Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Nest Predators (nest + predator)
Selected AbstractsNest predators affect spatial dynamics of breeding red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio)JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Staffan Roos Summary 1Predation may be a strong selective factor affecting individual behaviour and life histories. However, few studies have investigated whether predators affect breeding habitat selection of prey species. 2We tested whether breeding habitat selection and reproduction of a tropical migrant, the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio L.), was related to the presence of breeding pairs of its potential nest predators, magpie (Pica pica L.), hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix L.) and jackdaw (C. monedula L.). 3Only magpie and hooded crow territories were associated with an elevated risk of predation based on an artificial nest experiment with nests mimicking red-backed shrike nests. Predation risk on real red-backed shrike nests was also higher close to nests of hooded crow and magpie than elsewhere in the landscape. 4Occupation frequency of known red-backed shrike territory sites during 3 years of study increased with increasing mean distance to the nearest magpie nest. 5Changes in spatial distribution of corvids affected the spatial distribution of red-backed shrikes. Vacant red-backed shrike territory sites were more likely to become occupied in the next year when magpie and hooded crows had moved away from the site, while occupied sites were more likely to be abandoned in the next year when at least hooded crows had moved closer. 6Our results suggest that breeding territories of nest predators may affect breeding habitat selection of prey species. Thus, a large part of an observed spatial dynamics of prey species may be caused by a corresponding spatial dynamics of predators. Because sink territories are occupied more irregularly than source territories, we suggest that the dynamics in predator sinks may be the driving force of the spatial dynamics of prey species. [source] Nest predators of Lance-tailed Manakins on Isla Boca Brava, PanamáJOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Jennifer L. Reidy ABSTRACT Nest predation is often the primary cause of nest failure for passerines. Despite this, little is known about predation rates and the nest predators of birds in the tropics. I used video cameras to monitor seven Lance-tailed Manakin (Chiroxiphia lanceolata) nests on Isla Boca Brava, Panamá. One nest fledged young and six nests failed due to predation. I recorded five predation events involving four avian predators and one mammalian predator. Crested Oropendolas (Psarocolius decumanus) predated two nests and a Roadside Hawk (Buteo magnirostris) and a Black-chested Jay (Cyanocorax affinis) each predated one. The mammalian predator was a common opossum (Didelphis marsupialis). All avian predation was diurnal; the mammalian predation was nocturnal. My results suggest that tropical birds are subject to a diverse suite of nest predators, and that avian predators may be an important cause of nest failure at my study site. RESUMEN La depredación de nidos es usualmente la primera causa del fracaso de lo nidos de los paserinos. A pesar de esto, poco se conoce sobre la tasa de depredación y los depredadores de nidos de aves neotropicales. Yo use cámaras de video para monitorear siete nidos del Lance-tailed Manakins (Chiroxiphia lanceolata) en la isla Boca brava, Panamá. De un nido salieron polluelos y seis nidos fracasaron debido a la depredación. Yo documente cinco eventos de depredación de los cuales cuatro fueron por aves y uno por mamíferos. Crested Oropendolas (Psarocolius decumanus) depredo dos nidos y Roadside Hawk (Buteo magnirostris) y el Black-chested Jay (Cyanocorax affinis) depredaron uno cada uno. El depredador mamífero fue un marsupial común (Didelphis marsupialis). Todas las depredaciones de aves fueron diurnas y la del mamífero fue nocturna. Mis resultados sugieren que las aves neotropicales están sujetas a una diversa gama de depredadores de nidos y posiblemente la depredación por aves puede ser una causa importante del fracaso de las nidadas en mi lugar de estudio. [source] Innate and Learned Components of Defence by Flickers Against a Novel Nest Competitor, the European StarlingETHOLOGY, Issue 10 2004Karen L. Wiebe Defence against predators is an important component of fitness in wild birds but the first step of defence, predator recognition, is not well understood. Anti-predator behaviour may innate, in which case the individual responds without prior contact with that predator, and/or there may be a learned component that develops only after direct experience. In the wild, the development of anti-predator behaviour is studied by exposing naive individuals to novel predators. I studied responses of 71 naive and experienced northern flickers Colaptes auratus, to a novel nest predator and competitor, the European starling Sturnus vulgaris that was introduced to North America. Naive individuals responded more intensely to the model starling than to the control model suggesting an innate component to recognition. However, there was