Home About us Contact | |||
Neonatal Resuscitation (neonatal + resuscitation)
Selected AbstractsPaediatric training for family doctors: principals and practiceMEDICAL EDUCATION, Issue 5 2002C Melville Background There is controversy as to how best to train general practitioners for the paediatric challenges they will meet in practice, in particular what should be included in training, what should be left out and how long should it last? Subjects and methods All 615 general practice principals referring to 6 hospitals were surveyed (40% response rate). Setting West Midlands region of England. Study design Postal questionnaire. Statistics Quantitative and qualitative assessment of responses. Quantitative responses were analysed by hospital, decade of qualification, and duration of paediatric training. Qualitative responses were analysed using grounded theory. Results Satisfaction with training was directly related to its duration, with low levels of satisfaction for less than 6 months paediatrics, moderate levels for 6,11 months, and high levels with 12 months or more. The most important item of training was recognition of the sick child. Acute and chronic paediatrics was generally well covered. Psychosocial aspects, public health and immunisation were poorly addressed. Neonatal resuscitation and first day checks were seen as relevant, but neonatal intensive care was not. Conclusions At least 6 months of paediatrics is necessary for GPs in training, but longer paediatric exposure further increases their satisfaction with training. GPs have a biopsychosocial rather than biomedical approach to their child patients, suggesting potential benefits from a greater emphasis on psychosocial and public health aspects at the expense of neonatal intensive care. Recognition of the sick child is essential, and acute and chronic organic illness should be covered in breadth. Possible future models for GP training in paediatrics are discussed. [source] Pediatric Emergency Medicine Education in Emergency Medicine Training ProgramsACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 7 2000Vincent P Tamariz MD Abstract. Background: The educational goal of emergency medicine (EM) programs has been to prepare its graduates to provide care for a diverse range of patients and presentations, including pediatric patients. Objective: To evaluate the methods used to teach pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) to EM residents. Methods: A written questionnaire was distributed to 118 EM programs. Demographic data were requested concerning the type of residency program, number of residents, required pediatric rotations, elective pediatric rotations, type of hospital and settings in which pediatric patients are seen, and procedures performed. Information was also requested on the educational methods used, proctoring EM received, and any formal curriculum used. Results: Ninety-four percent (111/118) of the programs responded, with 80% of surveys completed by the residency director. Proctoring was primarily performed by PEM attendings and general EM attendings. Formal means of PEM education most often included the EM core curriculum (94%), journal club (95%), EM grand rounds (94%), and EM morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference (91%). Rotations and electives most often included the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and the emergency department (ED) (general and pediatric). Conclusions: Emergency medicine residents are exposed to PEM primarily by rotating through a general ED, the PED, and the PICU, being proctored by PEM and EM attendings and attending EM lectures and EM M&M conferences. Areas that may merit further attention for pediatric emergency training include experience in areas of neonatal resuscitation, pediatric M&M, and specific pediatric electives. This survey highlights the need to describe current educational strategies as a first step to assess perceived effectiveness. [source] Crocodiles and neonatal resuscitationJOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, Issue 1-2 2007Dr Helen Liley No abstract is available for this article. [source] A cognitive aid for neonatal resuscitation: a randomized controlled trialPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 7 2009M.D. Bould Introduction:, Anaesthetists are among several health care practitioners responsible for neonatal resuscitation in Canada. The Neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) courses are the North American educational standard. NRP has been shown to be an effective way of learning skills and knowledge but retention has been found to be problematic [1]. The use of cognitive aids is mandatory in industries such as aviation, to avoid dependence on memory when decision making in critical situations. Visual cognitive aids have been studied retrospectively in resuscitation and performance was found to correlate to the frequency of use of the aid [2]. Cognitive aids have been found to be of benefit in an unblinded prospective study [3]. We aimed to conduct the first blinded study on the effect of a cognitive aid on the performance of simulated resuscitation. Methods:, We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial to investigate whether the presence of a cognitive aid improved performance in a simulated neonatal resuscitation. After ethics board approval we recruited 32 anaesthesia residents who had previously passed the NRP. Subjects were randomized to an intervention group that had a poster detailing the NRP algorithm and a control group without the poster. The cognitive aid was positioned so that it could not be seen on the video recordings of the simulation that was