			Home About us Contact

Nickel Allergy (nickel + allergy)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

FS02.5 Nickel allergy and hand eczema , a twenty-year follow-up

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 3 2004
Anna Josefson
Aim:, To investigate the occurrence of hand eczema after 20 years in schoolgirls previously patch-tested to nickel. Methods:, In 1982,83, 960 schoolgirls, aged 8, 11 and 15 years, were investigated for the occurrence of nickel allergy (Larson-Stymne B and Widström L, Contact Dermatitis 1985:13:289,293). The girls were patch-tested and the prevalence of nickel allergy was 9%. Twenty years later, the same individuals have received a questionnaire regarding hand eczema and factors of importance for the development of hand eczema. After two reminders, the response rate was 81%. Results:, In total 17.5% of the girls reported hand eczema after the age of 15. The 1-year prevalence of hand eczema was 12.6%. Of the previously patch-tested schoolgirls who answered the questionnaire, 63 were sensitive to nickel. In this study, the prevalence of hand eczema among those 63 was 16%, compared to 17% in the non-sensitive group (NS). Excluding persons with atopic dermatitis, the prevalence of hand eczema was 12.5% in the nickel-sensitive group, and 10% among the others (NS). 32% of the persons who had had atopic dermatitis reported hand eczema after 15 years of age, compared to 10% of those with no history of atopic dermatitis (p < 0.001). Conclusion:, Contact allergy to nickel in early childhood (8,15 years) did not seem to increase the prevalence of hand eczema later in life. The prevalence of hand eczema was increased by a factor of three among those with a history of atopic dermatitis, which is in accordance with earlier reports. [source]

Differences between the sexes with regard towork-related skin disease ,

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 2 2000
Birgitta Meding
Work-related skin disease is common and usually presents as hand eczema. From the Occupational Injury Information System in Sweden, as well as from registers of industrial injuries in other countries, it is evident that females report skin disease more often than males. Epidemiological studies of hand eczema also show that women are more often affected than men, in particular young women. The most common type of hand eczema is irritant contact dermatitis, which is often caused by wet work. Many female-dominated occupations involve extensive wet work, e.g., hairdressing, catering, cleaning and health-care work. These occupations are also high-risk occupations for hand eczema. Experimental studies of skin irritation have not confirmed differences between the sexes; thus, the higher prevalence of irritant contact dermatitis among females is most likely due to exposure, occupational and non-occupational. Nickel allergy is the most common contact allergy, which is most frequent in young females, and in 30,40% results over time in hand eczema. Hand eczema has an impact on quality of life and females seem to report a higher degree of discomfort than males. To achieve the optimal effect of preventive efforts regarding occupational skin disease, the focus for prevention should aim at reducing wet exposure. [source]

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with a bioabsorbable occluder device,

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Issue 4 2009
Single-Centre Experience
Abstract Background: Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is routinely performed with nonbiological devices, characterized by a persistent low-grade inflammatory response. We report our experience about PFO closure with a bioabsorbable device, BioSTAR® (NMT Inc, USA). Methods: From September 2007 to September 2008, 14 patients with migraine (eight with aura) and cerebral magnetic resonance positive for silent ischemia and nine patients with prior cardiovascular accident (CVA) underwent closure of PFO using BioSTAR®. One patient had heterozygosis for sickle-cell-anaemia. Nickel allergy was present in eight patients. Echocardiogram was performed at 24 hr, one and 6 months. At 6 and 12 months a contrast-transcranial-doppler (c-TCD) and a trans-oesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) were scheduled, respectively. Results: BioSTAR® was successfully implanted in 22 patients (96%). The mean procedural time and the mean fluoroscopy time were 22 ± 6 and 4 ± 2 minutes, respectively. The mean in-hospital stay was 3 ± 0.5 days. After a mean follow-up of 7.8 ± 3.5 months there was an hemorrhagic stroke related to double antiaggregation. No other CVA or allergic reactions were registered. There were two cases of atrial arrhythmia. Fifteen patients had not residual shunts at c-TCD, while in four patients we observed a trivial microbubbles passage. The TOE, achieved in nine patients without contrast, showed the device well positioned, with a low profile and without thrombus. Conclusions: In our experience PFO closure with BioSTAR® is safe and efficacious in preventing recurrent CVA. Its use could be advantageous in patients with nickel allergy and haematological disorders. The potential benefits of this device need to be certified in a larger cohort of patients with a longer follow-up. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population , prevalence and main findings

