Home  About us  Contact
 

Node Micrometastases (node + micrometastase)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Node Micrometastases

  • lymph node micrometastase
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Analysis of micrometastatic disease in histologically negative lymph nodes of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastric cardia

    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, Issue 6 2008
    C. J. Buskens
    SUMMARY., Lymphatic dissemination is the most important prognostic factor in patients with esophageal carcinoma. However, the clinical significance of lymph node micrometastases is still debated due to contradictory results. The aim of the present study was to identify the incidence of potentially relevant micrometastatic disease in patients with histologically node-negative esophageal adenocarcinoma and to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of three different immunohistochemical assays. From a consecutive series of 79 patients who underwent a transthoracic resection with extended 2-field lymphadenectomy, all 20 patients with pN0 esophageal adenocarcinoma were included in this study. A total of 578 lymph nodes were examined for the presence of micrometastases by immunohistochemical analysis with the antibodies Ber-EP4, AE1/AE3 and CAM 5.2. Lymph node micrometastases were detected in five of the 20 patients (25%). They were identified in 16 of the 578 lymph nodes examined (2.8%) and most frequently detected with the Ber-EP4 and AE1/AE3 antibody (sensitivity 95% and 79% respectively). In 114 of the 559 negative lymph nodes (20.4%), positive single cells were found that did not demonstrate malignant characteristics. These false-positive cells were more frequently found with the AE1/AE3 staining (specificity of the Ber-Ep4 and AE1/AE3 antibody 94% and 84% respectively). The presence of nodal micrometastases was associated with the development of locoregional recurrences (P=0.01), distant metastases (P=0.01), and a reduced overall survival (log rank test, P=0.009). For the detection of clinically relevant micrometastatic disease in patients operated upon for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastric cardia, Ber-EP4 is the antibody of first choice because of its high sensitivity and specificity. Immunohistochemically detected micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes have potential prognostic significance and are associated with a high incidence of both locoregional and systemic recurrence. Therefore, this technique has the potential to refine the staging system for esophageal cancer and to help identify patients who will not be cured by surgery alone. [source]

    Real-time RT-PCR detection of CK19, CK7 and MUC1 mRNA for diagnosis of lymph node micrometastases in non small cell lung carcinoma

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 5 2005
    Pierre Saintigny
    Abstract Metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) are the major prognostic factor in resected non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, almost 50% of pN0 patients relapse, suggesting metastatic cells undetected by current staging procedures. A combination of markers [cytokeratins 19 and 7 (CK19, CK7) and mucin type 1 (MUC1) mRNAs] was therefore evaluated by real-time RT-PCR in order to detect occult cancer cells. Forty-three NSCLC tumor samples, 4 micrometastatic, 6 metastatic and 84 histologically negative mediastinal LNs from 19 patients with NSCLC were evaluated as well as blood mononuclear cells from 29 healthy volunteers and 17 benign LNs. When tested on cell lines, RT-PCR was particularly efficient for evaluation of CK19, CK7 and MUC1 mRNA expression. All tumor samples were positive for at least 1 marker and 74% of samples were positive for all 3 markers. CK7 and CK19 mRNA were not detected in benign LN and blood cells from healthy donors in contrast with MUC1 mRNA. Only CK7 and CK19 mRNA were therefore used for evaluation of mediastinal LNs: the 6 histologically metastatic and the 4 micrometastatic LNs were positive for at least one marker. Among the 84 histologically negative LNs, 6 (7%) were positive for at least one marker, potentially changing the stage of 2 out of 19 patients. In conclusion, in our feasibility study, parallel molecular detection of CK19 and CK7 mRNA can be considered a specific diagnostic tool for the assessment of microscopic lymphatic spread. Its prognostic impact remains to be evaluated in a prospective study. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

    Mortality association of enhanced CD44v6 expression is not mediated through occult lymphatic spread in stage II colorectal cancer

