Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Osteogenic Induction (osteogenic + induction)
Selected AbstractsOsteogenic Induction of Adipose-derived Stromal Cells: Not a Requirement for Bone Formation In VivoARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 1 2010Xiaoyu Li Abstract Osteogenic induction was regarded as an indispensable step for adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) to have osteogenic ability. Non-induced ADSCs can also produce bone in vivo and heal skeletal defects. The present study aimed to compare the bone-forming ability of osteogenically induced ADSCs and non-induced ADSCs in vivo. Tissue-engineered constructs were prepared from osteogenically induced or non-induced ADSCs and porous hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. A scaffold without cells and an empty defect group were used as control. All were implanted in rat critical calvarial defects. After implantation for 6 and 12 weeks, bone formation was analyzed using histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography; there were no significant differences in the formation of new bone between osteogenically induced ADSCs and non-induced ADSCs (P > 0.05). In conclusion, osteogenic induction of ADSCs is not an indispensable step for bone formation in vivo. Non-induced ADSCs can also be used as seeding cells to construct bone tissue. [source] Effect of Osteogenic Induction on the in Vitro Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Cocultured With Periodontal Ligament FibroblastsARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 11 2007Bülend Inanç Abstract:, Osteogenesis is one of the principal components of periodontal tissue development as well as regeneration. As pluripotent cells with unlimited proliferative potential and differentiation ability to all germ layer representatives, embryonic stem cells also hold the promise to become a cell source in bone tissue engineering. Our aim was to investigate osteogenic differentiation potential of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) under the inductive influence of human periodontal ligament fibroblast (hPDLF) monolayers. After being expanded and characterized morphologically and immunohistochemically, hESCs (HUES-9) were cocultured with hPDLFs for 28 days. Two groups were established: (i) osteogenic induction group with ascorbic acid, ,-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone containing hESC differentiation medium; and (ii) spontaneous differentiation group cultured in hESC differentiation medium. Morphological shift in cells was analyzed under an inverted microscope, and immunohistochemistry was performed on fixed specimens at days 1 and 28 using antibodies against alkaline phosphatase, osteonectin, osteopontin, bone sialoprotein (BSP), and osteocalcin (OSC). Reverse transcription,polymerase chain reaction was utilized for the detection of octameric binding protein-4, BSP, and OSC expression at mRNA level. Mineralization was assessed using alizarin red, and the surface topology shift in colonies was demonstrated with scanning electron microscopy. Results indicate the feasibility of osteogenic differentiation of hESCs in coculture, and suggest a role of periodontal ligament fibroblasts in their differentiation patterns. Advances in the field could allow for potential utilization of hESCs in periodontal tissue engineering applications involving regeneration of bone in periodontal compartment lost as a result of destructive periodontal diseases. [source] Osteogenic Induction of Adipose-derived Stromal Cells: Not a Requirement for Bone Formation In VivoARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 1 2010Xiaoyu Li Abstract Osteogenic induction was regarded as an indispensable step for adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) to have osteogenic ability. Non-induced ADSCs can also produce bone in vivo and heal skeletal defects. The present study aimed to compare the bone-forming ability of osteogenically induced ADSCs and non-induced ADSCs in vivo. Tissue-engineered constructs were prepared from osteogenically induced or non-induced ADSCs and porous hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. A scaffold without cells and an empty defect group were used as control. All were implanted in rat critical calvarial defects. After implantation for 6 and 12 weeks, bone formation was analyzed using histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography; there were no significant differences in the formation of new bone between osteogenically induced ADSCs and non-induced ADSCs (P > 0.05). In conclusion, osteogenic induction of ADSCs is not an indispensable step for bone formation in vivo. Non-induced ADSCs can also be used as seeding cells to construct bone tissue. [source] A subpopulation of mesenchymal stromal cells with high osteogenic potentialJOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, Issue 8b 2009Hua Liu Abstract Current bone disease therapy with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) is hampered by low efficiency. Advanced allogeneic studies on well-established mouse genetic and disease models are hindered by difficulties in isolating murine MSC (mMSC). And mMSC prepared from different laboratories exhibit significant heterogeneity. Hence, this study aimed to identify and isolate a sub-population of mMSC at an early passage number with high osteogenic potential. Enrichment of mMSC was achieved by 1-hr silica