Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Nobel Biocare AB (nobel + biocare_ab)
Selected AbstractsImmunohistochemical characteristics of inflammatory lesions at implantsJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Issue 1 2003Federico Gualini Abstract Objective: The aim of the present investigation was to study some immunohistochemical features of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis lesions. Materials and methods: Two groups of subjects (Groups A and B) were included. Group A consisted of 10 partially edentulous subjects (eight females and two males; 45,72 years of age) who had been restored with implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The implants had been in function between 2 and 5 years. In each subject, one implant site demonstrating signs of peri-implant mucositis, i.e. soft tissue inflammation but no bone loss, was selected. The site was anaesthetized and a soft tissue biopsy was collected. In Group B, six subjects were included. They had been restored with implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) between 5 and 11 years prior to the current study. In each individual ,,1 implant site exhibited signs of peri-implantitis and was selected for biopsy. All sites of peri-implantitis had (i) a history of continuous marginal bone loss (assessed in radiographs), (ii) clinical symptoms of soft tissue inflammation (bleeding on probing and suppuration) but (iii) no implant mobility. From each selected peri-implantitis site a 4 × 4 mm large soft tissue biopsy was obtained. All specimens were snap frozen and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis regarding the proportions of cells positive for the CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19 and elastase markers. Results: Peri-implantitis lesions were considerably larger and contained significantly greater proportions of B cells (CD19+) and elastase-positive cells than mucositis lesions. Peri-implantitis sites, in contrast to sites with mucositis, consistently displayed elastase-positive cells in the central portions of the infiltrate. Conclusion: It is suggested that peri-implantitis lesions exhibit properties that are different from mucositis lesions. [source] Clinical Experience of TiUniteÔ Implants: A 5-year Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Follow-Up StudyCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2010Bertil Friberg DDS ABSTRACT Background: Little is known of the long-term clinical and radiographic performance of moderately rough surface implants. Purpose: The aim of the present retrospective investigation was to study two pioneer cohorts of patients, that is, the first patients to receive Brånemark System® implants with a moderately rough surface (TiUniteÔ, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) at the present clinic. TiUnite implants were inserted either in compromised bone sites in a mixed-mouth concept together with turned implants or used solely. Patients were followed up over a period of 5 years with regard to implant survival and the marginal bone response. Materials and Methods: Patients who received both implant types (mixed group) comprised 41 subjects, and the second group (TiUnite group) comprised 70 subjects. A total of 110 turned and 68 TiUnite implants were placed in the mixed group, and 212 TiUnite implants in the TiUnite group. Follow-up radiographs were obtained at prosthesis placement and at the 1- and 5-year check-ups, and examined by independent observers. Results: One turned (0.9%) and two TiUnite (2.9%) implants failed in the mixed group, and three implants (1.6%) failed in the TiUnite group, indicating no significant differences between surfaces or groups (p < .05). The mean marginal bone loss at 5 years was 0.6 mm to 0.8 mm, also indicating no significant differences for the two implant types tested in the mixed group. Conclusions: Cumulative survival rates for the two implant surfaces were favorable at 5 years, and the marginal bone loss was low and similar for both implant surfaces. [source] Guided Surgery and Presurgical Prosthesis: Preliminary Results of 33 Fully Edentulous Maxillae Treated in Accordance with the NobelGuide® ProtocolCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2010Luc Gillot DDS ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to present the preliminary results of 33 edentulous maxillary patients treated using the Nobelguide® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients were treated according to the conventional protocol of the Nobelguide® technique in two clinical centers. This group of patients received 211 implants. Monitoring was carried out for over 12,51 months, depending on the patient. The Nobelguide® protocol was used for all patients. Results: Of the 211 implants loaded, four were lost (1.9%). The implant survival rate was therefore 98.1%. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%. There were some per-operative complications (four) and some postoperative complications (10 fractures of resin). Conclusion: These preliminary results seemed rather promising. These were the first cases of experienced surgeons who needed to learn a new implant placement protocol. It was clear that analysis and understanding of the system were essential in order to obtain such a success. Only one implant was replaced without there being any impact on the prosthesis survival rate which is 100%. [source] Two-Year Outcome with Nobel Direct® Implants: A Retrospective Radiographic and Microbiologic Study in 10 PatientsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2009Tommie Van de Velde LA ABSTRACT Introduction: The Nobel Direct® implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) was developed to minimize marginal bone resorption and to result in "soft tissue integration" for an optimized aesthetic outcome. However, conflicting results have been presented in the literature. The aim of this present study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic outcomes of Nobel Direct implants. Materials and Methods: Ten partially edentulous subjects without evidence of active periodontitis (mean age 55 years) received 12 Nobel Direct implants. Implants were loaded with single crowns after a healing period of 3 to 6 months. Treatment outcomes were assessed at month 24. Routine clinical assessments, intraoral radiographs, and microbiologic samplings were made. Histologic analysis of one failing implant and chemical spectroscopy around three unused implants was performed. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the evaluation of bone loss; otherwise, descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Implants were functionally loaded after 3 to 6 months. At 2 years, the mean bone loss of remaining implants was 2.0 mm (SD ± 1.1 mm; range: 0.0,3.4 mm). Three out of 12 implants with an early mean bone loss >3 mm were lost. The surviving implants showed increasing bone loss between 6 and 24 months (p = .028). Only 3 out of the 12 implants were considered successful and showed bone loss of <1.7 mm after 2 years. High rates of pathogens, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Tanerella forsythia, were found. Chemical spectroscopy revealed, despite the normal signals from Ti, O, and C, also peaks of P, F, S, N, and Ca. A normal histologic image of osseointegration was observed in the apical part of the retrieved implant. Conclusion: Radiographic evidence and 25% implant failures are indications of a low success rate. High counts and prevalence of significant pathogens were found at surviving implants. Although extensive bone loss had occurred in the coronal part, the apical portion of the implant showed some bone to implant integration. [source] Clinical and Microbiological Determinants of Ailing Dental ImplantsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2009Giorgio Tabanella DDS ABSTRACT Background: The failure of the host tissue to establish or maintain osseointegration around dental implants is due to either occlusal or parafunctional forces, premature loading, ill-directed stress, or microbial infection. The long-term failure rate of dental implants is generally 5,10%. Although a variety of etiologies of early peri-implant bone loss (from implant placement to 1-year post-loading) have been proposed, factors associated with late implant failures are less well understood but are probably related to both the peri-implant microbial environment and host factors. Discriminating between causes of implant failure is of importance for instituting a successful implant therapy. Purpose: The objective of this cross-sectional split-mouth study was to identify clinical, radiographic, and bacterial characteristics of peri-implant disease sites. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with bilateral implants (Brånemark®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden; and 3iÔ implant systems, Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) participated in the study. Sites with peri-implantitis (radiographic bone loss beyond the third implant thread) and peri-implant healthy tissues (radiographic bone level above the first implant thread) were identified in periapical radiographs using a long-cone paralleling projection technique. Microbiological identification was carried out using established anaerobic culture techniques. A descriptive statistics based on means and standard deviations was reported. Results: Peri-implant bone loss was associated with the absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura, peri-implant pocket depth, pain on chewing, and the submucosal presence of the putative periodontopathogens Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter species, and Peptostreptococcus micros. Pain was associated with P. micros, Fusobacterium species, and Eubacterium species. Discussion and Conclusion: The absence of radiographic crestal lamina dura and the presence of suspected major periodontal pathogens seem to be associated to peri-implantitis. [source] Turned Brånemark System® Implants in Wide and Narrow Edentulous Maxillae: A Retrospective Clinical StudyCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2008Bertil Friberg DDS ABSTRACT Background: The available jawbone volume is regarded as one of the most important factors when assessing the prognosis of oral implants in the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Purpose: The aim of the current investigation was to retrospectively evaluate and compare the outcome of implants placed in edentulous maxillae with either wide or narrow jaw shapes. The marginal bone loss and implant cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were calculated and analyzed with special reference to smoking habits. Materials and Methods: The study included 75 individuals with edentulous maxillae, of which 33 patients exhibited wide (group A) and 42 patients exhibited narrow jaw shapes (group B). A total of 506 turned Brånemark System® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) implants were inserted (226 in group A and 279 in group B) and followed clinically up to 7 years. Smoking habits were recorded. Radiographs were obtained at connection of prostheses, and at the 1- and 5-year follow-up visit. The marginal bone loss was calculated for the groups and analyzed using t -test. Results: Twenty-eight implants were lost during the study period, revealing implant CSRs at 7 years of 94.6% (11/226) and 93.6% (17/279) for wide and narrow crests, respectively. No difference in marginal bone loss was seen between the two groups, although a trend toward more bone loss was recorded for patients with wide crests. Smoking habits were more common in group A (45%) than in group B (31%). During the first year of function, smokers lost significantly more marginal bone than nonsmokers (p = .0447), albeit this difference did not prevail (p > .05) at the end of the study period. Conclusions: The implant CSRs at 7 years were equally good for the two groups of patients with various jaw shapes. Initially, smokers showed significantly more marginal bone loss than nonsmokers. [source] A New Technique for Reconstruction of the Atrophied Narrow Alveolar Crest in the Maxilla Using Morselized Impacted Bone Allograft and Later Placement of Dental ImplantsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2008Per Holmquist DDS ABSTRACT Background: In cases when the alveolar crest is too narrow to host an implant, lateral augmentation is required. The use of autogenous bone blocks harvested from the iliac crest is often demanded. One disadvantage is the associated patient morbidity. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate the use of morselized impacted bone allograft, a novel technique for reconstruction of the narrow alveolar crest. Materials and Methods: Two patients with completely edentulous maxillae and one partially edentulous, with a mean age of 77 years (range 76,79 years) were included in the study. The alveolar crest width was <3 mm without possibility to place any implant. Bone grafts were taken from a bone bank in Gävle Hospital. Bone from the neck of femur heads was milled to produce bone chips. The milled bone was partially defatted by rinsing in 37°C saline solution. After compression of the graft pieces with a size of 15 mm (height), 30 mm (length), and 6 mm (width), they were then fit to adapt to the buccal surface of the atrophied alveolar crest. One piece was placed to the right and one to the left side of the midline. On both sides fibrin glue was used (Tisseel®, Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, dental implants were placed, simultaneously biopsies were harvested and in one patient two oxidized microimplants were placed. At the time of abutment connection, microimplants were retrieved with surrounding bone for histology. Fixed screw-retained bridges were fabricated in mean of 7 months after implant surgery. Radiographs were taken before and after implant surgery and after 1 year of loading. Results: Sixteen implants with an oxidized surface were placed (TiUnite®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). After 1 year of functional loading, all implants were clinically stable. The marginal bone loss was 1.4 mm (SD 0.3) after 1 year of loading. The histological examination showed resorption and subsequent bone formation on the allograft particles. There were no signs of inflammatory cell infiltration in conjunction with the allograft. The two microimplants showed bone formation directly on the implant surface. Conclusions: This study shows that morselized impacted bone allograft can be used to increase the width of the atrophied narrow alveolar crest as a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts in elderly patients. The histological examination of biopsies revealed a normal incorporation process and no signs of an immunological reaction. Further studies with larger samples are of important to be able to conclude if equal results can be obtained using morselized impacted bone allograft as for autogenous bone graft. [source] Characterization of the Surface Properties of Commercially Available Dental Implants Using Scanning Electron Microscopy, Focused Ion Beam, and High-Resolution Transmission Electron MicroscopyCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2008Tobias Jarmar PhD ABSTRACT Background:, Since osseointegration of the respective implant is claimed by all manufacturing companies, it is obvious that not just one specific surface profile including the chemistry controls bone apposition. Purpose:, The purpose was to identify and separate out a particular set of surface features of the implant surfaces that can contribute as factors in the osseointegration process. Material and Methods:, The surface properties of several commercially available dental implants were extensively studied using profilometry, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Ultrathin sections prepared with focused ion beam microscopy (FIB) provided microstructural and chemical data which have not previously been communicated. The implants were the Nobel Biocare TiUnite® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), Nobel Biocare Steri-Oss HA-coated (Nobel Biocare AB, Yorba Linda, CA, USA), Astra-Tech OsseoSpeedÔ (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden), Straumann SLA® (Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland), and the Brånemark Integration Original Fixture implant (Brånemark Integration, Göteborg, Sweden). Results:, It was found that their surface properties had differences. The surfaces were covered with crystalline TiO2 (both anatase and rutile), amorphous titanium oxide, phosphorus doped amorphous titanium oxide, fluorine, titanium hydride, and hydroxyapatite, respectively. Conclusion:, This indicates that the provision of osseointegration is not exclusively linked to a particular set of surface features if the implant surface character is a major factor in that process. The studied methodology provides an effective tool to also analyze the interface between implant and surrounding bone. This would be a natural next step in understanding the ultrastructure of the interface between bone and implants. [source] Turned, Machined Versus Double-Etched Dental Implants In VivoCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2007B. Al-Nawas Priv.