Non-stress Test (non-stress + test)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Difference of fetal heart rate accelerations based on 10 and 15 beats per minute

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (ELECTRONIC), Issue 2 2010
Young-Sun Park
Abstract Aim:, To evaluate the correlation of 10 b.p.m.-10 s and 15 b.p.m.-15 s fetal heart rate (FHR) accelerations in gestations before or after 32 weeks using computerized analysis. Methods:, A combination of amplitude and duration of FHR accelerations, 10 b.p.m.-10 s (Acc10-10) and 15 b.p.m.-15 s (Acc15-15), was analyzed according to gestational weeks between January 1999 and December 2005 in 2358 normal pregnant women who received a non-stress test at 30,42 gestational weeks. A linear regression model between Acc10-10 and Acc15-15 was estimated, and the duration difference between 10 b.p.m. and 15 b.p.m. was converted into seconds. Results:, Before 32 weeks of gestation, the mean number of FHR accelerations based on 15 b.p.m. was below 2.00 (mean ± standard error, 1.58 ± 0.19). The correlation between Acc10-10 and Acc15-15 was Acc15-15 + 2.8 = Acc10-10 (r2 = 0.94, P = 0.0013). The mean duration difference between 10 b.p.m. and 15 b.p.m. was 36.8 s (range, 4,227 s). Conclusions:, Our study verified the difference of Acc10-10 and Acc15-15 using computerized analysis as the base of visual interpretation of the definition of FHR acceleration. Acc15-15 did not occur often enough to be relevant to the definition of FHR acceleration before 32 weeks' gestation. The difference between the mean number of FHR accelerations based on 10 b.p.m. and 15 b.p.m. within a 20-min window was 2.8. [source]


The efficacy of the non-stress test in preventing fetal death in post-term pregnancy

PAEDIATRIC & PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, Issue 3 2001
Tong Li
Summary We conducted a case,control study to examine the efficacy of non-stress testing in preventing fetal death in post-term pregnancy. The analysis was based on data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, which was a nationally representative sample of live births, fetal deaths and infant deaths that occurred in 1988. Information on whether a woman had non-stress testing was obtained from a questionnaire sent to prenatal care providers and hospitals. Cases were post-term women (with 42 weeks or more gestation) who had fetal deaths. Three post-term controls, who had live births and who delivered at the same time or later than the cases, were randomly chosen and individually matched to each case by maternal race. The proportion of women who had one or more non-stress tests during pregnancy was compared between cases and controls. Non-stress testing was used in 30.9% of the 126 cases and in 28.5% of the 375 controls. The race-adjusted odds ratio for exposure to non-stress test was 1.12 [95% CI 0.72, 1.75]. After controlling for other important confounding variables the odds ratio was 1.05 [95% CI 0.57, 1.91]. These results do not support the efficacy of non-stress testing in post-term pregnancies. A more detailed evaluation of this widely used screening procedure is needed. [source]