used to assess performance. The scenario was piloted to confirm adequate blinding. Both groups had their performance in a simulated neonatal resuscitation recorded and subsequently analyzed by a peer, an expert anaesthetist and an expert neonatologist, using a previously validated checklist. A further rater observed the scenario in real time to examine frequency of use of the cognitive aid. Results:, The inter-rater reliability of the checklist was excellent with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88. Consequently the mean of the scores assigned by all three raters was used for analysis. The median checklist score in the control group 18.2 [15.0,20.5 (10.7,25.3)] was not significantly different from that in the intervention group 20.3 [18.3,21.3 (15.0,24.3)] (P = 0.08). Retention of NRP skills and knowledge of was poor: when evaluated by the neonatologist none of the subjects correctly performed all life-saving interventions necessary to pass the checklist. Although only one subject in the intervention group did not use the aid at all, only 26.7% used the aid frequently and none used it extensively. Discussion:, Retention of skills after NRP training was poor. Our study confirms previous findings of poor retention of skills after NRP training: Kaczorowski et al. investigated family medicine trainees and found that none of 44 residents that were retested 6,8 months after an NRP course would have passed the course due to errors in life-saving interventions [1]. Previous research has shown that the presence of a cognitive aid can improve performance in the simulated management of a rare, high stakes scenario: malignant hyperthermia [3]. Our negative findings contrast with this and another previous study [2]. A potential reason for this discrepancy is that the raters in the previous studies were not blinded to group allocation, nor were the rating scales used validated. The infrequent use of the cognitive aid may be the reason that it did not improve performance in. Further research is required to investigate whether cognitive aids can be useful if their use is incorporated into NRP training. Conclusion:, A randomized single-blinded trial found that a cognitive aid did not improve performance at simulated resuscitation, in contrast to previous retrospective and unblended studies. Retention of skills and knowledge after resuscitation training remains an ongoing challenge for medical educators. [source] Manikin training for neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airwayPEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 6 2004Donna Gandini MB BS Summary Background :,We describe our experience of brief (,15 min) manikin-only training with the laryngeal mask airway (LMATM) for neonatal resuscitation in 80 health care workers. Methods :,Prior to training, 31% had not heard of the LMA, 57% did not know the LMA could be used for neonatal resuscitation and 88% thought it was a disposable device. Results :,The mean (sd) range time to insert the LMA after training was 5 (2, 5,16) s and there were no failed insertions. The preferred technique for neonatal resuscitation, before vs after training, changed from 72 to 14% for the face mask (P < 0.00001), from 6 to 80% for the LMA (P < 0.00001), from 5 to 0% for laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation (P = 0.04) and from 16 to 5% for unknown (P = 0.02). All considered that training was adequate and the LMA should be available on neonatal resuscitation carts. Confidence in using the LMA increased from 8 to 97% (P < 0.0001). Conclusions :,We conclude that LMA insertion success rates are high and confidence increases after brief manikin-only training. [source] Castor oil for induction of labour: Not harmful, not helpfulAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 5 2009Machteld Elisabeth BOEL Background:, Castor oil is one of the most popular drugs for induction of labour in a non-medical setting; however, published data on safety and effectiveness of this compound to induce labour remain sparse. Aim:, To assess the safety and effectiveness of castor oil for induction of labour in pregnancies with an ultrasound estimated gestational at birth of more than 40 weeks. Methods:, Data were extracted from hospital-based records of all pregnant women who attended antenatal clinics on the Thai,Burmese border and who were more than 40 weeks pregnant. The effectiveness of castor oil to induce labour was expressed as time to birth and analysed with a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Measures associated with safety were fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, tachysystole of the uterus, uterine rupture, abnormal maternal blood pressure during labour, Apgar scores, neonatal resuscitation, stillbirth, post-partum haemorrhage, severe diarrhoea and maternal death. Proportions were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results:, Of 612 women with a gestation of more than 40 weeks, 205 received castor oil for induction and 407 did not. The time to birth was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 1.20; n = 509)). Castor oil use was not associated with any harmful effects on the mother or fetus. Conclusions:, Castor oil for induction of labour had no effect on time to birth nor were there any harmful effects observed in this large series. Our findings leave no justification for recommending castor oil for this purpose. [source] A survey of neonatal resuscitation in Spain: gaps between guidelines and practiceACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 5 2009M Iriondo Abstract Objectives: To audit the knowledge and application of internationally recommended newborn