Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Outpatient Consultations (outpatient + consultation)
Selected AbstractsHealthcare resource utilization during 1-year treatment with long-acting, injectable risperidone,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 11 2004A. Leal Abstract Background Schizophrenia is associated with disproportionately high costs, mainly due to hospitalization rates. This study assessed healthcare resource use in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder during treatment with long-acting risperidone. Methods Patients (n,=,397 [inpatients, 24%; outpatients, 76%]) receiving stable doses of an antipsychotic for ,4 weeks were eligible to enter this 1-year, open-label study. Following a 2-week run-in period (oral risperidone 1,6 mg/day), patients received intramuscular long-acting risperidone (25 or 50 mg modal dose) every 2 weeks. Healthcare resource use in the previous 12 weeks was assessed at baseline and 12-weekly intervals. Results Patients needing hospitalization decreased significantly and continuously from 38% during the 12 weeks before study entry to 12% during the last 12 weeks. Mean hospitalization length during the study was 30.5 days (outpatients, 4.9 days; inpatients, 110 days). This included 28 patients (7%) who remained in hospital throughout the study. During treatment, 71% of those hospitalized at baseline were discharged. Partial hospitalization decreased significantly from 7% of patients during the 12 weeks before treatment to 3% during the last 12 weeks. Outpatient consultations also decreased significantly from 70% of patients to 30% in the first 12 weeks of treatment and remained stable thereafter. Only 9% of patients required an emergency room visit; mostly for non-psychiatric conditions. Conclusion Healthcare resource use is significantly reduced in patients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder receiving long-acting risperidone. It is highly likely that these reductions will decrease healthcare costs in patients receiving long-acting risperidone. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Targets and elective colorectal cancer: outcome and symptom delay at surgical resectionCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2 2005S. Bharucha Abstract Objective To determine, for elective patients with colorectal cancer, if associations exist between the length of symptom history at surgical resection and Dukes stage, completeness of the surgical procedure and patient survival. Patients and methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken. Five hundred and eighty-two patients with colorectal cancer, admitted for surgical resection after outpatient consultation, divided into four equal quartiles according to length of symptom history (short: n = 131, 0,103 days; medium: n = 136, 104,177 days; long: n = 136, 178,318 days; very long: n = 137, 319,1997 days). The main outcome measures used were the Extent of tumour (Dukes stage) at resection, completeness of resectional surgery (curative vs palliative), patient survival after resection. Results For patients undergoing elective surgical resection of colorectal cancer we did not find an association between Dukes stage and duration of patient history (Dukes stage C tumours were seen in 37% (CI: 26.2%-48.0%) of patients with a short symptomatic history as opposed to 34% (CI: 32%-62%) with a very long symptomatic history). Elective curative resection was not associated with a significantly different symptom duration than elective palliative resection (Palliative resections were performed in 24% (CI: 11.7%-36.4%) of patients with a short symptomatic history as opposed to 16% (CI: 2.4%-29.9%) with a very long symptomatic history). The median survival time for the four elective colorectal patient groups defined by length of symptomatic history was not significantly different , (short: n = 131, 4.3 years; medium: n = 136, 5.9 years; long: n = 136, 7.1 years; very long: n = 137, 5.0 years). Conclusion Tumour extent, completeness of resection and patient outcome after elective colorectal cancer resection was not found to have an association with length of patient history at the time of surgery. [source] Improving the organization of consultation departments in university hospitalsJOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 6 2007Agnès Dechartres MD Abstract Rationale, Changes in the demography of doctors require changes in care practices. Objectives, The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with doctors' workload in the ophthalmology consultation department of a university hospital, with a view to developing methods to improve the organization of hospital outpatient clinics. Methods, A 10-day cross-sectional survey was carried out in an ophthalmology outpatient clinic (in- and outpatient consultations, including emergencies) specializing in the uveitis care. Demographic and management data for each patient were collected on a structured form. The doctor's workload was assessed, using a scale taking into account the duration of the consultation and the number of diagnostic tests performed, as a function of management complexity. Results, Of the 861 consultations studied, 39.7% were highly complex. The level of complexity of consultations was correlated with the type of referral (phi = 0.602), consultation duration (phi = 0.545), the number of consultations in the previous year (phi = 0.499), and the number of diagnostic tests performed (phi = 0.445). Consultations were longer and diagnostic tests were more frequently performed if patients had been referred by an ophthalmologist, consulted a faculty doctor or a fellow, or presented with uveitis. Consultations were also more complex for patients with at least four previous consultations in the past year. Conclusions, Type of referral, status of the attending doctor and number of consultations within the course of 1 year were associated with doctors' workload and could be taken into account to predict the duration of complexity of consultations when scheduling appointments. [source] Tales from the frontline: the colorectal battle against SARSCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2 2004I. M. J. Bradford Abstract Objective The recent worldwide epidemic of Severe Acute Respiratory Disease (SARS) caused over 800 deaths and had a major impact on the health services in affected communities. The impact of SARS on colorectal surgery, particularly service provision and training, is unknown. This paper reports these changes from a single colorectal unit at the centre of the outbreak. Patients and methods Hospital databases and electronic patient records covering the 4 months duration of the SARS epidemic and an equivalent period preceding SARS were compared. Data was collected for inpatient admissions, outpatient consultations, operative surgery, colonoscopy and waiting times for appointments or surgery. Results The SARS epidemic resulted in reductions of 52% for new outpatient attendances, 59% for review attendances, 51% for admissions, 32% for surgical procedures and 48% for colonoscopies. Major emergency procedures, cancer resections and complex major procedures were unaffected. Operative procedures by trainees reduced by 48% and procedures by specialists reduced by 21%. Patients awaiting early or urgent outpatient appointments rose by 200% with waiting times for colonoscopy increased by a median 3, 5 or 9 weeks for outpatient, inpatient or non-urgent cases, respectively. The waiting time for minor elective colorectal surgery was extended by 5 months. Conclusion SARS resulted in a major reduction in the colorectal surgical caseload. The consequences were evidenced by a detrimental effect on waiting times and colorectal training. However, serious pathology requiring emergency or complex surgery was still possible within these constraints. [source] | ||||||||||