also a learned component to defence because flickers nesting near to starlings reacted more aggressively than naive individuals far from starlings. Consistent with theory on life histories and optimal defence levels, no significant differences in aggression were found between the sexes or between age classes. Selection should favour more intense, and possibly innate, defence against the introduced starling. Variation in responses of naive individuals suggests that there may already be some alleles in the population associated with higher defence, but that these may not be uniform within the population. [source] Sex roles, parental effort and offspring desertion in the monogamous Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquataIBIS, Issue 3 2001DAVE CURRIE The reasons for female desertion of offspring and the evolution of predominantly male care among monogamous bird species are not clearly understood. We studied parental effort during the incubation and chick rearing periods in the Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata in western Finland, and compared timing of brood desertion with other populations in Europe. Males and females contributed equally to incubation and showed no differences in the intensity of mobbing behaviour towards a potential nest predator (stuffed crow) shortly after hatching. However, females deserted their offspring approximately halfway through the brooding period (c. 16 d after hatching), while males remained with chicks until independence (c. 35 d). Females with late-laid clutches deserted their offspring sooner after hatching than those with clutches produced earlier in the season. Curlew females deserted younger chicks in northeast Europe, where laying dates were later, breeding seasons shorter and migration distances were longer, than in western and central Europe. We suggest that the most likely reasons for offspring desertion by females may be associated with increased female survivorship and maintenance of pairbond between years. [source] Eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis do not avoid nest boxes with chemical cues from two common nest predatorsJOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, Issue 1 2007Renee D. Godard Chemodetection of common nest predators may be advantageous for nesting birds; however, few studies have examined the ability of songbirds to detect chemical odors from predators. Thus, in 2002, we presented eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis with pairs of nest boxes; one box in the pair was regularly scented with chemical cues from a common nest predator, the black rat snake Elaphe obsoleta, and the other with a neutral cue. In 2004, we again presented bluebirds with pairs of boxes, one scented with chemical cues from a different nest predator, the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus, and the other with a neutral scent. Although human females were able to correctly distinguish paper laced with predator cues from paper with neutral cues, bluebirds were as likely to lay eggs in boxes with predator cues as in boxes with neutral cues. While it remains possible that bluebirds may detect scent from potential nest predators, it appears that the presence of these chemical cues does not ultimately influence selection of nest sites. [source] Habitat-specific demography and source,sink dynamics in a population of Siberian jaysJOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2010Magdalena Nystrand Summary 1.,There are a number of models describing population structure, many of which have the capacity to incorporate spatial habitat effects. One such model is the source,sink model, that describes a system where some habitats have a natality that is higher than mortality (source) and others have a mortality that exceeds natality (sink). A source can be maintained in the absence of migration, whereas a sink will go extinct. 2.,However, the interaction between population dynamics and habitat quality is complex, and concerns have been raised about the validity of published empirical studies addressing source,sink dynamics. In particular, some of these studies fail to provide data on survival, a significant component in disentangling a sink from a low quality source. Moreover, failing to account for a density-dependent increase in mortality, or decrease in fecundity, can result in a territory being falsely assigned as a sink, when in fact, this density-dependent suppression only decreases the population size to a lower level, hence indicating a ,pseudo-sink'. 3.,In this study, we investigate a long-term data set for key components of territory-specific demography (mortality and reproduction) and their relationship to habitat characteristics in the territorial, group-living Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). We also assess territory-specific population growth rates (r), to test whether spatial population dynamics are consistent with the ideas of source,sink dynamics. 4.,Although average mortality did not differ between sexes, habitat-specific mortality did. Female mortality was higher in older forests, a pattern not observed in males. Male mortality only increased with an increasing amount of open areas. Moreover, reproductive success was higher further away from human settlement, indicating a strong effect of human-associated nest predators. 