Home About us Contact | |||
Nonpharmacologic Treatment (nonpharmacologic + treatment)
Selected AbstractsCombined Ketogenic Diet and Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Rational Polytherapy?EPILEPSIA, Issue 1 2007Eric H. Kossoff Summary:,Objective: The concept of "rational polypharmacy" has been associated with anticonvulsant management for decades, but the term has not been applied to nonpharmacologic therapies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of children who received concurrent diet (ketogenic or modified Atkins) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) treatment for medically intractable epilepsy. Results: Thirty children in total from six epilepsy centers were treated over a 6-yr period. The median age at the initiation of combination therapy was 10 yr (range, 4,24 yr). Sixteen (53%) received dietary therapy followed by VNS; no differences were noted between centers. After 3 months, 21 (70%) had seizure reduced by >50% over the previous single nonpharmacologic treatment, of whom 13 (62%) had improvement within the first month. A 5-min VNS off-time correlated with >90% seizure reduction (p = 0.02). The median duration of nonpharmacologic polytherapy was 12 months (range, 0.5,96 months); 17 (57%) remain on dual therapy at this time. No side effects were noted. Most patients who discontinued combination therapy did so because of a lack of efficacy rather than restrictiveness. Conclusions: In this small group, the combined use of diet and VNS appeared synergistic and yielded rapid benefits. It may be more effective with longer VNS off-times. Further prospective studies of this combination in refractory pediatric epilepsy are needed to help guide optimal use. [source] Rational Combination Therapy in Refractory MigraineHEADACHE, Issue 6 2008B. Lee Peterlin DO Refractory migraine (RM) headaches pose important treatment challenges to the patients who live with them and the clinicians who try to treat them. Defined based on the lack of response to acute, preventive, and nonpharmacologic treatment, RM is often treated with a combination of treatments. Although combination therapy for RM has not been systematically studied in randomized trials, clinical experience suggests that a rational approach to RM treatment, utilizing a combination of treatments, may be effective where monotherapy has failed. In this article we briefly identify patient populations appropriate for more aggressive migraine prevention with combination therapy. We then discuss modifiable risk factors and comorbidities in migraine and then focus on the use of rational combination therapy, as well as the duration migraine preventatives should be considered for use. Future research is needed to evaluate the full potential of rational combination treatment as a strategy for treating and ultimately preventing RM. [source] Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT StatementJOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, Issue 3 2010Hugh MacPherson The STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) were published in five journals in 2001 and 2002. These guidelines, in the form of a checklist and explanations for use by authors and journal editors, were designed to improve reporting of acupuncture trials, particularly the interventions, thereby facilitating their interpretation and replication. Subsequent reviews of the application and impact of STRICTA have highlighted the value of STRICTA as well as scope for improvements and revision. To manage the revision process a collaboration between the STRICTA Group, the CONSORT Group, and the Chinese Cochrane Centre was developed in 2008. An expert panel with 47 participants was convened that provided electronic feedback on a revised draft of the checklist. At a subsequent face-to-face meeting in Freiburg, a group of 21 participants further revised the STRICTA checklist and planned dissemination. The new STRICTA checklist, which is an official extension of CONSORT, includes six items and 17 sub-items. These set out reporting guidelines for the acupuncture rationale, the details of needling, the treatment regimen, other components of treatment, the practitioner background, and the control or comparator interventions. In addition, and as part of this revision process, the explanations for each item have been elaborated, and examples of good reporting for each item are provided. In addition, the word "controlled" in STRICTA is replaced by "clinical," to indicate that STRICTA is applicable to a broad range of clinical evaluation designs, including uncontrolled outcome studies and case reports. It is intended that the revised STRICTA, in conjunction with both the main CONSORT Statement and extension for nonpharmacologic treatment, will raise the quality of reporting of clinical trials of acupuncture. [source] Esophageal Acid Levels after Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial FibrillationPACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2009GEORG NÖLKER M.D. Background: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is a potentially curative, nonpharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Several procedural complications have been described, including esophageal wall lesions ranging from erythema and esophagitis, necrosis and ulcer, to atrio-esophageal fistula. We prospectively studied changes in esophageal acid levels before and after PVAI. Methods: We performed 24-hour pH-metry before and 1.3 ± 1.6 days after PVAI, in 25 patients (mean age = 62 ± 12 years, 17 men) with symptomatic AF. A 2-mm transnasal probe was inserted into the inferior part of the esophagus and into the stomach to measure pH levels at fixed intervals. DeMeester scores, indicating acidic gastro-esophageal reflux, were calculated. Results: The mean number of reflux episodes increased from 89 ± 80 before to 107 ± 94 after PVAI. The mean percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 was shorter after (108 ± 193 minutes) than before PVAI (159 ± 245 minutes). The mean DeMeester score decreased from 49 ± 68 before to 31 ± 41 after PVAI (P < 0.05). We observed erythema or esophagitis in five patients, necrosis or ulcer in seven, and atrio-esophageal fistula in no patient. Conclusions: Our hypothesis of increased acid levels caused by stimulation of the right vagal nerve during isolation of the right upper pulmonary vein was not verified. [source] Hot Flashes in Breast Cancer SurvivorsTHE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 5 2003Daanish Hoda MD Abstract: Hot flashes can be a major problem for patients with a history of breast cancer. The precipitation of menopause in premenopausal women who undergo chemotherapy for breast cancer can lead to the rapid onset of hot flash symptoms that are more frequent and more severe than those associated with natural menopause. In addition, tamoxifen, historically the most commonly prescribed pharmacologic agent for the treatment of breast cancer, is associated with hot flashes in more than 50% of its users. Although estrogen relieves hot flashes in 80,90% of women who initiate treatment, its use in women with a history of breast cancer is controversial, and most physicians in the community will not use this treatment modality. In addition, the results of the long-awaited Women's Health Initiative study and other recent studies suggest that long-term estrogen therapy should not be recommended for most women for a variety of reasons. However, hot flashes in breast cancer survivors should no longer be considered untreatable, as there are many pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments that can help alleviate this problem. This article reviews the current strategies for the management of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors and the evidence supporting their use. [source] |