			Home About us Contact

Outflow Reconstruction (outflow + reconstruction)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Outflow reconstruction in recipients of right liver graft from living donors

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2002
Yasuhiko Sugawara MD
Right-lobe transplantation is now a commonly used procedure in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to adult recipients. However, the risk for outflow obstruction is still an issue in LDLT. The right hepatic vein (RHV) was anastomosed end to end to the graft hepatic vein without unfavorable tension on the anastomosis. The anterior wall of the recipient hepatic vein was incised longitudinally, and a V-shaped vein graft was patched to form a wide and long orifice. This new hepatic venoplasty was used in 14 adult patients who received right liver grafts and gave good results without stenosis of the hepatic venous anastomosis or other complications. Our new technique may be useful in recipients of a right liver graft when the recipient or graft RHV is not long enough. [source]

Venous outflow reconstruction with surgically reopened obliterated umbilical vein in domino liver transplantation

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2007
Hynek Mergental
[source]

Hepatic venous outflow reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplants without portal hypertension

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2004
Diego Bogetti
Abstract:, Graft congestion is one of the causes of poor graft function in segmental liver transplantation. Three factors are implicated in segmental graft congestion: graft size, hepatic venous outflow and portal inflow. The graft size must be matched to the body weight, which is conventionally done by using graft to body weight ratio. Hepatic blood outflow must be optimized by hepatic vein reconstruction, which can be complicated. High portal blood flow has been shown to be detrimental to small-for-size grafts. These factors are strictly connected to each other. They can all contribute to graft congestion and poor function, while one factor can compensate for the others and decrease congestion. Ideally, all the accessory veins should be reconstructed, if possible, to maximize the outflow. In the absence of portal hypertension and with an adequate sized graft, complex venous reconstruction may not be necessary. We present a case report of an adult living donor liver transplant with the favorable conditions of normal portal pressure and a large sized graft, but complicated by the presence of several accessory hepatic veins. A simple hepatic vein anastomosis was sufficient for adequate outflow and prompt graft function. [source]

Small-for-size liver syndrome after auxiliary and split liver transplantation: Donor selection

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2003
Nigel Heaton
Small-for-size liver grafts can be defined by a recognizable clinical syndrome that results from the transplantation of too small a functional mass of liver for a designated recipient. A graft to recipient body weight ratio less than 0.8, impaired venous inflow, and enhanced metabolic demands in patients with poor clinical conditions must be considered as main factors leading to the small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) when using living and cadaveric partial grafts such as split and auxiliary liver grafts. Increased risk of graft dysfunction is currently observed in fatty infiltration of more than 30%, abnormal liver test results (especially bilirubin and gamma glutaryl transferase), and other donor risk factors such as high inotrope administration and donor stay in the intensive care unit (>5 days). Older donors are especially vulnerable to prolonged cold ischemia and high inotrope levels, giving rise to early graft dysfunction and prolonged cholestasis. Increased metabolic need on a functionally small-for-size graft predisposes to surgical and septic complications and poorer survival. Splitting livers into right and left lobe grafts increases the potential risk of small-for-size grafts for both recipients. Several techniques of venous outflow reconstruction/implantation have been proposed to reduce the risk of obstruction postoperatively. Prevention and management of SFSS will improve in parallel with the increased experience, allowing us optimum usage of available organs and reducing overall morbidity and mortality. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:S26-S28.) [source]