summary Background, Esomeprazole and pantoprazole are metabolized in the liver and the polymorphic CYP2C19 enzyme is involved in that process. This genetic polymorphism determines fast (70% of Caucasians), intermediate (25,30% of Caucasians) and slow (2,5% of Caucasians) metabolism of PPIs. Aim, To compare the acid-inhibitory effects of esomeprazole 40 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg at 4, 24 and 120 h after oral administration in relation to CYP2C19 genotype and pharmacokinetics. Methods, CYP2C19*2, *3, *4, *5 and *17 genotypes were determined in healthy Helicobacter pylori- negative Caucasian subjects. 7 wt/wt, 7 wt/*2, 2 wt/*17, 2 *2/*17 and 1 *2/*2 were included in a randomized investigator-blinded cross-over study with esomeprazole 40 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg. Intragastric 24-h pH-monitoring was performed on days 0, 1 and 5 of oral dosing. Results, A total of 19 subjects (mean age 24 years, 7 male) completed the study. At day 1 and 5, acid-inhibition with esomeprazole was significantly greater and faster than with pantoprazole. Differences in acid-inhibition and pharmacokinetics between wt/wt and wt/*2 genotype were significant for pantoprazole at day 1 and 5. Conclusions, Esomeprazole provides acid-inhibition faster than and superior to pantoprazole after single and repeated administration. The acid-inhibitory effect and the kinetics of pantoprazole are influenced by CYP2C19 genotype. [source] Systematic review: standard- and double-dose proton pump inhibitors for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis , a mixed treatment comparison of randomized controlled trialsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2009S. J. EDWARDS Summary Background, No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared all European-licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis. Aim, To compare the effectiveness of licensed doses of PPIs for healing severe erosive oesophagitis (i.e. esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg). Methods, Systematic review of CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs in patients with erosive oesophagitis (completed October 2008). Endoscopically verified healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks were extracted and re-calculated if not analysed by intention-to-treat. A mixed treatment comparison was used to combine direct treatment comparisons with indirect trial evidence while maintaining randomization. Odds ratios (OR) are reported compared to omeprazole 20 mg. Results, A total of 3021 papers were identified in the literature search; 12 were of sufficient quality to be included in the analysis. Insufficient data were available to included rabeprazole. Esomeprazole 40 mg was found to provide significantly higher healing rates at 4 weeks [OR 1.84, 95% Credible Interval (95% CrI): 1.50 to 2.22] and 8 weeks (OR 1.91, 95% CrI: 1.13 to 2.88). No other PPI investigated had significantly higher healing rates than omeprazole 20 mg. Conclusion, Esomeprazole 40 mg consistently demonstrates higher healing rates compared with licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs. [source] [13C]-pantoprazole breath test to predict CYP2C19 phenotype and efficacy of a proton pump inhibitor, lansoprazoleALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 3 2009T. FURUTA Summary Background,13CO2 is produced on metabolism of 13C-labelled-pantoprazole ([13C]-pantoprazole) by CYP2C19. Aim, To investigate whether the [13C]-pantoprazole breath test can predict CYP2C19 status and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in Japanese. Methods, We classified 110 healthy volunteers as rapid metabolizers (RM), intermediate metabolizers (IM) or poor metabolizers (PM) of CYP2C19 by genotyping. Breath samples were collected at 10-min intervals for 60 min after dosing with 100 mg [13C]-pantoprazole. Changes in the carbon isotope ratios (13CO2/12CO2) in carbon dioxide in breath samples were measured and expressed as a delta-over-baseline (DOB) ratio (,). Of the 110 subjects, twenty-two randomly selected subjects underwent intragastric pH monitoring on day 7 of dosing with 30 mg of lansoprazole. Results, The DOB values of RMs were the highest and those of PMs the lowest of the three groups. Statistically significant differences were observed in the area-under-the-curve (AUC)20,60 min of DOB among the three groups. The mean 24-h intragastric pHs attained by lansoprazole 30 mg for 7 days were inversely correlated with the AUC20,60 min of DOB. Conclusions, [13C]-pantoprazole breath test can easily estimate the individual activity of