Home  About us  Contact
 

Neoclassical Growth Model (neoclassical + growth_model)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Business, Economics, Finance and Accounting100%

Selected Abstracts

INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS AND THE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODEL

ECONOMIC INQUIRY, Issue 4 2009
WILLIAM F. BLANKENAU
This paper studies industry-level dynamics and demonstrates the ability of a modified neoclassical growth model to capture a range of empirical facts. The paper begins by using U.S. data to document skilled and unskilled labor trends within industry sector classifications as well as industry sector output trends. Using Current Population Survey data from 1968 to 2004, it is shown that the ratio of skilled workers to unskilled workers employed has risen in all industries. The absolute increase in this ratio was larger in the more skilled industries, while the growth rate was larger in the less skilled industries. Furthermore, using national income account data, it is shown that relatively high-skilled industries have accounted for an increasing share of output over time. A version of the neoclassical growth model is then constructed to match these observations. One important feature of this model is a structure that introduces new goods into the economy at each moment of time. The model is able to capture a rich set of labor market movements between sectors and between skill levels as well as changes in the relative output shares across industries, yet preserves many nice features of the neoclassical growth model.(JEL E13, J20, 030) [source]

Supply-Side Economics of Germany's Year 2000 Tax Reform: A Quantitative Assessment

GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, Issue 2 2003
Holger Strulik
Tax reform; corporate finance; investment; growth; welfare; Germany Abstract. The paper provides an assessment of supply-side economics following Germany's year 2000 tax reform. Investigated are a corporate tax cut, deteriorating depreciation allowances and imputation rules, and a private income tax cut. For this purpose, a neoclassical growth model is augmented by various fiscal policy parameters and endogenous corporate finance and calibrated with German data. The model is used to evaluate consequences of Germany's tax reform on production, firm finance and leverage, investment, consumption and welfare of a representative household. [source]

ENDOGENOUS HEALTH CARE, LIFE EXPECTANCY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, Issue 1 2010
Michael C. M. Leung
We study the endogenous relationship between health care, life expectancy and output in a neoclassical growth model. Although health care directly diverts resources away from goods production, it prolongs life expectancy, which in turn leads to higher savings and, hence, capital formation through a private annuity market. We show that savings and health care are complements in equilibrium, with both rising with economic development. Our model is therefore consistent with several observed stylized development patterns across countries. Moreover, through the longevity-enhancing channel, health care and health production technology are found by simulation to be growth and welfare promoting. [source]

Why the Tigers Roared: Capital Accumulation and the East Asian Miracle

PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, Issue 2 2002
Peter E. Robertson
Recent growth accounting studies of Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea have found that the Solow residuals in these economies were relatively small. Given the high capital contributions, these results are often interpreted as evidence that factor accumulation, savings and investment were the principal cause of the East Asian miracle. This paper develops an alternative method of analysing these data, combining growth accounting methods with the linearized neoclassical growth model of Mankiw et al. (1992). The method explicitly quantifies the extent to which increases in productivity, as measured by the Solow residual, induced capital accumulation in these economies. It shows that in Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea, productivity growth contributed between half and two-thirds of the growth in GDP per worker over a 20-year period. [source]

Rich and Poor Countries in Neoclassical Trade and Growth

THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL, Issue 470 2001
Alan V. Deardorff
A neoclassical growth model provides an explanation for a ,poverty trap', ,club convergence', or ,twin peaks', in terms of specialisation and international trade. The model has many countries with identical linearly homogeneous technologies for producing three goods using capital and labour. With diverse initial endowments, initial equilibrium has unequal factor prices and two diversification cones. With savings out of wages, following Galor (1996), there may easily be multiple steady states. Poor countries converge to a low steady state while rich countries converge to a high one, even though all share identical technological and behavioural parameters. [source]