5.,Averaged over all years, 76% of the territories were sources. These territories generally consisted of less open areas, and were located further away from human settlement. 6.,The source,sink model provides a tool for modelling demography in distinct habitat patches of different quality, which can aid in identifying key habitats within the landscape, and thus, reduce the risk of implementing unsound management decisions. [source] Nest predators affect spatial dynamics of breeding red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio)JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2004Staffan Roos Summary 1Predation may be a strong selective factor affecting individual behaviour and life histories. However, few studies have investigated whether predators affect breeding habitat selection of prey species. 2We tested whether breeding habitat selection and reproduction of a tropical migrant, the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio L.), was related to the presence of breeding pairs of its potential nest predators, magpie (Pica pica L.), hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix L.) and jackdaw (C. monedula L.). 3Only magpie and hooded crow territories were associated with an elevated risk of predation based on an artificial nest experiment with nests mimicking red-backed shrike nests. Predation risk on real red-backed shrike nests was also higher close to nests of hooded crow and magpie than elsewhere in the landscape. 4Occupation frequency of known red-backed shrike territory sites during 3 years of study increased with increasing mean distance to the nearest magpie nest. 5Changes in spatial distribution of corvids affected the spatial distribution of red-backed shrikes. Vacant red-backed shrike territory sites were more likely to become occupied in the next year when magpie and hooded crows had moved away from the site, while occupied sites were more likely to be abandoned in the next year when at least hooded crows had moved closer. 6Our results suggest that breeding territories of nest predators may affect breeding habitat selection of prey species. Thus, a large part of an observed spatial dynamics of prey species may be caused by a corresponding spatial dynamics of predators. Because sink territories are occupied more irregularly than source territories, we suggest that the dynamics in predator sinks may be the driving force of the spatial dynamics of prey species. [source] Investigator activities reduce nest predation in blackbirds Turdus merulaJOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2010Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo The effect of investigator perturbance has been traditionally considered detrimental for avian nesting success in terms of enhanced nest predation. This conclusion was however based on a taxonomically biased group of species and, thus, the study of that effect in additional species was essential for reaching a more firm conclusion. Furthermore, although it has been suggested that the effect of nest visiting could also depend on nest predator community, no study has so far tested this hypothesis yet. Trying to detect possible influence of nest-visiting rates and predator community on nesting success we visited European blackbird Turdus merula nests at two different experimental rates in two populations that considerably differ in the composition of their nest predator communities and natural nest predation rates. Contrary to the traditional ideas, our results not only show that investigator disturbance significantly reduces nest predation, but also that this reduction is maintained in both populations despite the difference in the community of nest predators. We discuss these findings and suggest that predators, especially mammals, might avoid places disturbed by investigators. [source] Eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis do not avoid nest boxes with chemical cues from two common nest predatorsJOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, Issue 1 2007Renee D. Godard Chemodetection of common nest predators may be advantageous for nesting birds; however, few studies have examined the ability of songbirds to detect chemical odors from predators. Thus, in 2002, we presented eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis with pairs of nest boxes; one box in the pair was regularly scented with chemical cues from a common nest predator, the black rat snake Elaphe obsoleta, and the other with a neutral cue. In 2004, we again presented bluebirds with pairs of boxes, one scented with chemical cues from a different nest predator, the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus, and the other with a neutral scent. Although human females were able to correctly distinguish paper laced with predator cues from paper with neutral cues, bluebirds were as likely to lay eggs in boxes with predator cues as in boxes with neutral cues. While it remains possible that bluebirds may detect scent from potential nest predators, it appears that the presence of these chemical cues does not ultimately influence selection of