CYP2C19 and predict the efficacy of a PPI (i.e. lansoprazole). This test would be useful for individualized medicine with a PPI. [source] Clinical trial: factors associated with resolution of heartburn in patients with reflux oesophagitis , results from the EXPO studyALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2009J. LABENZ Summary Background, The ability to predict symptom response to reflux oesophagitis-healing therapy may optimize treatment decisions. Aim, To identify factors associated with heartburn resolution in patients receiving acid-suppressive therapy for reflux oesophagitis. Methods, In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial (EXPO; AstraZeneca study code: SH-NEG-0008), patients with endoscopically confirmed reflux oesophagitis and reflux symptoms received once-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy [esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 1562) or pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 1589)] for ,4 weeks. Factors associated with heartburn resolution after 4 weeks were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results, Esomeprazole therapy, positive Helicobacter pylori status and greater age were associated with an increased likelihood of heartburn resolution [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.31 (1.12, 1.54), 1.44 (1.19, 1.74) and 1.013 (1.007, 1.019) per year, respectively; all P < 0.001]. Men and patients with no acid regurgitation or epigastric pain pre-treatment were also more likely to achieve heartburn resolution (all P < 0.05). Conclusions, The use of esomeprazole rather than pantoprazole increases the probability of achieving resolution of heartburn during reflux oesophagitis-healing therapy. Other factors, including H. pylori status, age, gender and symptom profile may be helpful in determining the likelihood of heartburn resolution in such patients. [source] Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Pantoprazole in AlpacasJOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, Issue 4 2010G.W. Smith Background: Despite frequent clinical use, information about the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of pantoprazole in camelids is not available. Objectives: To examine the pharmacokinetics of both IV and SC pantoprazole and to determine whether pantoprazole administration would increase 3rd compartment pH in alpacas. Animals: Six healthy adult alpacas. Methods: Alpacas were fitted with a 3rd compartment cannula for measuring gastric pH. After recovery, alpacas received 1 mg/kg pantoprazole IV, q24h for 3 days or 2 mg/kg SC q24h for 3 days. Alpacas received both IV and SC pantoprazole, with a minimum of 3 weeks between treatments. Third compartment pH was recorded and plasma samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results: Pantoprazole induced a slow but sustained increase in 3rd compartment pH when given by both the IV and SC routes. Third compartment pH was significantly increased as compared with baseline values (1.81 ± 0.7; mean ± SD) at 24 (2.47 ± 0.8), 48 (3.53 ± 1.0) and 72 hours (4.03 ± 1.3) after daily IV administration of pantoprazole. Third compartment pH increased from 1.73 ± 0.6 at baseline to 3.05 ± 1.1, 4.02 ± 1.4, and 3.61 ± 1.6 at 24, 48, and 72 hours after SC administration, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that pantoprazole had a short elimination half-life (0.47 + 0.06 h) and a high clearance rate (12.2 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min) after both IV and SC administration. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Based on the results of this study, pantoprazole represents a safe and effective drug for increasing 3rd compartment pH in camelids. Either IV or SC administration is likely to be an effective treatment for gastric ulcers. [source] International validation of a health-related quality of life questionnaire in patients with erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 6 2009G. HOLTMANN Summary Background, Although erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent condition, there is no specific, valid, reliable and sensitive questionnaire that allows evaluating treatment-induced changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Aim, To design a self-administered questionnaire, the GERD Analyzer (GERDyzer), for use in clinical studies. Methods, The GERDyzer comprises 10 dimensions each illustrated by pictogram-like drawings, simplifying communication with the patients. Self-assessment is performed by 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales. For validation, a 5-week clinical trial