Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Panoramic Radiography (panoramic + radiography)
Selected AbstractsAssessment of periodontal conditions and systemic disease in older subjectsJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 9 2002I. Focus on osteoporosis Abstract Background: Osteoporosis (OPOR) is a common chronic disease, especially in older women. Patients are often unaware of the condition until they experience bone fractures. Studies have suggested that OPOR and periodontitis are associated diseases and exaggerated by cytokine activity. Panoramic radiography (PMX) allows studies of mandibular cortical index (MCI), which is potentially diagnostic for OPOR. Aims: i) To study the prevalence of self-reported history of OPOR in an older, ethnically diverse population, ii) to assess the agreement between PMX/MCI findings and self-reported OPOR, and iii) to assess the likelihood of having both a self-reported history of OPOR and a diagnosis of periodontitis. Materials and methods: PMX and medical history were obtained from 1084 subjects aged 60,75 (mean age 67.6, SD ą 4.7). Of the films, 90.3% were useful for analysis. PMXs were studied using MCI. The PMXs were used to grade subjects as not having periodontitis or with one of three grades of periodontitis severity. Results: A positive MCI was found in 38.9% of the subjects, in contrast to 8.2% self-reported OPOR. The intraclass correlation between MCI and self-reported OPOR was 0.20 (P < 0.01). The likelihood of an association between OPOR and MCI was 2.6 (95%CI: 1.6, 4.1, P < 0.001). Subjects with self-reported OPOR and a positive MCI had worse periodontal conditions (P < 0.01). The Mantel-Haentzel odds ratio for OPOR and periodontitis was 1.8 (95%CI: 1.2, 2.5, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The prevalence of positive MCI was high and consistent with epidemiological studies, but only partly consistent with a self-reported history of osteoporosis with a higher prevalence of positive MCI in Chinese women. Horizontal alveolar bone loss is associated with both positive self-reported OPOR and MCI. [source] Odontogenic keratocyst in maxillary sinus with invasive behaviourJOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, Issue 4 2006Eneida Franco Vencio Odontogenic keratocyst is a cystic lesion characterized by a high rate of recurrence. This report describes a rare case of ciliated epithelium-lined odontogenic keratocyst in the maxilla of a 27-year-old female. Panoramic radiography showed a lytic lesion on the right maxilla associated with an impacted molar tooth. Computerized tomography image revealed the involvement of the lesion with the right maxillary sinus, destroying the sinus floor. Histopathologically, the typical keratinized epithelial-lined cyst of odontogenic keratocyst abruptly changed into a ciliated epithelium, suggesting the fusion of both these epithelia rather a metaplastic transformation. The biological behaviour of odontogenic keratocysts is discussed. [source] Classifying degenerative joint disease by the RDC/TMD and by panoramic imaging: a retrospective analysisJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 3 2010E. WINOCUR Summary, The purposes of the study were to evaluate the utility of diagnosing degenerative joint disease (DJD) by the clinical finding of coarse crepitus alone, without supporting imaging studies, as defined by the RDC/TMD, and to evaluate the contribution of panoramic radiography as an aid in the diagnosis of DJD. A retrospective analysis of 372 consecutive patients with TMD was conducted. Their panoramic radiographs were evaluated for the extent of their contribution to the final diagnosis. Panoramic radiography was of no diagnostic value in 94·4% of the cases when the group was considered as a whole. When patients diagnosed with DJD were considered separately, panoramic radiography was completely sufficient for reaching the final diagnosis in 20·0% of the cases. In almost 90% of these patients, however, the clinical examination did not support the diagnosis of DJD (no coarse crepitus was found). This raises some doubts about the effectiveness of the clinical examination according to the RDC/TMD and about the utility of panoramic radiography in the definitive diagnosis of DJD, because both techniques have low accuracy (11·1% and 20%, respectively). The present study supports the current recommendations that panoramic radiography should not be ordered routinely to assess DJD, but still it is first choice when any dental problem is suspected. Further additional imaging (computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) should be considered only if there is reason to expect that the findings might affect diagnosis and management. This study adds to recent criticisms of the clinical validity of the RDC/TMD, with regard to DJD. [source] Perineurioma of the mandibular dental nerve: a case report and review of the literatureORAL SURGERY, Issue 2 2009E.F. Vencio Abstract Perineurioma is an uncommon benign