nest sites. [source] Nest predators of Lance-tailed Manakins on Isla Boca Brava, PanamáJOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, Issue 2 2009Jennifer L. Reidy ABSTRACT Nest predation is often the primary cause of nest failure for passerines. Despite this, little is known about predation rates and the nest predators of birds in the tropics. I used video cameras to monitor seven Lance-tailed Manakin (Chiroxiphia lanceolata) nests on Isla Boca Brava, Panamá. One nest fledged young and six nests failed due to predation. I recorded five predation events involving four avian predators and one mammalian predator. Crested Oropendolas (Psarocolius decumanus) predated two nests and a Roadside Hawk (Buteo magnirostris) and a Black-chested Jay (Cyanocorax affinis) each predated one. The mammalian predator was a common opossum (Didelphis marsupialis). All avian predation was diurnal; the mammalian predation was nocturnal. My results suggest that tropical birds are subject to a diverse suite of nest predators, and that avian predators may be an important cause of nest failure at my study site. RESUMEN La depredación de nidos es usualmente la primera causa del fracaso de lo nidos de los paserinos. A pesar de esto, poco se conoce sobre la tasa de depredación y los depredadores de nidos de aves neotropicales. Yo use cámaras de video para monitorear siete nidos del Lance-tailed Manakins (Chiroxiphia lanceolata) en la isla Boca brava, Panamá. De un nido salieron polluelos y seis nidos fracasaron debido a la depredación. Yo documente cinco eventos de depredación de los cuales cuatro fueron por aves y uno por mamíferos. Crested Oropendolas (Psarocolius decumanus) depredo dos nidos y Roadside Hawk (Buteo magnirostris) y el Black-chested Jay (Cyanocorax affinis) depredaron uno cada uno. El depredador mamífero fue un marsupial común (Didelphis marsupialis). Todas las depredaciones de aves fueron diurnas y la del mamífero fue nocturna. Mis resultados sugieren que las aves neotropicales están sujetas a una diversa gama de depredadores de nidos y posiblemente la depredación por aves puede ser una causa importante del fracaso de las nidadas en mi lugar de estudio. [source] Validating the use of temperature data loggers to measure survival of songbird nestsJOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, Issue 4 2006Karel Weidinger ABSTRACT Accurate determination of nest fates and nest predators is possible through continuous video monitoring, but such monitoring is relatively expensive and labor intensive. If documenting of the timing of nest termination events is sufficient, then data loggers (DL) may allow more extensive sampling and may represent a viable alternative. I validated temperature DL records of nest survival time by simultaneous videotaping and compared results derived from DL records with those obtained by regular nest visits by an observer. I estimated the fate of 937 nests of nine species of open cup-nesting songbirds, including 673 nests monitored using DL, 165 monitored using video cameras, 33 validation nests monitored simultaneously using both DL and video cameras, and 132 control nests monitored only by observer visits. Deployment of DL did not negatively influence nest survival rate. DL reliably recorded survival time and allowed classification of nest fates based on the potential fledging age, regardless of the frequency of nest visits by an observer. The true fate of nests that survived beyond the potential fledging age can not be safely determined from time of failure, except for nocturnal events that suggest partial predation. Video revealed frequent partial or complete predation on nests with old nestlings that would have been categorized as successful by other methods. I conclude that temperature DL are efficient, reliable, and relatively inexpensive tools for recording exact nest survival times and classification of nest fates, with implications for nest survival modeling and discriminating between diurnal and nocturnal predation. SINOPSIS Es posible determinar con precisión la sobrevicencia en nidos y la depredación en estos mediante el uso de videos contínuos. Pero dicho monitoreo es relativamente costoso y requiere mucho trabajo. Si el documentar el momento en que se termina el anidamiento es suficiente para obtener la información, previamente mencionada, el uso de bitácoras electrónicas de temperatura (loggers) pudieran permitir el tomar muestras más amplias y por ende, representar una alternativa viable. Validé la toma de temperaturas con bitácoras electrónicas para determinar la sobrevivencia en nidos con la toma simultánea de videos y comparé los resultados obtenidos (con la bitácora) con los datos tomados por un observador que visitó regularmente los nidos. El estudio se hizo con 937 nidos de nueve especies de aves canoras cuyo nido es en forma de copa. De estos 673 se monitorearon utilizando bitácoras electrónicas de temperatura, 165 con cámaras de video, 33 con monitoreo simultáneo de bitacora y video y 132, como control, monitoreados mediante observación directa. El uso de las bitácoras no influyó negativamente en la tasa de sobrevivencia. La bitácora grabó el tiempo de sobrervivencia y permitió la clasificación de los nidos (exitoso o