Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Newer Drugs (newer + drug)
Selected AbstractsImmune response to leishmania: paradox rather than paradigmFEMS IMMUNOLOGY & MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 2 2007Parul Tripathi Abstract The leishmaniases are a group of diseases caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania. Various Leishmania species can cause human infection, producing a spectrum of clinical manifestations. It is estimated that 350 million people are at risk, with a global yearly incidence of 1,1.5 million for cutaneous and 500 000 for visceral leishmaniasis (VL). VL is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in East Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Coinfection with HIV enhances the risk of the disease. The only control measure currently available in India is case detection and treatment with antimonial drugs, which are expensive, not always available and cannot be self-administered. Newer drugs like oral miltefosine have not become widely available. Vector and reservoir control is difficult due to the elusive nature of the vector and the diversity of the animal reservoir. A detailed knowledge of immune response to the parasite would help in designing prophylactic and therapeutic strategies against this infection. [source] Onychomycosis: diagnosis and topical therapyDERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, Issue 2 2002Philip Fleckman Onychomycosis (true fungal infection of the nail plate) is a common malady that may present in several clinical patterns. Because many noninfectious disorders of the nail may masquerade as onychomycosis, the clinical diagnosis must be confirmed by wet mount (potassium hydroxide [KOH] examination), culture, or histology before treatment is begun. Although systemic therapy of onychomycosis with the newer drugs is more effective, the prospect of effective topical therapy is a welcome alternative in many situations. Choices for topical therapy are limited in the United States at this time. As new, improved choices are added to the therapeutic armamentarium, topical therapy my supersede systemic. In addition, the potential for synergism with systemic therapy and for prophylaxis of cleared infections is only now being explored. [source] Induction of endogenous pathways by antiepileptics and clinical implicationsFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 5 2005M. Strolin Benedetti Abstract The aim of this study was to review modifications of the endogenous pathways (e.g. enzyme elevations, normal body constituent depletion or higher formation/excretion of endogenous metabolites) which could be ascribed to enzyme induction by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Information on older (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin and carbamazepine) and newer drugs (where information is available) is discussed together with clinical implications. The enzymes involved in the endogenous pathways and induced by the AEDs will not be limited to the hepatic microsomal enzymes; extrahepatic enzymes and/or enzymes present in other subcellular fractions will also be discussed, if pertinent. The induction of endogenous pathways by AEDs has been taken into account in the past, but much less emphasis has been given compared with the extensive literature on induction by AEDs of the metabolism of concomitantly administered drugs, either of the same or of different classes. Not all of the endogenous pathways examined and induced by AEDs appear to result in serious clinical consequences (e.g. induction of hepatic ALP, increased excretion of d -glucaric acid or of 6, -hydroxycortisol). In some cases, induction of some pathways (e.g. increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or of conjugated bilirubin) might even be a beneficial side-effect, however enzyme induction is considered rather a detrimental aspect for an AED, as induction is generally a broad and a non-specific phenomenon. The new AEDs have generally less induction potential than the older agents. Yet some (felbamate, topiramate, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine) have the potential for inducing enzymes, whereas others (levetiracetam, gabapentin and vigabatrin) appear to be completely devoid of enzyme inducing characteristics, at least as far as the enzymes investigated are concerned. [source] Allen Denver Russell Memorial Lecture, 2006JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, Issue 4 2006The use of microbiocides in infection control: a critical look at safety, applications, testing Abstract Microbial pathogens continue as major threats to health. Indeed, many ongoing societal changes are enhancing our vulnerability and exposure to several frank and opportunistic pathogens. This, together with rampant antimicrobial resistance and reduced prospects for newer drugs and vaccines, is forcing a higher reliance on microbiocides in infection prevention and control. That this reliance may not be well-founded becomes apparent from a closer look at current ways of testing and registering microbiocides, their label claims as well as human and environmental safety of certain widely used microbicidal chemicals. Many methods to test microbiocides for registration are flawed and/or entail test conditions irrelevant to field use. Pathogens listed on product labels may not be among those amenable to interruption through microbiocide use. The wide variations and discrepancies in existing national/regional regulations for registering microbiocides for sale stifle innovation. This is a critical look at the above-mentioned