Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Offers Ways (offer + way)
Selected AbstractsCover Picture: Electrophoresis 16'2010ELECTROPHORESIS, Issue 17 2010Article first published online: 7 SEP 2010 Issue no. 17 is a regular issue comprising 18 manuscripts distributed over 5 separate parts. Part I has 7 research articles on some aspects of proteins and cell separations. Part II has 3 research articles on nucleic acid research including cloning/amplification, gene regulation and STR analysis. Part III offers ways of measuring diffusion and binding constants in two separate articles. Concentration and detection approaches are treated in 4 research articles making up Part IV. The last two articles in this issue (Part V) are on CEC and EKC describing a mixed mode monolithic stationary phase and a cyclodextrin-modified MEEKC. Featured articles include: Lamp-based wavelength-resolved fluorescence detection for protein capillary electrophoresis: Set-up and detector performance ((doi: 10.1002/elps.201000246)) Electromigration diffusivity spectrometry: A way for simultaneous determination of diffusion coefficients from mixed samples ((doi: 10.1002/elps.201000252)) Sample stacking capillary electrophoretic microdevice for highly sensitive mini Y short tandem repeat genotyping ((doi: 10.1002/elps.201000270)) [source] Dealcrafting: The Substance of Three-Dimensional NegotiationsNEGOTIATION JOURNAL, Issue 1 2002David A. Lax Much of our understanding of negotiation focuses on the process at the table involving a complicated set of interpersonal dynamics and strategies, or a "one-dimensional" approach to the subject. Conceptually independent of one-dimensional process factors is a second dimension of negotiation, "dealcrafting," which focuses on substance in the effort to create joint value. A third dimension of negotiation, involving entrepreneurial moves "away from the table," includes the first two dimensions but offers ways in which negotiators can change the game advantageously. Within this overall 3-D perspective, the second dimension (dealcrafting) calls for a relentless focus on creating maximum value and an equally relentless focus on differences as means to create joint gains. Following their description of the overall 3-D approach, the authors use numerous case examples to illustrate how principles of dealcrafting work in practice. [source] Stretch Goals and Backcasting: Approaches for Overcoming Barriers to Large-Scale Ecological RestorationRESTORATION ECOLOGY, Issue 4 2006Adrian D. Manning Abstract The destruction and transformation of ecosystems by humans threatens biodiversity, ecosystem function, and vital ecosystem services. Ecological repair of ecosystems will be a major challenge over the next century and beyond. Restoration efforts to date have frequently been ad hoc, and site or situation specific. Although such small-scale efforts are vitally important, without large-scale visions and coordination, it is unlikely that large functioning ecosystems will ever be constructed by chance through the cumulative effects of small-scale projects. Although the problems of human-induced environmental degradation and the need for a solution are widely recognized, these issues have rarely been addressed on a sufficiently large-scale basis. There are numerous barriers that prevent large-scale ecological restoration projects from being proposed, initiated, or carried through. Common barriers include the "shifting baseline syndrome," the scale and complexity of restoration, the long-term and open-ended nature of restoration, funding challenges, and preemptive constraint of vision. Two potentially useful approaches that could help overcome these barriers are stretch goals and backcasting. Stretch goals are ambitious long-term goals used to inspire creativity and innovation to achieve outcomes that currently seem impossible. Backcasting is a technique where a desired end point is visualized, and then a pathway to that end point is worked out retrospectively. A case study from the Scottish Highlands is used to illustrate how stretch goals and backcasting could facilitate large-scale restoration. The combination of these approaches offers ways to evaluate and shape options for the future of ecosystems, rather than accepting that future ecosystems are victims of past and present political realities. [source] Community in Public Policy: Fad or Foundation?AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, Issue 2 2001David Adams Both internationally and within Australia public policy is experiencing a rush back to the idea of community. After 15 years of discourse about the new public management and economic rationalism a much older discourse is slipping back into public policy. It is a normative discourse about changing relations between state democracy, market capitalism and civil society in which the idea of community is a central ,new' relation used to manage both state and market failures. Already new policy tools emerging from this discourse can be seen with innovations based on concepts such as partnerships, place management, and a raft of community consultation mechanisms. Much of the rhetoric about community as a new foundation for public policy, however, remains confused. The result is a muddle of ideas in which this potentially useful concept is in danger of becoming just another public policy reform fad. This article looks at what policy makers are saying about community, identifies problems in this current usage and offers ways of thinking about community with a view to establishing its policy utility. [source] | ||||||||||