involving 395 patients (per-protocol) with oesophagitis was conducted. Patients were treated with pantoprazole (40 mg o.d.) for 28 days. Psychometric analyses included internal consistency, test,retest reliability, responsiveness and construct validity. Results, Factor analysis showed consistency of the dimensions and no reduction was necessary. Validation of GERDyzer indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach's , = 0.95) and test,retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.91). Responsiveness of the total score expressed by nonparametric effect size was 1.38. Comparison of scores with other questionnaires resulted in logical correlation levels depending on the respected concepts measured. Conclusions, GERDyzer proved to be highly valid, reproducible and responsive. It allows reliably assessing treatment-induced changes in HRQoL in erosive GERD. [source] Clinical trial: intravenous pantoprazole vs. ranitidine for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding: a multicentre, multinational, randomized trialALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 5 2009C. VAN RENSBURG Summary Background, Controlled pantoprazole data in peptic ulcer bleeding are few. Aim, To compare intravenous (IV) pantoprazole with IV ranitidine for bleeding ulcers. Methods, After endoscopic haemostasis, 1256 patients were randomized to pantoprazole 80 mg+8 mg/h or ranitidine 50 mg+13mg/h, both for 72 h. Patients underwent second-look endoscopy on day 3 or earlier, if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was an overall outcome ordinal score: no rebleeding, rebleeding without/with subsequent haemostasis, surgery and mortality. The latter three events were also assessed separately and together. Results, There were no between-group differences in overall outcome scores (pantoprazole vs. ranitidine: S0: 91.2 vs. 89.3%, S1: 1.5 vs. 2.5%, S2: 5.4 vs. 5.7%, S3: 1.7 vs. 2.1%, S4: 0.19 vs. 0.38%, P = 0.083), 72-h clinically detected rebleeding (2.9% [95% CI 1.7, 4.6] vs. 3.2% [95% CI 2.0, 4.9]), surgery (1.9% [95% CI 1.0, 3.4] vs. 2.1% [95% CI 1.1, 3.5]) or day-3 mortality (0.2% [95% CI 0, 0.09] vs. 0.3% [95% CI 0, 1.1]). Pantoprazole significantly decreased cumulative frequencies of events comprising the ordinal score in spurting lesions (13.9% [95% CI 6.6, 24.7] vs. 33.9% [95% CI 22.1, 47.4]; P = 0.01) and gastric ulcers (6.7% [95% CI 4, 10.4] vs. 14.3% [95% CI 10.3, 19.2], P = 0.006). Conclusions, Outcomes amongst pantoprazole and ranitidine-treated patients were similar; pantoprazole provided benefits in patients with arterial spurting and gastric ulcers. [source] Predictors of inappropriate utilization of intravenous proton pump inhibitorsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 5 2007W. AFIF Summary Background, Inappropriate use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors is prevalent. Aim, To assess appropriateness of intravenous proton pump inhibitor prescribing. Methods, Retrospective review of in-patient prescribing of intravenous pantoprazole over a 2-month period in 2004, in an academic centre. Prescribing was deemed appropriate before and after endoscopic haemostasis, and in fasting individuals requiring a proton pump inhibitor. Results, Amongst 107 patients, 49 (46%) had upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, 33 (31%, 95% CI: 22,41%) received appropriate therapy (indication, dose and duration), 61 (57%, 95% CI: 47,67%) had an inappropriate indication, and 13 (12%, 95% CI: 7,20%) had an incorrect treatment dose or duration. Therapy was appropriate in 20 (41%, 95% CI: 27,55%) with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and 13 (22%, 95% CI: 12,33%) in the non-upper gastrointestinal bleeding group. Appropriate prescribing rates decreased (from 41% to 16%, 95% on difference CI: 14,38%) when considering intravenous proton pump inhibitor use while awaiting endoscopy as inappropriate. Significant predictors of inappropriate use were increasing age and decreasing mean daily dose, with a trend for prescriptions written during evening shifts. Conclusion, Inappropriate intravenous proton pump inhibitor utilization was most frequent in the non-upper gastrointestinal bleeding group, mostly for unrecognized indications. Educational interventions to optimize utilization should target prescribing in older patients, those receiving lower mean daily doses, and, perhaps, prescribing outside regular hours. [source] Oral rabeprazole vs. intravenous pantoprazole: a comparison of the effect on intragastric pH in healthy subjectsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2007D. ARMSTRONG