issues with emphasis on chemicals meant for use on environmental surfaces and medical devices. It highlights better ways to test microbiocides and to attain global harmonization of testing and product registration. It also details the known and potential dangers of microbiocide use and what to consider in choosing such formulations for optimal safety and effectiveness. End users are advised to be more critical and prudent in the selection and application of microbicidal chemicals, manufacturers are encouraged to explore infection control products and technologies that are safer in the workplace and for the environment, and regulators are urged to review and update the requirements and procedures for premarket review of microbiocide efficacy data and label claims. Independent investigations are also urgently needed to document the proportion of nosocomial infections that would be amenable to prevention through chemical disinfection of environmental surfaces. [source] Evaluating the evidence from clinical trials in chronic hepatitis CJOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, Issue 2006R. S. Brown Jr Summary., A number of studies are being published on investigational agents for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Before incorporating new medications into therapy or electing to postpone therapy until an investigational agent receives regulatory approval, it is important to evaluate the following specific features of the published evidence: quality of the evidence, precision of the treatment effect, magnitude of the treatment effect, magnitude of the hazards, and other factors such as risk-benefit analysis and cost, including cost-effectiveness. Previous studies of treatment of patients with the disease allow us to establish some benchmarks and provide structure to evaluate the evidence of the efficacy and safety of these newer drugs. [source] Adverse drug reactions in medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 7 2009Lisha Joshua MBBS Abstract Purpose Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have multiorgan dysfunction as well as altered pharmacokinetic parameters. Hence they are susceptible to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The objective of the study is to assess the characteristics of ADRs among inpatients in the medical ICU and to compare the same with patients who have not experienced ADRs. Methods Prospective, observational study for a period of 1 year in medical ICU of a tertiary care hospital. Relevant data of patients with ADRS were analysed. Characteristics of patients with and without ADRs were compared. Results Of 728 patients admitted in medical ICU, 222 (28.4%) had ADRs. Multiple ADRs (38.7%) implicated by the same drug and serious ADRs (37%) were noticed. Renal/electrolyte system (21%) was most commonly involved. Clinical spectrum included acute renal failure (ARF, 11.4%), hepatic injuries (5.4%), haematological dysfunction (4.2%), seizures (3.3%), upper gastrointestinal bleed (3.3%) and cutaneous ADRs (3.3%). Antimicrobials (27%) were the commonly implicated drug class. The most commonly implicated drug was furosemide (6.8%). Infrequently reported ADRs included azithromycin-induced erythema multiforme, leflunamide-induced erythema multiforme and vasculitis, ceftazidime-induced seizures and ceftriaxone-induced hepatitis. Co-morbidity, polypharmacy and duration of stay were significantly higher in patients with ADRs compared to those who have not experienced ADRs. Three patients died. Conclusion High incidence of serious and multiple ADRs noticed. A wide clinical spectrum of ADRs and infrequently reported ADRs to newer drugs were also observed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Maximizing anticholinergic therapy for overactive bladder: has the ceiling been reached?BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2007Scott A. MacDiarmid SUMMARY Urinary incontinence affects an estimated 20,33% of adults the USA and 55% of the country's elderly [1], having a more substantial impact on the physical and mental dimension of quality of life than other common chronic diseases. Muscarinic receptor antagonists, including oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium chloride, darifenacin, and solifenacin, are front-line therapies for overactive bladder (OAB), with an efficacy of 65,75% in reducing major symptoms. Strategies to increase the therapeutic index have included behavioural therapy, flexible dosing, and dose escalation, as well as newer formulations that reduce anticholinergic side-effects. Among approved OAB agents, the oxybutynin transdermal-delivery system has been associated with a lower incidence of dry mouth than immediate- and extended-release formulations of traditional agents. With a low propensity for drug interactions and dry mouth, it is a likely candidate for older patients taking multiple medications. The transdermal patch bypasses systemic and first-pass metabolism, avoiding higher plasma concentrations of the active metabolite (N -desethyloxybutynin) thought to be associated with dry mouth symptoms. Anticholinergics have a significant role to play in the management of OAB; newer drugs targeted toward muscarinic receptors, and novel delivery systems, continue to increase the therapeutic index for this condition. [source] The use of sputum cell counts to evaluate asthma medicationsBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 2 2001Krishnan Parameswaran Total and differential cell counts from hypertonic-induced, dithiothreitol-dispersed sputum provide reproducible measurements of airway inflammatory cell counts, which