-Doz., DrMed, DrMedDent ABSTRACT Background:, Positive effects on the clinical outcome of moderately rough implant surfaces are described. Intercomparison of clinical data, however, is rarely found. Purpose:, The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of two macroscopically identical implants, the one with a turned, machined and the other with an etched surface. Materials and Methods:, In a retrospective cohort study, the included implants followed the criteria: standard surgical protocol, >12 months in situ; minimally rough self-threading implants with a turned, machined surface (Mk IITM Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden], n=210); etched implants of the same macrodesign (3iTM Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA], n=151), length , 10 mm. Clinical data and implant success were rated. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest® (Siemens AG, Bensheim, Germany) were measured and related to the corresponding implant survival rate in the respective group. Results:, The total number of implants was 361, of which 264 (73%) were subject to clinical reexamination. RFA and Periotest could be recorded in 25% of the implants. Neither clinically relevant nor statistically significant differences between the surface designs were found in the RFA (64 ± 8.6 vs 63 ± 9.7), in Periotest (,2 ± 3.3 vs ,1 ± 5.1), and in mean survival periods (49 months, 95% confidence interval CI]: 46,51 months, for the turned vs 46 months, 95% CI: 43,49 months, for the double-etched implant). After osteoplastic procedures, a significantly higher rate of implant losses in the turned, machined implant group was observed (17 vs 1) with a mean survival period of 43 (40,46) months for the turned and 46 (45,48) months for the double-etched implants. Conclusion:, No difference between implants with two different minimally rough surfaces was found. A positive effect of surface roughness is observed in poor quality bone, but the pivotal proof of this effect is still lacking. [source] Outcome of Oral Implant Treatment in Partially Edentulous Jaws Followed 20 Years in Clinical FunctionCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 4 2006Odont Dr/PhD, Ulf Lekholm DDS ABSTRACT Background:, Most long-term follow-up studies of implants in partially edentulous jaws present their outcomes as mean values of implant survival and follow-up time, and few address the fate of the remaining teeth. Purpose:, The aim of this study was to investigate the results of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws after 20 years, and simultaneously to assess what happens to teeth present at the time of implant placement. Materials and Methods:, Seventeen partially edentulous patients, of 27 originally treated individuals, were retrospectively reviewed after receiving implants from 1983 to 1985. The parameters studied were implant survival, prosthesis stability, marginal bone loss at teeth and implants, treatment complications, need for dental treatment, and patient's satisfaction with the outcome. Results:, The cumulative survival rate was 91%, when all 27 patients were assessed, that is, including the 10 dropouts. Of the 69 inserted and followed implants (Brånemark system®; Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), six failed (8.7%) during the 20-year period, four during the first decade, and the remaining two during the second. A majority (n=4) of the losses were due to implant fractures, two after 8 years, and two after 17 years. In all, 10 of the original fixed bridges being followed (n=24) remained in function during the entire investigation period, whereas 12 were exchanged for new constructions after an average of 7 years. The mean marginal bone loss at teeth was 0.7 mm, and at implants it was 1.0 mm. The major complication observed during the second decade was veneer material fractures, which occurred 14 times in six patients. Component loosening and abutment- and bridge-locking screw fractures were the second most common problems seen, indicating material/component fatigue. Most patients were satisfied with their treatment and many mentioned that they did not think of the constructions as anything but a part of their own body. Conclusion:, Over the decades, treatment of partially edentulous jaws with turned titanium implants seems to function well and to provide patients with good support for fixed short-span bridge constructions. [source] Immediate Loading of Brånemark System Implants®: A Comparison Between TiUniteTM and Turned Implants Placed in the Anterior MandibleCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 4 2006Kjell-Krister Fröberg DDS ABSTRACT Purpose:, The aim of the present study was to compare the treatment outcome of TiUniteTM - and turned-surfaced Brånemark System® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) implants when applying immediate loading of cross-arch designed fixed partial dentures in the anterior mandible. Materials and Methods:, Fifteen patients with edentulous mandibles participated in the study. In one half of the jaw, between the exit of the nerve-vessel bundle and the midline, one type of implant was placed and in the remaining half the other type. The implants were loaded the day of surgery via a fixed, temporary supra-construction. Ten days later, the permanent one was screw retained to the implant pillars. Results:, The present 18-month clinical trial failed to demonstrate any differences regarding healing and cumulative success rate of an an-oxidized implant surface (TiUnite) and a turned (turned) one when implants in the anterior mandible were exposed to functional load within 24 hours after installation. Conclusion:, A high predictability regarding the treatment outcome for immediately loaded Brånemark implants in the anterior mandible was observed. Furthermore, no difference between the traditional turned and the an-oxidized implant surface (TiUnite) could be observed. However, it has to be stressed that all implants (irrespective of surface) were placed in the anterior mandible and also that all the patients demonstrated a high level of oral hygiene. [source] Bone Reformation and Implant Integration following Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation: An Experimental Study in PrimatesCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2006Vinicius C Palma DDS ABSTRACT Background:, Recent clinical studies have described maxillary sinus floor augmentation by simply elevating the maxillary sinus membrane without the use of adjunctive grafting materials. Purpose:, This experimental study aimed at comparing the histologic outcomes of sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous placement of implants with and without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts. The purpose was also to investigate the role played by the implant surface in osseointegration under such circumstances. Materials and Methods:, Four tufted capuchin primates had all upper premolars and the first molar extracted bilaterally. Four months later, the animals underwent maxillary sinus membrane elevation surgery using a replaceable bone window technique. The schneiderian membrane was kept elevated by insertion of two implants (turned and oxidized, Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) in both sinuses. The right sinus was left with no additional treatment, whereas the left sinus was filled with autogenous bone graft. Implant stability was assessed through resonance frequency analysis (OsstellTM, Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) at installation and at sacrifice. The pattern of bone formation in the experimental sites and