Summary Background Intravenous pantoprazole is often administered inappropriately to hospitalized patients who can take oral medications. Aim To compare the antisecretory effects of oral rabeprazole and intravenous pantoprazole in healthy subjects. Methods In a double-blind, double-dummy, two-way crossover study, 38 Helicobacter pylori -negative volunteers were randomized to oral rabeprazole 20 mg or intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 3 days followed, after a 14-day washout period by the comparator treatment. Intragastric pH was recorded continuously for 24 h at baseline and on days 1 and 3 of each treatment period. Results The mean (95% CI) percentage of the 24-h recording with gastric pH >4 was higher with rabeprazole than with pantoprazole on day 1: 37.7% (30.6,44.8%) vs. 23.9% (20.0,27.8). The mean percentage times with pH >3 and >4 for all intervals assessed were greater and the median 24-h intragastric pH values were higher with rabeprazole than with pantoprazole on days 1 and 3. The mean acidity index was lower with rabeprazole on days 1 and 3. Conclusions Oral rabeprazole 20 mg produced greater acid suppression than intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg. Therefore, it may be an appropriate and effective alternative in patients who can take oral medication. [source] Comparison of the effects of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension, delayed-release lansoprazole capsules and delayed-release esomeprazole capsules on nocturnal gastric acidity after bedtime dosing in patients with night-time GERD symptomsALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2007P. O. KATZ Summary Background Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients on proton pump inhibitors before breakfast or dinner have acid recovery at night. Bedtime immediate-release omeprazole (IR-OME) demonstrated better control of nocturnal pH than pantoprazole before dinner. Aim To compare repeated once daily bedtime dosing of IR-OME, lansoprazole and esomeprazole on nocturnal gastric acidity. Methods Open-label, randomized, crossover study enrolling 54 patients with nocturnal GERD symptoms comparing IR-OME, lansoprazole and esomeprazole at steady state for nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB), percentage of time with gastric pH > 4 and median gastric pH. Results Onset of nocturnal acid control with IR-OME was rapid. During the first half of the night, percentage of time with gastric pH > 4 and median gastric pH were significantly higher after IR-OME compared to esomeprazole or lansoprazole (P < 0.001, both comparisons). Over the 8-h night-time period, acid control with IR-OME was significantly better than lansoprazole (P < 0.001), and comparable to esomeprazole. IR-OME reduced NAB compared with esomeprazole and lansoprazole (61% vs. 92% and 92%; P < 0.001, both comparisons). Conclusions Bedtime IR-OME provided more rapid control of night-time gastric pH and decreased NAB compared with esomeprazole and lansoprazole. Nocturnal acid control with IR-OME was superior to lansoprazole and comparable to esomeprazole. Bedtime dosing with IR-OME may be effective for patients with night-time heartburn. [source] Esomeprazole 20 mg vs. pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy of healed erosive oesophagitis: results from the EXPO study,ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 9 2005J. LABENZ Summary Background :,Following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis, most patients require maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. Aim :,To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission rates over 6 months' maintenance therapy with esomeprazole or pantoprazole (both 20 mg once daily) in patients with healed erosive oesophagitis. Methods :,Patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and endoscopically confirmed erosive oesophagitis at baseline were randomized to receive esomeprazole 40 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg for up to 8 weeks. Patients with healed erosive oesophagitis and free of moderate/severe heartburn and acid regurgitation at 4 weeks or, if necessary, 8 weeks entered the 6-month maintenance therapy phase of the study. Results :,A total of 2766 patients (63% men; mean age 50 years) received esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 1377) or pantoprazole 20 mg (n = 1389) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. Following 6 months of treatment, the proportion of patients in endoscopic and symptomatic remission was significantly greater for those receiving esomeprazole 20 mg (87.0%) than pantoprazole 