    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 9 2000
    Gerard Clarke
    Abstract Background and Aims: In the absence of other metastatic disease, the presence of lymph node metastasis remains the most important determinant of survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). Cluster designation 44 variant 6 (CD44v6) over-expression is associated with worse outcome in all stages of CRC. The CD44v6 is believed to confer metastatic potential through its facilitation of migration, extravasation and proliferation, although the specific means by which it conveys an adverse prognosis in CRC is unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine if CD44v6 over-expression in Stage II CRC subjects was associated with the presence of lymph node micrometastases. Methods: We assessed tumour CD44v6 expression in 43 randomly sampled subjects who had resections for Stage II CRC between 1984 and 1991 by using immunohistochemistry. Micrometastases were sought in corresponding lymph node (LN) sections using keratin immunohistochemistry. Results: There was a statistical trend between tumour CD44v6 over-expression and mortality (P = 0.09) and a significant relationship between LN cytokeratins and mortality (P = 0.01). There was no association between the detection of LN cytokeratins and tumour CD44v6 over-expression. Conclusion: We conclude that the adverse survival effect of CD44v6 over-expression is not mediated though lymphatic spread and postulate that it may therefore facilitate haematogenous metastasis. [source]

    Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma who have sentinel lymph node micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry

    CANCER, Issue 8 2005
    Mesult Tez M.D.
    No abstract is available for this article. [source]

    Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma who have sentinel lymph node micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry,

    CANCER, Issue 8 2005
    Anees Chagpar M.D., M.Sc.
    Abstract BACKGROUND The ideal pathologic assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast carcinoma remains controversial. The authors evaluated how detailed assessment of SLNs using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and serial sectioning would affect treatment decisions and outcomes in patients with breast carcinoma who had negative SLNs on standard hematoxylin and eosin staining. METHODS The SLNs from patients who were treated between June 1998 and June, 1999 and who had negative lymph node status determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining (n = 84 patients) were evaluated further with serial sectioning and cytokeratin IHC. Patients were offered adjuvant therapy based on primary tumor factors. RESULTS The median patient age was 57 years, and the median tumor size was 1.2 cm. At a median follow-up of 40.2 months, 81 patients (96%) were alive with no evidence of disease, 1 patient was alive with disease, 1 patient had died of disease, and 1 patient had died of other causes. Fifteen patients (18%) had micrometastases identified on IHC. Of the total 84 patients, information regarding adjuvant therapy was not available for 5 patients. Of the remaining 79 patients, 10 patients (13%) were not offered adjuvant chemotherapy but had positive SLN status determined by IHC. SLN status based on IHC evaluation did not correlate with age (P = 0.077), tumor size (P = 0.717), grade (P = 0.148), estrogen receptor status (P = 1.000), or lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.274). Furthermore, IHC-detected positive SLN status did not correlate with distant metastasis (P = 0.372) or overall or distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.543 and P = 0.540, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Although the finding of SLN micrometastases by IHC may change management in > 12% of patients, preliminary results suggested that such micrometastases do not affect outcomes significantly. Cancer 2005;103:1581,6. © 2005 American Cancer Society. [source]

    The relevance of occult axillary micrometastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ,

    CANCER, Issue 10 2003
    A clinicopathologic study with long-term follow-up
    Abstract BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of newly diagnosed breast carcinoma cases. Historically, the incidence of axillary metastasis in DCIS has been small (1,2%) and its significance has been debated. It is widely known that serial sections of lymph nodes coupled with keratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) increases identification of micrometastasis. The advent of sentinel lymph node evaluation underscores the need to reevaluate the significance of occult micrometastases in DCIS. METHODS Patients with DCIS and negative axillary lymph nodes from 1974 to 1992 were selected from the Saint Barnabas Medical Center Tumor Registry. All diagnoses were confirmed, and paraffin blocks were retrieved after acceptance into the study. Seven serial sections were obtained from each block and evaluated with two cytokeratin IHC stains. Clinical follow-up ranged from 10 to 28 years. RESULTS One hundred two patients were included in the study. Micrometastases were identified in 13 patients (13%), mostly on 1 level and composed of microscopic clusters in the subcapsular sinus. Seven of these lymph node,positive patients (58%) had high-grade comedo DCIS, 4 (33%) had intermediate grades of various types of DCIS, and one had a low-grade micropapillary DCIS. The overall disease recurrence rate was 12%, but micrometasis was not detected in any of the patients who developed disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Serial IHC evaluation of lymph nodes dramatically increased the identification of occult micrometastasis. However, IHC detected micrometastasis has no apparent clinical significance in DCIS, based on the current long-term clinicopathologic study. Therefore, the authors questioned the significance of occult micrometastasis, identified by IHC, in DCIS of any type and extent. Further evaluation and follow-up of lymph node micrometastases in patients with invasive tumors of various sizes are needed. The current findings would not support altering the stage of patients with DCIS and micrometastasis detected by IHC only. Cancer 2003. © 2003 American Cancer Society. [source]