related to the different implant surfaces was investigated using fluorochromes. The animals were sacrificed 6 months after the maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure for histology and histomorphometry (bone-implant contact, bone area in threads, and bone area in rectangle). Results:, The results showed no differences between membrane-elevated and grafted sites regarding implant stability, bone-implant contacts, and bone area within and outside implant threads. The oxidized implants exhibited improved integration compared with turned ones as higher values of bone-implant contact and bone area within threads were observed. Conclusions:, The amount of augmented bone tissue in the maxillary sinus after sinus membrane elevation with or without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts does not differ after 6 months of healing. New bone is frequently deposited in contact with the schneiderian membrane in coagulum-alone sites, indicating the osteoinductive potential of the membrane. Oxidized implants show a stronger bone tissue response than turned implants in sinus floor augmentation procedures. [source] Report of a Case Receiving Full-Arch Rehabilitation in Both Jaws Using Immediate Implant Loading Protocols: A 1-Year Resonance Frequency Analysis Follow-UpCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2006Michael Portmann DDS ABSTRACT Background:, Immediate occlusal implant loading has been documented as a viable treatment option for various indications. However, documentations related to full-arch rehabilitation are usually limited to treatment of one jaw at a time, thereby leaving the opposing dentition unchanged. Furthermore, clinical documentation using traditional, well-accepted measuring techniques may not be adequate when it comes to short-term evaluation of the success or failure of implants subjected to immediate occlusal loading. Purpose:, The purpose of this case report is to (1) present an implant stability follow-up of a patient receiving an immediate, implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation in both jaws and (2) evaluate the patient's acceptance of this rehabilitation. Materials and Methods:, A 68-year-old patient scheduled for implant treatment was selected for an immediate implant loading protocol in both jaws. During two surgical events 3 weeks apart, eight maxillary and four mandibular Brånemark System® Mk IV TiUniteTM fixtures (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) were inserted and subsequently used to immediately support a cross-arch fixed prosthesis in the maxilla and a bar-retained overdenture in the mandible. Implant stability was recorded from the day of surgery periodically during a 1-year follow-up using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Results:, At the 1-year follow-up, based on clinical, RFA, and radiographic evaluations, all implants and the reconstructions were classified as successful. All maxillary implants showed a decrease in the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value from the measurement at the time of surgery to the first follow-up, whereas two of four mandibular implants revealed an initial drop in stability. Irrespective of a specific ISQ level measured at implant surgery (ISQ range 53,74) and despite an initial decrease in stability, measurements recorded at the 12-month follow-up indicated similar stability levels for all maxillary implants (ISQ range 64,68) or the group of mandibular implants (ISQ range 72,75) but with a higher ISQ level for mandibular implants. Furthermore, the patient's acceptance of the immediate full-arch rehabilitation in both jaws was high. Conclusions:, The present case report demonstrates that a slightly staged approach for full-arch rehabilitation in both jaws using immediate implant loading protocols is a realistic treatment option. Furthermore, RFA follow-up indicates that immediately occlusally loaded implants placed in reduced bone quality and quantity are more prone to loose stability in the early healing period compared with implants placed in dense bone quality. [source] A 3-Year Retrospective Study of Cresco Frameworks: Preload and ComplicationsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 4 2005Lars Hjalmarsson DDS ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of fixed implant-supported complete prostheses on Astra or Brånemark implants when using either conventional cast frameworks or frameworks produced according to the Cresco Ti Precision method® (Cresco Ti Systems Sàri., Lausanne, Switzerland). Materials and Methods: Forty-six patients treated 3 years previously were divided into four groups according to implant system and framework design. Clinical examinations were performed and case records were scrutinized. The stability for each prosthesis retention screw was recorded as the torque profile and was monitored using the Osseocare® torque controller (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). Complications in association with implants and superstructures were registered. Patient opinions were recorded. The significance level was set to 5%. Results: The Astra-Cresco group demonstrated a lower degree of prosthesis retention screw stability compared with the Astra group. No differences among the four groups were seen regarding plaque, bleeding on probing, or marginal bone resorption. The Brånemark group (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB) demonstrated more mechanical complications than the Brånemark-Cresco group. Mobile prostheses were found in the Brånemark and the Astra-Cresco groups. Fracture of veneer was seen in 20% of the prostheses and was more frequently found in the groups with mobile prostheses. Sixty percent of the prostheses showed reactions in the surrounding soft tissues. The most common reaction was mucosal proliferation. No differences were detected in the patients' opinions. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the following can be concluded: (1) compared with conventional frameworks, the Cresco distortion correction method does not provide a better clinical outcome after prosthesis connection in patients with fixed implant-supported complete prostheses; and (2) the two framework-producing methods behave differently on Astra implants compared with Brånemark implants concerning prosthesis retention screw stability, mechanical and biologic complications, and reactions in patients with fixed implant-supported complete prostheses. [source] Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of 86 Procera AllCeramÔ Anterior Single Crowns on Natural and Implant-Supported AbutmentsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2005Fernando Zarone MD ABSTRACT Background: The Procera AllCeramÔ (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden, and Procera Sandvik AB, Stockholm, Sweden) technique is one alternative to metal-ceramic restorations. However, few long-term evaluations of its use for single crowns on natural and implant-supported abutments are available. Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical performance of Procera AllCeram single crowns when placed in aesthetic sites supported by either natural teeth or implants over a period of 48 months. Materials and Methods: Eighty-six single crowns were fabricated and used in 51 patients. The restorations were examined according to the California Dental Association's quality assessment system. Results: One crown was lost after 20 months of follow-up. Of the 85 restorations that completed the 48-month follow-up, only one crown (1.2%) showed a veneering porcelain chip. All crowns were ranked as either excellent or acceptable. The success rates of single crowns supported by natural tooth and implant-supported abutments were 100% and 98.3%, respectively; the total crown success rate was 98.8%. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, Procera AllCeram crowns proved to be a reliable therapeutic choice for the restoration of anterior teeth on both natural and implant-supported abutments. The hybrid glass-ionomer cement used in the present study appeared to be a reliable luting agent. [source] Short Implants in the Severely Resorbed Maxilla: A 2-Year Retrospective Clinical StudyCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2005Franck Renouard DDS ABSTRACT Background: Although the predictability of endosseous dental implants is well documented, the restoration of the posterior region of the maxilla remains a challenge. The placement of short implants is one therapeutic option that reduces the need for augmentation therapy. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the survival rates of 6 to 8.5 mm-long implants in the severely resorbed maxilla following a surgical protocol for optimized initial implant stability. Materials and Methods: The study included 85 patients with 96 short (6,8.5 mm) implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) supporting single-tooth and partial reconstructions. The implants had a machined (54) or an oxidized (TiUniteÔ, Nobel Biocare AB) (42) surface. A one-stage surgical protocol with delayed loading was used. The patients were followed for at least 2 years after loading (average follow-up period 37.6 months). The marginal bone resorption was assessed by radiographic readings. Results: Five implants were lost during the first 9 months, and four implants were lost to follow-up. The cumulative survival rate was 94.6%. Four of the failed implants had a machined surface, and one had an oxidized surface. The mean marginal bone resorption after 2 years in function was 0.44 ± 0.52 mm. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the use of short implants maybe considered for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla as an alternative to more complicated surgical techniques. [source] Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses in Elderly Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Study of 133 Edentulous Patients Older than 79 YearsCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 4 2004Ingela Engfors DDS ABSTRACT Background: An increasing number of elderly patients are treated with implants, but results for the elderly patient in terms of implant success and adaptation to implant prostheses are contradictory. Objective: To retrospectively study the 5-year clinical and radiologic performances of fixed implant-supported prostheses placed in edentulous elderly patients and to compare those results with the results of using similar prostheses in a control group of younger patients. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised 133 edentulous patients who were 80 or more years of age and who were consecutively treated with fixed implant-supported prostheses between January 1986 and August 1998. Altogether 761 Brånemark System® implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) were placed in 139 edentulous jaws. The control group comprised 115 edentulous patients who were younger than 80 years and who were treated consecutively from March 1996 to November 1997 with similar prostheses. In this group 670 implants were placed in 118 edentulous jaws. Information was collected from all postinsertion visits, including the fifth annual checkup, and changes of marginal bone levels were analyzed from intraoral radiographs. Results: The 5-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) for implants in the maxilla was 93.0% in the study group and 92.6% in the control group; the corresponding CSRs for implants in the mandible were 99.5% and 99.7%. The most common complications for patients in the study group were soft tissue inflammation (mucositis) and cheek and lip biting (p < .05) whereas resin veneer fractures were the most common complications for the control group. Overall 5-year marginal bone loss for the study group was 0.7 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.45) in the upper jaw and 0.6 mm (SD, 0.50) in the lower jaw. Differences in bone levels and bone loss between the two groups did not reach significant levels (p > .05). Conclusions: Implant treatment in the elderly patients showed treatment results comparable to those observed in younger age groups. However, indications of more problems with adaptation could be observed and were reflected in more postinsertion problems. Cleaning problems and associated soft tissue inflammation (mucositis) as well as tongue, lip, and cheek biting were significantly more often observed among the elderly patients (p < .05). [source] A Three-Year Follow-Up Report of a Comparative Study of ITI Dental Implants® and Brånemark System® Implants in the Treatment of the Partially Edentulous MaxillaCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2004Per Åstrand DDS ABSTRACT Background: Many longitudinal studies of different implant systems have been published but few controlled randomized investigations have been reported. A 1-year report of a comparative study of ITI Dental Implant System® implants (Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) and Brånemark System® implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) has been published by the present authors. This paper is a 3-year follow-up of that randomized study. Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of fixed partial prostheses supported by ITI or Branemark implants. The outcome was evaluated primarily in terms of survival rates and changes in marginal bone level. Material and Methods: The study group comprised 28 patients with anterior residual dentition in the maxilla. The patients were provided with two to four implants on each side of the dentition and were randomly allocated to Brånemark implants or ITI implants; 77 ITI implants and 73 Brånemark implants were inserted. After 6 months abutment connections were made to both ITI and Brånemark implants. All patients were provided with fked partial prostheses of gold-ceramic. The patients were followed up annually with clinical and radiographic examinations for 3 years. Results: Two Brånemark implants and two ITI implants were lost. The Brånemark implants were lost before loading whereas the ITI implants were lost because of periimplantitis. The survival rate for both groups was 97.3%. The mean marginal bone level of the Brånemark implants was situated 1.8 mm from the reference point at both the baseline and the 3-year examinations. The corresponding values for the ITI implants were 1.4 mm at baseline and 1.3 mm after 3 years. There was no significant difference between the implant systems with regard to bone level or bone level change. A steady state of the marginal bone level was calculated to have been reached after 3 years for 95.5% of the Brånemark implants and 87.1% of the ITI implants. Periimplantitis (infection including pus and bone loss) was observed with seven ITI implants but with none of the Brånemark implants. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were found between the implants studied, except for the frequency of periimplantitis, which was higher for the ITI implants. The survival rates were high, and the marginal bone loss was small for both systems. [source] Provisional Implants: A Clinical Prospective Study in 45 Patients, from Implant Placement to Delivery of the Final BridgeCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 3 2004Par-Olov Östman DDS ABSTRACT Background: Protocols for submerged healing of dental implants often require the patient to have no teeth until suture removal and to wear a removable prosthesis during the remaining healing period. This may be inconvenient for the patient, and healing may be influenced negatively by the removable prosthesis. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the use of provisional implants (PIS) to provide patients with a provisional fixed bridge during the healing of permanent implants. Materials and Methods: Twenty female and 25 male patients were consecutively included in the study. The 45 patients were treated for either partial (16 patients) or total (29 patients) edentulism in the maxilla. The permanent implants were placed first; as many PIS as possible were then installed between the permanent implants. After suturing, impressions from which to manufacture provisional bridges (to be cemented to the PIS) were taken. The patients were monitored with clinical and radiographic follow-up from implant placement to delivery of the final prosthesis. Results: Five (2.2%) of the 230 permanent Brånemark System® implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) did not integrate. None of the failures could be related to the presence of PIS between the permanent implants. Seven PIS failed during the observation period. In addition, 17 (9%) of the 192 PIS showed mobility at the second-stage surgery although they had supported the provisional bridges without clinical symptoms. Forty-four of 45 patients showed stabile PI bridges at the time of second-stage surgery. Conclusion: Based on our experiences we concluded that provisional implants can be successfully used to provide patients with a fixed provisional bridge during the healing of permanent implants. [source] One-Year Prospective Three-Center Study Comparing the Outcome of a "Soft Bone Implant" (Prototype Mk IV) and the Standard Brånemark ImplantCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2003Bertil Friberg DDS ABSTRACT Background: Oral implant treatment ad modum Brånemark has been used for decades in the rehabilitation of edentate and partially dentate patients. Posterior jaw regions frequently exhibit bone of poor texture, and it is often difficult to obtain primary stability. Thus, it may prove beneficial to deviate from the original protocol and to use implants with a modified design, for example, with a slightly tapered geometry. Purpose: The purpose of the investigation was to compare the early behavior of a modified (prototype Mk IV, Branemark System, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; test) implant with that of the standard Brånemark implant (control) in regions of mainly type 4 bone. Materials and Methods: Three Swedish centers participated, and a total of 44 patients were treated with oral implants for 39 maxillas and 5 mandibles. The study focused on the most distal right and left implant sites (88 implants), which were randomized to receive either a test or a control implant. Various parameters were recorded, such as registered insertion torque (OsseoCare, Nobel Biocare AB), wobbling during insertion, primary and secondary stability (as measured with resonance frequency), and marginal bone loss. The implants were followed up for 1 year. Results.: The test implant more frequently required a higher insertion torque and showed a significantly higher primary stability than the control implant. This difference in stability leveled out over time, and test and control implants exhibited similar secondary stability at abutment operation and at the 1-year visit. Wobbling during insertion was rarely recorded for either of the implant designs. The 1-year cumulative success rate was 93.1% for test implants and 88.4% for control implants. Conclusions: The modified implant design resulted in an increased primary stability, which may be important when placing implants in jaw regions of type 4 bone. However, independent of the achieved primary stability, successful implants tended to approach similar secondary stability in the two designs tested. [source] Teeth in a Day® for the Maxilla and Mandible: Case ReportCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2003Thomas J. Balshi DOS ABSTRACT Background: A growing body of evidence indicates that successful osseointegration of dental implants can take place in the wake of immediate loading, providing that bone quality and quantity are adequate, and patients follow postsurgical instructions carefully. Purpose: The goal of this report is to demonstrate the efficient treatment protocol based on immediate loading for both the maxilla and mandible, including extraction site locations. Materials and Methods: Following extraction of the remaining anterior mandibular teeth, 18 Brånemark implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), including two zygoma and two pterygoid implants, were installed in both arches in accordance with the Teeth in a Day protocol developed by the authors 9 years ago. This protocol uses an acrylic screw-retained prosthesis, with steel prosthetic copings embedded, supported by full-size Brånemark implants to prevent micromotion at the bone-to-implant interface. Results: Only 1 of the 18 immediately loaded implants failed to osseointegrate. Three years after completion of treatment, the patient reported functioning well with no complications. Conclusions: When appropriate subjects are selected, the Teeth in a Day protocol offers patients a number of significant advantages, including condensed treatment time, reduced postsurgical discomfort, and almost instantaneous improvement in speech and masticatory function, esthetics, and patient self-image. [source] Early Functional Loading of Brånemark Dental Implants: 5-Year Clinical Follow-up StudyCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 2 2000Ingvar Ericsson DDS ABSTRACT Background: Short-term clinical studies have indicated the possibility of one-stage surgery and early loading of machined titanium implants. However, long-term data comparing the outcome to the conventional two-stage technique are missing. Purpose: A clinical and radiographic study was performed to compare the outcome of oral rehabilitation of the endentulous mandible by fixed suprastructures connected to implants installed according to either (1) a one-stage surgical procedure and early loading (experimental group - EG) or (2) the original two-stage concept (reference group - RG). The EG and RG comprised 16 and 11 subjects, respectively. Materials and Methods: The following specific inclusion criterion were adopted: (1) all patients had to consider themselves to be in good general health, (2) the amount of bone had to enable the installation of five to six, at least 10-mm long fixtures (Mk II fixtures; Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) between the mental foramina, and (3) the patients had to be available for the follow-up and maintenance program. A total of 88 implants were placed in the EG compared to 30 in the RG. In the EG, fixed appliances were connected to the implants within 20 days following implant installation while the fixed appliances in the RG were connected about 4 months following fixture installation. At delivery of the suprastructures, all patients were radiographically examined, an examination that was repeated at the 18- and 60-month follow-ups. Results: The analysis of the radiographs from the EG disclosed that during the observation period, between 18 and 60 months, the mean loss of bone support amounted to 0.2 mm (SD = 0.4). The corresponding value observed in the RG was 0.0 mm (SD = 0.5). During the 60-month observation period, no fixture was lost in any of the two groups examined. The implants under study as well as those in the reference material were at all observation intervals found to be clinically stable. Conclusions: This clinical study demonstrated that it is, at least based on a 5-year observation period, possible to successfully load via a permanent fixed rigid cross-arch suprastructure titanium dental implants soon after installation. However, such a treatment approach has to be strictly limited to the interforamina area of the endentulous mandible. Furthermore, the bone resorption was found to be within the same range around such implants as around implants installed and loaded according to the original two-stage protocal. [source] Microbiological and clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction for two treatment options in the edentulous lower jaw after 10 years of functionCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2005Marc Quirynen Abstract Background: Long-term data on microbiological and clinical outcome as well as on patient satisfaction after implant therapy in the edentulous mandible are limited. Especially comparisons between fixed full prostheses (FFPs) and overdentures (ODs), or between anchoring systems for the latter are scarce. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate both of these parameters at the 10-year follow-up in a group of fully edentulous patients rehabilitated via an OD or a FFP (the latter to allow inter-group comparison). Material and methods: A total of 37 fully edentulous patients (25 ODs, 12 FFPs, age at implant installation ranged from 36 to 85 years) participated in this study. All subjects received their implants (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) 10 years previously. For the ODs different attachment systems (bar, magnets, ball) had been applied that allowed a further intra-group comparison. At the follow-up visit, 10 years after the abutment insertion, a series of periodontal parameters were recorded, long-cone radiographs were taken and subgingival plaque samples were collected for analysis using checkerboard DNA,DNA hybridization. The clinical and radiographic data were recorded at abutment connection and after 1 and 10 years. Results: After 10 years of loading, mean plaque and bleeding indices and changes in attachment or marginal bone level were not significantly different, neither between the OD and FFP group, nor within the OD group. The marginal bone loss between abutment connection and year 10 was 0.86 and 0.73 mm for OD and FFP groups, respectively. The subgingival microbiota at implant sites from all (sub)-groups was comparable, with low numbers of DNA counts (±10 × 105) but high detection frequencies of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (>90%), Porphyromonas gingivalis (>85%) and Tannerella forsythensis (30%). The composition of the subgingival microbiota was influenced by probing depth and bleeding tendency. Patient satisfaction was very high for both types of prosthetic rehabilitation. The FFP group scored only slightly better for chewing comfort and general satisfaction. Conclusion: These data indicate that from the clinical and microbiological standpoint, as well as patient satisfaction, both an OD and a FFP offer a favourable long-term outcome. Résumé Les données à long terme de la guérison clinique et microbiologique ainsi que la satisfaction du patient après un traitement par implants dans la mandibule édentée sont limitées. Essentiellement des comparaisons entre les prothèses fixées complètes et les prothèses fixées amovibles ou entre les systèmes d'ancrage pour ces derniers sont rares. Cette étude a eu pour but d'évaluer ces paramètres après dix ans dans un groupe de patients complètement édentés qui avaient été soignés par une prothèse amovible ou fixée (cette dernière pour permettre la comparaison intergroupes). Trente-sept patients édentés [25 prothèses amovibles (OD), douze prothèses fixées (FFP), l'âge au moment du placement des implants était de 36 à 85 ans] ont participéà cette étude. Tous les sujets avaient reçu des implants Brånemark® 10 ans auparavant. Pour les prothèses amovibles, différents types d'attache (balle, aimant) avaient été utilisés, ce qui permettaient une comparaison intragroupe supplémentaire. Lors de la visite du suivi, dix ans après l'insertion des implants, une série de paramètres parodontaux ont été enregistrés, des radiographies par long cône prises et des échantillons de plaque sous-gingivale prélevés pour l'analyse utilisant l'hybridisation ADN-ADN échiquier. Les données cliniques et radiographiques ont été enregistrées au moment de la connexion de l'implant et après une et dix années. Dix années après la mise en charge, les indices de plaque et de saignement et les variations dans l'attache ou les niveaux osseux marginaux n'étaient pas significativement différents ni entre les groupes OD et FFP ni à l'intérieur du groupe OD. La perte osseuse marginale entre les connexions des piliers et dix ans après étaient respectivement de 0,86 et 0,73 mm pour les groupes OD et FFP. La flore sous-gingivale au niveau des implants pour tous les groupes et sous-groupes étaient semblables avec de faibles comptages ADN (±10 × 105) mais des fréquences de détection importantes de A. actinomycetemcomitans (>90%), P. gingivalis (>85%) et T.forsythensis (30%). La composition de la flore sous-gingivale a été influencée par la profondeur de la poche et la tendance au saignement. La satisfaction du patient était très élevée pour les deux types de prothèses. Le groupe FFP n'était qu'un petit peu meilleur pour le confort à la mastication et la satisfaction générale. Ces données indiquent que d'un point de vue clinique et microbiologique autant que d'un point de vue de satisfaction du patient les prothèses amovibles et fixées sont favorables à long terme. Zusammenfassung Hintergrund: Die Langzeitresultate über den mikrobiologischen und klinischen Verlauf und über die Zufriedenheit der Patienten nach Implantatversorgung im zahnlosen Unterkiefer sind limitiert. Im Speziellen sind Vergleiche zwischen festsitzenden totalen Brücken und Hybridprothesen und den verschiedenen Befestigungssystemen für Hybridprothesen selten. Ziel: Das Ziel der Studie war, beide Parameter anlässlich der Nachuntersuchung nach 10 Jahren bei einer Gruppe von zahnlosen Patienten, welche mit einer Hybridprothese oder mit einer festsitzenden Brücke wiederhergestellt worden waren, auszuwerten (bei den Hybridprothesen sollten auch Vergleiche innerhalb der Gruppe durchgeführt werden). Material und Methoden: Insgesamt nahmen 37 zahnlose Patienten an der Studie teil (25 Hybridprothesen (OD), 12 festsitzende Prothesen (FFP), Alter zum Zeitpunkt der Implantation 36 bis 85 Jahre). Alle Subjekte hatte vor 10 Jahren ihre Implantate erhalten (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare, Schweden). Bei den Hybridprothesen waren verschiedene Befestigungssysteme verwendet worden (Steg, Magnet, Kugeln). Dies erlaubte Vergleiche innerhalb der Gruppe. Bei der Nachuntersuchung 10 Jahre nach Einsetzten der Prothetikteile wurden parodontale Parameter aufgenommen, Röntgenbilder mit der Langkonustechnik angefertigt und subgingivale Plaqueproben zur Analyse mittels Ceckerboard DNA,DNA Hybridisierung entnommen. Die klinischen und radiologischen Daten wurden beim Einsetzten der Prothetikteile und nach 1 und 10 Jahren aufgenommen. Resultate: Nach 10 Jahren Belastung bestanden weder zwischen der OD und FFP Gruppe, noch innerhalb der OD Gruppe statistisch signifikante Unterschiede im mittleren Plaque- und Blutungsindex und in der Attachment- und marginalen Knochenhöhe. Der Verlust an marginalem Knochen zwischen der Montage der Prothetikteile und nach 10 Jahren betrug 0.86 mm für die OD Gruppe und 0.73 mm für die FFP Gruppe. Die subgingivale Flora war bei allen Implantatstellen der (Sub-) Gruppen vergleichbar. Es bestand eine geringe Anzahl an DNA Zählungen (±10 × 105) aber eine hohe Entdeckungsfrequenz für A. actinomycetemcomitans (>90%), P. gingivalis (>85%) und T. forsythensis (30%). Die Zusammensetzung der subgingivalen Mirkoflora wurde durch die Sondierungstiefe und die Blutungstendenz beeinflusst. Die Zufriedenheit der Patienten war für beide Arten der prothetischen Wiederherstellung sehr hoch. Die FFP Gruppe erreichte nur geringfügig bessere Werte bezüglich Kaukomfort und genereller Zufriedenheit. Schlussfolgerung: Diese Daten zeigen, dass sowohl vom klinischen und mikrobiologischen Standpunkt aus als auch seitens der Patientenzufriedenheit die Hybridprothese und die festsitzende totale Brücke gute Langzeitresultate zeigen. Resumen Antecedentes: Los datos a largo plazo sobre los resultados microbiológicos y clínicos al igual que la satisfacción del paciente tras la terapia de implantes en la mandíbula edéntula son limitados. Son especialmente escasas las comparaciones entre prótesis fija completa y sobredentaduras, o entre sistemas de anclaje. Intención: Este estudio se intentó para evaluar ambos parámetros en el control de seguimiento de los 10 años en un grupo de pacientes totalmente edéntulos rehabilitados por medio de una sobredentadura o una prótesis completa fija (la última para permitir comparaciones intergrupo). Material y métodos: Un total de 37 pacientes totalmente edéntulos (25 sobredentaduras (OD), 12 prótesis completas fijas (FFP), la edad en el momento de la implantación varió entre 36 a 85 años) participaron en este estudio. Todos los sujetos recibieron sus implantes (Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare, Suecia) 10 años antes. Para las sobredentaduras se aplicaron diferentes sistemas de anclaje (barras, imanes, bolas) lo que permitieron una ulterior comparación intragrupo. En la visita de seguimiento, 10 años tras la colocación de los pilares, se recogieron una serie de parámetros periodontales, se tomaron radiografías de cono largo y se recogieron muestras de la placa subgingival para análisis usando la cuadrícula de DNA-DNA hibridación. Los datos clínicos y radiográficos se recogieron al conectar los pilares y tras 1 y 10 años. Resultados: Tras 10 años de carga, los índices medios de placa y sangrado y los cambios en el nivel óseo marginal y de inserción no fueron significativos, ni entre los grupos OD y FFP, ni dentro del grupo OD. La pérdida de hueso marginal entre la conexión de los pilares y el