20 mg (74.9%, log-rank test P < 0.0001). Esomeprazole 20 mg produced a higher proportion of patients free of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and fewer discontinuations because of symptoms than pantoprazole 20 mg (92.2% vs. 88.5%, P < 0.001). Conclusions :,Esomeprazole 20 mg is more effective than pantoprazole 20 mg for maintenance therapy following initial healing of erosive oesophagitis and relief of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. [source] Comparison of the effects of immediate-release omeprazole powder for oral suspension and pantoprazole delayed-release tablets on nocturnal acid breakthrough in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 12 2005D. Castell Summary Background :,Many patients treated with a proton-pump inhibitor for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or erosive oesophagitis still have substantial night-time gastric acidity. A previous trial of a new immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension suggested that nocturnal gastric acidity could be more effectively controlled with a bedtime dose of immediate-release omeprazole than with a delayed-release proton-pump inhibitor administered before dinner or at bedtime. Aim :,To compare the ability of immediate-release omeprazole with pantoprazole to control nocturnal gastric acidity, when they were dosed once daily and twice daily. Methods :,Thirty-six patients with nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms received immediate-release omeprazole and pantoprazole in this open-label, randomized-crossover trial. Median gastric pH, the percentage of time with gastric pH > 4 and the percentage of patients with nocturnal acid breakthrough, were evaluated with 24-h pH monitoring. Results :,Repeated once daily (bedtime) dosing with immediate-release omeprazole suspension produced significantly better nocturnal gastric acid control than repeated once daily (predinner) or twice daily (prebreakfast and bedtime) dosing with pantoprazole delayed-release tablets (median pH: 4.7 vs. 2.0 and 1.7; percentage of time pH > 4: 55 vs. 27 and 34; nocturnal acid breakthrough: 53 vs. 78 and 75). Twice daily dosing (prebreakfast and bedtime) with immediate-release omeprazole 20 and 40 mg achieved the best night-time control of gastric acidity. Repeated once daily bedtime dosing with immediate-release omeprazole 40 mg and twice daily dosing with pantoprazole 40 mg gave similar 24-h pH control. No safety issues were associated with either drug in this trial. Conclusions :,Dosed once daily at bedtime, immediate-release omeprazole reduced nocturnal gastric acidity to a degree not observed with once daily dosing of delayed-release proton-pump inhibitors. [source] International validation of ReQuest in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 8 2004K. D. Bardhan Summary Background :,Reflux Questionnaire (ReQuest), a newly developed gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-sensitive scale, can be used to reliably evaluate the effect of treatment on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Aim :,International validation of this scale, in patients suffering from endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Methods :,In this open, multicentre and multinational clinical trial 840 endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients received pantoprazole 20 mg daily for 28 days. The long and short versions of ReQuest were completed both in the pre-treatment and treatment phases. For scale development an item reduction analysis was performed. Internal consistency, test,retest reliability and responsiveness were calculated for psychometric analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by comparison with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Psychological General Well-being questionnaire by means of correlation coefficients. Results :,Factor analyses confirmed the content validity of both long and short version of ReQuest. Psychometric calculations proved high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.9), test,retest reliability [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: 0.9 (long vs. long) and 0.8 (short vs. short)], and responsiveness (Responsiveness Index 320.3) of the scale, for which also good construct validity was achieved (correlation coefficient: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale ,0.6; Psychological General Well-being ,0.4). Conclusion :,ReQuest proved valid, reliable, and responsive in this multinational clinical trial to evaluate treatment response in endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||