Neurological Institute (neurological + institute)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Pearls From an Inpatient Headache Unit

HEADACHE, Issue 6 2008
Joel R. Saper MD
Much can be learned from treating over 15,000 headache hospitalized patients over the course of 30 years. By the very need to be admitted, these individuals are complicated, both physiologically and often psychologically. Founded in 1978, the Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute and its hospital unit developed a set of criteria for admission and a growing staff of professionals to serve this complex population of patients. Experience has taught us many lessons; several are considered in this review. Among the important topics discussed are: admission criteria to the hospital unit; treatment protocols and other hospital-based strategies; integration of behavioral therapy and therapists into the treatment system; diagnostic testing of patients with intractable headache; identifying the "problem patient" and "medication misuse" early in the course of therapy; approaching the headache patient with cluster B personality disorder; and the use of interventional and anesthesiological treatment for intractable headache. Outcome data and a review of recent publications are presented. [source]


Migraine Prevention: What Patients Want From Medication and Their Physicians (A Headache Specialty Clinic Perspective)

HEADACHE, Issue 5 2006
Todd D. Rozen MD
Objective.,To document the results of a migraine patients survey, from a headache specialty clinic, in which patients were asked to rank, in order of importance, certain characteristics of migraine preventive treatment. Methods.,A 10-question survey was completed by 150 patients (114 females and 36 males) with a history of migraine who presented to the Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute. The patients were asked to rank, in order of importance, characteristics of migraine preventive treatment. Each characteristic was rated individually on a 1 to 10 scale (1 being of little importance and 10 being extremely important). The mean rating of each characteristic was then calculated and the results analyzed. Results/Discussion.,From this migraine preventive treatment survey, the most important thing to migraineurs, from a headache specialty clinic population, is that the prescribing physician involves them in the decision making of choosing a preventive agent. The physician taking time to explain the possible medication side effects is the second most highly ranked characteristic. Migraine preventives with published efficacy in the medical literature are also deemed very important. Migraineurs do not mind using more than 1 preventive agent at one time if greater efficacy can be achieved. Agents that may affect weight and /or cause sedation may be important factors as to why patients (especially females) may not want to take a preventive medication. Natural therapies and once-daily dosing are ranked lower overall but still are important characteristics of preventive treatment. Some gender differences are noted in the ranking of migraine preventive characteristics. [source]


Semiquantitative study of current coffee, caffeine, and ethanol intake in essential tremor cases and controls

MOVEMENT DISORDERS, Issue 5 2004
Elan D. Louis MD
Abstract There are several reasons to study caffeine, coffee, and ethanol intake in essential tremor (ET) patients. ET patients also might modify their use of these beverages because of their effects on tremor. Intake of caffeine, coffee, and ethanol has not been quantified in a group of ET patients. Our objective is to use a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to compare current daily intake of coffee, caffeine, and ethanol in ET patients and controls. A total of 130 ET cases were patients at the Neurological Institute of New York, and 175 controls were ascertained by random digit dialing. Caffeine (in milligrams) and ethanol (in grams) intake were calculated from a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire. Mean daily caffeine intake in patients was 138.4 versus 246.6 mg in controls; medians were 101.1 versus 175.5 mg (P < 0.001). Mean daily ethanol intake in patients was 8.2 versus 6.2 gm in controls; medians were 2.4 versus 1.9 gm (P = 0.89). Cases drank less coffee than controls, but drank similar amounts of tea, soft drinks, fruit juices, and milk. Daily caffeine intake was not correlated with tremor severity or duration. ET patients consumed less caffeine than did controls, which is likely to be a dietary modification in response to tremor. The observation that caffeine consumption was not correlated with tremor severity raises the additional possibility that lower caffeine consumption in ET patients may not exclusively be a response to tremor. A prospective study is needed to explore whether decreased caffeine consumption is a risk factor for ET. © 2004 Movement Disorder Society [source]


Automatic segmentation of the brain and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid in T1 -weighted volume MRI scans of the head, and its application to serial cerebral and intracranial volumetry

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, Issue 5 2003
Louis Lemieux
A new fully automatic algorithm for the segmentation of the brain and total intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from T1 -weighted volume MRI scans of the head, called Exbrain v.2, is described. The algorithm was developed in the context of serial intracranial volumetry. A brain mask obtained using a previous version of the algorithm forms the basis of the CSF segmentation. Improved brain segmentation is then obtained by iterative tracking of the brain,CSF interface. Gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and intracranial CSF volumes and probability maps are calculated based on a model of intensity probability distribution (IPD) that includes two partial volume classes: GM-CSF and GM-WM. Accuracy was assessed using the Montreal Neurological Institute's (MNI) digital phantom scan. Reproducibility was assessed using scan pairs from 24 controls and 10 patients with epilepsy. Segmentation overlap with the gold standard was 98% for the brain and 95%, 96%, and 97% for the GM, WM, and total intracranial contents, respectively; CSF overlap was 86%. In the controls, the Bland and Altman coefficient of reliability (CR) was 35.2 cm3 for the total brain volume (TBV) and 29.0 cm3 for the intracranial volume (ICV). Scan-matching reduced CR to 25.2 cm3 and 17.1 cm3 for the TBV and ICV, respectively. For the patients, similar CR values were obtained for the ICV. Magn Reson Med 49:872,884, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]