tumour of the nerve sheath composed exclusively of well-differentiated perineurial cells. It usually affects the limbs or trunk; intraoral lesions are uncommon. A rare case of perineurioma is described involving the mandibular dental nerve in a 59-year-old female, microscopically characterised by a combined pattern of intraneural and soft tissue perineurioma. The patient was referred for treatment of a lesion in the mandible. Panoramic radiography revealed a well-delimited osteolytic lesion with radiopaque halo in an edentulous region of the left mandible. Occlusal view showed no expansion of cortical bone. A surgical procedure for incisional biopsy disclosed a connection between the tumour and the alveolar inferior nerve. Grossly, an enlargement of the affected nerve was described. Microscopic examination showed tumour cells arranged in pseudo-onion bulb structures, with scattered collagen bundles, and areas with a whorled (storiform) arrangement. Many concentric whorls of spindle cells exhibiting thin, elongated eosinophic processes were seen. Immunohistochemical study exhibited strong positivity for epithelial membrane antigen. We report a rare case of perineurioma affecting the mandibular dental nerve showing both intraneural and soft tissue microscopic patterns and discuss morphological aspects for differential diagnosis. [source] Radiological assessment of periapical status using the periapical index: comparison of periapical radiography and digital panoramic radiographyINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, Issue 6 2007C. Ridao-Sacie Abstract Aim, To compare the use of periapical radiographs and digital panoramic images displayed on monitor and glossy paper in the assessment of the periapical status of the teeth using the periapical index (PAI). Methodology, A total of 86 subjects were examined. All participants underwent a full-mouth radiographic survey (14 periapical radiographs) and a panoramic radiography. The periapical status, using the PAI score, of all appraised teeth was assessed. Results, Periapical radiographs allowed the assessment of the periapical status of 87% of teeth using the PAI. On the contrary, digital radiography had a significantly reduced potential to allow assessment of the periapical status (P < 0.01). Only 57.6% and 34.1% of teeth could be appraised using digital panoramic images displayed on monitor and glossy paper respectively (P < 0.01). The total percentage of teeth with periapical pathosis was five fold higher when assessed with digital panoramic images displayed on glossy paper compared with periapical radiographs (P < 0.01). Conclusions, Teeth were best viewed on periapical radiographs except maxillary second and third molars, which were better viewed in orthopantomograms. Orthopantomograms on screen were scorable more often than when on printed images. Apical periodontitis was scored more often on paper than on screen, and more often on screen than in periapical radiographs. [source] Hypomineralized molars and incisors of unknown origin: treatment outcome at age 18 yearsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, Issue 1 2005I. MEJĀRE Summary. Objective., To assess the outcome of treatment of hypomineralized molars and incisors of unknown aetiology (MIH) in 18-year-olds. Design., A follow-up study including clinical examination, panoramic radiography and intraoral photos. Sample and method., Seventy-six individuals treated at the Eastman Dental Institute in Stockholm during 1978,2001 with the diagnosis MIH. Severity of enamel defects in molars and incisors, prevalence and distribution of extracted molars, type, quality and median duration of restorations, periradicular condition of affected molars, dental occlusion and space closure in cases of extraction, as well as the individual's satisfaction with the treatment, were assessed. Results., Severe defects with enamel surface breakdown in all four molars occurred in 42% of the individuals and 29% had at least one incisor with yellow/brown opacity in the enamel. At follow up, 42% of the individuals had at least one molar extracted; 18% had all four molars extracted. The median duration of the molar restorations (n = 153) was 5 years. Of the individuals with restored molars, 48% had at least one unacceptable restoration. Periradicular pathology was observed in three molars. The sagittal relations did not differ between individuals with and without extraction of molars. Space closure was acceptable in 87% of the individuals with extracted molars. Eighty percent were satisfied with the treatment. Conclusions., Extraction of molars with severe enamel defects gave good or acceptable results in a majority of the patients while conservative restorative treatment resulted in a need for additional treatment in approximately half of the patients. [source] Radiographic detection and assessment of the periodontal endosseous defectsJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 4 2000Eudoxie A. Pepelassi Abstract Aims: The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of conventional radiography in detecting and accurately imaging periodontal endosseous (or osseous) defects when compared to surgical measurements. A further objective of the study was the selection of the most successful radiographic method for the assessment of endosseous defects. Method: Surgical measurements, during periodontal flap surgery, and radiographic measurements, from periapical and panoramic radiographs, were obtained from 5072 proximal surfaces of 100 patients presenting with periodontitis. Results: Statistical evaluation of the surgical and radiographic measurements revealed the following. (1) The ability of the radiographs to detect periodontal osseous defects was relatively low. (2) For periapical radiography, it depended, in descending order, on the depth and buccolingual width of the defect, the number of osseous walls and the jaw location. For panoramic radiography, it depended only on buccolingual width. (3) Osseous defects of small depth and/or small buccolingual width were the most difficult to detect radiographically. (4) Periapical radiography was more successful than panoramic in detecting osseous defects, and more accurate in assessing the defect dimensions (depth, mesiodistal width). (5) The difference in the defect detection ability between the 2 radiographic methods, the accuracy of the radiographic defect dimensions assessment as well as the degree of agreement between periapical and panoramic assessment depended on defect location and dimensions. Conclusions: Periapical radiography is superior to panoramic in detecting and accurately imaging periodontal osseous destruction. [source] Radiographic periodontal attachment loss as an indicator of death risk in the elderlyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 2 2000K. Soikkonen Abstract Objectives: Oral infections have been associated with serious systemic diseases and an increased risk of death. Our aims were to investigate whether radiographically-observed apical periodontitis lesions, carious teeth, periodontal attachment loss (horizontal bone loss, furcation lesions, number of teeth with infrabony periodontal pockets, the extent of infrabony periodontal pockets) and the sum of all these findings have any relationships with all-cause mortality within 4-year follow-up. Material and methods: 292 community-dwelling elderly persons aged 76, 81 and 86 years. The number of deaths within 4 years was 54 (18.5%). In the dentate 169 subjects, of whom 32 (18.9%) deceased within 4 years, the mean number of teeth was 15.5 in men and 13.2 in women. The imaging method used was panoramic radiography supplemented by intraoral radiographs. Results: 51% of the dentate subjects had infrabony pockets (mean 1.5, s.d. 2.2), and 40% had periapical periodontitis lesions (mean 1.0, s.d. 1.6). After controlling for age and gender, vertical bone loss judged as advanced infrabony pockets was associated with 4-year all-cause mortality (Odds ratio 2.2,1.0,4.7). Other associations were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Periodontal attachment loss may indicate an increased risk of death in the elderly. [source] Classifying degenerative joint disease by the RDC/TMD and by panoramic imaging: a retrospective analysisJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 3 2010E. WINOCUR Summary, The purposes of the study were to evaluate the utility of diagnosing degenerative joint disease (DJD) by the clinical finding of coarse crepitus alone, without supporting imaging studies, as defined by the RDC/TMD, and to evaluate the contribution of panoramic radiography as an aid in the diagnosis of DJD. A retrospective analysis of 372 consecutive patients with TMD was conducted. Their panoramic radiographs were evaluated for the extent of their contribution to the final diagnosis. Panoramic radiography was of no diagnostic value in 94·4% of the cases when the group was considered as a whole. When patients diagnosed with DJD were considered separately, panoramic radiography was completely sufficient for reaching the final diagnosis in 20·0% of the cases. In almost 90% of these patients, however, the clinical examination did not support the diagnosis of DJD (no coarse crepitus was found). This raises some doubts about the effectiveness of the clinical examination according to the RDC/TMD and about the utility of panoramic radiography in the definitive diagnosis of DJD, because both techniques have low accuracy (11·1% and 20%, respectively). The present study supports the current recommendations that panoramic radiography should not be ordered routinely to assess DJD, but still it is first choice when any dental problem is suspected. Further additional imaging (computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) should be considered only if there is reason to expect that the findings might affect diagnosis and management. This study adds to recent criticisms of the clinical validity of the RDC/TMD, with regard to DJD. [source] | ||||||||||