Home About us Contact | |||
Needle Passes (needle + pass)
Selected AbstractsPreparation of thyroid FNA material for routine cytology and BRAF testing: A validation studyDIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, Issue 3 2010Giancarlo Troncone M.D., Ph.D. Abstract V600E BRAF mutation is emerging as an independent marker of papillary thyroid carcinoma aggressive behavior. Papillary thyroid carcinomas harboring this mutation should be extensively resected. However, this requires an unquestionable cytological diagnosis of malignancy. Thus, cytological specimens should be properly handled to provide both morphological and molecular information. Here, we assessed whether our method of preparation of fine-needle aspiration material is suitable for both tests. A series of 128, routinely performed, fine-needle aspirations was analyzed. Each nodule was punctured three times. A representative Diff-Quik smear prepared from the first two passages was evaluated onsite. When microscopy was diagnostic (n = 44), the third needle pass was dedicated to harvest material for BRAF testing; in the remaining cases (n = 84), additional direct smears for cytology were prepared and the remaining material in the needle plus the needle rinsing was collected for BRAF testing. Cellularity was adequate in 126/128 (98%) cases. Cytological diagnoses were inadequate (2%), benign (85%), follicular lesion of undetermined significance (5%), follicular neoplasms (2%), suspicious for malignancy (2%), and malignant (4%). Higher average of extracted DNA concentration was observed in the dedicated pass group (25.9 vs 7.95 ng/,l). However, the rate of successful exon 15 BRAF amplification was similar with (43/44; 97.7%) or without (79/84; 94%) the dedicated pass. Thus, our protocol is suitable for both tests. Whenever necessary BRAF testing may also be performed on the residual samples of thyroid nodules, without interfering with routine cytology. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Procedural pain of an ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: a comparison of axillary and infraclavicular approachesACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 4 2010B. S. FREDERIKSEN Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular (IC) and axillary (AX) blocks have similar effectiveness. Therefore, limiting procedural pain may help to choose a standard approach. The primary aims of this randomized study were to assess patient's pain during the block and to recognize its cause. Methods: Eighty patients were randomly allocated to the IC or the AX group. A blinded investigator asked the patients to quantify block pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0,100) and to indicate the most unpleasant component (needle passes, paraesthesie or local anaesthetics injection). Sensory block was assessed every 10 min. After 30 min, the unblocked nerves were supplemented. Patients were ready for surgery when they had analgesia or anaesthesia of the five nerves distal to the elbow. Preliminary scan time, block performance and latency times, readiness for surgery, adverse events and patient's acceptance were recorded. Results: The axillary approach resulted in lower maximum VAS scores (median 12) than the infraclavicular approach (median 21). This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.07). Numbers of patients indicating the most painful component were similar in both groups. Patients in either group were ready for surgery after 25 min. Two patients in the IC group and seven in the AX group needed block supplementation (n.s.). Block performance times and number of needle passes were significantly lower in the IC group. Patients' acceptance was 98% in both groups. Conclusions: We did not find significant differences between the two approaches in procedural pain and patient's acceptance. The choice of approach may depend on the anaesthesiologist's experience and the patient's preferences. [source] A Model for Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar PunctureACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2009Matthew Herron Clinicians may find traditional lumbar puncture (LP) attempts fail due to indistinct landmarks in morbidly obese patients necessitating ultrasound localization or fluoroscopy. We believe a readily available teaching model is needed because many emergency physicians may be unfamiliar with ultrasound-assisted LP. Review of current literature shows that there are few commercially available LP models suitable for use with ultrasound. Those on the market are expensive and have limited reusability. We have succeeded in creating a low-cost reusable model for training health care professionals to perform ultrasound-assisted LP. We believe there will be many benefits to using this model including: increase in emergency department (ED) LP success rates, decrease in number of radiology consults for fluoroscopy, increase in patient satisfaction, decreased waiting time in the ED, and fewer complications due to fewer needle passes. This model effectively reproduces the sonographic appearance of the lumbar spine and overlying soft tissue and aids in teaching bedside ultrasound-assisted LP. The model has an opaque "skin" overlying a gel wax mold containing a lumbar spine. A catheter containing water is imbedded in the spine to simulate the spinal canal and cerebrospinal fluid. The skin allows for a more realistic procedure and can be removed for visual confirmation of a successful LP. In addition, successful needle placement will result in return of clear fluid. Construction of the model requires a commercially available lumbar spine and items found in craft stores with a total cost of approximately $100. [source] Alternative approaches for regional ulnar nerve blockade: A cadaveric studyCLINICAL ANATOMY, Issue 5 2004N. Lizamore Abstract Wrist blockade is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in surgery of hand injuries. With regard to the ulnar nerve, the volar approach is used, where the needle passes through or medial to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon; however, the ulnar artery is at risk because the needle may accidentally penetrate it, causing profuse bleeding. Alternatively, the wrist may be approached medially, the ulnar approach, and the needle tip placed posterior to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon. To determine which of these methods may be preferable for avoiding ulnar artery injury, needles were inserted into the wrist area of cadaver hands (n = 57) using the volar and ulnar approaches; detailed dissection of the region around the inserted needles was subsequently carried out. The position of the ulnar nerve relative to the ulnar artery and injury to the artery was documented. Damage to the ulnar artery using the volar approach was 36.8% (21/57 cases) compared to no (0%) injury observed using the ulnar approach. At the level of the wrist crease just proximal to the pisiform bone, the ulnar nerve was medial to the artery in 92.9% (53/57) of cases, medial and posterior in 5.3% (3/57), and anterior to the artery in 1.8% (1/57) of cases. This study suggests that in cases where ulnar artery pulsation is not reliable, the ulnar approach may be preferable for ulnar nerve blockade due to an increased incidence of ulnar artery penetration with the volar approach. Clin. Anat. 17:373,377, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |