			Home About us Contact

On-demand Therapy (on-demand + therapy)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Clinical trial: long-term use of proton pump inhibitors in primary care patients , a cross sectional analysis of 901 patients

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 7 2009
C. REIMER
Summary Background, The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is extensive. While the incidence of new treatments remains stable, the prevalence of long-term treatment is rising. Studies have shown that up to 70% of patients on chronic acid suppression lack a verified indication for treatment. Aims, To investigate primary care patient characteristics associated with long-term use of PPIs. Methods, A cross-sectional analysis of 42 634 patients registered with 22 general practitioners was performed. Patients with prescriptions of ,120 tablets/year were defined as long-term users. A survey of a subgroup of patients without verified indication was performed. Results, In all, 901 (2.1%) patients were long-term treated. Verified indications for treatment were identified for 247/901 (27%). An upper GI endoscopy had been performed in 418 patients (46%). Of the 194/654 without verified indication who participated in the survey, 71% reported heartburn/acid regurgitation as the reason for therapy. On-demand therapy was reported by 43/194 (22%) and previous attempts to withdraw by 119/194 (61%). Conclusions, The prevalence of PPI long-term treatment among primary care patients is 2.1%. The main reason for treatment is reflux symptoms or verified GERD. Rationalization of use of PPIs is possible as daily treatment without attempts to discontinue is frequently observed. [source]

Comparison of risk factors and clinical responses to proton pump inhibitors in patients with erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 2 2009
E. S. LEE
Summary Background, There has been no report on the response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and on-demand or the relapse rate of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive oesophagitis in Korea. Aim, To compare the risk factors, clinical symptoms and PPI responses between patients with erosive oesophagitis and NERD patients. Methods, A survey was performed prospectively in the erosive oesophagitis (205 patients) and NERD group (200 patients). Clinical symptoms, risk factors and PPI responses were analysed. On-demand therapy and the relapse rate of GERD symptoms were investigated during a one-year follow-up. Results, BMI , 25 (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1,8.3), alcohol use (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.0,8.3), hiatal hernia (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.2,20) and triglyceride ,150 mg/dL (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.7,10) were more common in the erosive oesophagitis group than in the NERD group by multivariate analysis. The ratio of oesophageal to extra-oesophageal symptoms was higher in the erosive oesophagitis group compared with the NERD group (P < 0.001). The PPI response rates at 8 weeks were different (P = 0.02); refractory rates were higher in the NERD group (16.7%) compared with the erosive oesophagitis group (6.0%). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in on-demand therapy or the relapse rate. Conclusion, These results suggest that the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of erosive oesophagitis and NERD are distinct. [source]

Cost-utility analysis of Canadian tailored prophylaxis, primary prophylaxis and on-demand therapy in young children with severe haemophilia A

HAEMOPHILIA, Issue 4 2008
N. RISEBROUGH
Summary. Primary prophylaxis is the emerging standard treatment for boys with severe haemophilia. Tailored (escalating-dose) prophylaxis (EscDose), beginning at a low frequency and escalating with repeated bleeding may prevent arthropathy at a lower cost than standard prophylaxis (SP). From a societal perspective, we compared the incremental cost per joint-haemorrhage that is avoided and quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained of SP and EscDose to on-demand (Demand) therapy in severe haemophilia A boys treated to age 6 using a decision analytic model. Costs included factor VIII (FVIII), professional visits and tests, central venous placement/complications, hospitalization, home programmes and parents' lost work-days. Resource utilization was estimated by surveying 17 Canadian clinics. The natural history of bleeding and other probabilities were determined from a longitudinal chart review (n = 24) and published literature. EscDose costs an additional $3192 per joint-haemorrhage that was avoided compared with Demand whereas SP costs an additional $9046 per joint-haemorrhage that was avoided compared with EscDose. Clinic costs and lost wages were reduced by 60,80% for EscDose and SP compared with Demand. EscDose attained more QALYs than SP and Demand on account of less bleeding than Demand and lower need for ports than SP. The incremental cost per QALY for EscDose vs. Demand was $542 938. EscDose was less expensive with similar QALYs compared to SP. Sensitivity analysis was performed on all probability- and cost-estimates, and showed the model was sensitive to the cost of FVIII and the SP and target joint utilities. In conclusion, prophylaxis will substantially improve clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to Demand treatment, but with substantial cost. [source]

A global view on prophylaxis: possibilities and consequences

HAEMOPHILIA, Issue 2003
A. D. Shapiro
Summary., Prophylactic infusion therapy, both primary and secondary, has proven of great benefit to patients with haemophilia, specifically those with severe disease or bleeding episodes and patterns that have lead to development of arthropathy. At this time, optimal outcome in patients with severe haemophilia has been proven achievable with primary prophylaxis initiated at an early age in a regimen of three times weekly or every other day for patients with factor VIII deficiency, and twice weekly for those with factor IX deficiency. Despite the demonstrated benefit of primary prophylaxis, this treatment regimen has not been uniformly adopted into clinical practice even in developed countries. In developing countries, where issues of allocation of precious health care resources are of paramount importance, access to adequate treatment for persons with haemophilia on a programme of on-demand therapy is not commonly available; the cost of primary prophylaxis, even with intermediate purity plasma-derived factor concentrates or plasma fractions such as cryoprecipitate, renders this treatment the exception rather than the rule. [source]

PDE5 inhibitors in diabetic peripheral neuropathy

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 9 2006
G. HACKETT
Summary Peripheral neuropathy is the most common complication of diabetes. This paper reviews the case histories of five patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy or severe peripheral vascular disease who reported improvement in their symptoms when treated with regular or daily dosing with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is). These patients had been previously treated with PDE5Is for erectile dysfunction (ED) and not responded to on-demand therapy with a PDE5I at maximal recommended dose. This improvement is likely to be due to the known benefit of these drugs on endothelial dysfunction via an improvement of blood supply to the vasa nervorum. These cases suggest that further research is indicated to evaluate the potential use of PDE5Is in the treatment and prevention of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, particularly as these drugs are already licensed to treat ED, which occurs in around 50% of male diabetics. [source]

Efficacy and safety of secondary prophylactic vs. on-demand sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII treatment in adults with severe hemophilia A: results from a 13-month crossover study

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 1 2010
P. COLLINS
Summary.,Background: Hemarthroses in severe hemophilia precipitate physical, psychosocial and financial difficulties. Objective: To compare the effects of secondary prophylaxis with on-demand sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS) therapy in severe hemophilia A. Patients and methods: This open-label study included patients aged 30,45 years with factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity < 1 IU dL,1 who were using on-demand FVIII treatment. Patients were treated with rFVIII-FS on demand for 6 months, followed by 7 months prophylaxis (20,40 IU kg,1, three times per week, with the first month considered a run-in). The primary endpoint was the number of hemarthroses. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled (n = 19 completed); the mean age was 36.4 years, and 16 had target joints. The median (25,75%) number of joint bleeds decreased significantly with prophylaxis [0 (0,3)] vs. on-demand [15 (11,26); P < 0.001] therapy. The number of all bleeds was 0 (0,3) vs. 20.5 (14,37; P < 0.001), respectively. Median (range) total Gilbert scores improved after prophylaxis [18 (3,39)] compared with on-demand [25 (4,46)] therapy, predominantly reflecting the improved bleeding score. Median time from last prophylactic infusion to bleed was 2 days; 82.5% of bleeds occurred 2,3 days after the last infusion. Median 48-h and 72-h FVIII trough levels measured during months 10 and 13 were consistently > 6 and > 4 IU dL,1, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, and no inhibitor formation was observed. Conclusion: Secondary prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS significantly reduced the frequency of hemarthroses compared with on-demand therapy in adult patients with severe hemophilia A. [source]

Comparison of risk factors and clinical responses to proton pump inhibitors in patients with erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease

Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil 20 mg on Demand vs.

THE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 8 2010
Tadalafil 5 mg Once-a-Day in the Treatment of Post-Radiotherapy Erectile Dysfunction in Prostate Cancer Men: A Randomized Phase II Trial
ABSTRACT Introduction., The role of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of post-radiotherapy erectile dysfunction (ED) has not been extensively investigated. Aim., To compare the efficacy and safety of on-demand 20-mg tadalafil (arm A) with the newly released tadalafil 5-mg once-a-day dosing (arm B) in patients with ED following radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC). Methods., Randomized study to receive on-demand 20-mg or once-a-day 5-mg tadalafil for 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures., Changes in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) domain scores and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) question 2 and 3 positive response rates. Results., Fifty-two out of 86 screened patients were randomized. Forty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. A significant improvement in all domains of the IIEF was observed in both arms (P = 0.0001) with mean erectile function domain scores values of 25 and 27.1 for the 20-mg and 5-mg tadalafil, respectively (P = 0.19). SEP 2 and 3 positive response rates increased from 0% in both arms at baseline to 81% and 70% in the 20-mg arm and 90% and 73% in the 5-mg arm, respectively, at the end of treatment (P = 0.27). End of treatment global efficacy question positive answers were 86% in the 20-mg arm and 95% in the 5-mg arm (P = 0.27). Higher treatment compliance was shown in arm B (100%) as compared with arm A (86%). There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward fewer side effects in favor of the 5-mg daily dose arm. Conclusions., In the study population, both tadalafil formulations generated significantly high response rates according to the outcome measures and were well tolerated. The once-a-day 5-mg dosing showed higher compliance and marginally reduced side effects, thus making it an attractive alternative to on-demand therapy for ED in post-radiotherapy PC patients. Ricardi U, Gontero P, Ciammella P, Badellino S, Valentino F, Munoz F, Guarneri A, Rondi N, Moretto F, Filippi AR, Ragona R, and Tizzani A. Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 20 mg on demand vs. tadalafil 5 mg once-a-day in the treatment of post-radiotherapy erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer men: A randomized phase II trial. J Sex Med 2010;7:2851,2859. [source]