resuscitation (NR) guidelines among delivery room (DR) caregivers of Spanish hospitals. Methods: A questionnaire-type survey on NR equipment and practices was performed in hospitals of the Spanish National Health System classified according to level of care provided. Results: 88% of the questionnaires were complimented. Limit of viability was set in 23,24 weeks in 78% of the centres. Availability of board-certified and instructors in NRwas significantly higher in level III versus level I,II centres (94 vs. 70% and 78 vs. 51%, respectively). No differences in equipment or knowledge of guidelines of resuscitation were found between centres. Substantial differences were observed in supplementation and monitorization of oxygen, and positive pressure ventilation during resuscitation and transportation. Conclusion: Equipment availability and knowledge of guidelines of NR does not differ between hospitals independent of their level of care. However, performance during resuscitation and transportation in level III hospitals is in significantly greater acquaintance with internationally recommended NR guidelines. [source] Training neonatal skills with simulators?ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 4 2009AP Cavaleiro Abstract Aim: To compare two different ways of learning (self-study vs. simulation sessions) the adequate steps to resuscitate a neonate in the 5th year undergraduate medical curriculum. Methods: One hundred and eighty students attending the 5-week paediatrics rotation were enrolled; 115 were invited to participate in this study, but only 45 students completed it. After a 50-min ,neonatal resuscitation' theoretical interactive class, students were randomly assigned into two groups: the first (n = 21) participated in a 30-min supervised self-study session, while the second (n = 24) attended a 30-min neonatal resuscitation session using the Zoe (Gaumard® Inc., Miami, FL, USA) simulator. Results: Tests consisting of 50 multiple-choice questions were taken before the theoretical class (pre-theoretical test), before the self-study or simulation session (pre-test) and after this session (post-test). Pre-test and post-test scores were similar in both groups (p = 0.118 and p = 0.263, respectively). Conclusion: Simulation-based training of medical students in management of neonatal resuscitation do not led to significant differences on short-term knowledge comparing with traditional method. [source] Safe reduction in administration of naloxone to newborn infants: An observational studyACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 9 2006Deborah Box Abstract Background: Naloxone, a specific opiate antagonist, is widely used during neonatal resuscitation to reverse possible opiate-induced respiratory depression. Aim: To determine the frequency with which naloxone is administered when resuscitation guidelines are conscientiously followed and to document any effect on respiratory morbidity. Methods: Perinatal data including naloxone administration and respiratory morbidity were collected retrospectively, and compared with prospectively collected data following the introduction of "Good Practice" guidelines. Results: There were 500 deliveries in the retrospective arm of the study and 1000 deliveries in the prospective arm. Although a similar proportion of women received opiates in labour in the two periods of study, there was a marked reduction in the use of naloxone when the guidelines were introduced (11% of opiate-exposed deliveries compared to 0.2%). There was no significant effect on respiratory morbidity with the change in practice. Conclusion: Naloxone is rarely needed to reverse the effects of opiates in newborn infants, and its use can be curtailed by following current resuscitation guidelines without increasing respiratory morbidity. [source] Positive pressure ventilation at neonatal resuscitation: review of equipment and international survey of practiceACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 5 2004CPF O'Donnell Background: The equipment used to provide positive pressure ventilation to newborns needing resuscitation at delivery varies between institutions. Devices were reviewed and their use surveyed in a sample of neonatal centres worldwide. Aim: To determine which equipment is used to resuscitate newborns at delivery in a sample of teaching hospitals around the world. Methods: A questionnaire was sent via e-mail to a neonatologist at each of 46 NICUs in 23 countries on five continents, asking which resuscitation equipment they used. If it was not returned, follow-up was by e-mail. Results: Data were obtained from 40 (87%) centres representing 19 countries. Round face masks are used at 34 (85%) centres, anatomically shaped masks are used exclusively at six (15%) and a mixture of types are used at 11 (28%). Straight endotracheal tubes are used exclusively at 36 (90%) centres; shouldered tubes are used infrequently at three of the four centres that have them. The self-inflating bag is the most commonly used manual ventilation device (used at 33 (83%) centres), the Laerdal Infant Resuscitator± the most popular model. Flow-inflating bags are used at 10 (25%) centres. The Neopuff Infant Resuscitator± is used at 12 (30%) centres. Varying oxygen concentrations are provided during neonatal resuscitation at half of the centres, while 100% oxygen is routinely used at the other half. Conclusions: This survey shows considerable variation in practice, reflecting this lack of evidence and consequent uncertainty among clinicians. Comparison of the two most popular manual ventilation devices, the Laerdal Infant Resuscitator and the Neopuff Infant Resuscitator, is urgently required. [source] |