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5 2007
Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
A substantial number of studies have investigated the prevalence of contact allergy in the general population and in unselected subgroups of the general population. The aim of this review was to determine a median prevalence and summarize the main findings from studies on contact allergy in the general population. Published research mainly originates from North America and Western Europe. The median prevalence of contact allergy to at least 1 allergen was 21.2% (range 12.5,40.6%), and the weighted average prevalence was 19.5%, based on data collected on all age groups and all countries between 1966 and 2007. The most prevalent contact allergens were nickel, thimerosal, and fragrance mix. The median nickel allergy prevalence was 8.6% (range 0.7,27.8%) and demonstrates that nickel was an important cause of contact allergy in the general population and that it was widespread in both men and women. Numerous studies demonstrated that pierced ears were a significant risk factor for nickel allergy. Nickel was a risk factor for hand eczema in women. Finally, heavy smoking was associated with contact allergy, mostly in women. Population-based epidemiological studies are considered a prerequisite in the surveillance of national and international contact allergy epidemics. [source]

10-year prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Denmark estimated through the CE-DUR method

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 4 2007
Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
The prevalence of contact allergy in the general population has traditionally been investigated through population-based epidemiological studies. A different approach is the combination of clinical epidemiological (CE) data and the World Health Organization-defined drug utilization research (DUR) method. The CE-DUR method was applied in Denmark to estimate the prevalence of contact allergy in the general population and compare it with the prevalence estimates from the Glostrup allergy studies. Contact allergy prevalence estimates ranging from very liberal (,worst case') to conservative (,best case') assumptions were based on patch test reading data in combination with an estimate of the number of persons eligible for patch testing each year based on sales data of the ,standard series'. The estimated 10-year prevalence of contact allergy ranged between 7.3% and 12.9% for adult Danes older than 18 years. The 10-year prevalence of contact allergy measured by CE-DUR was slightly lower than previous prevalence estimates from the Glostrup allergy studies. This could probably be explained by a decrease in nickel allergy. The CE-DUR approach holds the potential of being an efficient and easy monitoring method of contact allergy prevalence. [source]

Dose per unit area , a study of elicitation of nickel allergy

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5 2007
Louise Arup Fischer
Background:, Experimental sensitization depends upon the amount of allergen per unit skin area and is largely independent of the area size. Objectives:, This study aimed at testing if this also applies for elicitation of nickel allergy. Patients/methods:, 20 nickel allergic individuals were tested with a patch test and a repeated open application test (ROAT). Nickel was applied on small and large areas. The varying parameters were area, total dose and dose per unit area. Results:, In the patch test, at a low concentration [15 ,g nickel (,gNi)/cm2], there were significantly higher scores on the large area with the same dose per area as the small area. At higher concentrations of nickel, no significant differences were found. In the ROAT at low concentration (6.64 ,gNi/cm2), it was found that the latency period until a reaction appeared was significantly shorter on the large area compared to the small area. It was also found that the ROAT threshold (per application) was lower than the patch test threshold. Conclusion:, For elicitation of nickel allergy, the size of the exposed area and therefore the total amount of applied nickel, influence the elicitation reaction at some concentrations, even though the same dose per unit area is applied. [source]

FS02.5 Nickel allergy and hand eczema , a twenty-year follow-up

Contamination by nickel, copper and zinc during the handling of euro coins

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 4 2003
Paul-Guy Fournier
The introduction of the euro has revived interest in the risk of nickel allergy due to the handling of coins. In the present work, the transfer of metallic contamination during the manipulation of coins is examined by means of leaching experiments and manipulation tests. It is shown that pre-existing metallic species present on the surface of the coins are the major source of contamination during manipulation, and that friction inherent to everyday usage contributes predominantly to their transfer to the hands. The comparison of coins as to their relative risks of metal contamination should therefore rely on tests that simulate the friction inherent in everyday human handling. Carrying out such tests with the newly issued 1, and 2, pieces, we find, contrary to long-term leaching measurements, that the euros release less nickel than previously circulated pure-nickel coins, but that this decrease is less pronounced than might have been hoped for on the basis of their surface composition. When the coins are rubbed to a shiny polish before manipulation, contamination of the fingers is reduced by more than a factor of 10. A comparison of coins used in France indicates that the introduction of the common currency has led to a fourfold reduction in contamination by nickel, while causing a 45% increase in contamination by copper. [source]