año 10 fue de 0.86 y 0.73 mm para los grupos OD y FFP, respectivamente. La microflora subgingival en los lugares de implantes fue comparable entre todos los (sub)-grupos, con un bajo recuento de DNA (±10 × 105) pero una alta detección de A. actinomycetemcomitans (>90%), P. gingivalis (>85%) y T. forsythensis (30%). La composición de la microflora subgingival fue influida por la profundidad de sondaje y la tendencia al sangrado. La satisfacción de los pacientes fue muy alta para ambos grupos de rehabilitación protésica. El grupo FFP puntuó solo un poco mejor para la satisfacción masticatoria y satisfacción general. Conclusión: Estos datos indican que desde el punto de vista clínico y microbiológico al igual que la satisfacción del paciente, tanto la sobredentadura como la prótesis completa fija ofrecen unos resultados favorables a largo plazo. [source] Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implantsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 4 2004Dominic O'Sullivan Abstract Objectives: The study presented was designed to analyse the mechanical performance and the primary and secondary stability characteristics of endosseous titanium implants with 1° (EXP1) and 2° (EXP2) of taper when compared with the standard Brånemark design (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Materials and methods: One pair of 10 mm EXP1 and control implants were placed in the femoral condyles of six rabbits. Paired 6 mm EXP1 and control implants and 6 mm EXP2 and control implants were placed in the tibial metaphysis. The control implants used were 4 mm diameter standard Brånemark implants, the same length as the test implants. At placement, insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were performed. Six weeks postoperatively when the animals were killed, RFA and removal torque (RT) measurements were made. Results: At placement, significantly higher IT was needed to insert the EXP implants compared with the controls. RFA values were significantly higher for EXP1 implants placed in the tibia but not in the femur. In pooling data from the femur and tibia there was a significant difference. The EXP2 implants failed to insert fully and demonstrated a lower RFA value than may have been expected due to the exposed threads, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The results from the present study showed that 1° of taper results in a better primary stability compared with the standard Brånemark design. There was no evidence that the tapered design caused negative bone tissue reactions. All the implants gained in stability during the healing period. Résumé L'étude présente a été effectuée pour analyser la performance mécanique et les caractéristiques de stabilité primaire et secondaire d'implants endoosseux en titane avec un taper (fuselé) 1° (EXP1) et 2 (EXP 2) comparés au modèle ad modum Branemark® standard. Une paire d'implants contrôles et un EXP1 de 10 mm ont été placés dans les condyles fémoraux de six lapins. Des paires d'implants contrôles et EXP1 de 6 mm et des implants contrôles et EXP2 de 6 mm ont été placés dans les métaphyses tibiales. Les implants contrôles utilisés avaient un diamètre standard de 4 mm, la même longueur que les implants tests. Lors du placement, des mesures de force d'insertion (IT) et d'analyse de fréquence de résonnance (RFA) ont été effectuées. Six semaines après l'opération lorsque les animaux ont été euthanasiés, les mesures RFA et les forces d'enlèvement (RT) ont été relevées. Lors du placement un IT significativement plus important a été nécessaire pour insérer les implants EXP1 comparé au contrôle. Les valeurs RFA étaient significativement plus importantes pour les implants EXP1 placés dans le tibia mais pas dans le fémur. En rassemblant les données du fémur et du tibia il y avait une différence significative. Les implants EXP2 ne parvenaient pas àêtre insérés à fond et ont montré une valeur RFA inférieure qui n'était pas inattendue vu les filetages exposés bien que ces différences n'étaient pas statistiquement significatives. Les résultats de l'étude présente ont montré que le taper 1 résultait en une stabilité primaire supérieure comparé au modèle ad modum Branemark® standard. Il n'y avait aucun signe que ce nouveau modèle causait des réactions tissulaires osseuses négatives. Tous les implants ont gagné en stabilité durant leur période de guérison. Zusammenfassung Ziele: Die hier vorgestellte Studie hatte zum Ziel, das mechanische Verhalten und die Charakteristika von Primär- und Sekundärstabilität bei enossalen Implantaten mit einer Gewindeneigung von 1° (EXP1) und von 2° (EXP2) zu untersuchen. Man verglich die Daten mit dem Standarddesign von Brånemark (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Schweden). Material und Methode: Man implantierte ein Päärchen von 10mm-Implantaten (EXP1 und Kontrollimplantat) in die Femurkondylen von 6 Kaninchen. Zwei weitere Päärchen von 6mm-Implantaten (EXP1 und Kontrollimplantat, sowie EXP2 und Kontrollimplantat) implantierte man in die Metaphyse der Tibia. Bei den Kontrollimplantaten handelte es sich um Standardtypen von Brånemark mit einem Durchmesser von 4 Millimetern und derselben Länge wie die Testimplantate. Bei der Implantation mass man die Kraft, die es zu Eindrehen der Implantate brauchte (IT) und führte Messungen mit der Resonanzfrequenzanalyse (RFA) durch. Sechs Wochen nach der Operation wurden die Tiere geopfert, die RFA erneut durchgeführt und anschliessend der Ausdrehwiderstand (RT) bestimmt. Resultate: Bei der Implantation brauchte es signifikant grössere IT um die EXP-Implantate einzusetzen, als bei den Kontrollimplantaten. Die RFA-Werte waren bei den EXP1-Implantaten, die in die Tibia geschraubt worden waren, signifikant höher. Dies gilt aber nicht für die in den Femur geschraubten Implantate. Wurden die Daten vom Femur mit denen der Tibia verglichen, so erkannte man signifikante Unterschiede. Die EXP2-Implantate konnten nicht vollständig inseriert werden und zeigten auch tiefere RFA-Werte, als man den freiliegenden Schraubenwindungen entsprechend erwarten könnte. Diese Unterschiede waren aber nicht statistisch signifikant. Zusammenfassung: Die Resultate dieser Studie zeigten, das Schraubenwindungen mit 1° Steigung verglichen mit dem Standarddesign von Brånemark eine bessere Primärstabilität erzielten. Man fand andererseits keine Beweise, dass sich dieses neue Design der Schraubenwindungen negativ auf die Reaktion des Knochengewebes auswirkt. Alle Implantate gewannen während in der Heilphase an Stabilität dazu. Resumen Objetivos: El estudio presentado se diseñó para analizar el rendimiento mecánico y las características de estabilidad primaria y secundaria de implantes endoóseos de titanio con 1o (EXP1) y 2o (EXP 2) de autoroscado al compararlos con el diseño estándar de Brånemark (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Suecia). Material y Métodos: Se colocó una pareja de implantes de 10 mm EXP1 y de control en los cóndilos femorales de 6 conejos. Se colocaron pareja de implantes de 6 mm EXP1 y de control y de 6 mm EXP2 y de control en la metáfisis tibial. Los implantes de control utilizados fueron Brånemark estándar de 4 mm de diámetro. A la colocación, se llevaron a cabo mediciones del torque de inserción (IT) y del análisis de la frecuencia de resonancia (RFA). Los animales se sacrificaron a las seis semanas de la operación, y se tomaron medidas del torque de remoción (RT). Resultados: Al colocarse, se necesitó un IT significativamente mas alto para insertar los implantes EXP en comparación con los de control. Los valores RFA fueron significativamente mas altos para implantes EXP1 colocados en la tibia pero no en el fémur. Confrontando los datos del fémur y de la tibia apareció una diferencia significativa. Los implantes EXP2 fracasaron en insertarse completamente y demostraron un menor valor de RFA del que se podía esperar debido a la exposición de las roscas, aunque esta diferencia no fue estadísticamente significativa. Conclusiones: Los resultados del presente estudio mostraron que 1o de autoroscado resultan en una mejor estabilidad primaria comparada con el diseño estándar de Brånemark. No hubo evidencia de que el diseño de autoroscado causara reacciones negativas en el tejido óseo. Todos los implantes ganaron estabilidad durante el periodo de cicatrización. [source] | ||||||||||