incubation and negative selection. Approximately 96% of these cells synthesized osteocalcin after 28 days of osteogenic induction in vitro, and displayed a complete dynamic alteration of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity with increasing osteogenic maturation and strong mineralization. Moreover, the cells displayed uniform and stable surface molecular profile, long-term survival, fast proliferation in vitro with maintenance of normal karyotype and distinct immunological properties. CD73 was found to be expressed exclusively in osteogenesis but not in adipogenesis. These cells also retained high osteogenic potential upon allogeneic transplantation in an ectopic site by the detection of bone-specific ALP, osteopontin, osteocalcin and local mineralization as early as 12 days after implantation. Hence, these cells may provide a useful source for improving current strategies in bone regenerative therapy, and for characterizing markers defining the putative MSC population. [source] Wnt 3a promotes proliferation and suppresses osteogenic differentiation of adult human mesenchymal stem cells,JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, Issue 6 2004Genevieve M. Boland Abstract Multipotential adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are able to differentiate along several known lineages, and lineage commitment is tightly regulated through specific cellular mediators and interactions. Recent observations of a low/high bone-mass phenotype in patients expressing a loss-/gain-of-function mutation in LRP5, a coreceptor of the Wnt family of signaling molecules, suggest the importance of Wnt signaling in bone formation, possibly involving MSCs. To analyze the role of Wnt signaling in mesenchymal osteogenesis, we have profiled the expression of WNTs and their receptors, FRIZZLEDs (FZDs), and several secreted Wnt inhibitors, such as SFRPs, and examined the effect of Wnt 3a, as a representative canonical Wnt member, during MSC osteogenesis in vitro. WNT11, FZD6, SFRP2, and SFRP3 are upregulated during MSC osteogenesis, while WNT9A and FZD7 are downregulated. MSCs also respond to exogenous Wnt 3a, based on increased ,-catenin nuclearization and activation of a Wnt-responsive promoter, and the magnitude of this response depends on the MSC differentiation state. Wnt 3a exposure inhibits MSC osteogenic differentiation, with decreased matrix mineralization and reduced alkaline phosphatase mRNA and activity. Wnt 3a treatment of fully osteogenically differentiated MSCs also suppresses osteoblastic marker gene expression. The Wnt 3a effect is accompanied by increased cell number, resulting from both increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis, particularly during expansion of undifferentiated MSCs. The osteo-suppressive effects of Wnt 3a are fully reversible, i.e., treatment prior to osteogenic induction does not compromise subsequent MSC osteogenesis. The results also showed that sFRP3 treatment attenuates some of the observed Wnt 3a effects on MSCs, and that inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling using a dominant negative TCF1 enhances MSC osteogenesis. Interestingly, expression of Wnt 5a, a non-canonical Wnt member, appeared to promote osteogenesis. Taken together, these findings suggest that canonical Wnt signaling functions in maintaining an undifferentiated, proliferating progenitor MSC population, whereas non-canonical Wnts facilitate osteogenic differentiation. Release from canonical Wnt regulation is a prerequisite for MSC differentiation. Thus, loss-/gain-of-function mutations of LRP5 would perturb Wnt signaling and depress/promote bone formation by affecting the progenitor cell pool. Elucidating Wnt regulation of MSC differentiation is important for their potential application in tissue regeneration. Published 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Putative heterotopic ossification progenitor cells derived from traumatized muscle,JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, Issue 12 2009Wesley M. Jackson Abstract Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a frequent complication following combat-related trauma, but the pathogenesis of traumatic HO is poorly understood. Building on our recent identification of mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) in traumatically injured muscle, the goal of this study was to evaluate the osteogenic potential of the MPCs in order to assess the role of these cells in HO formation. Compared to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), a well-characterized population of osteoprogenitor cells, the MPCs exhibited several significant differences during osteogenic differentiation and in the expression of genes related to osteogenesis. Upon osteogenic induction, MPCs showed increased alkaline phosphatase activity, production of a mineralized matrix, and up-regulated expression of the osteoblast-associated genes CBFA1 and alkaline phosphatase. However, MPCs did not appear to reach terminal differentiation as the expression of osteocalcin was not substantially up-regulated. With the exception of a few genes, the osteogenic gene expression profile of traumatized muscle-derived MPCs was comparable to that of the MSCs after osteogenic induction. These findings indicate that traumatized muscle-derived MPCs have the potential to function as osteoprogenitor cells when exposed to the appropriate biochemical environment and are the putative osteoprogenitor cells that initiate ectopic bone formation in HO. © 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:1645,1651, 2009 [source] Adipogenic Effect of Alcohol on Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem CellsALCOHOLISM, Issue 7 2004Frederick H. Wezeman Background: In addition to a decrease in bone mass in alcoholics their osteopenic skeletons show an increase in bone marrow adiposity. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) in vivo differentiate into several phenotypes including osteogenic and adipogenic cells, both of which remain as resident populations of bone marrow. In vitro, the lineage commitment and differentiation of hMSC toward the adipogenic pathway can be promoted by alcohol. Methods: Human male and female mesenchymal stem cells from joint replacement surgery were cultured. Cells were grouped as: 1) Control (no additions to the culture medium), 2) EtOH (50 mm alcohol added to the culture medium), 3) OS (osteogenic inducers added to the culture medium), and 4) OS + EtOH (osteogenic inducers and 50 mm alcohol added to the culture medium). Cultures stained with Nile Red confirmed the development of differentiated adipocytes. Population analysis was performed using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Gene expression of early, middle, late, and terminal differentiation stage markers (PPAR),2, lipoprotein lipase, adipsin, leptin, and adipocyte P2 (aP2)] was studied by Northern hybridization, and protein synthesis of aP2 was determined by Western analysis. Results: Nile red staining confirmed increased adipocyte development 10 days after the onset of treatment with 50 mm alcohol and osteogenic induction. By day 21 the number of adipocytes increased to 13.6% of the total population. Alcohol up-regulated the gene expression of PPAR,2 whereas no up-regulation was observed for the other genes. Protein production of aP2 was significantly increased in hMSC cells by culture in the presence of alcohol. Conclusions: The data suggest that alcohol's adipogenic effect on cultured hMSC is through up-regulation of PPAR,2 at the point of lineage commitment as well as through enhancement of lipid transport and storage through increased aP2 synthesis. The alcohol-induced expression and synthesis changes account for the increased Nile red staining of cultured hMSC. [source] Osteogenic Induction of Adipose-derived Stromal Cells: Not a Requirement for Bone Formation In VivoARTIFICIAL ORGANS, Issue 1 2010Xiaoyu Li Abstract Osteogenic induction was regarded as an indispensable step for adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) to have osteogenic ability. Non-induced ADSCs can also produce bone in vivo and heal skeletal defects. The present study aimed to compare the bone-forming ability of osteogenically induced ADSCs and non-induced ADSCs in vivo. Tissue-engineered constructs were prepared from osteogenically induced or non-induced ADSCs and porous hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. A scaffold without cells and an empty defect group were used as control. All were implanted in rat critical calvarial defects. After implantation for 6 and 12 weeks, bone formation was analyzed using histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography; there were no significant differences in the formation of new bone between osteogenically induced ADSCs and non-induced ADSCs (P > 0.05). In conclusion, osteogenic induction of ADSCs is not an indispensable step for bone formation in vivo. Non-induced ADSCs can also be used as seeding cells to construct bone tissue. [source] Adipose-derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSCCELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND FUNCTION, Issue 6 2008Yanxia Zhu Abstract To further study the proliferation and multi-differentiation potentials of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), the cells were isolated with improved methods and their growth curves were achieved with cck-8. Surface protein expression was analyzed by flow cytometry to characterize the cell phenotype. The multi-lineage potential of ADSCs was testified by differentiating cells with adipogenic, chondrogenic, osteogenic, and myogenic inducers. The results showed that about 5,×,105 stem cells could be obtained from 400 to 600,mg adipose tissue. The ADSCs can be continuously cultured in vitro for up to 1 month without passage and they have several logarithmic growth phases during the culture period. Also, the flow cytometry analysis showed that ADSCs expressed high levels of stem cell-related antigens (CD13, CD29, CD44, CD105, and CD166), while did not express hematopoiesis-related antigens CD34 and CD45, and human leukocyte antigen HLA-DR was also negative. Moreover, stem cell-related transcription factors, Nanog, Oct-4, Sox-2, and Rex-1 were positively expressed in ADSCs. The expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was detected in the early osteogenic induction and the calcified nodules were observed by von Kossa staining. Intracellular lipid droplets could be observed by Oil Red staining. Differentiated cardiomyocytes were observed by connexin43 fluorescent staining. In order to obtain more stem cells, we can subculture ADSCs every 14 days instead of the normal 5 days. ADSCs still keep strong proliferation ability, maintain their phenotypes, and have stronger multi-differentiation potential after 25 passages. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] | |||||||||||||