are responsive to treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs. They have helped to understand the kinetics of inflammatory cell changes in asthma after the reduction of corticosteroids and the subsequent re-introduction of treatment. They have identified that the presence of sputum eosinophilia in asthma, chronic cough and chronic airflow limitation is a predictor of steroid-responsiveness and of lack of ,asthma control'. They can be used to study the dose,response effect of inhaled corticosteroids and may be useful to establish the relative potency of different corticosteroid formulations and delivery devices. Sputum cell counts are also useful to study the potential anti-inflammatory effects of drugs like theophylline, long-acting ,-adrenoceptor agonists, leukotriene antagonists and newer drugs in development. They may be helpful to select add-on therapy to corticosteroids in ,difficult-to-control' asthma. [source] Neurotransmitter transporters and their impact on the development of psychopharmacologyBRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, Issue S1 2006Leslie Iversen The synaptic actions of most neurotransmitters are inactivated by reuptake into the nerve terminals from which they are released, or by uptake into adjacent cells. A family of more than 20 transporter proteins is involved. In addition to the plasma membrane transporters, vesicular transporters in the membranes of neurotransmitter storage vesicles are responsible for maintaining vesicle stores and facilitating exocytotic neurotransmitter release. The cell membrane monoamine transporters are important targets for CNS drugs. The transporters for noradrenaline and serotonin are key targets for antidepressant drugs. Both noradrenaline-selective and serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors are effective against major depression and a range of other psychiatric illnesses. As the newer drugs are safer in overdose than the first-generation tricyclic antidepressants, their use has greatly expanded. The dopamine transporter (DAT) is a key target for amphetamine and methylphenidate, used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychostimulant drugs of abuse (amphetamines and cocaine) also target DAT. The amino-acid neurotransmitters are inactivated by other families of neurotransmitter transporters, mainly located on astrocytes and other non-neural cells. Although there are many different transporters involved (four for GABA; two for glycine/D -serine; five for L -glutamate), pharmacology is less well developed in this area. So far, only one new amino-acid transporter-related drug has become available: the GABA uptake inhibitor tiagabine as a novel antiepileptic agent. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, S82,S88. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706428 [source] Opinion of Belgian neurologists on antiepileptic drug treatment in 2006: Belgian study on epilepsy treatment (BESET-2)ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2009B. Legros Objectives,,, (i) To describe the medical treatment of epilepsy in Belgium in 2006, (ii) to detect the presence or absence of consensus in epilepsy treatment and (iii) to analyze the evolution of the neurologists' opinion between 2003 and 2006. Materials and methods,,, In December 2006, 100 neurologists were interviewed with a structured questionnaire, based on ordinal four-point scales. The questionnaire contained questions on treatment choices in adult patients with epilepsy. The results of this survey were compared with results of a previous one done in 2003. Results,,, Initial monotherapy was the preferred treatment strategy. Valproate was first choice in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine were first choice in focal epilepsy with partial seizures. Valproate was also first choice in focal epilepsy with secondarily generalized seizures. New antiepileptic drugs were recommended in second line. However, in special treatment situations, they were considered first-line, e.g. lamotrigine in case of women in childbearing age. In comparison with 2003, there was a trend of using earlier the new antiepileptic drugs. Conclusions,,, In end 2006, carbamazepine, valproate and oxcarbazepine were considered to be first choice drugs, whereas other newer drugs, like lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate were predominantly prescribed in second line. [source] Approach to seizures in the neonatal period: a European perspectiveACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 4 2010M Vento Abstract In the neonatal period, seizures rank among the most common neurological symptoms, often indicating an underlying serious neurological condition. It is remarkable that although new tools have been incorporated into the diagnosis of neonatal seizures, there is no consensus about the therapeutic approach among different doctors and institutions. Hence, although phenobarbital is still considered the initial drug of choice, the protocols reported in the literature show a great variability in the approach to treatment of refractory seizures. We used a questionnaire to gain information regarding the treatment of seizures in the neonatal period in different European institutions. Conclusion:, We conclude that phenobarbital is still the initial drug of choice followed by benzodiazepines, except in preterm infants with a birth weight below 1800 g. In refractory seizures, the use of continuous lidocaine infusion is most common. Of note, clinical studies with newer drugs have been mostly performed in the United States but not in Europe. [source] | ||||||||||