no exitoso) basado en el tiempo potencial de la edad de dejar el nido, sin importar la frecuencia de visita a los nidos por parte de observadores. La verdadera finalidad de los nidos que sobreviven, más alla de la edad potencial de dejar el nido los pichones, no puede ser determinado con exactitud, excepto en eventos nocturnos que surgieren depredación. El uso de videos permitió determinar la depredación parcial o completa en nidos, particularmente de pichones que se tardaron más que el tiempo promedio en dejar el nido y que en estudios se asume que sobrevivieron. Puedo concluir que las bitácoras electrónicas de temperatura son eficientes, confiables, de bajo costo y permiten determinar con precisión la sobrevivencia en nidos y la clasificación de estos entre exitosos y no exitosos, con implicaciones para construir modelos de sobrevivencia y discriminar entre depredores diurnos y nocturnos. [source] Predators at bird nests in a northern hardwood forest in New HampshireJOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, Issue 3 2006David I. King ABSTRACT Nest predation is the primary cause of nest failure in most passerine birds, and increases in nest predation associated with anthropogenic habitat disturbance are invoked as explanations for population declines of some bird species. In most cases, however, the identity of the nest predators is not known with certainty. We monitored active bird nests with infrared time-lapse video cameras to determine which nest predators were responsible for depredating bird nests in northern New Hampshire. We monitored 64 nests of 11 bird species during three breeding seasons, and identified seven species of predators during 14 predation events. In addition, we recorded two instances of birds defending nests from predators and, in both cases, these nests were ultimately lost to predation. These results contrast with other studies in terms of the relatively high proportion of nests depredated by raptors and mice, as well as the absence of any predation by snakes. The diverse suite of predators in this and other studies is likely to confound our understanding of patterns of nest predation relative to fragmentation and habitat structure. SINOPSIS La depredación de nidos es la causa principal del fracaso de anidamiento de muchos paserinos. El incremento en depredación ha sido asociado a disturbio antropogénico de habitat y considerado como la causa de la disminución poblacional de muchas especies de aves. En la mayoría de los casos, no se sabe a ciencia cierta quién es el depredador. Monitoreamos nidos activos con cámaras infrarojas de video que tomaban la acción en lapsos para determinar que depredadores eran responsables de la pérdida de nidos en el norte de New Hampshire. A lo largo de tres temporadas reproductivas monitoreamos 64 nidos, pertenecientes a 11 especies, e identificamos siete depredadores en 14 actos de depredación. Además, pudimos grabar dos casos en donde los aves defendieron sus nidos, aunque los nidos eventualmente fueron depredados posteriormente. Estos resultados contrastan con otros estudios en términos de la alta proporción de depredación por parte de rapaces y ratoncitos, y en la ausencia de depredación por parte de culebras. La diversidad de depredadores en este y otros estudios ampliará los conocimiento sobre los patrones de depredación en nidos, y su relación con la fragmentación y la estructura del hábitat. [source] Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birdsANIMAL CONSERVATION, Issue 1 2000Daniel A. Kluza In rural New England, forest fragmentation is caused by housing developments in forested areas. To evaluate the effects of these changes on forest birds, we compared bird assemblages between forests with different housing densities in western Massachusetts. Species occurrences and relative abundances were determined from systematic point count surveys and mist-netting at three plots in forest of low housing density (0,0.05 houses/ha) and of moderate housing density (0.60,6.70 houses/ha) in 1993 and 1994. Among guilds, Neotropical migrants and forest-interior species had significantly lower abundances in forests of moderate housing density. Abundances of ground/shrub nesting birds as a group, and of individual species such as veery (Catharus fuscescens), ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus) and wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), were greater in forest of low housing density, but blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) were more abundant in forest of moderate housing density. Although the abundances of ground/shrub nesting birds were positively related to ground cover, this vegetation structure did not differ between forest types. Avian and mammalian nest predators may be responsible for the trends in bird abundance. Avian nest predators may recognize forest of moderate housing density as edge habitat, and this rural development may also support relatively high densities of mammalian nest predators. These trends suggest that birds of New England's relatively extensive forests may be subject to greater fragmentation effects than generally thought, as a result of increasing rural housing development within forests. [source] | ||||||||||